I am interested to know your opinion on the 'red flags' explanation.
New York 194: Guns N' Roses Mafia! (Day 8)
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 102, Fraggernaut wrote:Hey Slandaar. It's been explained by Boonskie (#75) & Egg (#99), & I think I get what they're trying to explain. I think I would compare it to say video mafia which I have more experience in, where a scum is more likely to say "what do you want from me" or something along them lines to appeal to town or to try to seem town after a possible slip or something weird that they've said.
I wanted to know your opinion now it has been explained. You somewhat agree?
In post 118, KickAssAndGiggle wrote:BZZZZ. Wrong.
Actually he is right.
What do you think a vote on some random person for a pointless reason is doing?
(I see this is covered later somewhat)
In post 141, Performer wrote:Hmm . That was RVS, how did you develop an opinion on those 2 posts so quickly?
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 171, KickAssAndGiggle wrote:Slandaar,
What reason is there not to have an RVS vote on when it's 11 to lynch?
The point is: I see nothing wrong with unvoting when the vote is pointless. That said you didn't answer the question; What reason is there to have an RVS vote at the point he unvoted? (when it clearly achieved nothing).
In post 171, KickAssAndGiggle wrote:
Reactions to RVS votes, and the way the RVS reasons are phrased, is the way I see most games move into the proper nitty-gritty. How would you move the game forward, if you disagree?
Do I disagree that most games start with RVS? no.
RVS was short in this game. Jam effectively ended it with his post which did not contain a vote amusingly.
What has this got to do with anything?
In post 209, Creature wrote:but I didn't see him bothering to even answer his own questions.
Why would I do that?
In post 204, Fraggernaut wrote:@Irao
Quote posts in which I make "a half-hearted attempt to make it look like I'm scum hunting".
In post 23, iraonavp wrote:Are you feeling the pressure, jam?
Iraon, can you explain the pressure thing?
(I have my opinion on this but want to hear what you say)
Fragger:
In post 170, Slandaar wrote:In post 102, Fraggernaut wrote:Hey Slandaar. It's been explained by Boonskie (#75) & Egg (#99), & I think I get what they're trying to explain. I think I would compare it to say video mafia which I have more experience in, where a scum is more likely to say "what do you want from me" or something along them lines to appeal to town or to try to seem town after a possible slip or something weird that they've said.
I wanted to know your opinion now it has been explained. You somewhat agree?-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 215, Golden Robster wrote:Slandaar why did you just answer those questions with more questions
I asked the questions and was not given actual answers hence the questions still stand and are repeated.
In post 215, Golden Robster wrote:
i expected a clean town game like in ice cream
why do i not get a sense of that here?
I will be playing differently here. Go and meta me properly if you find this concerning.
Don't Know.
In post 216, KickAssAndGiggle wrote:I don't mind the unvoting so much, but there were plenty of possible people who could have taken a vote. Pick a reason and commit. I think people should take positions early so they can be challenged on them. Town's job is to use their vote to sort.
So, you made a bad word choice, it's easier if you just say so instead of going around the point.
In post 216, KickAssAndGiggle wrote:I don't even remotely agree Jam ended it at that point. In no scenario is RVS over when multiple people haven't even posted.
This doesn't have anything to do with anything does it?
In post 216, KickAssAndGiggle wrote:
When will you commit to a single read? Here's two for you from me:
Your turn.
I do things in my own time.
I am happy with how things are currently progressing though so will let you know soon.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 220, Creature wrote:In post 217, Egg wrote:Creature, you said "here we go" on Page 1. I was mostly trying to figure out if that had to do with anything specific or if it was the game starting in general. And if it was general, was it meant with excitement for the game starting or was it more of a concern for something that may have been coming.
Yeah, it was about the game starting in general. I wasn't that excited though.
Hello Creature.
In post 213, Slandaar wrote:
In post 209, Creature wrote:but I didn't see him bothering to even answer his own questions.
Why would I do that?
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 227, Creature wrote:I mean that you could share what do you think rather than asking some of the questions.
