[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 6444096 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Capcom Crossover Chaos - GAME OVER~ - Mafiascum.net
Our flavor is Pacman. That being said, we're going to be jumping on the main wagon from here on out.
Course, I might have some witty banter for you all. One doesn't just get in this awesome playerlist and lurk the entire time. Pretty much all I'm going to do though.
To clarify you win with both scum and town victory conditions? Shouldn't we as town lynch you day one because if you live to Lylo you just will vote with the scum wagon to win.
VOTE: skitty
This is scum.
In post 33, Johou Tougou Shinen-Tai wrote:Wisdom's vote is a good one, but we really need to sort the UT thing out. UT can't be alive at night if he's telling the truth.
This is scum, too.
Vote Untrod Tripod
Bulbazak is so town that everytime someone votes him Mastin coughs blood.
Our flavor is Pacman. That being said, we're going to be jumping on the main wagon from here on out.
Course, I might have some witty banter for you all. One doesn't just get in this awesome playerlist and lurk the entire time. Pretty much all I'm going to do though.
Hi! You should probably die, then.
VOTE: Skitty
Wheee, I finally paid attention and posted in a game without getting replaced.
This is scum too, especially since he wants to vote a survivor claim (of which there is no point) and keep the anti-town role alive.
Bulbazak is so town that everytime someone votes him Mastin coughs blood.
In post 48, Bulbazak wrote:This is scum too, especially since he wants to vote a survivor claim (of which there is no point) and keep the anti-town role alive.
Then why aren't you calling me scum as well?
~Wis
Because you never indicated that your vote was for the survivor claim. I also assumed that you were smarter in terms of who you would decide to policy lynch.
Bulbazak is so town that everytime someone votes him Mastin coughs blood.
Location: Thataway, Thataway, Betwixt the Presidents
Post
Post #57 (isolation #3) » Fri Dec 12, 2014 9:50 am
Postby Bulbazak »
If you're wanting to lynch them because they claimed survivor, that's a policy lynch. If they have other actions (besides the claim) that makes you think scum, then by all means, enlighten us.
Bulbazak is so town that everytime someone votes him Mastin coughs blood.
Location: Thataway, Thataway, Betwixt the Presidents
Post
Post #61 (isolation #4) » Fri Dec 12, 2014 9:54 am
Postby Bulbazak »
@Major: Fair enough.
@Wis: I'd rather not fully rely on that as a crutch. Paranoia is fine and all. Running against the wall screaming "The sky is falling!" is not. I trust our Role PMs to be somewhat accurate.
Bulbazak is so town that everytime someone votes him Mastin coughs blood.
Location: Thataway, Thataway, Betwixt the Presidents
Post
Post #93 (isolation #7) » Fri Dec 12, 2014 10:59 am
Postby Bulbazak »
The way AA9 talked to me is not coming from a town place. She tried to placate me and then went with a fake question to UT to make it look like she was town scumhunting. Nothing about that exchange was natural and coming from a town mindset.
In post 78, GGG wrote:
So if we choose not to lynch a claimed survivor who has committed to vote the largest wagon. We get to Lylo and the survivor votes the towniest person so the remaining scum jump on to win. How is this not be the outcome? And if this is the outcome how is it not better for us to lynch now.
Again, this is voting for policy reasons. If Skitty is a survivor, then her only goal is to stay alive, which means it doesn't matter who she votes. Personally, since survivors share the wincon, I have no problem with that and would instead make sure that she votes in our favor. If you think she's scum for the claim, then that's one thing. However, if you are trying to lynch her because she's a survivor, which it sounds like you are, then that is very scummy, since you are focusing on a useless wagon over a useful wagon on an anti-town role, or in lieu of actual scumhunting.
P-edit: @Major: I don't see the contradiction between the two roles.
Bulbazak is so town that everytime someone votes him Mastin coughs blood.
In post 93, Bulbazak wrote:P-edit: @Major: I don't see the contradiction between the two roles.
You don't see a contradiction between two roles, both being survivors, having different win conditions? Why can I only win with town/mafia, but Skitty can win with any alignment?
Given the possibility of cult, no I do not.
Bulbazak is so town that everytime someone votes him Mastin coughs blood.
Location: Thataway, Thataway, Betwixt the Presidents
Post
Post #130 (isolation #12) » Fri Dec 12, 2014 11:28 am
Postby Bulbazak »
In post 119, ArcAngel9 wrote:
bluba,
Placate you? what are even saying? I am not trying to scum hunt.. I am scum hunting. I didn't believe Skitty claim because it was odd. And there is no reason behind it especially the timing. If he can win game with mafia or town, it is no good for town and moreover you defense over this looks weird.
You were trying to get me off your back and were overdefensive. As for Skitty, if they win with mafia or town, then it's a wasted lynch as the role doesn't hurt anybody. Outside of Factions, I've never seen a win stealing survivor role. The only reason you should be lynching them is if you think their claim is fake.
P-edit: If she thought I was pressuring her, then she would have tried to placate me. I had been suspicious of everyone else on the Skitty wagon, and I outright said that I'd go back over the wagon later, because scum were sure to be on it. She told me to chill out right after that.
Bulbazak is so town that everytime someone votes him Mastin coughs blood.
Location: Thataway, Thataway, Betwixt the Presidents
Post
Post #329 (isolation #24) » Fri Dec 12, 2014 9:11 pm
Postby Bulbazak »
In post 316, adorkable wrote:
@Bulba 40 - I get the 'FoS' on GGG, but mind explaining the JTST FoS?
It was because I felt that scum would be jumping on Skitty for the Survivor claim, sensing an easy lynch opportunity. I became less gung-ho about it after more people kept piling on, and it was apparent that they weren't all scum. My only point of suspicion at this point is that JTST hasn't talked about anything outside of the 3rd party claims.
In post 317, ArcAngel9 wrote:the question of the day still remains, Can we believe UT claim or not?
Let's just say that he is being honest about this claim and he is really the person who he claims to be... A) What will we loose by lynching him? vs B) What issues we will have to face if cult gets activated? . These are questions that everyone should ask themselves to sort the UT's place. It's not really hard. It will be a choice.
I am quite clear on this... WE SHOULD LYNCH HIM TODAY. If there is any truth in his claims means.. Town have less chances to win because there is always someone stupid enough to target him, And to give more better reasons. We at least don't have to deal this issue tomorrow again. If he is scum and playing a clever gambit? its even better!!!!!!
VOTE: Tripod
Useless post is useless, especially when everything in it has been stated multiple times in better and more natural ways.
In post 318, ArcAngel9 wrote:
Its day 1 and he claimed on page 1. How does mafia can pull up a play like that? Unless they have pre-game plan... Which also leads to me believe that mafia probably have day talk in this game.
I hear that scum get to talk in their PT prior to the game starting. Pretty crazy theory, huh?
In post 325, adorkable wrote:
I feel like there's not much of an argument for lynching anyone but
one of the claimed three anti-town roles
today.
1 claimed anti-town role. 2 claimed "meh. Why do we care?" roles. Personally, I think Major is more likely to side with town in a Lylo situation, which we should be trying to avoid anyway with claimed survivors.
Bulbazak is so town that everytime someone votes him Mastin coughs blood.
In post 329, Bulbazak wrote:It was because I felt that scum would be jumping on Skitty for the Survivor claim, sensing an easy lynch opportunity. I became less gung-ho about it after more people kept piling on, and it was apparent that they weren't all scum. My only point of suspicion at this point is that JTST hasn't talked about anything outside of the 3rd party claims.
Why would scum not want to keep Skitty alive? They're basically saying to scum "We aren't going to scum hunt, and if you keep us alive till LyLo you win."
Skitty is a good place for scum to vote park due to policy reasons. It makes them look legitimate without putting in any effort. My comment had nothing to do with scum wanting Skitty lynched, but rather that their wagon would be an easy place for scum to hide out.
In post 510, mental somnic wrote:is it rlly a waste of a vig if u admitted to being an anti-town role and alignment?
Anti-town means against town not not-town. If a role's wincon is not working against yours, leave it alone.
In post 516, mental somnic wrote:mate
mate
town want to get rid of non-town
you are non-town
the fact that you could potentially be pro-town means jack shit
you are not town
Correction: Town want to get rid of scum.
Survivors are not scum.
Scum are Mafia, SK, Cult, Werewolves, Aliens, or the like. Anything else tends not to bother town and is a waste of time going after as town. Leave. It. Alone.
In post 515, Major Minor wrote:That's still not an anti-town role. My role is not inherently anti-town like, say, a Serial Killer or mafia faction. Suggesting it's a valuable thing for town to use shots on me is not a very town motivated suggestion unless you're claiming you believe me to be a serial killer or mafia faction (or cult).
lol
Survivor is
significantly
more anti-town than SK.
How so? An SK is essentially a lone mafia, with a similar wincon. An SK wins alone. Survivors just have to make it to the end. They win with whoever is left. The best survivor play is to work with town in secret but not stand out to scum. That makes them inherently more pro-town than SKs.
In post 528, DeathNote wrote:It's why you should never claim Survivor. Your word means nothing when in lylo, survivor is essentially another mafia member at worst or a kingmaker at best. There is no reason to let the role live till end game which means you can not win.
Lesson learned I hope.
This is scum.
I don't like Adorkable freaking out over ZZZX's claim.
On to page 23.
I need to check up on a few things, but I should be back later tonight. So help me if I see any more people freaking out over Survivors and not actually looking for scum...
Bulbazak is so town that everytime someone votes him Mastin coughs blood.
Location: Thataway, Thataway, Betwixt the Presidents
Post
Post #936 (isolation #26) » Mon Dec 15, 2014 6:14 pm
Postby Bulbazak »
In post 554, ArcAngel9 wrote:So yay.. Finally UT drama is over.. I am so tempted to vote Skitty but let's not rush the day. We have more time.
So fake.
In post 554, ArcAngel9 wrote:
And aneone remembers that we also have bulba in game.. Who happen to blame me and gone into lurking.
This is a scummy push and pretty effortless. AA9 spreads suspicion while taking no effort to check if my absence is exclusive to this game, and thus, alignment indicative. If she had, she would notice that I had been off the site since late Friday (around my last post) and hadn't posted in any other games. This is a cheap push, which is what I would expect from AA9-scum.
In post 681, wgeurts wrote:Reread and I'm wanting to lynch any of the 3rd-parties or zzzx. Bigger post coming later but can we please do a zzzx lynch?
Why is ZZZX scum?
In post 729, GGG wrote:I don't like zzzx, his role claim is scummy. It boils down to Town don't lynch me because I have powers and scum don't night kill me because it's bad for you. Puts negative pressure against his lynch
Actually his claim is that his role harms scum if he dies, which actually makes him a good compromise lynch down the line, i.e. I don't see this point at all.
In post 730, GGG wrote:Overall I think skitty or major is the right play today. Skitty has the higher probability of being a fake claim.
vote: skitty
So you just got done saying that ZZZX is incredibly scummy, yet you go for a policy lynch on Skitty?
Location: Thataway, Thataway, Betwixt the Presidents
Post
Post #942 (isolation #27) » Mon Dec 15, 2014 6:53 pm
Postby Bulbazak »
In post 871, Skitty wrote:
i think goat is breadcrumbing that hes scum
obvs he asked a question in the scum pt and hes waiting for his buddy to answer him
I was going to vote GGG at the end of my catch up, but this is scum and needs to die.
In post 922, Southern Belles wrote:Not a fan of bulbazack scum reading people for what amounts to a mafia theory difference of opinion.
If you're referring to the whole 3rd party wagon thing, I'm over that now (Although I'd still lynch Dramonic for the lols.).
In post 115, DeathNote wrote:Then I have no intentions of voting either claimed survivors but will shoot one/both of them if I am a vig.
In post 528, DeathNote wrote:It's why you should never claim Survivor. Your word means nothing when in lylo, survivor is essentially another mafia member at worst or a kingmaker at best. There is no reason to let the role live till end game which means you can not win.
Lesson learned I hope.
Also I think Purple Goo is just flavor text for Black Goo.
Okay. I missed that. The thought occurred to me. I looked the role up in the wiki and then looked back at his first post. I missed the clarification in the second post until you brought it up and I looked back.
Vote Skitty
Bulbazak is so town that everytime someone votes him Mastin coughs blood.
I'm not quite on board with that. I'd need to see the Skitty-neighbor flip first.
In post 1052, The Goat wrote:Also, if anyone can give me an explanation why Sonic (the character, not the hydra playing) would be neighbors with Pacman, I'd like to hear it.
Nevermind. I'm on board.
In post 1063, The Goat wrote:
Is mixed-alignment neighbors a fairly standard bastard setup?
In post 1080, The Goat wrote:Perspective, friend. If you were in my shoes, I'm pretty sure you'd be calling for Skitty's head.
this shows that not only do you fail at reading in between the lines, and know nothing about me, but you're naive enough to think I would do this without a fucking solid reason
you seem to be working under the assumption I'm an idiot. the fact that you (or anyone) think I'd do something that outright stupid is a personal insult to me.
the same thing applies to you, MS. sorry if this comes off offensive, but I can't fucking put up with this anymore. :/ anyway, night for real
No one was calling you an idiot or stupid. They were just disagreeing with you. That's not the same, and this entire post trying to make them be the same just reads as disingenuous.
Grabbing food and rewatching the first 2 Hobbit movies. I'll finish this up later today.
On to page 47.
Bulbazak is so town that everytime someone votes him Mastin coughs blood.
Location: Thataway, Thataway, Betwixt the Presidents
Post
Post #1558 (isolation #29) » Thu Dec 18, 2014 4:26 pm
Postby Bulbazak »
In post 1178, shos wrote:Sooooo caled. Notsci. Please, eachof you, explain to me what you are doing or thinking as town. BOTH heads.if possible, prove which head you are.
I can see what Bro is getting at here, although I think it's less Shos coaching Skitty and more him faking outrage/confusion as a means to appear town.
I'm still evaluating them, but I wouldn't call them derpy.
In post 1222, Skitty wrote:
I expected scum reaction to be to try and work with me initially but I'd wager that automatic assumption of gambiting looks pretty damning
You wager? You don't sound very convinced, and it looks like you're waiting to see on which side Nacho will come down on.
In post 1224, Skitty wrote:Also, GGG is scum for that early vote and Bulba is scum for the weak defense of me against GGG
Our flavor is Pacman. That being said, we're going to be jumping on the main wagon from here on out.
Course, I might have some witty banter for you all. One doesn't just get in this awesome playerlist and lurk the entire time. Pretty much all I'm going to do though.
Hi! You should probably die, then.
VOTE: Skitty
Wheee, I finally paid attention and posted in a game without getting replaced.
This is scum too, especially since he wants to vote a survivor claim (of which there is no point) and keep the anti-town role alive.
In post 84, ArcAngel9 wrote:Wisdom - I don't believe that survivor claim. Seems fake!!!!!!
Skitty - Do you have any night actions?
Scum, rolefishing. Also makes me think Goat is lying about his whole "oh I have no abilities" thing.
Again, no mention of Goat, so I don't see how you're leaping to this conclusion. It looks like you just quoted random posts and then said something hoping nobody would read too closely.
In post 1281, GGG wrote:From the sounds of the meta read there is something that t woh, skitty, and the other hydra dont want to disclose in the thread. This is fine. However Goat has access to a way to evaluate this info without it being disclosed. If everyone isnt stupid there is a good town reason for keeping it hidden I am not going to keep my vote on skitty demanding disclosure.
So if goat, who i am townreading, assesses the info and decides it is good enough for him to unvote, i will unvote. If it gets disclosed in the thread then i will evaluate it for myself.
That's a lot of words to say so little.
In post 1282, Winter Skies wrote:Nah. Not feeling the GGG lynch right now. I think his reactions towards the whole Skitty lynch looks the most genuine and he actually seemed interested in scumhunting the Survivor claim, not just policy lynching it. Also, if he thought Goat was being sincere about the neighborhood and the Notty-hydra being sketchy, I can see him wanting to sheep Goat. It's hard for me to see him proxying a vote to Goat when he's been advocating a Skitty lynch for a large portion of the day and even looked at the other people on the wagon he was advocating. 932 and 935 looks like he thought he found something scummy and wanted to make note of it.
This is the scummiest post ever made in the history of Mafiascum. Please lynch this one without second that. He is so flipping scum!!!!
Explain.
In post 1398, ArcAngel9 wrote:
Bulba is scum, All his tunneling instead of scum hunting, and pretending like he is defending skitty is the scummiest thing I have ever seen from him
Where and who have I been tunneling? Where have I defended Skitty?
In post 1425, GGG wrote:Arc how is your naked reads list any different than the post you call the scummiest ever?
they are not plain. i have read every single post and conclude them. Just because they aren't any substantive statements doesn't mean they are don't contain value and more over i have already stated my cases for my scum reads. And Town are reads simple conclusion based on interactions.
For trying to get me off her back after I voiced suspicion of her Skitty vote, but then decided that I was probably way off base with all my Skitty-vote suspicions. Her appeasement at that point was out of place and not necessary. AA9 scum wouldn't have cared or responded to me in that manner. Her following reaction to UT was also bad and was meant to make her look town without putting in much effort ("UT, why would you claim something like that?"). It's a fake question and wholly unnecessary, kinda like your response to the Skitty survivor claim. She's also been fake scumhunting and diverting attention away from her with either OMGUS or AtE. True, I normally don't expect much from AA9, but I expect more than the BS reasoning she's been providing. In fact, as I've pointed out several times, her reasoning is blatantly false, which anyone would see if they would actually read her posts. When a player is making things up out of thin air (And I mean seriously making things up, as in the basis of the accusations don't appear anywhere in the posts she's quoting or responding to.), than that player is definitely not playing towards a town wincon.
there is something you must know about me and this is also for the players who never played with me.
