You could be anyone II - Game Over

[House]

Hi all.

I ain't trying to read 78 pages.

Well participate from here and ISO as people draw my interest.

[House]

I also have no intention of reading this thread's archive

Anyone willing to volunteer summaries and reads? Links to cases and reads that were made shortly before lynch are acceptable

You are totes scum for echoing my laziness.

[House]

I won't be hammering HI.

Maybe I'm wrong, but his ISO doesn't read as scum to me.

[House]

If you really want to catch up. Read Pirate Mollie's ISO.

She's been a pretty active leader so far. As far as what she's leading, that's for you to decide.

Alrighty. I was going to get some work done tonight, but I'm in no shape to drive.

Will give the swashbuckler some attention.

[House]

Oh Damn. halfway down and I just got the worst sleep demon attacking me.

I gotta go, will pick back up on this later.

[House]

If you really want to catch up. Read Pirate Mollie's ISO.

She's been a pretty active leader so far. As far as what she's leading, that's for you to decide.

TBH I like TD's ISO thus far.

The whole multi-ball spec was kinda reachy, but nobody is perfect (and that's not determined yet, at any rate).

Still not super keen on the HI wagon, but that could just be my stupidity talking.

[House]

Yes, SK+Mafia+Mafia. Also crino gets to go on my scumlist for later, yay crino .

How do you explain a single kill, then?

I can understand one protective role getting lucky, but do you really think

two

kills got blocked?

[House]

Pay attention bud

That's just unreasonable.

[House]

HI isn't necessarily scum.

Why are you still voting for him, then?

[House]

HI isn't necessarily scum.

Why are you still voting for him, then?

Because "isn't necessarily scum" doesn't mean definite not-scum?

If that is the rationale we're using, I might as well vote for you.

You're not necessarily scum, but that doesn't mean you're definitely not scum.

I hate hedgey b/s.

VOTE: T S O

[House]

are you somehow advocating not lynching groupscum

...

...

Is that really what you think I'm saying?

...


Really?

yep

HI isn't necessarily scum.

Why are you still voting for him, then?

Because "isn't necessarily scum" doesn't mean definite not-scum?

If that is the rationale we're using, I might as well vote for you.

You're not necessarily scum, but that doesn't mean you're definitely not scum.

I hate hedgey b/s.

VOTE: T S O

It's really not hedging.

Why are you so keen to start a wagon off Hostile Intent?

I don't know a thing about HI, he's not my person of interest.

Your hedging drew my interest. Idgaf who the vote is on, there should be conviction behind it.

[House]

It's really not hedging.

Why are you so keen to start a wagon off Hostile Intent?

Why are you so keen to deflect?

[House]

Ignoring mafia hunting in favor of SK-hunting smacks very strongly of mafiascum

I've heard that somewhere.

Sounds so familiar.

[House]

If you'd read the game, you'd know I'd advocated a Hostile Intent wagon d1.

But, you didn't, so all you're doing is trying to dodge questions about your Hostile Intent townread.

Adding misrep to your hedging.

My my, how scummy you look over a simple question.

[House]

Oh, okay, he's just been doing his very best to prevent a lynch on his nullread. Oh, that makes sense.

The world doesn't revolve around what you want to discuss.

Just because you have a hard-on for HI doesn't mean other players can't be questioned.

Even you, by George!

[House]

@T S O: Why so hostile about questions directed at you?

[House]

Blatant OMGUS is blatant.

[House]

@T S O: Why so hostile about questions directed at you?

[House]

Have you read the part where Hostile Intent claims? According to you, all you've done is ISO him.

If this is what you are so butthurt about, no because his iso has nothing to do with my interest in your hostility at being asked questions.

Now stop deflecting and answer a question for once.

[House]

Also, do show us where I called you scum.

I want you to stop bullshitting.

[House]

House, define omgus for me would you?

You're not clever. If you have a point to make, say it.

[House]

Humor me and answer the question.

Fabricating a scum read because someone scum reads or votes for you.

Voting me for not answering a question that was completely irrelevant to my read of him and misrepresenting my position on HI is OMGUS. It doesn't require a specific, "you suck!" post, though he has been implying as m much.

[House]

I am making one post about this. I will not be talking to you again about my scumread on you because getting bogged down in an argument is what you want. I know, if I do, it will only make people skim and not read. I am aware you will spam stuff about me being scum and probably reply to this with a huge wall. Again, I do not care, and will not be responding. The only thing I will ask people to read about you, is this post.

The House-scum case:

House tells us he hasn't read the game and doesn't plan to do so.
He then says that he could be wrong, but he doesn't think HI is scum from his ISO, and won't hammer/vote him.
After that, we're again told that he doesn't think HI is scum but he could be wrong.

It's fair to say that this stage House has demonstrated he isn't scumreading HI, but the read is definitely not strong or definite.

At this stage, I'm voting for the guy I was scumreading all d1, Hostile Intent. It's my belief that scum will know if there is an SK due to team sizes, and thus would rather keep HI alive. Everything up to this point is basically background, but it's necessary to understand.

So I say that HI's not necessarily scum, but people backing him probably are.
House replies: "So why are you still voting him?"
My response: "Just because he's not necessarily scum doesn't mean he's definite not-scum."

If anyone other than House has a problem with the above, feel free to tell me - but I can see no fault with it after copious re-reading of it. It's a basic logical statement without much complication. The below is where House begins to show his colours.

House votes me for that statement using the justification: I hate hedgey bs.

Spoiler: The definition of hedging:

Refining your claim simply to avoid counter evidence and then acting as if your revised claim is the same as the original.

It's quite clear I didn't refine my claim or act as if said refined claim was the original. That's bullshit. House's reason for voting me, in other words, is non-existent.

I tell him that I'm not hedging and ask him why he's so keen to get a wagon off Hostile Intent.
His reply is as follows:

I don't know anything about HI, he's not my person of interest, but your vote should have conviction.

This is blatantly false. Firstly, he has already told us in the above he will

not

vote/hammer HI - that's obviously a sign he has a read on HI. Secondly, he says my vote has no conviction. If he ISO'd HI,

like he said he did

, he would know I had been pushing HI all d1.

This is the first contradiction of his. If he had ISO'd Hostile Intent he would have KNOWN that I had been advocating his lynch and so would not have posted that my vote lacked conviction. The only way he could have posted that is if he DIDN'T actually ISO Hostile Intent.

And if he didn't ISO Hostile Intent, why would he be against the lynch of HI?

It's because he wants to keep him around to find the Serial Killer, because he's groupscum.

After this, House, in response to me asking him why he's so keen on getting away from the HI-wagon, asks me why I'm so keen to deflect. This is a regular feature - instead of responding to me about his HI-townread, he tries to push the pressure back towards me by pretending my actions are scummy.

