In post 161, Radical Rat wrote:People I'd like to hear from before putting my vote back:
Salsa (V/LA should be up today)
catboi
Entellian himself (though that may not be possible...)
And everyone else, of course, but those are the main ones.
I absolutely agree with you, that hearing their point of view would be good. But why not from Save the Dragons (I just noticed that using just the first letters of those three words is no good way to shorten his name) or floo? They didn't respond to this matter either.
I sadly guess you are right about Entellian. And I think Salsa won't change her tripple vote on me either (maybe only by adding more votes. Maybe I am listening to Queen too much [is that even possible?], but it might be she just did what she did, because she's the 'Killer Queen').
I like the upper part of this post.
Why just the upper part? Don't you like to be called Killer Queen?
In post 122, kennyk wrote:@all other players: No, I didn't ask for a prodding because I miss my fellow mafia player. And no, this was no confession of being mafia. I would never confess that. Or maybe i would in some crazy setup or as part of a really crazy plan in some situations.
feels like an odd reaction. i didn't feel this way over you explciitly telling me not to put floo at E-2, despite you scumreading them. wouldn't that be more partnery, despite you voting them because you think they're mafia?
basically what i want to ask is: why are you so concerned about your self-image here and not when talking about floo?
That tunnel tho...
Do you mean
clSr
is tunneling
Radical
here?
I'm waiting for someone to say something special in mafia game(s) about me, so that, I can change my pathetic signature.
Damn you salsa and your kamikaze claim that allowed you to enjoy and succeed within your own personally crafted win condition ~ AurorusVox
Yes, because I can see a world where you and CLS are Scum here. Hence it would be a post to make me look bad... Not like you could have predicted that I would make that post, but, meh. I feel like there would be reason to SR me based on me admitting I see where you thought I was buddying you when I wasn't, but I digress.
Contradict...
I'm waiting for someone to say something special in mafia game(s) about me, so that, I can change my pathetic signature.
Damn you salsa and your kamikaze claim that allowed you to enjoy and succeed within your own personally crafted win condition ~ AurorusVox
In post 164, kennyk wrote:I absolutely agree with you, that hearing their point of view would be good. But why not from Save the Dragons (I just noticed that using just the first letters of those three words is no good way to shorten his name) or floo? They didn't respond to this matter either.
Forgot to answer this, but well. I do of course want to hear from everyone, but I want(ed) to hear from Salsa and catboi because I trust them.
Don't tell me it’s a buddy attempt
I'm waiting for someone to say something special in mafia game(s) about me, so that, I can change my pathetic signature.
Damn you salsa and your kamikaze claim that allowed you to enjoy and succeed within your own personally crafted win condition ~ AurorusVox
Yes, because I can see a world where you and CLS are Scum here. Hence it would be a post to make me look bad... Not like you could have predicted that I would make that post, but, meh. I feel like there would be reason to SR me based on me admitting I see where you thought I was buddying you when I wasn't, but I digress.
in the scenario of CLSR vs STD i'm probably doing all of the pairing with posts like 102 and 204, with STD passively registering them in their mind until asked for reads: 103 ||203, 206
are you sure that we are paired? i'm feeling more of a S v T
it won't mean anything in the grand scheme of things but salsa random voted dragon's slot
i'll order my readslist while i'm at it:
In post 60, floo wrote:I think she says kennyk is trying too hard, missing the obvious motive as I pointed out for a scum accusation. It's good that someone is trying to be serious because this is how we move out of RVS, but kennyk is doing this wrong. She may also be accusing kennyk of doing that just to look town. I recall that the term LAMIST is used here for this.
Perfectly explained but I want to add one thing: they said they had an account here before, so they played before here imo. That's why I'm not taking them that much of a newb player and when I read their posts ("
this sus, that sus
"), I found they were trying
too much
which I generally find suspicious.
This looks like either a defense of floo or a buddy attempt.
In post 60, floo wrote:I think she says kennyk is trying too hard, missing the obvious motive as I pointed out for a scum accusation. It's good that someone is trying to be serious because this is how we move out of RVS, but kennyk is doing this wrong. She may also be accusing kennyk of doing that just to look town. I recall that the term LAMIST is used here for this.
what's the best way to move us outside of RVS, if the way kenny is doing it is "wrong"? is it just because the pushing happened to be on you because he thought your thought process was unclear? what happened in this game seems like just as good of a method as any, which is why i'm asking
I find
LAMIST play
scummy in general basis.
Almost every town games of mine, there was at least one scum
who appeared to be solvy in the early stage of the game
to gain towncred and in my scum games, I also tried to get towncred at RVS stage.
This might be nothing, or it might be made to make CLS look bad while also carrying the same thing of buddy/defence of floo in prior post.
But then I saw a spinet of Kenny's post in 72 in reference to the original post 62.
