skitter30 standing V/LA Fridays and Saturdays & mental health V/LA.
[/area]
Last edited by Datisi on Thu Mar 26, 2020 3:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
Like aside from paranoia about “skitt is rly good as scum so this is within her scumrange” I don’t think there’s anything skitt has done yet that seems like it comes from a scum mindset (*prepsring for horrendous egg on face postgame)
Whereas I just want like, a lot more from furret and don’t see anything e’s done as town yet
In this kind of gamestate it's easy to justify a vote/lynch on me yet furret is trying to analyze the situation and come to his own conclusion
I think that's pro-town
Wow you're so good at avoiding death and killing slots that are not part of the informed minority. Wow how are you so good at playing this game.
this is just a personal note but this kind of rvs post/vote is scummy as fuck
I agree with Skitter that Menalque’s opening is NAI, especially taking into account his meta where it kind of makes sense. It’s possible that Nom felt the need to add something or her own to the table rather than purely sheeping, but it doesn’t sit well with me.
In post 162, nomnomnom wrote:idk man people seem to think I'm stupid as fuck when it comes to scumhunting but what I say makes sense for me god damn it :/
hard to make people follow wagons with me when they hardly understand my reasonings and it's irritating
This seems a bit of an overreaction to Skitter’s comment. I’m not sure as Town if you’d take it to heart so much? It didn’t seem like a massive deal.
In post 160, Menalque wrote:@skitt @furret what are your opinions on nomx3's scumgame?
do you scumread her
maybe
lmao
this level of non commitment
Why should he be committed on page 7/8 or whatever it is? I think ‘maybe’ is understandable in this context.
In post 170, nomnomnom wrote:my seer senses are tingling
they're telling me that if furret was voting me, menalque would have sheeped
hmhnmhnnnn
Again her tone is preemptively defensive. This could be a move that’s designed to set Menalque up - either he doesn’t vote her because of the trap she’s set, or he does and she can be like ‘hah! I told you!’.
this feels like you're going down a list of things to attack over an actual read tbh
'skitter is fucking terrifying' ~ town-bork about scum-me
'Skitter [was] terrifying to play against ngl' ~ scum-bork about town-me
'Going into lylo against scum!skit unprepared is like having someone force feed you dull razor blades. It's painful, and once it starts, you're pretty much dead' ~ NMSA
'Skitter you're a spirit animal's spirit animal' ~ slaxx
In post 303, nomnomnom wrote:In this kind of gamestate it's easy to justify a vote/lynch on me yet furret is trying to analyze the situation and come to his own conclusion
I think that's pro-town
Okay, I’ll think about it
I kind of don’t think scum would want to jump on your wagon too much tho as if you got flipped it would look bad so that gives me somewhat lower faith there
this is just a personal note but this kind of rvs post/vote is scummy as fuck
I agree with Skitter that Menalque’s opening is NAI, especially taking into account his meta where it kind of makes sense. It’s possible that Nom felt the need to add something or her own to the table rather than purely sheeping, but it doesn’t sit well with me.
In post 162, nomnomnom wrote:idk man people seem to think I'm stupid as fuck when it comes to scumhunting but what I say makes sense for me god damn it :/
hard to make people follow wagons with me when they hardly understand my reasonings and it's irritating
This seems a bit of an overreaction to Skitter’s comment. I’m not sure as Town if you’d take it to heart so much? It didn’t seem like a massive deal.
In post 160, Menalque wrote:@skitt @furret what are your opinions on nomx3's scumgame?
do you scumread her
maybe
lmao
this level of non commitment
Why should he be committed on page 7/8 or whatever it is? I think ‘maybe’ is understandable in this context.
In post 170, nomnomnom wrote:my seer senses are tingling
they're telling me that if furret was voting me, menalque would have sheeped
hmhnmhnnnn
Again her tone is preemptively defensive. This could be a move that’s designed to set Menalque up - either he doesn’t vote her because of the trap she’s set, or he does and she can be like ‘hah! I told you!’.
this feels like you're going down a list of things to attack over an actual read tbh
What gives you that impression?
