In post 523, EspressoPatronum wrote:Thank you. I have some follow-up questions.In post 513, eyestott wrote:post 383, EspressoPatronum"]@eyestott -- what went into your decision for my flavour?Not a whole lot. I'm sorry your flavour is so bland, but I tried make sure that no two players flavour roles were more or less connected than any other pair.
1. Did you struggle with anyone else's flavour?yes, you’re not the only person with slightly lacklustre flavour. I’m not exactly the most creative guy.
2. Regarding my flavour, why did you choose this specific flavour? I understand that you wanted to avoid overlap, but that doesn't actually answer how/why you chose mine.I probably put about 20 minutes work into deciding on everyone’s flavour, and you were one of the last ones. I saw your name standing there, and probably thought something like “ “”if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it”
3. What hint would you have given to me if your plan wasn't foiled?who said I haven’t given you the hint already?
In post 524, EspressoPatronum wrote:Before you reveal the information itself, can you first reveal the type of information you know? Eg. If you know roles of specific people, say "I know people's roles" before you actually say their roles.In post 521, eyestott wrote:I did promise I’d be completely honest. I am anIn post 520, alimdia wrote:aka is that the extent of your role.
Since you seem to be hinging on the reasoning that you must be town because your role is 'weak'informedrole flavourer. Im not sure whether the information is completely useless, or if revealing it may bring one of the anti town factions closer to victory somehow.
I would definitely prefer to not have to reveal it now, but if you ask me again, I will tell the truth.
I can do that, yes.
No need to do so yet, but consider doing that before a full information reveal.