Scum always always and always want to get rid of me early(mostly through mis-lynch) because when I am town, I am more transparent player that one could ever be and some experience players already know this through meta and they all can sort my alignment just skimming through few posts (Nacho is an expert reading me). This is my greatest strength but also my week point at the same time because if those same old players are aligned to mafia they will use it against me. And which is exactly what currently happening today, Bulba scum read on me proves it. because we had typical past and he hates seeing me being universal town read for all the time. So after looking at his & TD reads on me, I am very positive that they are scum together. They just want to twist around and pull a mislynch on me. Will of Heavern are the only hydra who had noticed this twisting attitude of Bubla which is exactly why i read them as town.
And TD scum read have no real case, All he said that my reactions in game are fake especially my interactions with Bulba. that was it. And please ISO TD posts against mine. And honestly ask yourself if TD is being logical or idiotical. You will know the answer.
Anyone who is falling for this AtE should feel ashamed of themselves. AA9 is discrediting the entire push against her, instead of actually responding to or actually trying to understand the arguments. There is no town motivation in this whatsoever. Yes, I know that AA9 has a tendency to OMGUS and AtE, but she also actually responds to her detractors and is more accurate with her accusations. This is not AA9-town at all, and you guys need to realize that.
Also, given the large defense of Skitty and resistance to their lynch coming from my major scum reads, I'm thinking that they're probably a scum PR of some sort.
On to page 60.
Bulbazak is so town that everytime someone votes him Mastin coughs blood.
You can happily leave this task to me. I always catch scum bulba. and He is scum!!
You do know that you were simply a no information kill in that sole game you've played with scum me, right?
In post 1482, ArcAngel9 wrote:
He literally went after every single person who voted skitty for survival claim. There is nothing wrong in lynching survivors at any point of game which is much better than lynching a townie on day1 and moreover lynching anyone who claims as survivor on day1 will avoid scum using such claims as gambit. And Skitty didn't needed bulba defence, they had hardly three votes in their wagon. 3 votes is basically nothing in a large game and they were not anywhere close to get lynched.
I've explained this already. I believed that scum would be trying to hide on PL wagons, and it would be easier to spot scum jumping on the Skitty wagon than the UT wagon, since there was a large town motivation to lynch UT, but not Skitty. I gave up on this theory when you joined the wagon. Funny enough, you quote my responses out of order in an attempt to make it look like I was being inconsistent, rather than realizing the error of the theory.
In post 1482, ArcAngel9 wrote:
And another important thing to notice was that in his post #48, he was supporting policy lynch and later he defended skitty saying that it was a policy lynch. this indeed a double mind play and only scum plays in this manner.
Actually, I said that the PL lynch on Skitty was "the worst one", indicating that I thought there was a better PL: UT.
You I'm just going to forget it being a scum claim and look at that wagon later. There's definitely scum jumping on the survivor claim.
Chill Bluba, Why are you being so defensive about votes on Scum claim. Its just 4 votes.. You should remember that it require 13 for a lynch.
Placation. She wants me off her back, even though I'm not scumreading her at this point.
In post 71, ArcAngel9 wrote:
And this whole UT cult thingy.. UT, Why are you doing this so early.
This is fake and is meant to look like she's town asking questions. However, notice how the tone doesn't feel natural.
P-edit: GGG, why aren't you voting Major then?
@Major: Not really.
This is another ridiculously scummy post from him. I had same reaction of everyone else in game for UT claim. How could he say my opinion is fake and it has come from a scum mind? I never felt like I was in pressure by him to be out of my back. Here he made statements that don't exist. How does he know what is my tone? My natural play is asking questions, I always does and he know this already yet he twisted my post to make it look like it is coming from scum mind. He have no knowledge of me being scum and there is no way he could scum read just because I voted skitty for their claim.
It's funny that you said you had the same reaction to UT when you clearly didn't. The reaction to UT was either asking a dayvig to take care of him, voting him, or refusing to vote him in fear that he was a jester. You, however, enter the game and say "UT, why do you do this so early?" which is a nonsensical and useless question that you could not have possibly hoped for UT to answer. You want to know how I can know your tone? Simple. It comes down to how you ask your question. Your question was meant to be seen, not answered, which means it was for appearances only. That's why it read so fake. And don't pull that BS about me having no knowledge of you as scum. You know better.
In post 137, Bulbazak wrote:Also, I'm not going to let AA9-scum skate by just because she's overdefensive as town. Her response was all wrong, Wisdom.
This post tells that he is using my meta against me to support his scum read on me. this is exactly what I said in my post earlier. the players who know how to read me through my strengths will use it against me. And bulba did the same!!!!!!
Actually, I'm saying the exact opposite and telling Wisdom that his meta read is BS.
In post 211, Bulbazak wrote:If I had to choose between which 2 survivor claims I believe, it'd be Major.
He defended skitty when they claimed survior and now he is okay lynching major but not skitty. How is major survivor claim is any different to skitty.
Actually I'm saying the opposite: That if only 1 survivor claim was accurate, I'd believe Major's over Skitty's.
You're really bad at misrepping my posts. Do you want to try again?
In post 1482, ArcAngel9 wrote:
Also see the post #329, post # 936
He repeatedly said same things over and over again. My reactions and posts are just my response and they are no different how i do things when i am town. Instead giving me benefit of doubt, he read me as scum like he knew i am scum which is not possible unless he have access to my role pm. This is another solid reason to see that he is scum and his objective was to get rid of me.
In post 1491, dramonic wrote:You don't have proof. You have opinions, perceptions, meta, gut reads perhaps, but you don't have proof.
I thought you might actually be onto something even though your ISO looks like the pilot of a cheap sitcom, but you're just talking out of your ass some more aren't you?
He would also make a very good policy lynch regardless
So, I think it is better for all if we lynch him
I mean,
He's scum
Even if he isn't
That's okay
This is horrible reasoning.
In post 1564, dramonic wrote:He doesn't work for the town, he's someone the scum doesn't need to kill.
It's a guy with the passive ability "you do not count against the mafia's win condition"
He has a detrimental role, and the only guy we know for sure is not gonna flip town.
He also has the passive ability of "you do not count against the town's win condition". Just saying.
In post 93, Bulbazak wrote:The way AA9 talked to me is not coming from a town place. She tried to placate me and then went with a fake question to UT to make it look like she was town scumhunting. Nothing about that exchange was natural and coming from a town mindset.
In post 78, GGG wrote:
So if we choose not to lynch a claimed survivor who has committed to vote the largest wagon. We get to Lylo and the survivor votes the towniest person so the remaining scum jump on to win. How is this not be the outcome? And if this is the outcome how is it not better for us to lynch now.
Again, this is voting for policy reasons. If Skitty is a survivor, then her only goal is to stay alive, which means it doesn't matter who she votes.
Personally, since survivors share the wincon, I have no problem with that and would instead make sure that she votes in our favor.
If you think she's scum for the claim, then that's one thing. However, if you are trying to lynch her because she's a survivor, which it sounds like you are, then that is very scummy, since you are focusing on a useless wagon over a useful wagon on an anti-town role, or in lieu of actual scumhunting.
P-edit: @Major: I don't see the contradiction between the two roles.
I like arc angels bulba case. In addition to her case I went back and Iso'd and didn't like this, how will he ever make someone vote for him.
Solid scumposting based on BS reasoning and nitpicking. Might still be scum with AA9, but this does make me doubt my read a little.
I also realized I was confusing Skitty posting with AA9. They're both bad and filled with BS, though.
In post 1582, Johou Tougou Shinen-Tai wrote:
what are your thoughts on 1520? Kagami thinks his focus on TD feels extremely narrow; he claims the wagon on TD makes no sense, but doesn't put up a complaint with any of the people on the wagon or divine a sensible explanation for it. I don't like it for basically the same reason, and also bc the logic behind it ~again~ isn't very good - it's entirely bc of TD doing things that match one town game, with no attempt to divine motivation for any of it. on top of that there's absolutely no interest in all the meta stuff everyone else is bringing up that points to TD being scum.
I don't see how you're attacking Bro for lack of logic and narrow focus in a post that simply asks Sonic to explain his TD case more. It feels like you're really stretching to justify your Bro push.
In post 1491, dramonic wrote:You don't have proof. You have opinions, perceptions, meta, gut reads perhaps, but you don't have proof.
I thought you might actually be onto something even though your ISO looks like the pilot of a cheap sitcom, but
you're just talking out of your ass some more aren't you?
In post 1395, TiphaineDeath wrote:@adorkable. The spam posting is terrible, the vote on me is terrible, and our original interaction was terrible, though to be fair I was only reading him as scum for the middle bit originally.
@Mentalsomnic, you sir, may take your “lack of reason” and shove it up your ass. I think the claim is fake, I think skitties posting since then has been fake, I’m not buying this reaction test BS. This is a caught scum trying to backpeddle, hard, and it needs lynched.
@Everyone, I'd have loved to see an arc angel lynch, but no one but me can see that, and I see the way the wind is turning. Johou threatened his scary fakedayvig, ya'll got cold feet, and now nachodisdumb has provided an alternative wagon for you to sheep on. Congratu-fuckin-lations. I'm going to eat this "bullet" now so that you idiots can get back to lynching actual scum if you're capable of remembering that's what skitty is.
VOTE: skitty
In post 1474, TiphaineDeath wrote:So, just for reference, when skitty flips scum we are speedlynching johou for that BS fake dayvig, right?
^ i don't like any of these posts. (bolded mine)
What don't you like?
