Cat (
7) - Leaning towards this being a genuine reaction to not realizing the setup, which makes me inclined to think it's towny
D&D (
16) - Could see this question being faked or being real
Cat (
17) - I agree with this assessment
Cat (
21) - Leaning towards Cat really just realizing this as opposed to faking just realizing it. would expect scum to wait longer perhaps, unsure
Hoctac (
23) - Oh god
D&D (
25) - voting group one as a snap reaction to me only saying hello to one half. Or something like that. either way i can't get a read on d&d.
Ame (
28) - This is a good point that i missed earlier. I agree wholeheartedly, i think scum set it up this way with the intent of getting maximum expected value
Kanna (
31) - I am starting to become suspicious of players who want to nuke group one. However, my initial reaction to the setup was also wanting to nuke group one, so there's a grace period on this
Kanna (
32) - i do tend to agree with this though. Actually this is pretty similar to my reaction. I am pretty sure it's 2 scum + i too did not realize the MYLO 2 scum bit
Ame (
34) - Good post by Ame. way ahead of me on realizing we can't really figure out how scum distributed themselves without actually finding scum first. I read a game where Ame tricked a town into sending her up to heaven, though. Scary scum player
Enomis (
39) - Wanting to nuke group one initially cause there's probably 2 scum in there
Enomis (
47) - And then realizing that even if we get 2 scum, we get sent to MYLO. similar progression to Kanna and myself once again where we initially want to kill group one but then realizes better
Dsjstr (
49) - This is a pretty surface-level assessment. We should lynch group one because there are more people, which means there's more mafia? That also means there's more town in there, dude. Also i disagree with the 1/1/1 assessment
Dsjstr (
51) - Ds still seems to think 0 mafia in group one is an option. It really isnt. They don't care if one of their members dies if it means winning
Kanna (
53) - I disagree that all 3 scum would go down together if they hate playing scum. I think they'd be more likely to 1/1/1 if they hate playing scum. that way they can win quickest or at least die quickly if they fail. 3/0/0 ensures a longer scum game and a very stressful D2 probably
Mohab (
56) - I disagree, i think talking about the partitions is useful, especially in the first few pages.
Mohab (
57) - Okay mohab realizes we dont have anything else to discuss and talks about partitions anyway
Mohab (58) - Mohab has a realization that lynching group 1 is even more risky because scum has a nightkill. Suggests we use it to our advantage on D2 rather than hit group 1
Mohab (
59) - Votes for his own group of 3 ! I think Mohab found ds scummy and is now voting for group 3, his own group, because of it. Strong town pings
Ame (
61) - I agree, that post by Kanna is a pretty big niche situation to defend the possibility of 3/0/0
Enomis (
62) - Eh this is kind of a pointless question
Enomis (
63) - Theorycrafting that gets more or less disproven by Ame a bit later. Town indicative? Scum knows a lot more about this than we do, im inclined to believe this theory was genuine
Ame (
64) - I do slightly wonder if Ame knows more about the setup and can disprove faulty reasoning easier than town. I actually don't think this is likely in this case though, what she says here isn't something only scum could figure out
Albert (
72) - I agree. Could be a faked reaction or a real one though.
Albert (
73) - Albert sounds really confident scum would put all 3 in group one and then sweep the game from there. i have no idea if this is because he is scum muddying the waters or if that's what he felt
Raya (
74) - Raya doesn't really say anything in this post. someone points this out later. I do agree with Raya's points, but that's because a lot of them are my points
Albert (
75) - Albert really thinks scum should have chosen to put all 3 in group one. Hm.
Raya (
76) - Raya is more than happy to lynch her own group if it were decided there was 2+ scum in it. Doesn't give me the town vibes like Mohab did. Mohab is taking a risk, raya is more like a "Yeah i'd do that too", but Raya is in way less risk of it actually happening
Hoctac (
81) - Well yes. But still. let me have my partition speculation fun :'c
Enomis (
83) - "i want to be here on day 2" lol what? Lean town cause i find it hard to believe scum says that
Hoctac (
85) - I disagree, Enomis and Mohab haven't been sus. But i can see why someone would find them suspicious. Ds sure.
Cat (
89) - Cat leans town on Mohab!! yes !!!
Hoctac (
91) - Suggesting we lynch group one if there's enough scummy players in there, although he presently thinks there's scummy players in group three. You're worrying me hoctoc
Enomis (
92) - Enomis is not self aware of how he kinda seems like lynchbait. To clarify: He does kinda seem like lynchbait. but he's town i think
Hoctac (
95) - I can see the reasoning here: Mohab goes back on what they said immediately about the partitions, sure. But i dont think Mohab is scum, and certainly not from this
Dsjstr (
97) - Ds cannot see why mafia would go for a 1/1/1 setup. Hard disagree
Cat (
99) - yeah cat u tell him
Albert (
102) - Albert is pushing really hard for a group one suspicion. it worries me but still i dont think its necessarily scummy
Albert (
106) - i am scARED
Ame (
115) - I agree
Ame (
120) - I agree again
D&D (
135) - Disagree on the point about the setup talk. i think the sentiment is towny though. Don't like the enomis read. Do like the Raya read
Adorbs (
137) - Interesting she came to the conclusion it's likely 1/1/1, and therefore dissuades us from voting group one. I wonder if it's 2/0/1 and adorbs wants us to think there's only 1 in group one so day 2 is easier. I'm biased though cause i admit i read cat saying she doesn't like Adorbs' entrance
Albert (
139) - Disagree, there could be 1 scum in group 2