So, in my next post, I step it up a little. I ask him why he's dodging questions about his Hostile Intent townread, and refute his point about my vote lacking conviction.
Again, House

does not

answer the questions about his townread on Hostile Intent - rather, he posts that I am misrepping as well as hedging and that I look scummy. Again, as said above, this is his tactic to avoid talking about his read - insinuate that I am scum instead in an attempt to make me drop it.
Hilariously, he then posts that the reason he hasn't responded is that the world doesn't respond around what I want to discuss. I'm trying to count the number of excuses he's posted at this stage because that's at least the second, and neither have been half-valid.
I'm, at this stage, done being lenient. I vote him and summarise my reasons into 2 sentences and request votes for House.
House, realising the shit he's got himself into, panics. He immediately characterises my vote as blatant OMGUS, admits he has not read the part in Hostile Intent's ISO where he claims, asks me to stop deflecting, asks me to stop bullshitting, and asks me to show him where he called me scum.

This is another huge problem with House. His original claim was that, after ISO'ing Hostile Intent, he didn't really feel he was scum. Almost the entire case on Hostile Intent is centred around the time of his claim. You wouldn't have to read the game to know this, since it's been a hot topic today as well. This is further evidence which conclusively proves that House is

lying

about having ISO'd Hostile Intent and not thinking he's scum from that.

Aside from that, his reaction to my vote is really awful. He discredits me three times within 3 posts without any basis for doing so. And he asks me to show him where he called me scum when one of his posts is, word for word, "My my, how scummy you look over a simple question."

In summary, House's read on Hostile Intent doesn't make sense with his actions and words. His vote on me is reasonless and he refuses to answer any questions, instead calling the questioner scum. His reaction to being voted was shit. But, again, his stance on Hostile Intent has a myriad contradictions. They're all above there, if you're interested in lynching scum. I've done all I can - it's up to you to vote him now.

It amuses me that I inspire such a passionate response when all I want to know is why you get so hostile when being questioned.

[House]

I think town should wagon us both, lynch me, then ragelynch him after I flip.

[House]

Did a quick catch up don't like house

VOTE: House

Bitch, you don't even

know

me.

[House]

I made a case so people could respond to it. Do not just ignore it.

Your case is shit, ignoring it is the appropriate response.

[House]

I am making one post about this. I will not be talking to you again about my scumread on you because getting bogged down in an argument is what you want. I know, if I do, it will only make people skim and not read. I am aware you will spam stuff about me being scum and probably reply to this with a huge wall. Again, I do not care, and will not be responding. The only thing I will ask people to read about you, is this post.

Ad hominem, attempt to prejudice readers.

The House-scum case:

House tells us he hasn't read the game and doesn't plan to do so.

Not alignment indicative, also you misrep me by not mentioning my intent to ISO people as they draw my interest.

He then says that he could be wrong, but he doesn't think HI is scum from his ISO, and won't hammer/vote him.

Not being omniscient is also not alignment indicative. I'd be more suspicious of someone that easily jumped on a wagon after replacing in.

After that, we're again told that he doesn't think HI is scum but he could be wrong.

Re-read what I said above, I see no need to repeat myself just because you do.

It's fair to say that this stage House has demonstrated he isn't scumreading HI, but the read is definitely not strong or definite.

Is there even a point here?

So I say that HI's not necessarily scum, but people backing him probably are.
House replies: "So why are you still voting him?"
My response: "Just because he's not necessarily scum doesn't mean he's definite not-scum."

You are not just voting him, you are actively campaigning against a player you admittedly have doubts about alignment on.

House votes me for that statement using the justification: I hate hedgey bs.

Read above.

It's quite clear I didn't refine my claim or act as if said refined claim was the original. That's bullshit. House's reason for voting me, in other words, is non-existent.

More misrep.

You refined your claim when you admitted you were no longer certain he was scum.

I tell him that I'm not hedging and ask him why he's so keen to get a wagon off Hostile Intent.
His reply is as follows:

I don't know anything about HI, he's not my person of interest, but your vote should have conviction.

This is blatantly false. Firstly, he has already told us in the above he will

not

vote/hammer HI - that's obviously a sign he has a read on HI. Secondly, he says my vote has no conviction. If he ISO'd HI,

like he said he did

, he would know I had been pushing HI all d1.

False. Not having a read is why I refuse to vote for him. Only scum and really shit town feels comfortable voting for someone without a read.

This is the first contradiction of his. If he had ISO'd Hostile Intent he would have KNOWN that I had been advocating his lynch and so would not have posted that my vote lacked conviction. The only way he could have posted that is if he DIDN'T actually ISO Hostile Intent.

And if he didn't ISO Hostile Intent, why would he be against the lynch of HI?

As usual, wrong.

Admitting HI may not be scum shows a lack of conviction. My read of you has nothing to do with HI, you are the one with a one track mind, not me.

It's because he wants to keep him around to find the Serial Killer, because he's groupscum.

Retardulous.

After this, House, in response to me asking him why he's so keen on getting away from the HI-wagon, asks me why I'm so keen to deflect. This is a regular feature - instead of responding to me about his HI-townread, he tries to push the pressure back towards me by pretending my actions are scummy.

I asked you why you were so keen to deflect because you refuse to answer my questions, and this ridiculous bullshit is just more of that deflection.

So, in my next post, I step it up a little. I ask him why he's dodging questions about his Hostile Intent townread, and refute his point about my vote lacking conviction.

You didn't refute shit, and I have nothing to say about a read I don't have.

Blah blah repeating shit

Aside from that, his reaction to my vote is really awful. He discredits me three times within 3 posts without any basis for doing so. And he asks me to show him where he called me scum when one of his posts is, word for word, "My my, how scummy you look over a simple question."

Anybody can do scummy shit regardless of alignment. That was me telling you to townie your ass up.

[House]

I made a case so people could respond to it. Do not just ignore it.

I read your case Liked it and didn't like houses response to it so I grabbed your hips and danced that congo line.

That you jumped on such a weak case tells me you are out for an easy target.

VOTE: Garmr

[House]

I made a case so people could respond to it. Do not just ignore it.

I read your case Liked it and didn't like houses response to it so I grabbed your hips and danced that congo line.

That you jumped on such a weak case tells me you are out for an easy target.

VOTE: Garmr

So why do you consider yourself a easy target?

I didn't say I did.

[House]

I made a case so people could respond to it. Do not just ignore it.

I read your case Liked it and didn't like houses response to it so I grabbed your hips and danced that congo line.

That you jumped on such a weak case tells me you are out for an easy target.

VOTE: Garmr

So why do you consider yourself a easy target?

I didn't say I did.

your obviously thinking it if your saying tso's case was weak and you couldn't even explain why.

Nope. I'm thinking you are thinking it since I didn't see a point in spelling out why T S O's case was retarded.

[House]

@house
Care to explain why he is wrong then?

Scroll up.

[House]

Somebody with half a brain feel like giving me any leads?

T S O need not apply.

[House]

All this having been said, Housy's defense of the case on a skim did not look great to me. I would not say I lean sour on him, as that would imply a level of strength bringing my suspicion up to the Cougy/Keithy level and it is not quite that strong. I will say that he is on the negative side of null, and that I will be reading both the case and the defense in full on my return.

Smart lady. I'm a negative person.

Fortunately, personality is not alignment-indicative.

Fortunately for others, neither is a lack of intelligence.

[House]

I'm also saying, here and now, that if anyone kills Coug, vig or SK, I will give them towncred. Straight up.

This is worthy of a PL.

VOTE: T S O

[House]

House isn't scum because he isn't reading, you didn't even read the case did you?

No, I'm scum because I refuse to vote for someone that I don't have a scum read on, which makes even less sense than being scum for not reading 76 pages.

[House]

I'm also saying, here and now, that if anyone kills Coug, vig or SK, I will give them towncred. Straight up.

This is worthy of a PL.

VOTE: T S O

This is the sort of shit that makes House scum. I ask for a policy vig, and this make me worthy of a policy lynch?

And we're calling this Town?

Fucking really, guys?

Yes really. That post is just the most egregious of your shit play and I didn't feel like creating a wall of examples.

On the bright side, this steaming pile of shit that I've cropped is another fine example of why you're a waste of a slot.

[House]

your, even.

[House]

I'd appreciate if someone other {House, HI, Coug} could discuss House-scum with me. I know TD and Garmr's opinion on it, but the majority of the game simply hasn't commented.

It'll take a damn good argument to convince me I'm wrong, but if you're up to post something half-logical, I'll listen, no problem.

How about the possibility that folks don't really care what your opinion is?

That's the conclusion

I'm

coming to, anyway. It's heart-warming, actually.

[House]

That's great, you keep insulting me and trying to get me to respond. I'll insult you back once you flip in red.

Only idiots are as certain of someone's alignment based on the kind of shitty assumptions and malformed logic that you've been displaying as you are.

[House]

That's great.

Your assumption that insulting me will somehow make you seem more genuine isn't going to work, little man, because most of the players in this game aren't naive enough to fall for it.

But you keep trying it - your scumgame certainly needs improvement.

Another display of your ignorance.

My scum game is awesome, it's my town game that trends to earn me votes because I don't kiss ass.

[House]

It just seems silly that you all feel the need to fling insults and get the thread cattywampus from its original state.

Point taken. I'm done with it.

[House]

That actually makes a lot of sense.

Pine, T S O, House - what's your read on Josh_B?

Initial impression: townie not invited to the Kool Kids Klub. (I feel your pain, bro.)

[House]

The extremely heavy resistance to a House push makes me think he's scum. So does his vote for me, which he justifies with

policy lynch.

And the reason I'm up for that is, apparently, I requested a policy vig.

That's completely. and utterly. backwards.

That asking for a policy kill is so scummy that he feels the need to ...ASK FOR A POLICY KILL! YEAH!

For somebody that likes to whine about being misrepped, you do twice as much as I ever did.

I voted you for appealing to an SK with town cred.

[House]

Keep trying to worm your way out of the noose.

If you had either an ounce of credibility or logic, I'd think you might have a chance.

[House]

I tire of T S O's bullshit, so I'll do what he can't... I'll sell a House lynch.

I AM SCUM!

[House]

Don't bother waiting for D2 to confirm, I'm a Godfather.

Might as well lynch me now and be done with it.

[House]

(Or wtf ever day is next)

[House]

In other news, T S O's extreme retardation has earned him a spot on my blacklist.

[House]

...What hath God wrought? I don't know what to think of what House is doing.

Clearly, it's got scum motivation behind it.

[House]

(Saving T S O the trouble of having to post it)

[House]

House, your friends are going to be mad. StrangCoug and Hostile Intent have really been working hard against TSO for scum reading you.
Thanks for replacing in though.

VOTE: House

If I had a bearing on where their motives were coming from, that would matter to me a lot more than two players that I don't know anything about. Thanks for the vote, though.

[House]

(Josh_B is town, do not lynch him. If T S O demands you do at some point in the future, that will confirm this post as undeniably true)

[House]

Oh wait... I'm scum.

Josh_B is scum. Totes scum. Lynch him after I die!

[House]

Everything else you're doing is fair game for scum flailing, but claiming that I'm now on your blacklist for catching you as scum is pretty low.

Tell people how low it is after I flip.

Now stop bothering me. I'm making your case for you so I won't have to put up with your shit anymore. Go away.

[House]

If I had a bearing on where their motives were coming from, that would matter to me a lot more than two players that I don't know anything about. Thanks for the vote, though.

I really didn't like Lucky2you. He made one game related comment prior to you replacing in and it was really suspect. I've really been ignoring TSO's push on you because I've played with TSO a few times before. I actually like that he is trying to give this game some direction. A GodFather claim was really unnecessary. I kind of feel like it was a scummy response to AuntJ's vote.

I also think my D3x vote is kind of lame, and neither of us really got the traction that I was hoping for. PirateMollie and I have kind of been butting heads all game, so to see

another

vote from her on me is a big not surprise. IamI's vote on me feels town, I'm translating it as "I'm voting you because your D3X vote is retarded." Kthxbye, I kind of feel the same way about. D3x's vote was kind of a flyer. So anyways, I'm moving on.

My gratitude wasn't sarcasm, so idk why you felt the need to defend it.

If you can't tell, I'm kinda fishing for them and want T S O to hammer me himself.

[House]

(Speaking of... unvote me and wait for L-1, so you can get your proper reward for all the diligent work and extreme intelligence you have put into this wagon)

[House]

Seriously, Scum Claiming is so stupid, there's no reason to do it, ever, it's childish and dumb and destroys games, it's blatantly playing against win condition and should be punishable via modkill, I'm going to take my rant elsewhere now, but suffice it to say this kind of behavior really pisses me off.

Aw you're pissed? Poor fucking you.

Welcome to the club!

[House]

My gratitude wasn't sarcasm, so idk why you felt the need to defend it.

You asked me for bearing on where my motives were coming from.

Fair play.

[House]

House I feel like your scum claim really puts StrangCoug and HostileIntent in bad positions. If you are scum, and they aren't on your team, Good Job.
If you flip town, it really means nothing. On a real note, I can't imagine you fake claiming as town.

Don't worry. SC & HI won't be affected by my flip.

[House]

...people are taking this seriously?

Totes.

Sarcasm doesn't exist in this dimension.

[House]

Have you

seen

this town? Why wouldn't they take it seriously?

Yeah, I have extensive experience with everybody here and know exactly how they think!

Oh wait...

[House]

The extent of my problem with him is that he needs his sanity checked.

I get that a lot. I trod one, but the doc couldn't locate it.

His scumclaiming has caused him to go from probtown to unreadable for me.

Just trying to help a brother out.

[House]

Alright, with your suggestions, and TD being the only one that we seem to fully agree on, I say that he's probably the only reasonable lynch for today.

House, what's your Strangcoug read?