In post 1591, shos wrote:just by reading page 60:
1. AA9 is town. no fucking way scum would invest so much power in such a short time in order to do what she did there, IMO. even me.
2. dramopnic is scum and he's with bulba. see how he keeps saying 'you ahve no proof'? proof is a word that means FACT. if I don't have the proof, then it is still a fact, but I just cannot prove it. as in, "pythagoras was right" "prove itf" against "pythagoras was wrong" "convince me".
Still scum. I don't like how he's stretching on the Dramonic point. It's like he senses that the tide is turning against Dram, and he wants to start laying the foundation to jump on him later.
I was hoping to finish catching up before I went to bed, but it looks like I'll have to leave the rest until I'm back on Monday. There will probably be over 100 pages by then...
On to page 65.
Bulbazak is so town that everytime someone votes him Mastin coughs blood.
Location: Thataway, Thataway, Betwixt the Presidents
Post
Post #2346 (isolation #32) » Mon Dec 22, 2014 1:00 pm
Postby Bulbazak »
In post 1649, ArcAngel9 wrote:I am very positive bulba is scum and i want to drag his ass into this discussion so that others could see but i don't see him fighting at all which again one of his scum tactics.
Actually, I'm not afraid to get into fights as scum, which you saw in Maniacal when I took on Nero.
In post 1700, The Will of Heaven wrote:on the other hand, bulba's townread is completely unexplained and looks like a wk.
Tiph looks a lot like the town Tiph I saw in Imaginary Fights.
I'm gut reading Esp as scum.
In post 1866, shos wrote:Say what hapened to the skitty wagon.
did it die out of lurkage or people lost interest or did we decide to keep him alive for some reason?
I thought you weren't scum reading Skitty?
In post 1868, ooba wrote:
Skitty - Nothing's really shaken my town read on this slot from the start
In post 1955, Winter Skies wrote:
Kise: Don't worry, I'm just trying to bully om / metal sonic into giving me reasons that I can look at for why they think what they do.
I don't
actually
hate their playstyle. I just really want to have something tangible to look at. I love everyone in this game! Not equally, but still.
That being said, Ray's posting is making me feel better about that hydra.
I'm going to eat and do some other stuff. I plan on getting back to this later tonight.
On to page 80.
Bulbazak is so town that everytime someone votes him Mastin coughs blood.
Sonic, Wisdom is hard headed and tunnely. Him not listening to you about someone he's tunneling on is not a scum tell.
In post 2082, shos wrote:Grand OMGUS post bulba. any reason with that or just because I'm calling you scum with dram? also what tides are against dram, if you allow me to ask?
Dram was getting a lot of suspicion when you posted that. I saw a scum Shos taking advantage of the opportunity that the game flow was presenting him. And it's also not an OMGUS post, because I've been suspecting you for awhile, and you opportunistically positioning yourself is not something I'm going to let slide.
I don't get it. You did not like my vote on Skitty, and did not like AA9's vote on skitty, and therefore you pushed it; I ignored you entirely, and she tried to get you off her back and decided you're 'off the base' (which I agree with), so that makes AA9 and me scum? Also, how does that align with the last sentences of your post, where you DO think Skitty is scum PR or something?
I think Skitty might be a scum PR due to so many of my scumreads protecting them. Also, didn't you call AA9 scummy for her Skitty vote as well? I did forget that you voted Skitty though...
In post 1462, Bulbazak wrote:I'm not quite on board with that. I'd need to see the Skitty-neighbor flip first.
Why was seeing a Skitty-neighbor flip necessary to call Goat town until Goat flavorclaimed?
I was thinking that Skitty was scum due to the neighbor claim, because I didn't believe that Survivor Neighbor was real. When Goat claimed neighbors with Skitty, my first thought was scum. It was his reaction to Skitty, not the claim, that changed my mind and made him a strong townread.
In post 2121, GGG wrote:
Bulba - despite reading arc as scummy her bulba case in still good. I don't consider associative tells in day one before we no more about he set up.
AA9's case was BS, and I had already posted my response to it by this point. This is scumposting.
On to page 86.
Bulbazak is so town that everytime someone votes him Mastin coughs blood.
In post 109, Bulbazak wrote:This is fake and is meant to look like she's town asking questions. However, notice how the tone doesn't feel natural.
He calls her out for a fake sounding tone, which really isn't a case based on much, and yet it dominates a larger majority of the case on her than it should: this is especially strange when Bulbazak in general is a very logical entity (which explains why he does as well as he does as scum, he's free to pick apart cases where he sees fit and has the know-how to put the passion behind them) and doesn't generally build his focus around tone sounding fake.
This is false. I base a lot of my reads on how a player sounds and feels.
In post 211, Bulbazak wrote:If I had to choose between which 2 survivor claims I believe, it'd be Major.
I think this reaction to the survivor counterclaim is weird as shit and generally unnatural. There were some people (ooba) who believed both claims because MM obviously wasn't lying and they didn't think Skitty looked bad. This is fine, this is a reaction that makes sense. There are some people who developed scum, not-survivor reads on Skitty based on the counterclaim. This is also fine, also a reaction that made sense. There are still more people who didn't give a shit and thought both should die either way. Still fine, still making sense. This reaction from Bulbazak holds him in a place where he goes "oh I believe both survivor claims but if I didn't believe one it would be Skitty" which shows that he's not actually updating reads based on new information: it reads like he knew that Skitty wasn't scum because they weren't on his scumteam but also saw that the chance for wagonning them might have come up later so he's laying foundation for a scumread there.
I actually don't see the problem with this. This was in response to Sonic, and I made it known that while I believed both claims, the Major one was the most believable of the two.
In post 329, Bulbazak wrote:It was because I felt that scum would be jumping on Skitty for the Survivor claim, sensing an easy lynch opportunity. I became less gung-ho about it after more people kept piling on, and it was apparent that they weren't all scum
This is Bulba stating that he actually believed that only scum would attack Skitty, which makes absolutely no sense whatsoever and more a sign of him bucking against what was a larger anti-Survivor sentiment than he initially predicted there would be.
Yes, the large anti-Survivor sentiment surprised me. It's one of a few third party roles that hurts no one, so the hate for it doesn't make sense to me. As such, I thought it would be the perfect place for scum to hide.
In post 936, Bulbazak wrote:This is a scummy push and pretty effortless. AA9 spreads suspicion while taking no effort to check if my absence is exclusive to this game, and thus, alignment indicative.
This point states that AA is scum because she didn't check his onsite activity before accusing him of lurking...?
This is a bad point.
How is this a bad point? AA9 used lurking as a reason for me being scum. This coming in a game that has a tendency to pack on 20 pages overnight and in which I've fallen consistently behind. I also have a tendency to disappear during the weekends, hence the new addition to my sig. Beyond all of that, if she seriously thought I was avoiding this game, then looking into my activity should have been her first priority. Instead, she focuses on a weak point, my absence, as a reason to push me, which is scummy as heck Nacho.
In post 2069, Bulbazak wrote:For trying to get me off her back after I voiced suspicion of her Skitty vote, but then decided that I was probably way off base with all my Skitty-vote suspicions. Her appeasement at that point was out of place and not necessary. AA9 scum wouldn't have cared or responded to me in that manner. Her following reaction to UT was also bad and was meant to make her look town without putting in much effort ("UT, why would you claim something like that?"). It's a fake question and wholly unnecessary, kinda like your response to the Skitty survivor claim.
This is a case created on page, what, 7? Being carried out to Post #2000. >.>
What part of being behind don't you get? From my perspective catching up, AA9 has posted infrequently, hence the points from page 7 hold just as much weight.
In post 2069, Bulbazak wrote:She's also been fake scumhunting and diverting attention away from her with either OMGUS or AtE. True, I normally don't expect much from AA9, but I expect more than the BS reasoning she's been providing. In fact, as I've pointed out several times, her reasoning is blatantly false, which anyone would see if they would actually read her posts. When a player is making things up out of thin air (And I mean seriously making things up, as in the basis of the accusations don't appear anywhere in the posts she's quoting or responding to.), than that player is definitely not playing towards a town wincon.
OMGUS + AtE is that whole overdefensive bit that Bulb showed he was aware of before, and yet he continues to attack it. He hasn't shown anywhere where her reasoning is false, but saying "oh her reasoning is false and I have demonstrated as much several times" sure does sound great!, and he hasn't shown where AA has been making anything up at all.
I got her confused with Skitty, something I didn't realize until after I posted that. They both made similar attacks featuring posts that didn't say what they said they did and accusing me of things that I never did. Subconsciously I mixed the two up.
In post 2069, Bulbazak wrote:Anyone who is falling for this AtE should feel ashamed of themselves.
This is manipulative as hell: he's trying to say that anyone not scumreading AA for the playstyle we are ALL FAMILIAR WITH should feel stupid aka trying to add legitimacy to his push by saying anyone who disagrees with it just doesn't understand it. This also doesn't make sense from a town-Bulbazak because I have never ever seen him post something as arrogant as this.
Then you haven't been playing in the right games, because Mastin has accused me of it before.
In post 2069, Bulbazak wrote:Yes, I know that AA9 has a tendency to OMGUS and AtE, but she also actually responds to her detractors and is more accurate with her accusations.
