In post 300, Kilgamayan wrote:It's more that (a) I don't think Feysal is going to change their posting habits based on that vote, and (b) a Feysal vote implies you've seen nothing else voteworthy in the 270-odd posts since the game began.
I grant that I could very well be wrong about (a) - I still have little-to-no clue what the ethos is like here, so maybe lurkers do get jump-started by getting voted - but I'd be surprised if I was.
I disagree on both counts.
Regarding (a), lurkers do get jump-started, because lynches here typically occur very near deadline on Day 1 and are decided among whichever wagons seem viable. A player who has a few votes on them around midday becomes very vulnerable to compromise/counterwagon votes as deadline looms, so people tend to try to keep wagon-momentum off themselves.
In any case, Feysal isn't a lurker. From my limited experience/meta-diving, she's a competent town player who generally has worthwhile insights to share, which we haven't yet seen here.
As for (b), not posting is more death-worthy than anything in thread thus far. I have a couple scumreads among those who have been posting, but I'd much rather lynch among those who aren't. I have absolutely no problem lynching at least one player in this list even with a null read.