My priority is to find scum not to let you know what I think. To find scum I shall ask questions. Why didn't you ask me my opinion(s) if you find the opinion(s) I chose not to post important?-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 316, iraonavp wrote:I found the reasoning behind Mafiaturtle's vote odd, who explicitly states that they are trying to pressure someone? Doesn't that defeat its purpose, if its purpose was to learn something about jam? So I wished to continue this train of thought, but Mafiaturtle seems to be outright ignoring me, how rude!
I thought that was the case (well similar) just wanted to hear you say it
Let me go back a bit...
In post 216, KickAssAndGiggle wrote:Your turn.
Iraon is town
VOTE: Creature
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 326, jam wrote:So I read irao's ISO. One particular post is interesting to me, which has been mentioned by fragger, yet not really been answered when irao replied to fragger (315)
In post 153, iraonavp wrote:Hey, Mafiaturtle. How are you going to Pressure jam if you aren't voting him?
How can you possibly say this whenyou weren't voting me either?
Its an extension of:
In post 316, iraonavp wrote:I found the reasoning behind Mafiaturtle's vote odd, who explicitly states that they are trying to pressure someone? Doesn't that defeat its purpose, if its purpose was to learn something about jam? So I wished to continue this train of thought, but Mafiaturtle seems to be outright ignoring me, how rude!
I hope your mind is now clear.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 333, Fraggernaut wrote:@Mod
VC Please.
Also SirCakez I don't really care about people's particular reads on me. but it got the game moving again from a dead stand still. Nothing was going on so asking questions to both Performer & KAAG sprung some life into the game.
VOTE: Iraonavp
What is this Fragger?
Iraon is town.
Why are you voting him?-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
Your response is interesting.
Why would mine change?
In post 361, Creature wrote:
Seems fair, but I think you could've commented on some things you find strange.
Alright I will say something.
It's strange that you care so much about kops vote.
It's also strange how Fragger was lost earlier - he seemed out of synch with the town, pestered for an explanation of the 'red flags', then didn't provide his opinion on it after the explanation was posted without being chased.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
Why do you think Drixx is scum?
In post 445, Kop wrote:These 2 posts aren't pleasing me. I think my vote on Creature looks like it'll be staying. If you can give me a case on why Sircakes is scum, and if I can find something within it that I can agree with, I might reconsider my vote.
Yes, obviously, if someone makes a good point against another you should reconsider your vote. Thank you for stating that. Very town.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 438, Creature wrote:If you notice, SirCakez is only scum reading easy mislynch targets.
This is never a good argument.
In post 209, Creature wrote:Ness - Typical panicking. Well, so far his behavior matches with his scum play, but I need to take a look at his town behavior and see what matches more.
Jam - Newbscum for me. I see hesitation on his initial posts to accuse someone, I also think he's pretending to be stupid. His vote on Golden seems sheepy (sheeping Snarky).
I point this out to help you not to accuse.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
Drixx didn't pretend to claim survivor.
UNVOTE: Creature
VOTE: Guy
I think this is better.
In post 417, Drixx wrote:But like ... tell me if you're seriously going to wagon me for that before I read the 400 posts before my replace-in, becauseit would be kind of dickish to have me catch up and read things just to be mislynched.
When you replace in there is no rule stating you cannot be lynched. You knew there is that risk so I find this line very ugly. Maybe you should catch up and make yourself really obviously town and then no problem, right? I think this is actually a scum mentality but am debating it with myself.
Did you think you would be lynched for saying you are scum?-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 494, Drixx wrote:You were there the last time someone posed a lose/lose question to me as a "reaction test", and if you recall I pointed out that it was a trap and declined to answer, and I'm sure you recall how that turned out.
I don't remember it well enough to comment currently.
You think there is a 'lose' to answering the question 'no'?
In post 496, SirCakez wrote:You know Guy is lynchbait Slandaar, you were in Ice Cream. Not a very good vote.
I am quietly confident in my vote.