This is 1) a bad attempt as misrepping her meta, and 2) a point that is completely wrong.
What the hell is AA doing but responding to him after her giant case wall against him? He's almost pretending that she's been ignoring him completely and that is blatantly false.
From my perspective she wasn't. I'm seeing her being a lot more active as I get closer to the end.
In post 2075, Bulbazak wrote:I've explained this already. I believed that scum would be trying to hide on PL wagons, and it would be easier to spot scum jumping on the Skitty wagon than the UT wagon, since there was a large town motivation to lynch UT, but not Skitty.
I gave up on this theory when you joined the wagon.
Re: the bolded: since when? I have a quote from you in this very wall of you saying you gave up the theory because too many people jumped on Skitty for them to be all scum.
That's exactly what I'm saying. I made that post you're referring to right after AA9 jumped on the Skitty wagon.
In post 2075, Bulbazak wrote:Solid scumposting based on BS reasoning and nitpicking. Might still be scum with AA9, but this does make me doubt my read a little.
This reads like horrible progression: Bulbazak has built his entire game around AA9-scum, but then he starts to doubt AA9-scum because GGG says that he likes her case? No, this is Bulbazak realizing that he's getting a lot of deserved shit for a bad AA9 case and then trying to back off as a result.
GGG-scum > AA9-scum. So when GGG starts piggybacking on AA9's reasoning, alarms go off in my head and I start thinking buddying, which makes me doubt my AA9 read. This is the most natural progression imaginable, Nacho, and I'm surprised you didn't see it.
In post 2131, The Will of Heaven wrote:I think he's putting extra emphasis on things like "gut reads" that he wouldn't normally because it's easy to say despite being obvious case padding.
I've been relying on gut reads more and more, especially in d1. I'm pretty sure you've been in games with me since I started doing this.
In post 2131, The Will of Heaven wrote:
2) He's been pushing the same reasoning for her being scum than he hasn't added significant content since PAGE FOUR. For proof of this, his case on Page 4 is here and the updated case here. You'll notice the new reasons he added were "fake scumhunting" (no specifics), and she "made things up" (no specifics). He says he's demonstrated where she's been making stuff up, but if you ISO him yourself, you'll notice all he's done nothing of the sort at all.
I've addressed all this already, but I want to remind you that my perspective catching up on the game is very different from your perspective in the game's present.
In post 2131, The Will of Heaven wrote:
3) Again, this is the centerpiece of his play this game. This is the only significant contribution he's made in all his posts since the beginning of the game. If Bulbazak was town, I'd expect he would believe very, very strongly in his case, especially considering natural tunneling tendencies. He begins to doubt his case in 2075 because GGG agrees with AA9's case, which to me tells me he didn't have any sort of confidence in his case to begin with. This doesn't mesh with in-game posting, but it does mesh with scum-Bulbazak becoming increasingly uncomfortable pushing an obviously town AA9.
I do have natural tunneling tendencies, but I've also recognized that such tendencies are a weakness. I still break into them now and then, but I try not to.
In post 2131, The Will of Heaven wrote:
The flaw with the second one is that his entire argument for why AA9 started interacting with UT in the first place is to placate him? Thus it makes no sense for him to give up on said theory just because AA joined the UT wagon.
AA9 didn't join the UT wagon. She joined the Skitty wagon, which was why I gave up my theory that only scum were jumping on Skitty. And I didn't say that AA9 interacting with UT was to placate me. I said that her telling me to "chill" when I showed no suspicion of her and instead said that I was rethinking my stance on those who were jumping on Skitty after she joined the wagon was an attempt to placate me.
In post 2152, The Will of Heaven wrote:It is scummy when you center your game around majority consensus and your reasons for doing so make absolutely no sense.
Besides UT and Skitty, show me where I've done this.
In post 2193, Johou Tougou Shinen-Tai wrote:
the last line in the first (dramonic) post was a type of cheeky taunt that I hardly ever actually see town do. it's a lot more typical of scum who are looking for an easy way to make someone look worse than them
I do this all the time as town. Heck, I've done so in this very game. This is a bad point.
In post 2197, Johou Tougou Shinen-Tai wrote:you could probably have done some kind of analysis on the Skitty wagon now that he's basically as conftown as an IC
In post 2279, ArcAngel9 wrote: His ISO is just full of me.. only me. He just want me to get lynched.
Which is why my vote is on Skitty, obviously.
Also, I don't think you've responded at all to my responses to your case.
In post 2286, TiphaineDeath wrote:Metal Sonic is being flaily and wagon jumpy, and derpsih, can't tell if this is scum or town though, feels desperate to lynch someone, but might just be a combination of boredom and hydra dissonance, hard to read :/.
You just described town Sonic to a T.
On to page 93.
Bulbazak is so town that everytime someone votes him Mastin coughs blood.
TD is #2 in my scum list but i am against his lynch today (Only he has power to change my mid, if he pisses me off more.. I will not mind lynching him today).
But my biggest concern for the day is Bulba. He is happily lurking and om & metal have become his official attorney's.
Yes I am Bulba official attorney
I can't believe you can't see what I'm seeing
I am seeing bulba town role pm
How do you have access to bulba role pm? Tell me how!!!
He hacked my account. How was I to know that he'd figure out my password was Sonic? (If anyone seriously tries to get into my account with that password I'll lol.)
In post 2394, Johou Tougou Shinen-Tai wrote:>Nacho pushes Bulba for a bad AA9 scumread
>Bulba proceeds to immediately declare AA9 town
>while continuing to push AA9's case was BS
You seem to be ignoring the fact that I've been behind and couldn't logically see Nacho's case. Why is that?
Is your read on bulba a read in which you could be wrong or a result of a role? A fake day cop is a pretty arrogant play.
Stop rolefishing.
GGG also continues to post only about lurkers. Besides policy stuff, his only significant posting has been echoing others. Why is anyone thinking this is town?
Esp is scum for the bloc voting. He's not actually developing his own scumreads, but is instead hiding behind the reads of others. He did the same in the recent Lucid Dreamers marathon game by sheeping Mew (Lynch the heretic who betrayed the Cult of Mew!).
I had another point, but I've forgotten it. Anyway, the Skitty wagon needs more votes. I don't buy the town claim at all, and I expect much much more from town NS.
Bulbazak is so town that everytime someone votes him Mastin coughs blood.
you keep calling AA9 out for ignoring you, but you're not interested in the fact I ignored your callout from earlier?
I actually went through a lot, so I can't remember what I called you out on. However, if you are aware that you ignored my callout, why don't you answer it? Please include quotes for context.
In post 2454, Johou Tougou Shinen-Tai wrote:
also you've been poking at me for a while now, but haven't put me on your scum list nor did you seem suspicious of me in the slightest in said list. why is that?
I'm not sure how to read you. I want to get a day or two under my belt before taking a serious look at your slot.
In post 2454, Johou Tougou Shinen-Tai wrote:
I think you're trying to go with the flow here, considering the 3 people you put instead of me are for the most part reads a lot of ppl would agree on (Skitty, GGG, Esp)
Well, if a lot of people are agreeing on those reads, why are we having such a hard time getting them lynched? Heck, I thought my Esp read might be a little controversial, seeing as how people are townreading him for no good reason. For everyone supposedly calling Skitty and GGG scum, wagons on both have stalled.
Bulbazak is so town that everytime someone votes him Mastin coughs blood.
In post 2455, Bulbazak wrote:I actually went through a lot, so I can't remember what I called you out on. However, if you are aware that you ignored my callout, why don't you answer it? Please include quotes for context.
if you can't even remember what you called me out on, I'm not going to bring it back up for you .-.
however, I did answer it in my most recent post to Tammy
Okay. It must not have been that important.
In post 2457, Johou Tougou Shinen-Tai wrote:
are you seriously going to deny that a lot of people think Skitty and GGG are scum? those are probably 2 of the most agreeable reads in the game right now. how hard it is to get someone lynched has nothing to do with this (and if you want to talk votes, iirc Skitty and GGG both are major wagons? I at least remember Skitty was. so I don't know what you're going on about here), and I think you should be aware of that.
No, but I'm also pointing out the resistance to show you that those reads are not as easy to jump on from a "go with the flow" type perspective. There are much better reads that I could jump on if I was scum trying to skate by, TD being one of them. Skitty has just as many people townreading them than scumreading them, and the wagon only just recently started taking off again, and I predict that it's going to stall just as heavily due to the opposition. GGG is another read that everyone seems to agree with, but no one wants to push. Your point seems to be that I'm scum because I agree that both of these players are scum and that I'm going with the flow. I would like to point out that I think that they're scum separate from concensus, that I was one of the first ones on GGG, that I stayed on Skitty when people started jumping off that wagon, and that I think that the fact that both wagons keep stalling is alignment indicative. Just because a read is common does not mean that it's wrong.
Bulbazak is so town that everytime someone votes him Mastin coughs blood.
Location: Thataway, Thataway, Betwixt the Presidents
Post
Post #2477 (isolation #42) » Tue Dec 23, 2014 12:09 pm
Postby Bulbazak »
Yes. MS is that good. I think he went overboard at times, but I do think that his insistence shows town motivation, and you guys really should have listened to him.
Bulbazak is so town that everytime someone votes him Mastin coughs blood.
Location: Thataway, Thataway, Betwixt the Presidents
Post
Post #2480 (isolation #43) » Tue Dec 23, 2014 12:15 pm
Postby Bulbazak »
I just got done playing Mastin's Unbalanced Bastard Mini, and Sonic showed very little interest in finding scum or posting much in general. I compare that to the Marvel large where he was just as manic as he is here and very vocal about his reads. I know that he can town read me very fast, and that when he does, he will not let it go.
Bulbazak is so town that everytime someone votes him Mastin coughs blood.
In post 2480, Bulbazak wrote:I just got done playing Mastin's Unbalanced Bastard Mini, and Sonic showed very little interest in finding scum or posting much in general. I compare that to the Marvel large where he was just as manic as he is here and very vocal about his reads. I know that he can town read me very fast, and that when he does, he will not let it go.
okay well i say go look at organic chemistry where metal spammed the shit out of that game! what do you think about that?
Well, I did get paranoid of him there and called him scum, so...
In post 2523, The Will of Heaven wrote:
So get on bulba: scummy, hard to read, different people have expressed different opinions on him with some of them extreme and therefore decent information lynch.
You know what, I'm getting sick and tired of this crap, so this is your one and only reach out. Nacho, Wisdom, get the crap off of me, listen to Sonic, and start learning to read between the freaking lines. This wagon is crap, and you should feel bad. Is it not making either of you paranoid that it's building so fast where every other wagon has stalled? Get your heads on straight, realize that this wagon is scum driven, and get off! If I end up dying in the first day phase of this game, I will make sure neither of you ever live this down and will force you to sheep me for the rest of eternity. Do I make myself clear?
In post 2612, Johou Tougou Shinen-Tai wrote:
it's funny, cos he didn't put AA9 as scum or mention her at all in his most recent reads list (the one I called him out on)
What reads list?
In post 2613, Johou Tougou Shinen-Tai wrote:
1. why is it alignment indicative that these specific wagons are stalling? none of the wagons in this game save the Skitty one from before have got past like 5 votes. you're also townreading TD, whose wagon stalled in a similar way.
From a game flow perspective, the Skitty wagon hit a wall and then started reversing. TD was under a lot more scrutiny for a lot longer, but that was disbanded in a fairly organic manner (mostly to do with the Sonic/TWOH fight and the subsequent move back to Skitty followed quickly by the counter wagon on me.). Compare that with my wagon, which is building quickly. The typical mode of thought is that wagons that are hard to build tend to be on scum and that fast moving wagons tend to be on town. While I don't always agree with that, I have started to see the validity, and it does freak me out if a wagon starts building really fast or if one fails to gain momentum despite many people being suspicious of that player. It's not the strongest bits of evidence, but combined with other info, I think they're more than adequate.
In post 2613, Johou Tougou Shinen-Tai wrote:
I also want to fact check that bit about GGG because afaik you were pushing AA9 over him, and then sometime later said they weren't scum together and thus that GGG was more likely. this (iirc, correct me if I'm wrong) came *after* a lot of people expressed suspicion of GGG and when it looked like you sure as hell believed AA9 was scum.
I wouldn't know, as I was in a different part of the game at that point. It does concern me that you keep glossing over that fact.
In post 2613, Johou Tougou Shinen-Tai wrote:
3. what the hell happened to your AA9 push from before? I would expect you would at least mention her in your reads list, given you still seem to be pushing her as suspicious independently of GGG. I think it looks like you're scared to actually follow through on the AA9 push.
After my concern with GGG buddying up to her, I took a step back when reading her posts. I really liked her back and forth with Sonic, as well as her yelling at everyone voting TWOH. Both were extremely town, so she's moved up to a townread.
Bulbazak is so town that everytime someone votes him Mastin coughs blood.
In post 2630, Bulbazak wrote:From a game flow perspective, the Skitty wagon hit a wall and then started reversing.
if you're town, I really wish you would give up on this. you're on the wrong track here and you're not reading in between the lines enough. it's pretty embarrassing that you're telling everyone to read in between the lines re: you, but haven't done so yourself.
I'm seeing a lot more scum motivation behind what NS is doing, and while I don't know what you're talking about, I do know that I don't trust you. Until I see something that even looks remotely town, my vote is staying.
this is also incredibly inconsistent. you just said earlier that:
In post 2435, Bulbazak wrote:Esp is scum for the bloc voting. He's not actually developing his own scumreads, but is instead hiding behind the reads of others. He did the same in the recent Lucid Dreamers marathon game by sheeping Mew (Lynch the heretic who betrayed the Cult of Mew!).
Esp was not developing his own reads but hiding behind the reads of others, and I'm pretty sure the BRO read was one of the reads you were referring to here.
Esp votes and pushes Bro. The wagon starts to pick up. While you may have started the Bro wagon, Esp is the driving force behind it, and that point is not inconsistent with what I said in the above post, since he's hiding behind your reasoning while doing so.
Bulbazak is so town that everytime someone votes him Mastin coughs blood.
Location: Thataway, Thataway, Betwixt the Presidents
Post
Post #2648 (isolation #49) » Wed Dec 24, 2014 7:03 pm
Postby Bulbazak »
Esp took a big freaking spotlight and shone it on Bro. You want to think the attention was because of you. I get that. But the fact of the matter was that it was not. Esp started getting attention. Esp jumped on Bro using your reasoning and posted like mad about it. All of a sudden, we're getting a lot of "That's a good Bro case.". If you can't see that, then I don't know what to say to you.
Bulbazak is so town that everytime someone votes him Mastin coughs blood.
Location: Thataway, Thataway, Betwixt the Presidents
Post
Post #2660 (isolation #50) » Wed Dec 24, 2014 8:24 pm
Postby Bulbazak »
Okay, I went back over the game from Esp's hiding behind your reasoning on, and I'm seeing what you're saying. I swore that there was a lot more heat on Bro, but that might have been because Mollie/Tammy were going over the Bro case at that point in time, making me think that the tide was turning in that direction.
All paranoia aside, you do know that Esp is still the scum on that wagon, right?
Bulbazak is so town that everytime someone votes him Mastin coughs blood.
Location: Thataway, Thataway, Betwixt the Presidents
Post
Post #2913 (isolation #51) » Mon Dec 29, 2014 8:28 am
Postby Bulbazak »
In post 2661, Johou Tougou Shinen-Tai wrote:
now that you realized there wasn't *actually* that much heat on BRO, what do you make of BRO attempting to sheep your point on this?
I can actually see town Bro seeing what I saw and then not reevaluating it.
Because I currently see no upside.
I don't believe they aren't survivor at this point so we get no chance of scum flip.
They have no interactions meaning we get no information either.
In post 2433, Bulbazak wrote:This is false. I base a lot of my reads on how a player sounds and feels.
Hilariously Unbalanced Mafia: you stopped using the sounds and feels crap after the RVS vote was over. Your correct push on VoidedMafia was based on flaws in his reasoning, your correct push on Sonic/Titus was based on their crazy coasting, and your push on EddieFenix was based on him defending scum as soon as they got to be L-1. This is a more typical game for you: the current game you've been trying to play here is a bunch of feels far past the point where pushing on people because "feels" is acceptable.
You must have been reading a different game, Nacho, because you didn't get any of that right. Voided was a town cop, and I didn't figure out he was town until near the end of d1, and that was solely based on how he was posting, i.e. "feels". I figured out Sonic was scum due to his posts not "feeling" like town Sonic, and how he was coasting. I backed off once he claimed cop, which I feel badly about. You are technically correct on Eddie, but you also glaze over the fact that I know his personal habits, so there was some gut involved in that read, and I backed off once I saw evidence of Eddie as a cop and his town paranoia shining through. You're also glazing over the ProHawk town read I carried through that game, which I hardly explained at all (It was based on a misread mason tell, but I still got ProHawk town right before anyone else.). All that being said, you're ignoring that I've given other reasons for a lot of my pushes in this game beyond "feels", and that's what I've been focusing on. To chalk everything to a gut read, and then call me scum for it, is a strawman argument, and that doesn't sit well with me coming from you.
In post 2433, Bulbazak wrote:I actually don't see the problem with this. This was in response to Sonic, and I made it known that while I believed both claims, the Major one was the most believable of the two.
Here's the post:
In post 210, mental somnic wrote:yea but i s2g
i read her posts
and she sounds sneaky
its all like "we have daycop to do the job"
and it just sounds super duper bullshit to me
idk man
also im probably gonna have to collab with ms when he finally gets on skype or smth to go over the role claims and shit but my opinion on skitty is that skitty can be dealt with another day but today is not the day to do it. im more inclined to vote UT rather than skitty/major today if it were purely on a claim basis.
1) That's not Sonic.
2) This post doesn't talk about Skitty/Major as a dichotomy, it talks about UT/Survivor claims as a dichotomy.
Try again.
He talks about how he'd rather vote UT over Major/Skitty. My thought follows from that, although tangentially. Given how I know I'm already outed (I checked our PT before posting here.), I was originally going to post that privately, but then thought "Aw, screw it. It's a good thought, and I might get some discussion out of it.".
