mmmk then I'm not worried, I was getting annoyed at the "not allowed to TR andante cause of meta" crap... it's fine though, you'll probably tr me with later postsIn post 1068, SirCakez wrote:oopsies I meant 29In post 1061, Andante wrote:I didn't even talk on page 28?In post 1058, SirCakez wrote:im taking back my Andante townread page 28 irked me quite a bit. they felt defensive in a not good way.
pages are blending together here
I know, thus I'm waiting on my Something_Smart read, it's very easy to do the stats stufff he's done as scumIn post 1074, SirCakez wrote:I don't like that the only notable thing SS has done is post stats analysis
what are the odds the scum team saw the stats and specifically played against them
this is good logic and mare could definitely be scum based on their awful push of meIn post 926, catboi wrote:I had had a thought while I was out for a run that if flow trap is in fact town he is an LHF-ish player who is likely to attract votes from scum, which wouyld point to one of Mare/Datisi possibly being scum, and if there was one there I would have guessed Datisi, as I'd kind of liked Mare's 719 last night although on a reread I'm not sure it'sthattownie, and as I am catching up I am liking Datisi more and Mare less
like I do this every game these days this is total bullshitIn post 931, Mare wrote:In post 581, SirCakez wrote:this post kinda bothers me tonally. it feels too agreeable (ok and not just because they said I agree with Datisi)In post 128, midwaybear wrote:VOTE: skitter
Hi everyone. I pretty much agree with Datisi’s thoughts on flow trap not being w/w with SS. It is more likely than not that scum has someone who was aware of SS pattern, but not guaranteed. Having meta numbers seems a little broken lol
VOTE: midwaybearSame exact vibe which made me instantly suspect him in a previous game. Same exact slow catching up with eh takes as the previous game. Mediocre draft placement.In post 108, SirCakez wrote:VOTE: mirioIn post 33, Mirio wrote:I am not saying we should not do the raids. I am saying we should let the entire game check in first.
This post gives me tonally gross vibes
SirScumz strikes again.
I mean, I'm not playing this game solely off stats here, I'm voting you mostly cause for you it just seems to be "I want the highest post count" not "I'll actually play the game"In post 1073, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:ok that's not how probability works lolIn post 1070, Andante wrote:Look at how many times scum chose 1 when 1 wasn't first draft. Scum is basically in that group every time
lol I'm a terrible stats major XD Failed probability last semester.. wooo I'm the "expert" hereIn post 1082, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:mmm maybe i shouldn't be arguing probability with a stats major >_>
you're all like blah blah I don't like what Cakez is sayingIn post 960, Mare wrote:And, let me say, once more.
I really don't give a fuck if he's catching up. People do it. I dislike it. Whatever.
I dislike what he's saying.
In post 966, Mare wrote:Like you want to be ? but you're sitting here saying that he hasn't done anything AI which is patently false soooo.
this feels fake as fuck
That's fair :3In post 1083, Andante wrote:I mean, I'm not playing this game solely off stats here, I'm voting you mostly cause for you it just seems to be "I want the highest post count" not "I'll actually play the game"
with all due respect, are you really making this argument as a stats majorIn post 1070, Andante wrote:Look at how many times scum chose 1 when 1 wasn't first draft. Scum is basically in that group every time
When can I expect to start seeing some actual content? Maybe tomorrow?In post 1088, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:That's fair :3In post 1083, Andante wrote:I mean, I'm not playing this game solely off stats here, I'm voting you mostly cause for you it just seems to be "I want the highest post count" not "I'll actually play the game"
In post 1006, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:is it time to restart the animal police department to get some civility back
this is definitely scum and I don't want to move my vote
are you going to give me a homework assignment?In post 1090, Andante wrote:When can I expect to start seeing some actual content? Maybe tomorrow?In post 1088, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:That's fair :3In post 1083, Andante wrote:I mean, I'm not playing this game solely off stats here, I'm voting you mostly cause for you it just seems to be "I want the highest post count" not "I'll actually play the game"
lol ok you're the 2nd one to say something, I don't see what's wrong with that statement?? When only town chose 1 (ignoring 630) there were only 2/13 games where #1 wasn't 1st draft and was still all town. Whenever scum chose #1, there was more than 1 person that chose it. 6/8 times that #1 wasn't 1st draft, it had scum. High odds to be scum! I don't understand what's wrong with this statementIn post 1089, Something_Smart wrote:with all due respect, are you really making this argument as a stats majorIn post 1070, Andante wrote:Look at how many times scum chose 1 when 1 wasn't first draft. Scum is basically in that group every time
Sure. ReadsIn post 1092, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:are you going to give me a homework assignment?In post 1090, Andante wrote:When can I expect to start seeing some actual content? Maybe tomorrow?In post 1088, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:That's fair :3In post 1083, Andante wrote:I mean, I'm not playing this game solely off stats here, I'm voting you mostly cause for you it just seems to be "I want the highest post count" not "I'll actually play the game"