[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 4372620 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Micro 45 - Artemis Fowl Game Over - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #71 (isolation #6) » Tue Oct 02, 2012 8:30 pm
Postby absta101 »
My read on Hawk is simple. He's an easy target town.
My scum read on Shamrock is due to post #37, his shitty reaction to my vote on him and largely meta which I can't discuss atm.
---- VOTE: Shos
I'm also fine with lynching GNR. I know he plays like this as scum.
Post
Post #79 (isolation #7) » Wed Oct 03, 2012 9:01 am
Postby absta101 »
In post 75, Kmd4390 wrote:Absta, do you mean lurking for guy's scum meta? I've seen him lynched for it as town.
Mala, no. Confirmation is mostly just when a player is online. Only exception is if scum can talk during confirmations. Even then, most don't take that opportunity.
Post
Post #162 (isolation #22) » Fri Oct 05, 2012 10:54 am
Postby absta101 »
Also, what is really off about you is your lack of scum reads on anyone else aside from the fact that there has been plenty of scummy behavior floating around.
Add in the fact that Mala has only placed mild suspicion on shos but opted to vote absta instead and I think we got ourselves a nice little connection.
Post
Post #242 (isolation #33) » Sun Oct 07, 2012 8:19 am
Postby absta101 »
Your meta research on Shos suggests he isn't scum this game no?
- Shamrock's been tunnelling Hawk all day and lightly defending Shos. Now, near the end, he jumps on the Shos waggon (just as a sheep) disregarding everything he "had" on Hawk as "probably wrong".
- His play here is different to the town play i've seen of him.
- etc.
Post
Post #248 (isolation #34) » Sun Oct 07, 2012 8:49 am
Postby absta101 »
In post 244, Mehdi2277 wrote:Yup, but overall shos is still one of the most scummy players based quite a bit on PoE. I also like the other people found on this wagon.
Yeah, this doesn't help you. PoE is non-existent this early and thus can't be used to call Shos scum.
----
@Shos - Who do you think is scum on your waggon?
Post
Post #307 (isolation #43) » Mon Oct 08, 2012 9:03 am
Postby absta101 »
In post 298, Shamrock wrote:Like seriously I expressed confusion about your asking shos to claim literally FIVE POSTS ABOVE YOURS, what the fuck was that question?
You could have said "Shos, don't claim!", yet you didn't. You were okay with Shos claiming.
Post
Post #322 (isolation #48) » Mon Oct 08, 2012 7:35 pm
Postby absta101 »
In post 318, Shamrock wrote:Okay, but you were soft-defending him and you certainly weren't calling him scum. And you gave no explanation for voting him at the time, and when pushed, the only explanation you gave was that you didn't believe his claim. What don't you believe about it?
310 is obvfake
This whole post sucks. I'll explain everything later. I gotta run.
Post
Post #335 (isolation #49) » Tue Oct 09, 2012 5:24 am
Postby absta101 »
@Shamrock
Shamrock wrote:Okay, but you were soft-defending him and
you certainly weren't calling him scum
. And you gave no explanation for voting him at the time, and when pushed, the only explanation you gave was that you didn't believe his claim. What don't you believe about it?
1. The bolded is an outright lie.
2. Not giving an explanation "at the time" is scummy? Explain.
absta, you asked someone you thought was town to claim as a "reaction test" when he was at L-3 and then, when he claimed VT, you suddenly decided he was scum after all and voted him without an explanation.
I think you're choosing to "misunderstand" me. I was reaction fishing to see if anyone would take an opportunistic jump on me after I asked Shos to claim. I did NOT expect him to claim and I think he knew he wasn't L-1.
Zero percent of that makes sense from a town perspective.
Nor does it from a scum perspective it seems? I asked for scum motivation, answer me directly.
----
@Shos
- The reason I don't believe your claim is because it doesn't fit your behaviour this game. I believe your vote on me is survivalistic. PRs and scum are survivalistic. VOTE: Shos
----
@Everyone
- I'm not for forcing another claim unless it's from Shamrock. Sho dies today.
Aside from the slew of scummy posts, his reveal directly conflicts information I have in my role. I will have to defer to you all on if this evidence has any merit as I am not experienced enough to know if we can base conflicting flavor as being a made up role reveal.
Keep your info hidden for now. I believe your town.
Post
Post #342 (isolation #52) » Tue Oct 09, 2012 5:46 am
Postby absta101 »
In post 339, shos wrote:what.?
I want prohawk to reveal the flavor info that he has in his role immediately. I'm not taking a bullet like that based on a 'trust me'. that's just stupid.
if there's a cop, cop absta.
if there's a tracker, track kmd.
if there's a doc or a watcher - prohawk.
if absta survives the night, burn him tomorrow like gunpowder.
you guys have bullied the shit out of me this entire game with freakin no reason, no reason at all. end of AtE, off I go to other games.
pedit:
Chaos, opinion on absta and prohawk please.
Post
Post #364 (isolation #56) » Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:28 am
Postby absta101 »
In post 355, shos wrote:K well seems I'm doomed. when I die, do *NOT* kill prohawk, kill absta. and take into consideration that flavor should NOT matter in this game.
abstascum.
prohawktown.
You're just adding more WIFOM to your scum flip. What makes you think Hawk will die?
Post
Post #369 (isolation #59) » Wed Oct 10, 2012 5:45 am
Postby absta101 »
Shamrock:
- Defending Shos from Robo.
- Jumping on Shos's waggon by way of sheeping when his lynch looked inevitable.
- Jumping on my waggon as an alternative (chainsaw defence).
----
P-Edit: If you flip town i'll be looking at Robo/Kmd.