In post 2707, The Will of Heaven wrote:
Do you see the problem in believing that only scum would attack a survivor claim?
I do now, but I still don't think that was a bad line of reasoning at the time. I've caught scum before for similar things in early game.
In post 2707, The Will of Heaven wrote:
She doesn't need to look into your activity to call you out for lurking: if you have reasons, you explain them when you get back. Her not looking into his activity isn't scummy: you know this because in mastin's game that just ended you were happy to call Sonic Boom scum for coasting without looking at either's onsite activity >.>
Lurking does not equal coasting. Lurking is activity based, which is not alignment indicative. Coasting is based on the type of posts being made, which can absolutely be used to determine alignment.
In post 2707, The Will of Heaven wrote:
It's also a massive problem that page 7 stuff was still the only thing that stood out to you when you had managed to get pretty fucking deep into a game.
AA9 had still done diddly squat that deep in the game. I felt my initial reasoning still held merit.
In post 2433, Bulbazak wrote:GGG-scum > AA9-scum. So when GGG starts piggybacking on AA9's reasoning, alarms go off in my head and I start thinking buddying, which makes me doubt my AA9 read. This is the most natural progression imaginable, Nacho, and I'm surprised you didn't see it.
Since when the fuck was GGG scum > AA9 scum considering AA9 scum was all you talked about the entire game...?
So you're just going to ignore the part where one scum read piggback's on my reasoning to talk about who I find scummier? I would think that alone should make anyone paranoid, but sure, let's talk about my order of scumminess. I have not seen one redeeming feature of GGG's posts that make me think he might be town. AA9 had points that could indicate that, but I thought that they didn't at the time. I also had several town reads saying I was wrong (I didn't ignore that.), plus I had Sonic screaming at me in the PT. The point is that while I was certain of both, AA9 was on shakier ground due to the faith I also have in my town reads.
In post 317, ArcAngel9 wrote:the question of the day still remains, Can we believe UT claim or not?
Let's just say that he is being honest about this claim and he is really the person who he claims to be... A) What will we loose by lynching him? vs B) What issues we will have to face if cult gets activated? . These are questions that everyone should ask themselves to sort the UT's place. It's not really hard. It will be a choice.
I am quite clear on this... WE SHOULD LYNCH HIM TODAY. If there is any truth in his claims means.. Town have less chances to win because there is always someone stupid enough to target him, And to give more better reasons. We at least don't have to deal this issue tomorrow again. If he is scum and playing a clever gambit? its even better!!!!!!
VOTE: Tripod
you commented on this post.
First, I did comment on that post. I called it useless. Second, you are quoting 1 sentence of a larger argument out of context and ignoring the argument as a whole. This is what I actually said:
In post 2433, Bulbazak wrote:
AA9 didn't join the UT wagon. She joined the Skitty wagon, which was why I gave up my theory that only scum were jumping on Skitty. And I didn't say that AA9 interacting with UT was to placate me. I said that her telling me to "chill" when I showed no suspicion of her and instead said that I was rethinking my stance on those who were jumping on Skitty after she joined the wagon was an attempt to placate me.
This was in response to you saying that I called her scum for hopping onto UT and accused her of placating me, when I had called her scum when she told me to "chill" after she jumped on Skitty. I also pointed out that her vote had nothing to do with my reasons for voting her, but rather her reaction to me when I had not even called her scum. In fact, I had done the opposite and said that I was reevaluating my stance about those jumping on the Skitty wagon. What bothers me, Nacho, is that I know you're better than this, and your ignoring my actual argument and strawmanning me in such a way is reminding me of your play in There is No Doctor.
In post 2656, mental somnic wrote:I've tried every single method that I can imagine to reach out to the three of you that I can imagine, and I am disappointed that my efforts have been for naught. Save for speaking in Japanese to you, Since it appears, that you, along with the likes of Wisdom, do not understand basic fucking English. "Bulba is town" three god damn words, and it goes over your head like I'm speaking a foreign language.
The only method you tried was repeating the same tired nonsense over and over again. You're also shutting down scumhunting on scummy people in a very anti-town way: if you are masons with Bulbazak (which is what the between the line shit seems to be saying), you are masons with Bulbazak in a bastard game, which means you should at least let other methods of pressuring him reach their natural conclusion unless you have real reasons to defend him. If you have real reasons to defend him, don't spam 10 pages with nothingness and instead just defend him with real reasons because screaming "oh you should trust me I don't know why you aren't trusting me" doesn't work when I feel just as strongly about Bulbascum as you do about Bulbatown and you won't let me even talk to him when you can't produce real reads and you absolutely lose your shit when people don't listen to you even though it's fairly obvious why people are not listening to you?
What's disturbing about this is that you should know that mods tend to lean more towards the alignment change side of things in bastard themes than the mod lie side. When Mollie mentioned the mod's responding yes to the question in the queue, she overlooked that it is the standard question regarding a bastard game, which essentially defines what elements make a game bastard. Just because moderator lies are on the list does not necessarily mean that they're in the game. Even if we are to assume that the mod might lie to us, I think that's a dangerous assumption to make d1, and I'd much rather take the Mastin tack of trusting my mason partners with my life (Heck, Mastin takes it 1 step further to include neighbors.). I'm not going to lynch in my masonry. Ever. And even if you want to be paranoid of us, you know as well as I that lynching into a masonry is bad play on d1. If it gets to late game and we're still around, then maybe you can be paranoid, but you trying to float this now reminds me of scum you trying to keep the door open on a mislynch.
Then why are there neighbors? Including both in the game and having the masons not be conf. town seems awfully redundant.
In post 2723, The Will of Heaven wrote:They're not masons, pie asked him and ms said no. Besides, ms is not the type to keep that hidden. He would have said so ages ago.
First, Sonic never said no. Second, I told them to keep the masonry secret. I'm not a big fan of outing PRs, and I know how game breaking masons can be near the end of the game.
I see what you're saying Goat, however is it really pressing in such a large game?
Also can you comment on their activity in the neighbourhood in comparison to in thread?
This is scum posting.
In post 2732, droog wrote:get another wagon to lynching size
and ill jion skitty
The only reason you're not higher on my lynch list is because Sonic told me you were town and not to vote you.
In post 2741, Espeonage wrote:Look, you needed to claim anyway. If you guys waited any longer it would have been too late to get another wagon going. And I would rather get a lynch tan a no lynch. So it needed to be forced out.
I helped the entire situation and you should be able to see that. Now work with me. We can get a heap more information on other players out of the skitty slot. Bro is hella scum and gives us information now.
I gave you a lot of support, payment time.
Seriously?! Why is no one else seeing the scum intent behind this? He excuses his opportunistic vote, which caused us to be outed, by saying that outing a masonry is a good thing and that he helped us out. There is no way this is a town mindset.
Bulb is town, bulb shares your alignment, bulb is not mafia?
Masons by definition are 100% town. It's possible to have a scum mason in a bastard game, but all the bastard games I've seen focus more on alignment changing mechanics more than the mod screwing with the town via a scum mason.
This wagon makes the most sense. Town skitty would have at least made some effort to play and scum hunt even after the gambit screwed up.
I don't like droogs play.
He is just wanting to vote the biggest wagon and not even putting any effort into developing any reads. He position of lynch someone clean up the thread is pro town on the surface but his reluctance to pick anyone is scummy.
Hello everyone. The previous demonstration was my own social experiment to see
how many of
my friends
people would believe my reads without providing "evidence"/explanation
.
Apparently, zero.
That sucked. Although the parameters of the experiment did not include the whole town, as they were busy from Christmas, et cetera, it DID involve people whom I know and have a history with, specifically Wisdom, Nacho, Pieguy, and ArcAngel. (Most notoriously Wisdom. baka)
Despite my methods of attempting to reach out to each individual, using variants of AtE, AtH, AtP, whatever I can think of, to deliver an unchanging message "Bulbazak is town", without explanation, it appears that these methods fail in comparison to a shabby, manufactured case which I could have done in 1 post, and 30 minutes. Instead, in pursuit of the social experiment, the total time taken on "proving Bulbazak town", took more than 100 posts and a collective time of more than 2 hours. Let me just remind you that cases can be made by scum as well as town, and using that as a key base to change your opinion (Note: might not change opinion, will try again in future experiments), is extremely naive, in contrast to the effort that one puts in to yell "Bulbazak is town" for 40 pages is more than the effort put in to make a convoluted, but true case of "Bulbazak is town".
On the other hand, Tammy/Mollie believed my pleas and read Bulbazak as town as a result. It is interesting to note that they immediately faced a backlash and pressure from the Wisdom/Nacho hydra.
Although this is a small sample size of only 5, and personalities and persuasion levels may change from person to person, 80% of the blind-testing participants responded negatively to truth w/o explanation, that is, when presented a statement which seems intuitively wrong but emphasized as fact, without an explanation , it is likely that they would reject it. This is known as a veridical paradox. Parallels can be drawn to the Monty Hall problem, where a simple probability problem where intuition would suggest the wrong answer, caused more than 10,000 people, including 1,000 with PhDs(I'm looking at you, nacho, you should know better) to reject the correct answer that was proposed by a magazine. Oh, and that magazine then had to provide mathematical proof, evidence, you-name-it, and there were still people who insisted that they were wrong.
