with 9 votes in play, it takes 5 to make a decision. day 1 ends in (expired on 2020-12-13 10:40:00).
Last edited by Datisi on Wed Dec 02, 2020 9:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
Scooby do you think Farren is the most likely scum in the block?
What's your read on the others in there?
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
In post 591, Scooby Dooby Doo wrote:This post is sus because why are you even focusing on this. And what about the possibility of NEE being scum with a partner already in the coalition? That's an obvious one you missed out.
This is the kind of post which is fun to theorise about and fabricate, but is actually pretty unhelpful as town, in place of actual reads on the playerlist.
Both of these are already answered.
In post 573, Farren wrote:I keep getting distracted by the Norwegian / Mystic show.
The logical follow-up: why do I keep getting distracted? Because I'm easily distracted by shiny objects. Why? I don't know; I wish I did know so I could make it stop.
In post 573, Farren wrote:WIFOM is only meaningful to scum if there's scum in the coalition
I did not ignore it; it's a possible answer. Logical follow-up: why not follow-up on that? Because delving further into hypothetical WIFOM would be a waste of time.
In post 587, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I don't understand the logic of people here, and it's kinda ridiculous that i have to act like the devils advocate, but isn't it quite weird that y'all "place your trust" in Mystic Bear for their gambit, but vote him for the execution if the coalition fails? I think we'd be better off preparing for the worst case scenarion by already keeping our vote on whoever of the 5 in the coalition we have the least trust in, so if the coalition fails they are eliminated. Best case scenario, scum in the pool is removed early. Worst case scenario, we get rid of someone that is likely to be eliminated anyway in the event of the coalition failing.
Therefore i propose we all agree on one of Tris/Vanderscamp/Farren/Scooby Dooby Doo to eliminate if the plan goes wrong.
Yes, it was a horrible idea. Which is why it was a good idea to propose - to see who went along with it, especially if that someone was in the Coalition. If the Coalition failed, that narrows the suspect pool rather nicely.
Or would have. Did you see a scum motivation in Bear's plan? If so, what was it? If not, why play devil's advocate?
And please watch the pronouns. Unless you think they're proposing that only Pooky be executed for a failed coalition.
In post 571, StarToAYoungCulture wrote:It's like saying "I will stop playing mafia if this person isn't mafia" and that person not being mafia then first person who said that keeping to play mafia and no one else not saying anything about it.
If you're gonna play like that you really need something on the stakes
But why is this necessary?
I don't personally care what Mystic's stakes are regarding the coalition succeeding or not because I think they're likely town regardless. Just because the coalition fails, that doesn't mean I'll want to lynch someone I think is town just because they're asking for it.
You've also said you think they're town so it's fairly strange you're taking this line.
In post 587, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I don't understand the logic of people here, and it's kinda ridiculous that i have to act like the devils advocate, but isn't it quite weird that y'all "place your trust" in Mystic Bear for their gambit, but vote him for the execution if the coalition fails? I think we'd be better off preparing for the worst case scenarion by already keeping our vote on whoever of the 5 in the coalition we have the least trust in, so if the coalition fails they are eliminated. Best case scenario, scum in the pool is removed early. Worst case scenario, we get rid of someone that is likely to be eliminated anyway in the event of the coalition failing.
Therefore i propose we all agree on one of Tris/Vanderscamp/Farren/Scooby Dooby Doo to eliminate if the plan goes wrong.
I would rather have the time to talk about it rather than instantly killing someone.
I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
In post 571, StarToAYoungCulture wrote:It's like saying "I will stop playing mafia if this person isn't mafia" and that person not being mafia then first person who said that keeping to play mafia and no one else not saying anything about it.
If you're gonna play like that you really need something on the stakes
But why is this necessary?
I don't personally care what Mystic's stakes are regarding the coalition succeeding or not because I think they're likely town regardless. Just because the coalition fails, that doesn't mean I'll want to lynch someone I think is town just because they're asking for it.
You've also said you think they're town so it's fairly strange you're taking this line.
maybe they are not town, who knows, but the guy have been playing this for at least 18 years he probably knows something (pooky)
and if pooky is wrong maybe he's wrong because they are mafia
Wow the post speed has gone down maybe I can actually keep up with this game
MY PRONOUNS ARE THEY/THEM
do not assume my posts follow coherency they do not imagine that every time i post i put half of my knowledge into a clone and then the clone murders me
I'd like it if more people could discuss their thoughts on the current plan/consensus townblock and who the elimination should be. (Since if the townblock fails the player with majority of votes will automatically be eliminated from what i gathered in the rules)
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
In post 2, Datisi wrote:Normal votes will be tracked during the coalition phase, despite it being impossible to achieve an execution.
However, if a failed coalition is locked in, and there is currently a majority vote on someone, that player will be executed.
Oh wait, no i'm i think wrong. An elimination can't happen until we form an block?
God this is confusing.
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
In post 610, bugspray wrote:Wow the post speed has gone down maybe I can actually keep up with this game
Well... do it.
Did you really show up just to post that?
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
@Norway, Before the coalition is formed, no one gets eliminated. Once the coalition is formed, if there is currently a majority on someone, they are eliminated. otherwise we keep playing until we get an elimination.
In post 615, tris wrote:i don't think this was stated to be the final townblock yet
We need an consensus regardless. Most people seem to trust Mystic Bear (Except Bugspray?) so that’s why i think it’s best to just sheep whatevers their block.
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
In post 610, bugspray wrote:Wow the post speed has gone down maybe I can actually keep up with this game
Well... do it.
Did you really show up just to post that?
Prodging real good
How does it look when there's a coalition that is getting popular that scum isn't in? I feel like they would freak out and have trouble trying to give non ate reasons to avoid that coalition
MY PRONOUNS ARE THEY/THEM
do not assume my posts follow coherency they do not imagine that every time i post i put half of my knowledge into a clone and then the clone murders me
After the reread I might warm up to the spamhydra but I just really didn't like the early flood
MY PRONOUNS ARE THEY/THEM
do not assume my posts follow coherency they do not imagine that every time i post i put half of my knowledge into a clone and then the clone murders me
In post 620, bugspray wrote:After the reread I might warm up to the spamhydra but I just really didn't like the early flood
I find it funny you call them spam hydra. Meanwhile i just surpassed their number of posts.
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
Additionally, I think if both MB and Norwegian are actually town, there is a pretty good chance this was TMI.
Because I am a bad player and can't be right?
No, because I don't think there was a particularly good reason to think you were right, and the kind of read you gave is the kind that a lot of scum tend to give a lot.
Vanderscamp are you gonna vote Mystic Bears block? I'm so bored.
Put some pressure on scum guy. (assuming they are not already in it)
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting