In post 559, TheThirteenthJT wrote:It makes no sense for them to drive a lunch at this point if they know their target will flip town due to the backlash that would fall.
How do you possibly say this and then decide to vote 72 when he was the one most vocal about driving a lynch today
that's too much cognitive dissonance for me to ignore at this point VOTE: TheThirteenthJT
DoctorPepper - if you are town, please revisit the point about 72
steering the lynch away from TTJT and onto you
and why that's scum-motivated. I think if you're town, you're letting your frustration at being pushed for activity blind you to the fact that there's really no incentive to do that if he's scum, unless he's exactly partnered with TTJT.
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
In post 569, TheThirteenthJT wrote:I don't understand you guys on the point of me not wanting to take a side being scum motivated. I believe 72 has been a driving force day one and do feel him moving on from to go after DrPepper was town motivating I'm trying to see a reason against this. I've also hated the points on Drpeppers inactivity when he's clearly stated multiple time tHroughout the game the work has been killing him. I ask him to clarify whether he was disinterested or just lacking on time and he stated he posting more because of time. I believe him here.
If you want me to take a stance VOTE: 72offsuit because after weighing both side I will edge with him as scum over DrPepper. Mostly due to his push on dp being Ill fated and refusing the evidence that Drpeppers activity ahs directly correlated with his vla.
Once last attempt here to drive the lynch away from both of them. What's our game plan if either DrPepper or 72 is lynched?
I want you to tell me how this could possibly not ruin our game if they are both town? We would want to go over tHe other and potEntially mislynch tWice in a row. (Like I said I think it's ways to risky for scum to drive a lunch so late in the day). If one is scum great, more than likely I'm in the chopping block next based on today's wagons. Now if they are botH scum well played because I doubt we would ever vote both off. Too big of a Gambit in my opinion.
that was actually a hammer
and I'm surprised you didn't see that given the VC at the top of this page?
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
I think Micc is here so get your thoughts out fast.
I think 72 hammering can be scum motivated if he is partnered with JT to distance of his lynch
It's scum motivated if JT is town because HE COULD HAVE BEEN A PR AND YOU QUICKHAMMERED
In post 578, 72offsuit wrote:Suddenly TTJT's top scumreads are the top 2 wagons.
this is also bad because he took great care to say he wasn't really scumreading either slot, which I actually thought was scummy because if you & DocPep is TvT then he knows either lynch would flip green
he def didn't say you were his top scumreads, he was asking to see if we could lynch elsewhere
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
In post 590, 72offsuit wrote:Lol. Nice so im scum either way. Fits nicely with your tunnel
yes because your hammer was insanely bad
I'm not even sure why it had to happen (assuming you're scum), TTJT was prob getting lynched over you most times there
either you're hoping to hit PR or you're distancing, exactly as DocPep said
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
In post 559, TheThirteenthJT wrote:It makes no sense for them to drive a lunch at this point if they know their target will flip town due to the backlash that would fall.
How do you possibly say this and then decide to vote 72 when he was the one most vocal about driving a lynch today
that's too much cognitive dissonance for me to ignore at this point VOTE: TheThirteenthJT
DoctorPepper - if you are town, please revisit the point about 72
steering the lynch away from TTJT and onto you
and why that's scum-motivated. I think if you're town, you're letting your frustration at being pushed for activity blind you to the fact that there's really no incentive to do that if he's scum, unless he's exactly partnered with TTJT.
See this is exactly what i was saying. I was in a position were no matter what I did someone would turn into me being scummy. Completely ignores my reasoning and points out what is convinient. This damn game has been frustrating. I wish I would have given more time before queing up from my last game.
I'm at L-1 and will claim/ final post in the morning. I'm not in the right state of mind right now to post. If someone hammers anyway here's a quick summary. I'm sure now one of guiltylion/72/DrPepper is scum. Their partner falls in the MINI, Ydrasse or Italiano category. Someone who was told to stay low. Uno has given me tunneling vibes today and I no longer think he was intentionally misinterpreting me. Also I think that last vote count is beautiful. 3 Seperate wagons with three voted each. Never seen that before. I think it's telling and I'm going to guess here that both scum aren't on the same wagon.
