James:
In post 22, FA_Q2 wrote: In post 19, Carmen wrote:
I'm not sure where your confusion comes in. What's "interesting" about it?
Not sure how he finds it interesting but I find it interesting because it is not entirely obvious if your reason was tongue in cheek as a RVS or if you are serious here. More interesting is that you did not clarify when this was pointed out. Almost like you don't want to give a hard reason yet.
VOTE: carmen
In post 24, FA_Q2 wrote:Mini, don't want to see a hammer happen suddenly. Did not realize 4 ends in a hammer aright away. Still want to see a response here.
So initially I thought this was OK. But look at the speed at which he unvoted. It's like he's aware he screwed up.
In post 26, Carmen wrote: In post 24, FA_Q2 wrote:Mini, don't want to see a hammer happen suddenly. Did not realize 4 ends in a hammer aright away. Still want to see a response here.
Yeah, the three person scumteam is going to quickhammer me on page two.
In post 39, FA_Q2 wrote: In post 26, Carmen wrote: In post 24, FA_Q2 wrote:Mini, don't want to see a hammer happen suddenly. Did not realize 4 ends in a hammer aright away. Still want to see a response here.
Yeah, the three person scumteam is going to quickhammer me on page two.
Why mention a number in the scum team here? I have heard that statement a thousand times in various forms here but I don't think that anyone has ever said something so awkward as 'the three person scum team' like this. It just does not fit.
A) Word semantics is a weird way to approach this. B) The fact that 3 is mentioned specifically bugs me. That's odd. Thinking that Carmen knows something here that we don't.
In post 85, Carmen wrote:BEF is a gut scumlean but I have no doubts I can clarify that better given time.
In post 136, Carmen wrote:By the way, BEF's latest two posts don't do him any favors.
In post 141, Carmen wrote:I'm going to leave my vote on BEF for reasons, but my top scumread is still Carcalilly.
VOTE: BrightEyedFish
In post 88, Carmen wrote: In post 86, Krazy wrote:It's a bastard, this game could have ended in pre-game LOL
Is it? Hadn't realized. I remember that this is apparently the second in some series but I can't find the first game to see what that setup was like.
In post 93, Carmen wrote: In post 92, Krazy wrote:I'm a little worried she's too scummy to be scum here, but don't hold me to that.
Thinking like that will lead you straight away from the correct solution nine times out of ten.
In post 95, Carmen wrote:Oh, wonderful, even more nonsense to deal with.
No offense to the mod.
In post 101, Carmen wrote:I'm going to solve this game whether this lobby wants to shitlynch me or not. That's just the way things are going to be.
In post 102, Carmen wrote:So if you want to beat me in postcount, you better start solving
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile")
This is so much fluff. He's actively lurking here to try and look busy. Also, he admits he's scumreading Carcalily, and only gutreads BEF, but then goes in and votes him anyways?
In post 111, Carmen wrote: In post 105, FA_Q2 wrote: In post 98, Krazy wrote:I lynched him fairly recently in a recently completed game and I think the manner in which I did so left an impression.
I keep wanting to do this and now I think I'm going to do it
Vote FA_Q
Hope he's not like Profii and is just someone I'm always thinking is scum but never is
No, no real impression. I don't actually recall which game that was.
This is +scum indicative for FA. Townpoints to anyone who can guess why I think this.
This is +scumpoints for Carmen. Way overreaction
In post 114, Carmen wrote: In post 112, Krazy wrote:cause he's not paying enough attention to realize the first part was about BEF?
Bingo. There's also a small element of a guilty conscience, assuming that you talking about someone you're voting would be him even when the context doesn't make immediate sense.
In post 116, FA_Q2 wrote: In post 114, Carmen wrote: In post 112, Krazy wrote:cause he's not paying enough attention to realize the first part was about BEF?
Bingo. There's also a small element of a guilty conscience, assuming that you talking about someone you're voting would be him even when the context doesn't make immediate sense.
Assuming that he is talking about me - the only player he mentions in his post is scum indicative...
That is asinine.
In post 118, Carmen wrote: In post 116, FA_Q2 wrote: In post 114, Carmen wrote: In post 112, Krazy wrote:cause he's not paying enough attention to realize the first part was about BEF?
Bingo. There's also a small element of a guilty conscience, assuming that you talking about someone you're voting would be him even when the context doesn't make immediate sense.
Assuming that he is talking about me - the only player he mentions in his post is scum indicative...
That is asinine.
Not reading the context of the conversation taking place in the two posts directly above the one you responded to -
that
is scum indicative.
But hey, cool your jets. I'm still voting Carcalilly. You should be too, really.
Scum indicative -- But no vote, no further searching, just a casual, "This is scum-indicative" and moves on. That's a casual bus if I've ever seen one.
In post 135, Carmen wrote:Stop canvassing people onto a wagon that isn't the one that I'm voting on.
In post 143, Carmen wrote:Whatever you want to believe.
By the way, if you're curious, I'm no longer townreading you.
In post 160, Carmen wrote:Yeah, I'm hard turning to townleaning BEF. Scumreading Krazy more now.
Lot's more fluff
In post 182, FA_Q2 wrote: In post 173, Krazy wrote: In post 168, BrightEyedFish wrote:I took it off because it was a pure RVS vote. Maybe it was placed correctly out of luck, but I can always throw it back if the situation arises.
so you looked at FA_Q's game there and noticed he had good reads, but didn't comment on the lack of an unvote and the lack of caution
the lack of caution is what is what I focus on. He is an aggressive, highly reactionary player as town
and he doesn't seem to be that way here
maybe it's because he's a double voter
or maybe it's because he's scum or third party
but what do you actually think of his reads in this game, and what do you think of his tonality in this game?
Did I put someone at L-1 on the first page in RVS?
No, no I didn't. As soon as I explained the post you immediately went into lynch mode. And assuming 3p? Based on what? It is as though you are not bothering to evaluate anything I state at all.
This is scum.
VOTE: Krazy
And this is an attack and an attempt to make something not scummy look very scummy.
Gonna double check to make sure I'm not quickhammering, but
FOS: Carmen, FA_Q2
Also thinking there is a possible traitor here, maybe Carmen? Unsure atm, but that 3-person thing has me leaning in that direction.