Despite all this, it should be stated that the alignments of the above 5 players are unknown, though assumed town. They might be scum, and might have their own personal agendas. However, a scum would also know that Bulbazak is town, or at least not on their team, and thus might have "joined the winning side".
Nevertheless, this experiment has led to interesting results, and I am glad that this is a social forum, or one that emphasizes on interpersonal communication, in order to facilitate this. I certainly would not have been able to enact this in real life. Although the conclusions drawn here might not apply to real life, or even possibly the next game, it is something good to take note of, in order to understand human psychology better.
Thank you.
This answers a lot of questions, actually, like how you went from being able to keep up with an arguing Bulba in Voided's Nightless Mountainous to acting like a hyperactive chihuahua in every game afterward.
In post 2785, Espeonage wrote:om is being moody, you are much more level headed which is what we need at the end of the day.
I love om, but this is the time for you to be playing the slot.
I don't like that he's trying to split the Sonic hydra.
I'm going to keep a list of those who are trying to split the masonry and post it in our PT. It should prove to be helpful later.
I'll be back later tonight. We're starting a new Monday tradition.
On to page 113.
Bulbazak is so town that everytime someone votes him Mastin coughs blood.
Location: Thataway, Thataway, Betwixt the Presidents
Post
Post #2941 (isolation #52) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 8:30 am
Postby Bulbazak »
In post 2808, Johou Tougou Shinen-Tai wrote:I at this point think you know better than this and am considering the possibility both you and Bulba are scum masons with each other, but whatever.
That's not a masonry. That's a scum team. I can understand if you think that we're scum pulling a gambit, but if you don't, this doesn't make sense, and I have a hard time seeing how town can come to this conclusion.
I thought this was okay the first couple of times, because lol joke, but you repeatedly using this to defend Shos worries me.
In post 2842, Espeonage wrote:Just going to come out and say that I don't really like Goat this game so far and I want Skitty around for relational reads further on.
This wagon makes the most sense. Town skitty would have at least made some effort to play and scum hunt even after the gambit screwed up.
I don't like droogs play.
He is just wanting to vote the biggest wagon and not even putting any effort into developing any reads. He position of lynch someone clean up the thread is pro town on the surface but his reluctance to pick anyone is scummy.
This is a good reasoning for skitty, actually. very good. GGG is town.
You do know he essentially repeated what I said, right?
In post 2827, The Goat wrote:About more than one thing. I'd really love to focus on other persons playing, as I have been requested to put in effort elsewhere. However, those who are adamant in the "We're not lynching Skitty today and that's final" crew, coupled with Skitty's general unwillingness to explain WTF they did is making things difficult.
the only thing I remember about them lying was caled denying being a neighbor with you? I think that post was pretty obviously a joke and I think you're taking it way too literally. NS at the least has def trolled in a similar way before, and I'm pretty sure caled would as well.
I agree that _if_ NS hasn't yet fully explained what he did in the neighbor QT he should go ahead and do that. however,
1. NS tends to get irrationally paranoid of neighbors, so I don't particularly think the way he's skeptical about it is indicative
2. I think this is a completely dumb thing for NS-scum to actually lie about, so I don't think his lack of giving answers points to him hiding anything.
the latter point in particular is of interest (and is smth I find 99% of players outright ignore when they think they pick up on someone hiding smth) and is the reason none of this about "lol he lied about xxx" matters to me. combined with the fact that I know exactly what he's trying to do here and that it'd be suicidal to even try to attempt smth like it as scum in this scenario, is why they're basically as conftown as an IC for this.
I have no intention of budging on this read nor arguing about it. this is how it is.
In post 2868, Johou Tougou Shinen-Tai wrote:the other one is that it appears they are very far behind and there is no denying that the current gamestate is pretty shit and likely impossible to catch up on with all the MS spam going on; so I don't exactly have a problem with them being apathetic, especially when they fucked up to the extent that they did.
So what I'm getting is that if I'm put under a lot of pressure, I should lurk it out and blame the game moving fast? The fact of the matter is that NS has done nothing to make me think he's town. If he had scumhunted or been protown in any sense of the word, maybe I'd consider it, but he hasn't, so I'm not moving, and I'm not seeing how you're getting conf. town from "He got caught, backtracked, and then lurked his troubles away.".
In post 2870, BROseidon wrote:Saying that a mason in a bastard game means absolutely nothing is pretty fucking terrible
At least 2 of the people saying that are scum trying to use this being a bastard game as a smokescreen to push a mislynch.
In post 2890, Elric Brothers wrote:A mental lynch gives us similar info though, and helps with the postclutter
Bulba has actually been scummy, ms has only been annoying. Above all we should try and lynch someone who has a decent chance of being scum.
Plus, ms hasn't been wagoned or discussed as much as bulba has. There have been more stances on bulba from various people. Therefore more info.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the only things I've been accused of is suspecting AA9 and having a weird stance regarding neighbors. Was there more to the case, and why have you been dancing around my response and strawmanning my arguments?
In post 2899, TiphaineDeath wrote:I would still love to have aa9 dead today, who would be up for that instead of skitty?
As opposed to all the other wagons he's been trying to start and drive to end the day? Which, you know, has been his focus since he entered this mess of a game because a 100+ page Day 1 is anti-town as fuck?
First, we've already had the discussion about Esp and the Bro wagon. Second, I don't like that Esp has been solely focused on that and has not been trying to figure the game out. He's focused on pushing lynches through, not figuring out who is scum, and I remember town Esp being different than that.
In post 2914, ArcAngel9 wrote:this whole MASON claim thing.. Am not sure if I want to believe it.
Do you think Sonic is town? Y/N
In post 2918, The Will of Heaven wrote:I liked how she remained on bulba in her last post, unphased by the fact people were leaving the wagon, but she completely nullified that now :/
You better not be setting up a later push on AA9.
I'm going to get the list of people who tried to split of the masonry from the PT. Be right back.
Bulbazak is so town that everytime someone votes him Mastin coughs blood.
Location: Thataway, Thataway, Betwixt the Presidents
Post
Post #2942 (isolation #53) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 8:39 am
Postby Bulbazak »
{Wischo, Piegami, Esp, Dramonic, Shos}
There's scum in there somewhere. Shos I'm 50/50 on. Dram fits his play so far. Esp is a scum read, so it makes sense. The statement coming from Wischo & Piegami makes me uncomfortable, because they should know better, and of the group, it feels like both of them are trying to push an agenda.
I also don't like how the majority of this game is focused on policy, in one form or the other. Policy pushes are to be expected, but it's gone overboard here, and I think scum is hiding behind such reasoning. I was going to save this for the Mason PT, but I think it's important to say: I think the town in generally is playing terribly, myself included. There is scum among the skilled players, no doubt, and we've stopped trying to figure it out and have instead just tried to get any old lynch we could without thinking it through. There was at least some attempt at the beginning and middle to do some sorting, which is why I have Mollie/Tammy and Bro as firmly town and am moving Winter Skies there too, but it's fallen apart recently. I think the end of d1 will be helpful in rooting out the experienced scum, as I think they are the ones pushing hard for lynches at any cost and are hiding behind policy and this being a bastard game, but if we don't break out of this mindset soon, this will not end up being a town win.
Bulbazak is so town that everytime someone votes him Mastin coughs blood.
Location: Thataway, Thataway, Betwixt the Presidents
Post
Post #2952 (isolation #55) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 9:57 am
Postby Bulbazak »
They. Are. Not. A. Cop.
I also looked back through my ISO, and I guess I didn't say anything about NS being scum for lurking and not scumhunting. I could have sworn I did. Regardless, I actually liked the last few GGG posts, especially with the clarifications and him actually engaging.
Bulbazak is so town that everytime someone votes him Mastin coughs blood.
Location: Thataway, Thataway, Betwixt the Presidents
Post
Post #2955 (isolation #57) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 10:03 am
Postby Bulbazak »
This does make me think you're town, though, because it reminds me of Hilariously Unbalanced Mafia where I thought I saw mason crumbs from ProHawk and Nazerene and ended up being wrong.
Bulbazak is so town that everytime someone votes him Mastin coughs blood.
Location: Thataway, Thataway, Betwixt the Presidents
Post
Post #2957 (isolation #58) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 10:05 am
Postby Bulbazak »
The progression is all off. I'd expect them as town to try to figure him out, either here or in their PT, but that clearly hasn't happened. This looks more like scum who tried to push hard and fast, got burnt, and have been hiding in the shadows hoping no one would notice.
Bulbazak is so town that everytime someone votes him Mastin coughs blood.
Location: Thataway, Thataway, Betwixt the Presidents
Post
Post #2960 (isolation #60) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 10:14 am
Postby Bulbazak »
Then why haven't they tried to push Goat? Why is their vote on TD? Heck, why haven't they continued to question the Goat? I would think that even if they had moved to another scumspect, they'd at least continue trying to scumhunt and figure the Goat out.
Bulbazak is so town that everytime someone votes him Mastin coughs blood.