In post 503, Performer wrote:The town Slandaar I saw in the game with Titus, Ircher, BBT, Thor665, and Keyser - as well as the town Slandaar I played against last year - were very reasonable. How are you reading that Fragg is putting in a nonsense case against ira?
Which points do you think are actually good?-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 521, Reubus Swagrid wrote:
Obviously but 21 pages is a bit hard to sift through wouldn't you agree?
I do not agree. You just read the thread and after 21 pages you should have a starting point. What is difficult about that?-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 531, Reubus Swagrid wrote:Having 21 people to read
It's only 20. But on point - I don't see how that makes you special?-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 536, Performer wrote:What I have in my notes are this regarding Frag's points against ira: 279 , which was looking at pgs 2-11 at the time. Since then, ira has not been convincingly town.
That isn't really relevant. We are talking about what Frag wrote. Just get the points Frag made (quote Fragger) which you feel are good.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 603, Fraggernaut wrote:Like Kop's #557 & #559, & I feel it's coming from a town viewpoint while explaining why the No Lynch is not happening.
Interesting.
I felt the opposite.
The best he can post is about the nolynch nonsense and basically suggest certain players, yourself included, were over-reacting to it when lets be honest you didn't.
In post 557, Kop wrote:
Whilst I agree that it is a atrocious idea to no lynch, especially day one, I don't agree with jumping on him for it.
Were you 'jumping on him for it'?
Also can you answer this:
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 515, Fraggernaut wrote:Also I don't think Drixx is scum off one joke. His play IMO has been similar to a previous newbie we played together where he was the IC & town.
In post 603, Fraggernaut wrote:
I'm still fairly comfortable with Drixx being closer to my town circle. His play is similar to town play I've seen before from him. On a side note though, I haven't had a chance to experience scum Drixx, so that view may be diluted by that.
I find this repetition weird - Not sure the point of it Drixx had done near enough nothing between the two. I also dislike that both have a form of disclaimer.
I have a theory: Fragger & Drixx are both scum.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 633, Fraggernaut wrote:That's a loaded question, the one about jumping on the no lynch thing. Regardless of my answer you'll be able to spin it & fit it to a certain agenda. Rather I answer yes or no, it won't be alignment indicative.
I mean the fact is there is no agenda. You were not 'jumping on him' were you? you didn't think it was a good idea to tell Kop? You like his very standard theory which is completely null (and forgets you can lynch scum)? Mmm.
In post 633, Fraggernaut wrote:
As for your opinions changing, do you not reevaluate as the game progresses? I've reevaluated on a few people. Just because I still believe Ira is scummy as hell, doesn't make me wrong. That's my opinion. I'm allowed to be wrong, that's the game of Mafia.
This has nothing to do with anything. You told me my opinion should have changed and I am asking you why? This does not have any resemblance to an answer to the actual question.
In post 633, Fraggernaut wrote:
Just as such, how you're wrong for a second time on my alignment; as you were the previous game we played together where you deah tunneled me. Both games I've been town, and your read on me has proven to be bad. I don't fault you for that, cause that's your opinion & you're allowed to be wrong. Drixx has played similar to what I've seen before as town, so I'm currently reading him slight town for it.
I don't remember much about that. Sometimes I am wrong though, yes, it happens unfortunately.
In post 633, Fraggernaut wrote:
Regardless, I've came to take your opinion & reads Slandaar with a grain of salt.
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
I did not.
In post 638, Kop wrote:
VOTE: Iraonavp
Actually not contributing a lot to peoples posts, and is just basically saying this is town this is scum, without actually engaging into the content that is here. If your failing to actually contribute to posts that you are quoting, you can't say anything incriminating or leaving your self up to possible contradictions.
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 191, Ozgin wrote:You ever go to classes, then to work, then come home and get hammered, and then wake up with an awful head cold, and look at the mafia game you're in, and see the game went from like 3 or 4 pages to like 8 pages, and those 4-5 pages were just two people arguing about being defensive, one person shitposting, and like three or four people chiming in from the fray (or at least that's what my sick mind clung to), and like you ISO like two or three people together to observe an argument, and you think someone is playing very similarly to how you played scum literally every game in the past?