Town as fuck, and after reading her ISO I'm down for a HI lynch.

Unlike scum-T S O, she is rational and provides good reasons for her reads. I can sheep that.

[House]

Guessing it's she... I always read the word cougar as she for ~ reasons~

[House]

*points to own profile*

I want one, but not

THAT

kind

Oh, you are missing out.

[House]

Interesting that AJ voted for SC. She is added to my PoI list to read up on.

[House]

Hip hip hooray?

What I'd like to know is... were you right?

If you weren't, you should have kept it to yourself. If you were, depends on what kind of QT, I'd think.

Just kidding, of course. Any kind of information sharing is good, even if it is wrong. Others can potentially find something useful even in incorrect assumptions or mistaken logic.

[House]

So... sk hunting is considered town in this game... o_O

Let's pop some Mollie.

VOTE: pirate mollie

[House]

no literally he has provided 0 reason for anyone to think he would support mollie

And then just votes her when others do to get people off his back.

And his fucking "breakdown" goes poof and disappears.

Why am I having to explain this?

Because nobody else lives in your little world of flying elephants and people dinosaurs?

I've been told since day one that sk hunting is scum as fuck, but apparently town wants to sk hunt.

You are drowning in your confirmation bias.

[House]

Garmr stop reaching. I am not the type of scum people coach ever. You and House both jump on Mollie despite me wanting the sk dead.

I am scumhunting. I didn't sk hunt ftr. When the sk up and claims, you lynch it.

Mollie is town knock it off.

Okay, what is your case for Mollie being town?

[House]

Garmr stop reaching. I am not the type of scum people coach ever. You and House both jump on Mollie despite me wanting the sk dead.

I am scumhunting. I didn't sk hunt ftr. When the sk up and claims, you lynch it.

Mollie is town knock it off.

Or.

Hes town because claiming FBI agent D1 is suicide if he isnt.

What if Mollie is scum?

[House]

What does that mean in idiot-speak?

What would stop scum-Mollie or SK-Mollie from fakeclaiming FBI Agent?

[House]

I guess the question you ask yourself is this:

What it five shots or was it six?

Is Hostile scum or do I just

want

Hostile to be scum?

I asked that very question, and I have to go with the former.

VOTE: Hostile Intent

[House]

What does that mean in idiot-speak?

What would stop scum-Mollie or SK-Mollie from fakeclaiming FBI Agent?

It means I'm not talking about mollie.

I was responding to Titus' statement that "the sk claimed and we should lynch him" in reference to HI

The thing that stops anyone from fake claiming FBI agent is that its not a good fakeclaim.

Groupscum claiming it are asking to be killed by the SK.

The SK is never going to find an SK, and hes going to be lynched sometime before lylo.

Hair splitting, but would group scum claim if they felt confident a townie would protect them, and ride town cred by busing a partner?

Not that I think that is relevant to this game, to be clear.

[House]

Cool beans, didn't know if Agents also got cop guilty style reads on group scum.

Thanks.

[House]

@House, We can help with basic setup stuff but the wiki is even better.

No it's not. I got raked over the coals for mentioning it.

I'm not going back there unless it actually gets updated to be something close to relevant.

[House]

Garmr stop reaching. I am not the type of scum people coach ever. You and House both jump on Mollie despite me wanting the sk dead.

I hadn't read HI's ISO yet, partly because of T S O's tantrum making me apathetic to his interests.

When I did, I switched my vote.

[House]

Tso is still town his belief in house being scum appears genuine.

Are you kidding me? According to his logic, anybody that doesn't sheep his every move is scum.

[House]

I mean God, if he had simply asked me to read HI's ISO instead of jump all in my shit over faulty assumptions, all that drama could have been avoided.

If he's town, he's terribad.

P-Edit: Okay.

[House]

I mean God, if he had simply asked me to read HI's ISO instead of jump all in my shit over faulty assumptions, all that drama could have been avoided.

If he's town, he's terribad.

P-Edit: Okay.

You sheeped my case on mollie brahIf your saying i'm terribad what does that make you.

Inexperienced. I never claimed to be Einstein.

You weren't being a dick, and you at least made sense.

Wtf is a brahlf, Mr. Awesome?

[House]

I mean God, if he had simply asked me to read HI's ISO instead of jump all in my shit over faulty assumptions, all that drama could have been avoided.

If he's town, he's terribad.

P-Edit: Okay.

You sheeped my case on mollie brahIf your saying i'm terribad what does that make you.

he isn't even fucking talking about you

are you drunk? cos I will give you time to sober up and either readjust or give this discussion space cos you are shitting up the game right now and it will make it impossible for the lurkers/non active players/replacements to catch up and figure things out.

like srsly STFU

I know you weren't addressing me, but he was defending his town read (and thus, his honor by proxy).

[House]

I mean God, if he had simply asked me to read HI's ISO instead of jump all in my shit over faulty assumptions, all that drama could have been avoided.

If he's town, he's terribad.

P-Edit: Okay.

You sheeped my case on mollie brahIf your saying i'm terribad what does that make you.

Inexperienced. I never claimed to be Einstein.

You weren't being a dick, and you at least made sense.

Wtf is a brahlf, Mr. Awesome?

Sorry i'm just getting sick of some of the people with damsel of distress complexes

I just reread your post. I was talking about T S O, not you.

Go away, little mosquito.

[House]

I mean God, if he had simply asked me to read HI's ISO instead of jump all in my shit over faulty assumptions, all that drama could have been avoided.

If he's town, he's terribad.

P-Edit: Okay.

You sheeped my case on mollie brahIf your saying i'm terribad what does that make you.

Inexperienced. I never claimed to be Einstein.

You weren't being a dick, and you at least made sense.

Wtf is a brahlf, Mr. Awesome?

so garmr made sense when it has been demonstrated that he does NOT know how to use the search function? and has been proven wrong?

VOTE: house

eta: so were you calling garmr terribad yes or no

Wow, you are incredibly petty.

Reach moar, that dumb shit isn't worth my time.

[House]

Wow, you are incredibly petty.

Reach moar, that dumb shit isn't worth my time.

Echo is all that is worth.

[House]

Let's see how much sense you make after a 14 hour day.

It's not like I timeless your ass to the death, all T S O-style.

Get over your fucking self.

[House]

Tunneled*

[House]

Wow, you are incredibly petty.

Reach moar, that dumb shit isn't worth my time.

Echo is all that is worth.

you never answered my question you dismissed it with "oh you are petty"

you sheeped a player who has demonstrated that he knows fucking clue how to use the search function and you are still voting me cos you think that I claimed fbi agent, yeah?

saying some1 is "making the most sense" who's tactic of accumulating info is demonstrably wrong comes more from a scum mindset than a town 1.

I will be happy to engage you further if you stop lying about what I said and correct your fallacious statement.

Until then, you can piss off.

[House]

you are still voting me cos you think that I claimed fbi agent, yeah?

No, I'm not. For someone who is so fucking awesome at research, you missed something big.

I guess the question you ask yourself is this:

What it five shots or was it six?

Is Hostile scum or do I just

want

Hostile to be scum?

I asked that very question, and I have to go with the former.

VOTE: Hostile Intent

Now gfy.

[House]

quick note-
Twie is on my town list his been thinking logically the whole day 2 and reading back I can see how he see's how reacted could be town. Being wrong (about me) doesn't automatically make him scum even the best of town get it wrong sometimes of the time.

That's a good mindset. Found a new ISO target, thanks.

[House]

I bet house will never respond with why he thinks garmr is making the most sense

Not as long as you continue to misrep me.

I'd rather be mislynched than put up with stupidity.

[House]

I meant seven flavors typo.

Cafarelli was a role that translates. Parker was not really. Don't remember Ballard. Backup my play?

Titus, are you town?

[House]

Lulz.

[House]

I meant seven flavors typo.

Cafarelli was a role that translates. Parker was not really. Don't remember Ballard. Backup my play?

Titus, are you town?

Yes.

Kthx.

Point me somewhere.

[House]

So, the logic behind a Mom Scum that you used is "Titus calls her town, so Mom might not be town"

Sounds legit.

[House]

That's a blatant scum fail.

Are you not familiar with the phrase?

It's typically used sarcastically.

[House]

I meant seven flavors typo.

Cafarelli was a role that translates. Parker was not really. Don't remember Ballard. Backup my play?

Titus, are you town?

Yes.

Kthx.

Point me somewhere.

Hostile intent needs to be followed by votes to his insane grave.

Staying put, then.

[House]

"player x makes the most sense"

Perhaps you can clear up a bunch of the confusion by pointing out where I ever made that statement.

[House]

The Mollie wagon is stupid.

Even if you think she is scum she's not viable whatsoever today.

stop wasting your time.

I have still not seen anyone with ANY reasons for House-town. No-one.

If you post and do not either vote him or take a hardline stance on not doing so, complete with reasoning, I will fucking hound you.

Vote him.

House is town because he is an arrogant aggressive ass even worse than me when he's town. I was his IC offsite.

Flattery will get you everywhere. ~_^

[House]

I am probably still going to use it since I am using it in its correct context.

No, there is no context in this game where the use of that word is appropriate when a player finds offense in it with cause, which Titus has clearly stated.

[House]

Titus unless you can prove that House is not arrogant as scum, your argument is completely worthless, and unless you can prove that House, as town, blatantly lies about ISO'ing people, it's worthless once more.

Just because you create your own little world where you magically know what all your imaginary people do within it doesn't mean we are those imaginary people, T S O.

You can assume whatever you want about what I've done or not, but that doesn't make it true.

A common sense tip from your intellectual superior.

[House]

Titus unless you can prove that House is not arrogant as scum, your argument is completely worthless

Game 5, o'er there.

unless you can prove that House, as town, blatantly lies about ISO'ing people, it's worthless once more.

As town, I'll say wtf ever I want with no concern for self-preservation. Also, you should stop lying about me. The only time I ISO'ed HI (which is the subject of your oral diarrhea), I acted on it by placing a vote.

Just because you assumed I ISOed him before that doesn't mean I did. Perhaps you should have tried something new and maybe fucking ASKED ME.

[House]

Titus unless you can prove that House is not arrogant as scum, your argument is completely worthless, and unless you can prove that House, as town, blatantly lies about ISO'ing people, it's worthless once more.

Just because you create your own little world where you magically know what all your imaginary people do within it doesn't mean we are those imaginary people, T S O.

You can assume whatever you want about what I've done or not, but that doesn't make it true.

A common sense tip from your intellectual superior.

You can be really smart but if your socially awkward you won't win mafia games. It takes just as much charisma as it takes smarts.

Take a look at me I'm bloody sexy even if people are scum reading me they rarely lynch me because I'm damn fine.

I don't play by others' standards. I'm just interested in finding scum. Y'all do what you will, and so will I. I'm not skurred of text.

[House]

that's cute, House.

Your scumgame is really mediocre if insults and lies are all you've got to defend it.

Dumbassery brings that out in me. It's not alignment indicative.

[House]

I am probably still going to use it since I am using it in its correct context.

No, there is no context in this game where the use of that word is appropriate when a player finds offense in it with cause, which Titus has clearly stated.

I wasn't calling titus retarded.

and I don't cater to people who get offended on other people's behalf.

I'm starting to think you simply have no reading comprehension skills.

Do point out where I stated offense.

[House]

That was a fair recap on my wagon. Thanks for that much, at least.

[House]

HI is still not scum.

Titus, still scum.

People still lurking.

That seems like a pretty good recap.

If Titus is scum, then HI is definitely the SK. Her recent mention of the blocked NK could indicate that HI is bullet proof- a common feature of SK's. I'm not sure how you can have Titus as scum without believing that she would give an honest assessment of who the SK is.

I"m willing to vote HI. again.

VOTE: HOstile Intent

This post is made of win & kittens.

[House]

HI is still not scum.

Titus, still scum.

People still lurking.

That seems like a pretty good recap.

If Titus is scum, then HI is definitely the SK. Her recent mention of the blocked NK could indicate that HI is bullet proof- a common feature of SK's. I'm not sure how you can have Titus as scum without believing that she would give an honest assessment of who the SK is.

I"m willing to vote HI. again.

VOTE: HOstile Intent

I believe Titus thinks HI is the SK.

Shes just wrong.

And scum.

That's an awful lot of certainty against a post that makes complete sense.

[House]

Could someone please explain HI-town?

I don't see why he's still alive.

[House]

Ok... the FBI Agent spec is over my head.

I thought the timing of the claim was pretty strange, and people dogpiling on him since then added to that image.

So... have you considered the fact he may be an SK but simply not submitting night actions? If people buy the claim, he could skate to endgame without getting his hands dirty.

[House]

Fair point.

UNVOTE:

[House]

If we get anywhere near Endgame and he's still alive as SK w/o submitting NKs, either GroupScum will take him out as Confirmed Town, or he'll have cleared everyone and we Lynch his ass. Either way, I don't see any reason to doubt his Claim D2 with nothing to refute it.

Another question. What's to stop him from simply claiming no result (due to roleblocker)?

[House]

Who did HI clear D2?

[House]

I feel like I've said this before... multiple times.

Thank you for indulging me. I've been preoccupied with other drama, which kept me sidetracked from looking into the very issue the brainpan was criticizing me for not having a read on.

[House]

Yes.

Kthx.

Point me somewhere

.

Hostile intent needs to be followed by votes to his insane grave.

Staying put, then.

Just because you create your own little world where you magically know what all your imaginary people do within it doesn't mean we are those imaginary people, T S O.

You can assume whatever you want about what I've done or not, but that doesn't make it true.

A common sense tip from your intellectual superior.

You can be really smart but if your socially awkward you won't win mafia games. It takes just as much charisma as it takes smarts.

Take a look at me I'm bloody sexy even if people are scum reading me they rarely lynch me because I'm damn fine.

I don't play by others' standards. I'm just interested in finding scum.

Y'all do what you will, and so will I. I'm not skurred of text.

You show a lot of independence house.

You don't know me. It's a mistake to take everything I post as concrete. If I am crunched for time, I find something acceptable until my schedule clears up.

It's not hard to tell which of my posts are "this'll do for now" and which are my own opinions.

[House]

This site needs a Like button on the posts, lol.

[House]

Almost forgot.

@House- HI cleared Majiffy/Kise. What scenario predicates that either GroupScum or SK HI would need to give RB'ed results? I would assume that any potential RB'er would have far higher priorities than Blocking SK-HI.

Perhaps the scenario where the "FBI Agent" is the only outed/known PR?

Although the fact he cleared someone N1 lowers that likelihood, granted.

[House]

Well, it's also a PR that doesn't threaten GroupScum in any way and that they actually would

want

to succeed. Mind you, SK is no friend of GS.

No, but they can benefit by the thread drama by role blocking, and the SK would play that up. Which isn't happening, I know. Just saying there is more than one way to play the game.

[House]

This discussion had devolved to generic theory. My point is that I didn't know a player was cleared, and was hypothesized on how a SK could avoid suspicion without clearing... Which is now irrelevant.

[House]

@SC- What part of p2498 makes sense to you in a way that SK-HI would be a higher priority than GroupScum-Titus?

I don't see the point of asking me this since I've already unvoted HI and am still pondering the arguments for scum!Titus

[House]

I have the sudden urge to lynch Garmr.

[House]

@ d3x

we are gonna fight.

garmr's play does not support a 1 shot hider claim.

like no way no how in any way.

See, that's something to look at.

I read up on the role, and I don't buy the claim at all, given the way it was outed and supposedly used.

VOTE: Vote: Garmr

[House]

IAI, I stated rather plainly that my questions were hypothetical.

I'm not getting back into the topic, but I don't appreciate you taking my posts out of context.

[House]

Hostile Intent claiming FBI Agent and that Majiffy is not a SK.

@Jiffy- Is Hostile lying scum or telling the truth?

Would he really call HI a liar?

[House]

Alllllllllllrighty then!

VOTE: Hostile intentI

[House]

Kinda figured you solved that House as you voted after my follow crumb.

In still on formula, haven't graduated to solid foods yet.

[House]

@mod: V/LA until the 11th.

[House]

Neither is a scum tell, Pine.

I've seen town campaign using those tactics several times.

I don't really care for it, but it doesn't make them scum.

[House]

Ok this is ridiculously fucking stupid lynch but I get it.

Why would I (as scum) fucking make up a guilty?

Theoretically, to take a townie down before you die because you know you won't last long.

That said, I don't see

you

being the kind to incriminate yourself so blatantly as to seal you own fate on a fake guilty. You are a fighter and will argue your lynch until the floor drops from beneath your feet.

No track results but a town rb would visit me so yeah.

Solid point.

[House]

VOTE: Pirate Mollie

I can sheep this.

VOTE: Pirate Mollie

[House]

You're probably some flavor of scum, so no

I just don't suck at this game, so I am disinclined to let you off the hook with a quick lynch

I'm usually the first to call for Titus' head on a platter (often before she even posts), but I'm just not seeing it this game.

She comes up with some next level theories and wtfgambits sometimes, but she's actually less scummy as scum than she is as town for me... if that makes sense at all.

[House]

Ok this is ridiculously fucking stupid lynch but I get it.

Why would I (as scum) fucking make up a guilty?

Theoretically, to take a townie down before you die because you know you won't last long.

That said, I don't see

you

being the kind to incriminate yourself so blatantly as to seal you own fate on a fake guilty. You are a fighter and will argue your lynch until the floor drops from beneath your feet.

No track results but a town rb would visit me so yeah.

Solid point.

House, I was under zero pressure before being forced to out that guilty. Zero.

If you were forced to out the guilty... wouldn't that mean you were under pressure, and thus able to infer the possibility of imminent danger?

Hair splitting question really, because I can't see you being so obvious as to sell a fake guilty, but I am curious for the sake of theory.

[House]

*eyeroll* And you would be eliminating me as the sk because?

Because remember this:

I believe Titus thinks HI is the SK.

Shes just wrong.

And scum.

Now I have additional reasons to believe that.

The kill flavor on the mafia kill matches the kill flavor on Vezok.
Meaning the SK didnt shoot at HI N1.

Meaning that the scumteam shot HI N1, he didnt die.

You assumed he didnt die because hes the SK and he's bulletproof and decided to gambit at being a town power role for town cred.

I'm fairly sure thats what happened because of this quote from your scumbuddy:

he really is an FBI agt, SK took a shot at him, and Doc protected him. I can't see a more likely scenario for HI.

Because no one is guessing that the doc protected HI N1 in the dark after almost half the game wanted to lynch him D1.

Sense making Titus posted here.

[House]

Oh, that was TWIE.

I need coffee.

[House]

Titus isn't scum, and I totally buy HI as SK.

Somebody get me a caffeine IV.

[House]

Yeah I'm saying the doc protect on HI happened N1.

Because IaI told me it happened.

Because thats a strange thing to assume in the dark.

Would somebody please translate this to human speak?

Is he seriously giving confirmed scum credibility?

[House]

Hey house if you act now, you can still probably play that post off like a joke.

Limited time offer though.

No need, I'm VI level 99. Shit that apparently Ovid to others looks pretty obtuse to me. I blame it on my ignorance of theory, which will never be corrected if I don't ask stupid questions.

[House]

Ovid (wtf is Ovid?) = obvious

[House]

Thats cool and all titus but you should get back to explaining your bullshit track result.

Care to address my question, or are you content in letting me wallow in ignorance?

[House]

And yes.

I think that, as scum if you thought that HI claimed SK, and then didnt get lynched and might not be lynched for a couple days, its possible you would shoot him.

Also. I'm not assuming shit.

I'm using IaI's guess about what happened N1.

Which you know, seems like pretty solid strategy.

Since I feel like he would know more than me.

Yes, and I'm sure he had zero reason to lie and support a townie mislynch, amirite?

[House]

TWIE is looking scum as shit, I could vote him or Mollie interchangeably.

[House]

Because of how worried groupscum were of an FBI agent duh.

An easy mislynch is an easy mislynch.

They'd have had the same motivation if he was vanilla town.

[House]

Getting the name of the person you investigated in your result is the mod telling you you werent redirected.

@mod: confirm?

[House]

Getting the name of the person you investigated in your result is the mod telling you you werent redirected.

@mod: confirm?

Mods rarely confirm if someone is lying or telling the truth in that kind of scenario. Thanks for obvtowning though. Scumhouse ignores theory.

They don't explain mechanics?

*boggle*

[House]

Getting the name of the person you investigated in your result is the mod telling you you werent redirected.

@mod: confirm?

Mods rarely confirm if someone is lying or telling the truth in that kind of scenario. Thanks for obvtowning though. Scumhouse ignores theory.

Subjective confirmation of Titus-town.

She'd never say I was obvtown as scum. I'm too easy a target to mislynch, which she does without hesitation when she is scum.

So yeah... the only way Titus is scum is if I am scum too, which is kinda stupid because I'd be 100x more likely to bus the shit out of her for town cred than white knight her if we were both scum. Especially since I typically try to lynch her anyway.

[House]

Which one is ika?

IHNC

[House]

See, I actually agree with house, I think either titus and house are scum or neither of them is, I'm just currently in the both camp.

Then lynch me and according to your own logic that will clear Titus, who is a stronger player.

[House]

Subjective confirmation of Titus-town.

She'd never say I was obvtown as scum. I'm too easy a target to mislynch, which she does without hesitation when she is scum.

So yeah... the only way Titus is scum is if I am scum too, which is kinda stupid because I'd be 100x more likely to bus the shit out of her for town cred than white knight her if we were both scum. Especially since I typically try to lynch her anyway.

You guys are starting to make me think that all these posts have been serious the whole time.

Which is not a good thing.

Way to support my read of you, dude.

[House]

Buddy, if I only had the power.

I'll self-vote if it'll help sell the wagon.

[House]

Framer or Redirector. Done.

Much simpler. I was doing that yesterday. These were the likely conclusions.

Frame investigative target numbero uno by framer or redirect. Town PR has guilty. Two mislynches.


You would think by now there would be a cc or a guilty claim.

A standard framer doesn't mess with track investigations, Titus...

You have read the title of the game right.

Of what relevance is that, and when did I say that no framers mess with track investigations?

This backpedaling is shady as fuck, too.

[House]

It matters because theres support for a Titus lynch.

Yup. It's the idiot plus scum.

Why don't you listen to House if you townread him so hard?

Or will he have to claim cop?

Fuckin' subtle, much?

[House]

We're at L-1? Fuck that.

UnVote

I need to read and sort tonight.

I'm towning you so hard right now.

[House]

Well shit, what else you got House, might as well go the full monte.

I didn't claim cop.

Even if I were, I've only been in the game for one night.

[House]

It matters because theres support for a Titus lynch.

Yup. It's the idiot plus scum.

Why don't you listen to House if you townread him so hard?

Or will he have to claim cop?

Fuckin' subtle, much?

This pretty much looks like a cop claim to me. That's why I asked... what did you not think I was not being subtle about then?

Just eat your hat, Titus.

I'll get the barbecue sauce.

[House]

It matters because theres support for a Titus lynch.

Yup. It's the idiot plus scum.

Why don't you listen to House if you townread him so hard?

Or will he have to claim cop?

Fuckin' subtle, much?

This pretty much looks like a cop claim to me. That's why I asked... what did you not think I was not being subtle about then?

Just eat your hat, Titus.

I'll get the barbecue sauce.

but I'm townreading you... I always have been... *scratches*

There is more to me than my alignment in both scenarios.

[House]

That... was... the meet crumb...

Same role, same alignment.

It's the only time I was in that role that I can easily link to.

[House]

Although I spouse I can relate my current role to the time I had to it my name as Jack, and for the same reason.

That's the best I can do, though.

[House]

Spouse = suppose

Gah.

[House]

As much as your circumstances suck, it would be worse for town if I did that.

I haven't yet found what I'm looking for.

[House]

Well what can I do to help you find it?

You already have. Now it's just a matter of wait and see.

[House]

So Mollie, how did it feel when you opened up that scum RPM?

[House]

The fact the Titus wagon skyrocketed to L-1 should speak to her alignment, for those of you who actually think past your emotions.

Those wheels were greased.

[House]

T S O, keeping your vote on me is a scum claim.

[House]

A framer who framed HI to a tracker would give my result according to the wiki.

lolno.

if she flips town your basicly prime suspect number 1 just an fyi

your arguing with the wiki now

let me requote it for you:

In games without Cops, Framer/Tailor variants can exist that alter results given to other investigative roles (such as Tracker).

(such as Tracker).

so explain to me like im 5 how it does not confirm a framer existance and that it was tampered with (and no saying it only affect mafia kill is not vaild)

Ika, I'll accept your logic if you can explain to me in clear, unambiguous terms how the mafia would know who the sk was targeting as well as who the sk is.

Unless, of course, you are suggesting the sk is also a framer.

Otherwise yes, a mafia framer would frame someone for killing mafia victims.

[House]

Serial killer/Framer would be a beautiful combo, come to think of it.

Titus, consider this a suggestion for the invitational.

[House]

The only thing I'm having a hard time with is Titus's assertion that she's been set up, but hasn't taken this into account in the least.

I'm thinking Titus may have a bit of a blind spot irt ika.

Valid point, though.

[House]

Based on what, exactly?

This isn't the first game I've been in with both of them, and she tends to include him in her gambits frequently.

[House]

Here's the problem with a redirect or framer.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but a scum framer would have to know that Titus was a PR D1 in order to redirect correct? Are we assuming scum caught a crumb and assumed Titus was investigative? That's a fucking stretch.

It's not at all a stretch if IHNC is scum, considering Titus crumbed to him D1.

It makes perfect sense that way, actually.

[House]

Would anyone else be able to make heads or tails of the crumb Titus dropped for ika D1?

[House]

If not, that sure narrows the list of suspects down when she flips town since people are so invested in their misconceptions that they are unwilling to consider how they could have been duped.

[House]

Another huge problem is the fact sk killed vekoz not the mafia. Because if you read the kill flavor the sk has executed. That means it has to be a sk framer for titus's claim to make sense and not a mafia one unless mafia predicted the sk's moves which I doubt highly is the case.

Dead Players

FFAE00 FFED00 was John Cena, Vanilla Town lynched day 1

vezokpiraka was Robbie Williams, Vanilla Town executed Night 1

Hostile Intent was Andy Murray, FBI Agent lynched day 2

DrCirno was Charlie Sheen, Vanilla Town killed night 2

I am Innocent was Tom Cruise, Mafia goon executed night 2

Post 2976 makes the same point.

[House]

There is no twist. Me claiming a track result makes zero sense as a fake claim.

Are you illiterate? I accused House of twisting my words in order to save you. I do not buy that anyone's results were twisted in any way.

In games without Cops, Framer/Tailor variants can exist that alter results given to other investigative roles (such as Tracker).

[/size]

OK. Still not buying that that's what happened.

The fact the Titus wagon skyrocketed to L-1 should speak to her alignment, for those of you who actually think past your emotions.

I think, given the circumstances, it's understandable.

No. I think L-3, maybe L-2 would be understandable, but we still need to take our time and not jump to hammer zone prematurely regardless of how certain a player's alignment may appear to be.

There is still much to be gained by utilizing our day wisely instead of forfeiting 2 weeks and rushing the night phase.