It feels like
ok
so I can attack this post
and this post
and this post
but not this post
but also this post
In post 236, Luca Blight wrote:You’re trying to shoehorn my play into being scummy rather than fairly evaluating it imo. You’re under pressure and are scrambling for something to cling onto.
I agree that townreading people left and right can be a scumtell, but it doesn’t pertain to what I’ve done in this game.
Not voting a scumread I guess could be a thing, but you’re assuming a scummy motive when a townie one exists. You asked why I wasn’t voting you but ignored my answer and assumed a scummy motive - that makes it seem as though the only reason you asked that question was to set-up your hop onto my wagon.
Your recent opportunism also seems at odds with your AtE from the other page. One minute you’re feeling sad because you’re being scumread, the next you’re jumping on me for not automatically voting you after raising my suspicions. It feel off to me.
VOTE: Nom
you feel a bit more unnatural then the normal I played with you.
Later into the game at least you started to obvtown yourself, but atm you just feel very unnatural
In post 236, Luca Blight wrote:You’re trying to shoehorn my play into being scummy rather than fairly evaluating it imo. You’re under pressure and are scrambling for something to cling onto.
I agree that townreading people left and right can be a scumtell, but it doesn’t pertain to what I’ve done in this game.
Not voting a scumread I guess could be a thing, but you’re assuming a scummy motive when a townie one exists. You asked why I wasn’t voting you but ignored my answer and assumed a scummy motive - that makes it seem as though the only reason you asked that question was to set-up your hop onto my wagon.
Your recent opportunism also seems at odds with your AtE from the other page. One minute you’re feeling sad because you’re being scumread, the next you’re jumping on me for not automatically voting you after raising my suspicions. It feel off to me.
VOTE: Nom
you feel a bit more unnatural then the normal I played with you.
Later into the game at least you started to obvtown yourself, but atm you just feel very unnatural
this is just a personal note but this kind of rvs post/vote is scummy as fuck
I agree with Skitter that Menalque’s opening is NAI, especially taking into account his meta where it kind of makes sense. It’s possible that Nom felt the need to add something or her own to the table rather than purely sheeping, but it doesn’t sit well with me.
In post 162, nomnomnom wrote:idk man people seem to think I'm stupid as fuck when it comes to scumhunting but what I say makes sense for me god damn it :/
hard to make people follow wagons with me when they hardly understand my reasonings and it's irritating
This seems a bit of an overreaction to Skitter’s comment. I’m not sure as Town if you’d take it to heart so much? It didn’t seem like a massive deal.
In post 160, Menalque wrote:@skitt @furret what are your opinions on nomx3's scumgame?
do you scumread her
maybe
lmao
this level of non commitment
Why should he be committed on page 7/8 or whatever it is? I think ‘maybe’ is understandable in this context.
In post 170, nomnomnom wrote:my seer senses are tingling
they're telling me that if furret was voting me, menalque would have sheeped
hmhnmhnnnn
Again her tone is preemptively defensive. This could be a move that’s designed to set Menalque up - either he doesn’t vote her because of the trap she’s set, or he does and she can be like ‘hah! I told you!’.
this feels like you're going down a list of things to attack over an actual read tbh
What gives you that impression?
It feels like
ok
so I can attack this post
and this post
and this post
but not this post
but also this post
Like I don’t think anyone is liable to be open wolfing there so it’s like more confidence than I think you have the right to express in nom!scum
The second one is like idk, just seems weird. Like putting the focus on bad reasoning as the thing that makes nomx3 scummy when I think bad reasoning is just as likely to come from town as scum (or almost)
I actually didn’t hop on her though? Which is ironically a stick she’s using to attack me. I pointed out things I didn’t like and was waiting to get a read on everyone before committing to a vote.
Why is it hard to believe that I could genuinely see her as scummy, as opposed to being opportunistic scum?