Yeah, that's my morning so far. VOTE: N e s s.
I think Ness plays like how I play scum, quoting and attempting to refute literally every post thrown at him. The whole talk about defensiveness is kinda stupid, but it also rings true that most nervous scum see scum reads on them or even statements made loosely against them to be excessively detrimental to their success. In other words, N e s s is probably going to quote me, say why he thinks I'm wrong, and that's his way of defending himself when he really never had too much pressure on him to begin with.
Also, all of the talk about "meritable day 1" (I think the word credible is more fitting in this instance) isbullshit.Every dayis "meritable."Every postis "meritable."Every fucking argument in a postis "meritable." You're on a forum, playing a forum game where you get information bywriting posts to each other. It doesn't matter if you wrote the post "two irl days" into the game, it doesn't matter if you wrote the post "on the first in game day," it just doesn't matter, every post reveals information about every player, every time. Even though Golden Robster is just shitposting, for example, you can argue that the shitposting is just an earnest effort to move pressure around the player pool, or that the shitposting can come in handy later if they randomly stop doing it or if they do it the entire game. All posts, sooner or later, tell us something about a player. If anything, it at least shows us how a player plays the game, and meta albeit, that's information.
/end rant
I found this ridiculously over the top. Seems like scum trying to be charismatic rather than genuine town ranting.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 793, Fraggernaut wrote:Interestingly enough you want to lynch some of the more active players, but don't have any reasons for Ozgin or Guy.
Guy, Kop, Ozgin are not some of the more active players. You mean yourself and Drixx
Besides that I have reasons just hadn't posted them.-
-
Slandaar
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 1008, Drixx wrote:In post 998, Firebringer wrote:In post 997, Performer wrote:Fire why are you scum so much, in games that you and I are in? Lol
This is exactly what you said in that game Pisskop took over, and guess what?
Way to not learn from past experiences bro.
Holy fallacious reasoning, Batman. The role that someone had in a prior game has absolutely no bearing on what role they were assigned this game.
He didn't suggest it does.
?-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 979, Ozgin wrote:@Slandaar - Give me one sentence why I should vote Aristophanes
He is scum.
Have you looked at Kop's (Aristo) ISO?-
-
Slandaar
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
OK I will post content.
In post 445, Kop wrote:In post 342, Egg wrote:Why should a VT without much to add be worried about being taken out first?
A VT shouldn't be worried about anything, they should be doing the best they can to eat a nightkill. But anyway, it still could be scum claiming an easy role.
The first point being made points to bugs being scum. (Bolded)
Therefore saying the second part makes no sense as he is implying the opposite!
(= scum)-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 1027, Egg wrote:
Slandaar, my question was phrased in the sense that whoever we were talking about WAS a VT. He believed that person to be scum. So he answered the question about VTs first, used the word "but", and continued to hold his original position.
I understand what you are saying but I disagree and think there is a disconnect. If a VT shouldn't be worried about anything then that seems like reason to suspect him for not being a VT you need not add 'but still he could be scum'. The second implies the first point isn't an argument against. You could argue perhaps the first point about VT is just complete theory but I will go further and say: I highly highly doubt Kop who posted:
In post 638, Kop wrote:Actually not contributing a lot to peoples posts, and is just basically saying this is town this is scum, without actually engaging into the content that is here. If your failing to actually contribute to posts that you are quoting, you can't say anything incriminating or leaving your self up to possible contradictions.
Would think 'VT's shouldn't be worried about anything but that doesn't mean VT's are not worried about things'. I would expect him to jump on it to some extent.
Maybe I will post the larger argument against Kop (Aristo) ... I guess I have to
Most of Kop's content is theory and being helpful, trying to sound pro-town, while not actually posting content. I pulled him up on this here:
In post 459, Slandaar wrote:
In post 445, Kop wrote:These 2 posts aren't pleasing me. I think my vote on Creature looks like it'll be staying. If you can give me a case on why Sircakes is scum, and if I can find something within it that I can agree with, I might reconsider my vote.
Yes, obviously, if someone makes a good point against another you should reconsider your vote. Thank you for stating that. Very town.
Sounds nice and pro-town but it alerted me to him.
He then focused on the no-lynch stuff way too much... (theory)
In post 638, Kop wrote:and is just basically saying this is town this is scum
His vote on Iraon is awful and then the question becomes why not DGB? why didn't he mention her?
Probably the best question (scumhunting) he asked he didn't follow up on which is also a negative for him. Lots of trying to be helpful + theory with a lack of actual content and the content he did post being very questionable.
I think the vote is good.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 1051, Performer wrote:UNVOTE:
Hold on, I mixed him up with someone else.
VOTE: Aristophanes
Complete vanishing act on d2 and I wasn't townreading him on the first day. Based on Slandaar's behavior and what I've seen of Slandaar's town meta, I'm inclined to trust him. Fire's gradual behavior on d2 hasn't made him my top scumread anymore.
@Slandaar who are your other scumreads? Do you happen to share any on my list?
Ozgin
Votes Jam
Votes Ness
Votes Creature
(Wanted to Vote) Reubus
Amazingly when wagons are on players/forming he always turns up with a case against them. It's magic. (well bar jam kinda but eh he has one for iraon too) + His overreaction and he seems like a good vote. Might explain Drixx/Fragger at some point.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 979, Ozgin wrote:@Slandaar - Give me one sentence why I should vote Aristophanes
Here is the funny thing about this sentence.
It is the first time he has actually tried to engage someone instead of just ISOing the person in question.
Coincidence perhaps.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 1110, Ozgin wrote:
It's almost like every time I've made a case against someone, it's after I prodge and am not around for days at a time because I'm a lazy shitsack, and just forcing an interaction with someone to try to discern whether or not they're scummy is harder than just ISOing them and not liking their posts. Woah!
Everytime you are not around for days at a time because you are a lazy shitsack you return and just happen to think the latest wagon is scum and have a huge case on them! Woah!
In post 1110, Ozgin wrote:
Anyways, I still like Ira for scum, and yes, I'm going to ISO Fragger and then Drixx, but I'll probably only do Fragger for now because ISOing people, while it is more direct and effective and it makes more sense to judge someone based on their history rather than a few interactions with someone, is time consuming,and takes at least half an hour to try to build a case against someone. Pity.
Why are you trying to build cases against players Ozgin? Ozgin
You know. If you were town you could just read their ISO see if you suspect them and then vote a case is not required. Your cases are not having any effect on anything.
In post 1110, Ozgin wrote:
tl;dr - I'm lazy and ISOing people is easier for me to scumhunt rather than trying to force some interaction, and, to nobody's surprise, my next plan of action is to ISO Fragger.
No don't do that.
I would like to see an ISO on killthestory. Will you do that for me?-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 1132, Ozgin wrote:Mobile post - yeah, I'll do an ISO of killthestory, I wanna do a Drixx ISO first.
I look forward to it!
In post 1132, Ozgin wrote:
As far as building a case for everyone, I do have to do that, at least for me, because I don't like votes without explicit reason beyond, "they're scum, read their ISO."
OK that is fine but explain why you have a huge case with something like:
In post 562, Ozgin wrote:In 433, Creature says "Two stones, one scum" and votes for Drixx, which is some strange cryptic thing that has no apparent meaning.
How is this alignment indicative?
In post 1132, Ozgin wrote:
Innocent until proven guilty,if I try to prove someone guiltyand it falls apart, then they are probably innocent. It works, I'm telling you.
Yes. I do get the impression you try to prove them guilty and when you can't they are innocent. Seems more like Guilty until proven innocent.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
Ozgin...
In post 1162, Ozgin wrote:So I'm down to 314 in this ISO already and all I see is a lot of light shitposting, but posts like 110-112 and 108 before this point are sarcastic and sassy but they're still accurate. I'm pretty content with this ISO so far.