Why this is interesting is because of what Kenny said here:
In post 155, kennyk wrote:@ Uranus: I guess you didn't read the thread properly. After Radical Rats Unvote I am now
'only'
E-2
And given StD and Kenny both come from a different game meta than current MS meta, this indicates to me that the site meta they come from people are generally much more hesitant with their votes and only vote for serious reasons. If this is the case, then Salsa vastly comes from a different meta than these two players because of their constant votes in 39, 40, and 44. What's more is that Salsa actually know this and just keeps voting Kenny for very little reason even though they are already voting for Kenny. And this happened BEFORE Kenny pointed out the 'only' E-2 comment.
Either way, it looks to be the case that Salsa has inside knowledge of Kenny's and StD's game meta that they come from. I'm hesitant to call out SvS interactions so early, but I'm not sure what another conclusion would be given this... the other option, I suppose, is that Salsa is Scum with floo. But this seems unlikely to defend a buddy so directly so early in the game.
Am I going crazy or is there something here?
Again, nothing makes sense to me except one thing: YOU ARE CRAZY....
I'm waiting for someone to say something special in mafia game(s) about me, so that, I can change my pathetic signature.
Damn you salsa and your kamikaze claim that allowed you to enjoy and succeed within your own personally crafted win condition ~ AurorusVox
In post 248, kennyk wrote:Just to be clear: I played here and on greylabyrinth in the past. But this is my first mafia game in 15 years. I might have a game meta from way back but I really don't know if I am playing the same way now. I t definitely was a different time then.
As to Salsas multivoting me for being too solvy, I don't think it is that much if a tell (the multivoting part. The reason might give us something). If I recall correctly, it was the second vote on me (after floo). Her second vote on me might just habe been to tip on my toes or to annoy me into a state where I make a mistake. And to be honest, I guess I called for the third vote. So no hard feelings from me for the multivote.
I multi-voted to irritate you
You were using the
sus
word so much at the early stage of the game, which annoyed me a decent amount while reading your post
I'm waiting for someone to say something special in mafia game(s) about me, so that, I can change my pathetic signature.
Damn you salsa and your kamikaze claim that allowed you to enjoy and succeed within your own personally crafted win condition ~ AurorusVox
In post 259, Salsabil Faria wrote:Can you explain more? How do you think expressing paranoia
over NAI stuff without even getting pressure is coming from town mindset? The more I'm reading them, more I find them scummy but on the same time their wagon isn’t having that much of resistance I'm thinking scum!them would have atp which is giving me 2nd thoughts....
what kenny did was undoubtedly odd. i do not think it comes from a town mindset
only
though.
i think that what he did is something both town and mafia can do.
i pushed a little bit on something that i thought could actually be scummy (him defending floo despite voting them) and made it related to him being defensive about his prod, and he gave good answers to both
(i think that if mafia is forced to answer a lot of things at once, they'll struggle a bit, but his post felt natural, so i think he is town right now)
Can you mention the post where they defend
floo
please?
I'm waiting for someone to say something special in mafia game(s) about me, so that, I can change my pathetic signature.
Damn you salsa and your kamikaze claim that allowed you to enjoy and succeed within your own personally crafted win condition ~ AurorusVox
In post 161, Radical Rat wrote:People I'd like to hear from before putting my vote back:
Salsa (V/LA should be up today)
catboi
Entellian himself (though that may not be possible...)
And everyone else, of course, but those are the main ones.
I absolutely agree with you, that hearing their point of view would be good. But why not from Save the Dragons (I just noticed that using just the first letters of those three words is no good way to shorten his name) or floo? They didn't respond to this matter either.
I sadly guess you are right about Entellian. And I think Salsa won't change her tripple vote on me either (maybe only by adding more votes. Maybe I am listening to Queen too much [is that even possible?], but it might be she just did what she did, because she's the 'Killer Queen').
I like the upper part of this post.
Why just the upper part? Don't you like to be called Killer Queen?
Because that part I think you made from good faith (your other posts are weird tbh) and it’s not about what you're calling (unless it’s something offensive), I felt you already made up your mind about me without properly having any conversation with me, that's what I don’t like.
I'm waiting for someone to say something special in mafia game(s) about me, so that, I can change my pathetic signature.
Damn you salsa and your kamikaze claim that allowed you to enjoy and succeed within your own personally crafted win condition ~ AurorusVox
In post 259, Salsabil Faria wrote:Can you explain more? How do you think expressing paranoia
over NAI stuff without even getting pressure is coming from town mindset? The more I'm reading them, more I find them scummy but on the same time their wagon isn’t having that much of resistance I'm thinking scum!them would have atp which is giving me 2nd thoughts....
what kenny did was undoubtedly odd. i do not think it comes from a town mindset
only
though.
i think that what he did is something both town and mafia can do.
i pushed a little bit on something that i thought could actually be scummy (him defending floo despite voting them) and made it related to him being defensive about his prod, and he gave good answers to both
(i think that if mafia is forced to answer a lot of things at once, they'll struggle a bit, but his post felt natural, so i think he is town right now)
Can you mention the post where they defend
floo
please?
I guess he meant this post (quote shortened for a better reading experience concerning this question), which was more like a general thing that a defence:
In post 62, kennyk wrote:cowsloveSushirolls please don't do an E-2 vote just for moo > floo. You need to have another motive to give someone a third vote.