Micro 909: 09:12 (Game Over!)

[AaronFrost]

Actually I think it's safe to assume that emps likely isn't a scum PR since he's not all that resistant to his lynch as well as him claiming VT.

[the worst]

sorry to remain contrarian but it's simply not worth withholding your roleblock target.

At the very least he should probably crumb it

crumbing it in this context will be easier for two scum (two minds > one) to pick apart than any one townie; if it's obscure enough it's probably just lost to the ages if uncrowned dies and if it's earnest enough scum are more likely to catch it than town.

what uncrowned has suggested is, basically, optimal.

[Menalque]

EV = expected value

[the worst]

that's right, thanks. i thought it was expensive vol-au-vents. i will forget that again, i promise.

[Menalque]

easy mistake to make tbh, happens to the best of us

[Menalque]

I often confuse it for "explosive vomiting", another one of my favourite foods

[the worst]

and NOT to be confused with expensive vomiting, or exploding vol-au-vents. god forbid.

[Datisi]

Official Vigilant Corndog 2.06

With 8 votes in play, it takes 5 to lynch.

Lynching

emps

(3): HH, the worst, Look At Me Im So Town

the worst

(1): Menalque

Not Voting

(4): emps, Uncrowned, Alduskkel, AaronFrost

Deadline:

(expired on 2020-01-14 14:30:00).

Mod notes:

• ...

[the worst]

VC

datisi with the vigilant checkers!

[Menalque]

with the violent corndogs!

[the worst]

...shit
you're good.

[Menalque]

but maybe I want to be

bad

[the worst]

you've got my number right?

[Alduskkel]

so is there any reason for me to not put emps at L-1 now? seems like we've discussed everything there is to discuss and now we just need to see what happens

[the worst]

I'm

e

.

[Alduskkel]

i have no idea what that means

[Alduskkel]

never mind i just got it

you're ready

[the worst]

I'm red e!!!
Sorry I'm pretty droll when playin hard is low reward

[JJJ]

Emps think it's HH or LAMIST?

Can we gather anything from this? Does anyone know if Emps is the type to try and distance?

In deathcars he shaded nearly every slot, including his partner I believe. But didn't he just play like 5 scum games? Idk how his play progressed/remained same through all that.

-eth0s

[JJJ]

sorry to remain contrarian but it's simply not worth withholding your roleblock target.

I agree. Also a no nightkill is good for us even if it's framing a rb'ed target, right?

-eth0s

[JJJ]

actually aldus has the good point

it's strictly optimal to say, for example

if emps flips scum i'm blocking mena
if emps flips town i'm blocking in {tw, aldus}

I gave some pretty extensive conditional targets and you said it was bad :/

Can you tell me why you felt that way since you seem to agree a conditional target announcement is a good idea?

[the worst]

sorry to remain contrarian but it's simply not worth withholding your roleblock target.

I agree. Also a no nightkill is good for us even if it's framing a rb'ed target, right?

-eth0s

Exactly /o/

actually aldus has the good point

it's strictly optimal to say, for example

if emps flips scum i'm blocking mena
if emps flips town i'm blocking in {tw, aldus}

I gave some pretty extensive conditional targets and you said it was bad :/

Can you tell me why you felt that way since you seem to agree a conditional target announcement is a good idea?

Did I? I might have misunderstood ya could you quote me?

Either way it was kinda sour of the moment - I think letting Uncrowned operate on his own initiative is probs wise if emps actually greens

[Uncrowned]

Is there anything left to go over this phase?

[JJJ]

sorry to remain contrarian but it's simply not worth withholding your roleblock target.

I agree. Also a no nightkill is good for us even if it's framing a rb'ed target, right?

-eth0s

Exactly /o/

actually aldus has the good point

it's strictly optimal to say, for example

if emps flips scum i'm blocking mena
if emps flips town i'm blocking in {tw, aldus}

I gave some pretty extensive conditional targets and you said it was bad :/

Can you tell me why you felt that way since you seem to agree a conditional target announcement is a good idea?

Did I? I might have misunderstood ya could you quote me?

Either way it was kinda sour of the moment - I think letting Uncrowned operate on his own initiative is probs wise if emps actually greens

I thought you said my idea for who emps should rb was a 5-6 out of 10 idea

[JJJ]

sorry to remain contrarian but it's simply not worth withholding your roleblock target.

I agree. Also a no nightkill is good for us even if it's framing a rb'ed target, right?

-eth0s

Exactly /o/

actually aldus has the good point

it's strictly optimal to say, for example

if emps flips scum i'm blocking mena
if emps flips town i'm blocking in {tw, aldus}

I gave some pretty extensive conditional targets and you said it was bad :/

Can you tell me why you felt that way since you seem to agree a conditional target announcement is a good idea?

Did I? I might have misunderstood ya could you quote me?

Either way it was kinda sour of the moment - I think letting Uncrowned operate on his own initiative is probs wise if emps actually greens

I thought you said my idea for who emps should rb was a 5-6 out of 10 idea

Who unc should rb*
Ugh
-eth0s