OK.
In post 110, Killthestory wrote:In post 109, N e s s wrote:In post 107, Killthestory wrote:why are so defensive? clearly that was just a reaction test and joke post that i was making?
however now youre responding to me with memes? dont you realize how defensive that is?
great job you figured it out i'm José the taco vendor
how great job admitting your scum, what are you abilities? what do your tacos do specifically scum?
This is an accurate post? how exactly was it accurate?
In post 112, Killthestory wrote:happiness is a scumtell
Same as above. How is this accurate? You actually think Happiness is a scumtell?
In post 1162, Ozgin wrote:
429 is a naked vote with no reasoning, not even loosely discernible from the context surrounding the posts. This is different than some of his previous votes, that either came with a quote (implying some reason) or at least made sense with the context surrounding the vote (usually the previous 2-5 posts or so). People were talking about SirCakez a little before this vote on him, but opinions were tossed and nothing was really brought up against him. This just strikes me as weird.
Don't care for this paragraph basically says nothing.
In post 1162, Ozgin wrote:
714 is a kinda dickish post. I mean, this was in response to what I assume is Ira's 713 (the post immediately before kts's), but ira was actually making a decent point about being active, even as a replacement, rather than just trying to back out of putting in effort and blaming the fact that you have a lot to catch up on. Was this supposed to be a defense of Drixx, then? Because that's who iraon's 713 was aimed at. This is just strangely abrasive, especially against a valid point against Drixx.
The whole sequence not just responding to the one post I would assume.
In post 1162, Ozgin wrote:
786 - No, stop that. Even when we're going for a shitty last-minute lynch on an apathetic player, quick hammering is bad, there's no town motivation in rushing a lynch, regardless of how stupid you think it is.
Nothing here.
Annoying not scummy is worth a note.
In post 1162, Ozgin wrote:
890 made me deja vu back to 786, I actually fucking refreshed my ISO page on this stupid and bad post.
Same as previous.
In post 1162, Ozgin wrote:
This post made me think back to when a certain player said responding to posts with memes was defensive, and furthermore scummy. Who said that again? Oh yeah.
Although in this post where he reuses the image, it actually kinda makes sense.
Different scenarios. But - you didn't seem to want to say that you find this contradictory?
Eh Nothing here.
In post 1162, Ozgin wrote:
All in all, despite a few discrepancies, I think KTS is actually a relatively townie player this game. A bit of an asshole, yeah, but it kinda reminds me of House or ABR's styles of being an ass, but being a correct ass.
What is he correct about?
Really have no idea how your conclusion ended up as 'relatively townie' with the comments you made it kind of makes the comments pointless?-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 1245, Drixx wrote:You're smarter than this Egg. So that means you're either being stubborn, or you're scum.
The idiot ball thing makes sense Drixx but you think you know Egg well enough to say this?
In post 422, Drixx wrote:Ummm... you haven't played with me in a really long time Egg.I've moved beyond feeling like I have to be perfectly honest and moral and such in mafia. It's a game that by its very nature encourages people to lie, regardless of alignment.
Your meta on me is out of date. Check me out in Mafiaception for recent town, and I'll be glad to link you to my most recent couple scum wins.
I'm not the Drixx you remember from like a year ago.
I think not. You think he knows you well enough that he shouldn't scumread you? your above post suggests otherwise.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
Don't have much time but will be back later...
In post 1412, Aristophanes wrote:This is regarding 1055 in which Slandarr makes a case on my slot based on Kop's play.
First off, his argument begins arguing not that I'm scum,but that I'm not a VT, as VTs shouldn't be worried about what they say.
This is PR/Scum hunting, and I dislike how strongly it feels like the former.
I don't even think the post he quoted looks relevant to the argument he's making, but I may be missing something contextual about it. Regardless, PR Hunting is bad.
That is not my argument.
Bugs claimed VT. Kop was talking about his claim. I was talking about Kops opinion on Bugs claim.
Which part is PR hunting exactly?
