Vanderscamp do you think you would ever be willing to take yourself out of your own coalition for any reason?
What is the point of this question?
I would like to see you answer it please.
The answer is yes, there are circumstances where that would happen, mainly if I'm not particularly trusted and I'm choosing between ones without me.
But I'm also not remotely interested in taking myself out of it if there's a consensus that I'm good, which is the case.
I think this answer is very obvious and I have no idea what you hoped to gain from it.
I feel like Tris or Jackson are both decent candidates we could agree on.
Also this game got dull so i feel more willing to just compromise on a solve that's not too terrible as long as it moves the game forward and we get something solid to talk about.
I don't remember anyone actually town-casing tris, can you do that for me? Otherwise I am fully against tris being in the coalition.
"Am I a ghost like you, caught between the seams of two intertwining melodies?"
Bugs, there's probably a reason why the only Town wins shown on the wiki for this setup is actual wins from the Coalition going through. The rest are scum victories so please take the coalition bit seriously.
"Am I a ghost like you, caught between the seams of two intertwining melodies?"
In post 1033, JacksonVirgo wrote:I believe I've said this before but if tris is in any failed coalition I will gun for their head on a pike.
This feels like you've got her listed as confscum, or the next closest thing. I know she's been your worst read, but did something happen to change your confidence level? If so, what?
@mod can you make it so that the coalition counters have better readability like order the members of each coalition in alphabetical (or some other consistent) order and also group together identical coalitions?
members are ordered by oldest to newest added into the coalition, and identical coalitions are already grouped together.
I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
In post 1053, dostin wrote:Farren what do you think of Vanderscamp right now? I think we can come to an agreement between both of our coalitions if I take out STAYC and put in tris and you take out Vanderscamp and put in me. What do you think of that grouping?
Right now, as far as Vanders goes, I'm trying to suppress my paranoia. It happens so bloody frequently, and it's usually wrong.
As for your proposed coalition: I'm getting a pocketing vibe here. Or something along those lines - there's something off about trying to directly push into a coalition.
In post 1059, Vanderscamp wrote:Not sure about this one, I don't think I say this about you every game.
Not this in particular, no. Usually you think I'm Evil.
I'm not sure how to compare it, though - if this were a BGG game, we'd be a lot farther along. Does it make more sense to go by realtime or game progression?
(that's rhetorical; I need to figure that out myself.)
I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
@mod can you make it so that the coalition counters have better readability like order the members of each coalition in alphabetical (or some other consistent) order and also group together identical coalitions?
members are ordered by oldest to newest added into the coalition, and identical coalitions are already grouped together.
ok thanks that makes them a lot easier to understand
MY PRONOUNS ARE THEY/THEM
do not assume my posts follow coherency they do not imagine that every time i post i put half of my knowledge into a clone and then the clone murders me
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
Yeah Farren's block is good. I do not disagree with anyone there. HURT: Tris HEAL: JacksonVirgo
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
I'd like for us to have some time to either discuss where we went wrong or just win the game.
That's my current plan.
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
Why is it bad? I don't think Jackson's been terrible.
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
I mean, i guess they scumread you.
But what's the alternative? Dostin? Bugspray? STAYC?
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
put me in and thats one town but ugh im so demotivated by how we're focusing on the coaloition too much
i shouldnt /in to stuff with alternate wincons anymore
MY PRONOUNS ARE THEY/THEM
do not assume my posts follow coherency they do not imagine that every time i post i put half of my knowledge into a clone and then the clone murders me
