i mean i could see reigns/seth/dean aka moxleyIn post 2157, Battle Mage wrote:Unvote, Vote: Lavender
Claimed Roman Reigns. Don't buy anything else in the claim. Why would Seth have a third party hunting him, and a town party immune from his finish? Seems a bit shitty.
im a heel, traditionally, and im town, so this theory is not correctIn post 2160, Doctor Drew wrote:The only thing that gives me pause is that that Lavender hemmed and hawed about revealing, could have been coached by scum about the details.In post 2158, 50 Judge Powers wrote:If true, then that's pretty awesome imho. And tbh, I don't see you coming up with that out of thin air, so I'm inclined to believe it. Thank you.In post 2155, Lavender wrote:So what do you think? Does this clear me or you want me to convince ya more?
P.S. That doesn't seem like something you should have hidden either. I mean, I understand not saying anything on D1, but as soon as FL flipped there was nothing to worry about revealing it anymore and especially so when you have already used the finisher at least once.
But, I do seriously doubt that since so far the town flips have been babyfaces and the scum/third party flips have been heels(I believe, I should double check that). And if Lavender is lying than almost guarantee there is the real Roman Reigns.
Shield-scum was my first thought yeahIn post 2250, xRECKONERx wrote:i mean i could see reigns/seth/dean aka moxleyIn post 2157, Battle Mage wrote:Unvote, Vote: Lavender
Claimed Roman Reigns. Don't buy anything else in the claim. Why would Seth have a third party hunting him, and a town party immune from his finish? Seems a bit shitty.
dean being third party who left wwe and changes his name might make sense? might be like a multiple lyncher who wants to get both reigns/seth killed
just speculating trying to understand the claim
that's lucky because you're like my only town-readIn post 2252, xRECKONERx wrote:ok caught up
i read bm as pretty heavy town here on his interactions, but i dont know that drews push isnt genuine.
@bm can you state your reasons for the 50jp scumread? clearly
I'm also a (beloved) heel!In post 2251, xRECKONERx wrote:im a heel, traditionally, and im town, so this theory is not correctIn post 2160, Doctor Drew wrote:The only thing that gives me pause is that that Lavender hemmed and hawed about revealing, could have been coached by scum about the details.In post 2158, 50 Judge Powers wrote:If true, then that's pretty awesome imho. And tbh, I don't see you coming up with that out of thin air, so I'm inclined to believe it. Thank you.In post 2155, Lavender wrote:So what do you think? Does this clear me or you want me to convince ya more?
P.S. That doesn't seem like something you should have hidden either. I mean, I understand not saying anything on D1, but as soon as FL flipped there was nothing to worry about revealing it anymore and especially so when you have already used the finisher at least once.
But, I do seriously doubt that since so far the town flips have been babyfaces and the scum/third party flips have been heels(I believe, I should double check that). And if Lavender is lying than almost guarantee there is the real Roman Reigns.
Er, is Dean Karnage's role?In post 2250, xRECKONERx wrote:i mean i could see reigns/seth/dean aka moxleyIn post 2157, Battle Mage wrote:Unvote, Vote: Lavender
Claimed Roman Reigns. Don't buy anything else in the claim. Why would Seth have a third party hunting him, and a town party immune from his finish? Seems a bit shitty.
dean being third party who left wwe and changes his name might make sense? might be like a multiple lyncher who wants to get both reigns/seth killed
just speculating trying to understand the claim
nope, Karnage was Bray WyattIn post 2257, Lavender wrote:Er, is Dean Karnage's role?In post 2250, xRECKONERx wrote:i mean i could see reigns/seth/dean aka moxleyIn post 2157, Battle Mage wrote:Unvote, Vote: Lavender
Claimed Roman Reigns. Don't buy anything else in the claim. Why would Seth have a third party hunting him, and a town party immune from his finish? Seems a bit shitty.
dean being third party who left wwe and changes his name might make sense? might be like a multiple lyncher who wants to get both reigns/seth killed
just speculating trying to understand the claim
In post 2151, 50 Judge Powers wrote:So, if you're asking me if I have reads; I do. If you're asking me to convince you; I'm afraid I can't.
In post 2153, 50 Judge Powers wrote:Looking back through my -admittedly messy- notes; I see that DGB also had you as one if her top TRs (second only to UT), so there's that.
And regarding your activity, I think -and feel free to correct me if I'm wrong- the last 2 games I played with you were To Boon Or Not To Boon (you were town and even less engaged than this) and "some other game" in which you rolled scum and replaced out (I think I linked that one earlier when I was explaining why I meta TR you). If you feel like I might be WKing, you need to ask yourself "why you?" first, and then "why not gobble or Kuroi or hiplop?". But the former is actually more important because you are not such an influential figure in this game AT ALL, so what's in it for me and what makes you special?
In post 2196, Battle Mage wrote: My point was, and is, that Lavender being confirmed-town doesn't help us at all today, because we probably weren't going to lynch her anyway before she claimed, and if he had claimed later with fewer players left it might have helpfully narrowed the lynch field. Now it just means she is a ripe target for scum.
Now join me in lynching 50JP-scum!
yup sameIn post 2267, Battle Mage wrote:I really just don't know about this game. Feels like almost anyone could be scum, and looking at vote patterns, everyone has an equally crap record.