In post 1412, Aristophanes wrote:
The second quote from Kop he makes is Kop staying open to positions form others, rather than being tunnel visioned upon his current target. Slandarr makes a sarcastic remark in response, and says it's empty posting. I disagree and think it looks like a townpost, and would even if I didn't know the alignment of the poster.
Its definitely not a townpost we will just disagree.
In post 1412, Aristophanes wrote:
Theory talk isn't always bad, and Slandarr seems to be saying it is. I really don't think he has any solid case on this slot.
No, I am not. I am saying Kop was struggling to post real content. 80% of what he posted revolved around theory as it's much easier to post about theory (not alignment indicative) than actually (fake) scumhunting.
You disagree?-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 1453, Aristophanes wrote:Slandarr, I suppose I misunderstood the whole of that post then?
I haven't read Kop so I don't have an answer.
You tell me. Maybe you should look into it if you think I am PR hunting, hm?-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 1482, Aristophanes wrote:I'll agree with you that this is a possible scum slot based on this Iso, but I don't think it should be our main concern today.
I'd sheep this if a wagon were a thing though, without any issues.
Why is Snarky a bigger concern?-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 1256, Drixx wrote:
Egg was referring to a very specific ethical quandary I used to have with the game. I came to grips with it. There's a difference between big picture and fine detail.
In post 1255, Egg wrote:Drixx wrote:You're smarter than this Egg. So that means you're either being stubborn, or you're scum.
2) You've seen me play well as scum. You hadn't even seen my town game until this game.
I find this interesting. Drixx can you explain to me exactly what is the idiotball you think he has made?-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 1509, Slandaar wrote:In post 1482, Aristophanes wrote:I'll agree with you that this is a possible scum slot based on this Iso, but I don't think it should be our main concern today.
I'd sheep this if a wagon were a thing though, without any issues.
Why is Snarky a bigger concern?
In post 1512, Slandaar wrote:In post 1256, Drixx wrote:
Egg was referring to a very specific ethical quandary I used to have with the game. I came to grips with it. There's a difference between big picture and fine detail.
In post 1255, Egg wrote:Drixx wrote:You're smarter than this Egg. So that means you're either being stubborn, or you're scum.
2) You've seen me play well as scum. You hadn't even seen my town game until this game.
I find this interesting. Drixx can you explain to me exactly what is the idiotball you think he has made?-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 1566, Slandaar wrote:In post 1509, Slandaar wrote:In post 1482, Aristophanes wrote:I'll agree with you that this is a possible scum slot based on this Iso, but I don't think it should be our main concern today.
I'd sheep this if a wagon were a thing though, without any issues.
Why is Snarky a bigger concern?
I have a theory why you haven't answered this Aristo.
Perhaps you could at least attempt to though?-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 1479, Aristophanes wrote:DGB, did you make a scumcase here?
All I remember is a case based on inactivity, which is null.
What is the case on Snarky other than being inactive which is null (your words)?
Lynch Aristo.
Be Happy.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
We are talking at the time you made the statement, obviously.
Nothing you said explained why 'he shouldn't be the main concern today' over Snarky. Both are avoiding contribution for the most part.
In post 1647, Aristophanes wrote:His empty readslist was just that, and he hasn't really done much else. Not sorting the game is his biggest red flag.
Can argue the same on the Yume/Jam slot.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 1650, Aristophanes wrote:Right. But I can only do pressure on one at a time and I wanted/had it on Snarky at the time. Why would we want to split that Pressure?
It has nothing to do with pressure.
but I don't think it should be our main concern today.
Snarky is the main concern.
Yume shouldn't be.
Your reasoning for this is basically that Snarky has done very little, made an empty read list (after said comment so yeah). That's it.
Yume has done very little. Jam did very little.
You favour Snarky over Yume for no discernible reason. (I expect you are buddies).-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
Aristo's scumhunting summed up
'Hey guys!
There is this guy called Snarky. He doesn't post much. Must be scum!'
In post 1479, Aristophanes wrote:All I remember is a case based on inactivity, which is null.
Just lynch him.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-