How rude ;.;In post 394, implosion wrote:Oh i'm not pleaing to you, I'm pleaing to gamma to overwrite your vote when he's online :p
~ C
How rude ;.;In post 394, implosion wrote:Oh i'm not pleaing to you, I'm pleaing to gamma to overwrite your vote when he's online :p
Talk about this?In post 362, The Coalition wrote:something i noticed this morning is that I got the vibe the black ranger entered the game playing in a way that feels "safe". Not coalitioning that slot likely.
Why is Vulture in it over implosion?In post 372, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:does any1 have a problem with my coalitionIn post 350, Datisi wrote:PookyTheMagicalBear [5]: GuiltyLion, PookyTheMagicalBear, Art, The Cheek of Gamma, Vulture
lets hear some criticism.
"im not on it" is not a valid complaint.
this feels dodgy/hedgy/scumbaglogicIn post 381, implosion wrote:There's nothing mandating I do this.In post 377, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:dude if you have a problem with my coalition you need to tell me who on my coalition is a baddie and why they're a baddie
It would be funny if this was a PT slip.In post 268, Black Ranger wrote:imp, what's a good GL take? I'll read up in the morning and see if I get there.
Oh darn it's not.In post 267, Black Ranger wrote:i read the first 4 pages and only managed to get a townread on imp
I really liked 94. The "fuck you and the horse you rode in on" vibe I'm getting does read completely like bravado and may even be performative. How has The Coaltion being outed as Koba as of post 128 effected how you feel about the theatrics of their behavior?In post 115, GuiltyLion wrote:a) where do you see me doing that?In post 94, The Coalition wrote:GL reasoning works backwards, starting at "this person is X" and then tries to manufacture reasons for it. I'm not sure where people get townreads on that but its like blatantly scum and I'm vetoing all coalitions with them on it.
b) Do you disagree with any of my townreads (Iverson, Cheek, Vulture) in my coalition? If not, this is a bizarrely harsh reaction to the fact that I'm scumreading you
And is your read on Vulture dependent on your read on implosion?In post 134, implosion wrote:This is, not true? I generally don't consider almost anything like "focusing on mech" to be alignment-indicative outside of context, and I think the context of the tone in which Vulture did it is townish.Iverson wrote:Implosion is oldschool and sees scum focus on mech like clockwork and he should be shot on sight.
Scum might focus on mechanics sometimes but it was page three and and Vulture had already said they were going to drop it at that point.
In post 368, The Cheek of Gamma wrote:Yeah I'm not wasting my breath spoon feeding you pretty simple logic. I said what I meant in a non cryptic way. GL elaborated your approach pretty nicely this page.In post 367, Uncle Shelby wrote:Cheeky, you've ignored a pretty simple and direct question from me twice now.
~ C
Where is this emotional response coming from My question is a pretty straightforward self-meta request.In post 369, The Cheek of Gamma wrote:In post 360, GuiltyLion wrote:their catchup posts/questions up to this point are more centered around finding 'gotcha!' contradictions than they demonstrate genuine solving, or interpreting people's posts with charitable intent
Is this a serious list?In post 372, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:does any1 have a problem with my coalitionIn post 350, Datisi wrote:PookyTheMagicalBear [5]: GuiltyLion, PookyTheMagicalBear, Art, The Cheek of Gamma, Vulture
lets hear some criticism.
"im not on it" is not a valid complaint.
"Caught for the wrong reasons" feels like a buzzword atp, but that's sort of how I'm feeling about this. Actually it's a little more specific than that, because implosion could be intentionally masking his scum meta in this game, which is a pointless way of hiding as scum if you're playing at an unfamiliar table. Having a hard time deciding between this and the Lion for my second spot.In post 390, implosion wrote:Cheeky you should listen to your hydra partner who's played with me before, rather than you who has not.
What are your in-game reasons for reading them as town?In post 402, implosion wrote:CoG: town unless someone has some good reason to meta-read Cheeky as scum.