[House]

There is no twist. Me claiming a track result makes zero sense as a fake claim.

Are you illiterate? I accused House of twisting my words in order to save you. I do not buy that anyone's results were twisted in any way.

In games without Cops, Framer/Tailor variants can exist that alter results given to other investigative roles (such as Tracker).

[/size]

OK. Still not buying that that's what happened.

The fact the Titus wagon skyrocketed to L-1 should speak to her alignment, for those of you who actually think past your emotions.

I think, given the circumstances, it's understandable.

No. I think L-3, maybe L-2 would be understandable, but we still need to take our time and not jump to hammer zone prematurely regardless of how certain a player's alignment may appear to be.

There is still much to be gained by utilizing our day wisely instead of forfeiting 2 weeks and rushing the night phase.

I think that's why dex unvoted so it would be L-2 and we have time. Titus still deserves death through.

Right, but that doesn't change the fact the wheels were greased to get there in the first place.

Damning evidence notwithstanding, it is scummy to push a player to L-1 so early into the day.

That wagon is scum-powered.

[House]

There is no twist. Me claiming a track result makes zero sense as a fake claim.

Are you illiterate? I accused House of twisting my words in order to save you. I do not buy that anyone's results were twisted in any way.

In games without Cops, Framer/Tailor variants can exist that alter results given to other investigative roles (such as Tracker).

[/size]

OK. Still not buying that that's what happened.

The fact the Titus wagon skyrocketed to L-1 should speak to her alignment, for those of you who actually think past your emotions.

I think, given the circumstances, it's understandable.

No. I think L-3, maybe L-2 would be understandable, but we still need to take our time and not jump to hammer zone prematurely regardless of how certain a player's alignment may appear to be.

There is still much to be gained by utilizing our day wisely instead of forfeiting 2 weeks and rushing the night phase.

I think that's why dex unvoted so it would be L-2 and we have time. Titus still deserves death through.

Right, but that doesn't change the fact the wheels were greased to get there in the first place.

Damning evidence notwithstanding, it is scummy to push a player to L-1 so early into the day.

That wagon is scum-powered.

to be fair the vote count was on 5 and then jumped to 10 with 11 to lynch between 7 pages it would be easy to lose track of votes. Also you may have scum on the wagon as they could be busing titus, with the feeling people harbor to titus included none of this actual points away from titus being scum.

My reasons for saying Titus is town have absolutely nothing to do with her wagon, I just pointed out that jacking it up to L-1 was scummy.

[House]

The only thing I'm having a hard time with is Titus's assertion that she's been set up, but hasn't taken this into account in the least.

I'm thinking Titus may have a bit of a blind spot irt ika.

Valid point, though.

Ika is the biggest idiot in the world when town.

Have you even considered that he just might not be town?

[House]

UNVOTE: unvote

well my biggest town reads are

Garmr
Dr. Cirno
I have no creativity

and who else?

Put me at null, please. Misfit for life.

[House]

cus im lazy and not going to find house post about framer let me rephrase the question

Please do, b/c I have no idea what you are talking about.

[House]

Titus is saying to ihnc that she was blocked last night and will likely continue to be blocked, therefore she prob won't be able to successfully track house if she lives tonight.

Nero what's happening?

Wouldn't do any good to track me. I'm boring.

[House]

Looks like scum! Mollie just snuck Titus back to L-1.

[House]

Why would a Titus lynch be a derp hammer?

Why are you in such a rush to get to night phase?

[House]

"50 shades of derp"

We can be friends.

UNVOTE:

[House]

Good to hear, mollie. Nero vanished so I don't have anyone to star wars with.

UNVOTE:

Do you have proof Titus is town or was that a gambit or are you leaving her to hang or what's going on with that?

Titus is a big girl. I have a busy schedule and can't spare the time to take her case. Besides, she's more competent, anyway.

She's town, though. Idk wtf her play is about, but she's town.

Just getting it on the record so I can rub it in everybody's face when she flips.

[House]

UNVOTE:


so someone does not derp hammer

Why are you worried about a derp hammer? If Titus is scum, what's derp about hammering her?

Maybe try reading the game, it has been discussed.

[House]

UNVOTE:


so someone does not derp hammer

Why are you worried about a derp hammer? If Titus is scum, what's derp about hammering her?

Maybe try reading the game, it has been discussed.

You completely missed my point.

Then you should have been more clear.

[House]

That is one way to read the situation.

Another is scum using a townie's uncertainty to sell two mislynches.

I might sheep, but I want to ISO RM first.

[House]

Nah. Not today.

Not tomorrow, either.

[House]

Yeah, gonna assume my suggested scenario is more likely.

VOTE: kthxbye

[House]

Active lurking? With the amount of r/l stuff RM has going on?

Gee, I wonder why... besides, she is town.

That you would paint her as scum to cement a future wagon is scummy.

[House]

Guys I don't like to rehash things but whats the point in having a fbi agent if the town power role is a tracker. It doesn't make sense she's lying and anyone trying to break down the titus wagon is scum or a village idiot.

So lynch kthxbye today and wagon her again tomorrow and see who else comes to the rescue.

You know it's the smart play.

[House]

I loled.

[House]

I loled.

Just explain House.

I told you all I can at this point.

[House]

I loled.

Just explain House.

I told you all I can at this point.

You can stop wifoming already.

If you insist.

VOTE: Titus

Town or no, you are working awfully hard to out a suspected PR that, even if it were true, has only been in the game long enough to use his action once and would become a NK target if I outed to save your skin.

I don't see why town-Titus would do that. Or town-anyone. Especially considering you are NK bait anyway if you get "cleared".

[House]

unvote
vote: titus

I think this was hammer.

Was this hammer?

[House]

though anyone with half a brain as scum would be powerbussing titus, so meh

Right... so according to your theory, I soft-claimed a PR to nudge the wagon off Titus, then bussed the shit out of her when people didn't buy the implied innocent that Titus was claiming I crumbed.

You got me dead to rights, T S O. I totally faked cop to save my buddy's ass then bussed her when it didn't work. Because that's how I roll.

GG all.

Spoiler:

The sarcasm is strong with this post.

[House]

Kise, let T S O crow about lynching me, it might keep scum at bay.

[House]

I'm scum, I'm just not mafia aligned.

zomgtotesSKclaimlynchitwithfire

[House]

I am pretty sure house thinks you are scum.

Hahahahahaha

[House]

I am pretty sure house thinks you are scum.

Hahahahahaha

Ahahahahaha

[House]

Titus (8): TheWayItEnds, Garmr, Kise, StrangerCoug, PeregrineV, pirate mollie, House, TSO

L-3 and you all seriously think that was hammer?

Last couple times I checked in, she was flaring around L-1/L-2.

[House]

Floating

[House]

Also on a sidenote what we learned from the night phase was hitler was good and sacrificed to stop the evil of jesus christ. Lol

That is histericlops.