Spoiler: mare
In post 49, Mare wrote:I town.
In post 52, Mare wrote:
In post 66, Mare wrote:IV why do you seem self-conscious about your number.
In post 78, Mare wrote:Dunno this just sounds weirdly vulnerable compared to your posts so far.In post 63, innocentvillager wrote:i just picked a number that I thought was under picked
don’t think many people have picked 10 if not ever in the games I saw
Shrug.
In post 86, Mare wrote:Also, FWIW I’m of the opinion that scum are almost always going to try for a high or middling number. The benefit of WIFOM exists but it seems useless when you can just get caught by the PRs you’re handing over to town.
In post 96, Mare wrote:I don’t... really think this a real passing thought you had.In post 83, innocentvillager wrote:well everyone was talking about their numbers and picks and shit and I wanted to jump into the discussionIn post 78, Mare wrote:Dunno this just sounds weirdly vulnerable compared to your posts so far.In post 63, innocentvillager wrote:i just picked a number that I thought was under picked
don’t think many people have picked 10 if not ever in the games I saw
Shrug.
for example, I thought it was unlikely scum chose both 8 and 9, but knowing SS always chooses 9 I may need to rethink this thought a little
pedit: skitter dw I’m obvtown
In post 101, Mare wrote:It’s just one of those awkward sounding things that feels like you’re making up thoughts to tell us.
In post 111, Mare wrote:I don’t.In post 106, innocentvillager wrote:mare why do u think that faker post was scummy?
I wanted to add something like *condescending movie-like face pat* or something but that felt too weird.
In post 114, Mare wrote:I mean, if you want me to nail down the exact, “rethink this thought” is strange.In post 108, innocentvillager wrote:ok well I don’t really know how to respond to something like thisIn post 101, Mare wrote:It’s just one of those awkward sounding things that feels like you’re making up thoughts to tell us.
let me know if you think of something more specific
In post 119, Mare wrote:If anything I think my point stands more given the spat of energetic posting IV made following.In post 115, Faker wrote:I just woke up and decided my vote wasn't doing much. I did not think 78 was a real process.In post 107, skitter30 wrote:Amd why mare?
I believe I answered your other question already in a response to Datisi.
In post 159, Mare wrote:I’m rarely in a mood to play in a more... direct way rather than fleeting thoughts, but I am this game, so it felt important to press down on something for once.In post 127, Faker wrote:The few games I have seen of IV (9:12 and a few specced) lead me to lean that towards both his initial statements and the followups being very NAI.In post 119, Mare wrote:If anything I think my point stands more given the spat of energetic posting IV made following.
Normally I don't like to go out of my way to say this, but you seem to be want me to reassess and engage directly with the attack in a substantive way, so I will humor you.
That being said, IV made a post about what scum would subconsciously do rather than just basic “scum doesn’t do this because it looks bad” which is something that appeals to me and I think less likely to come from scum.
(In an effort not to clutter as much myself, @IV, the spewing wasn’t clutter.)
UNVOTE:
In post 165, Mare wrote:Also, given the meme/fun numbers of the last set’s iteration and this one, scum team’s probably taking it seriously/coordinating what they do together more than an average team might.
In post 173, Mare wrote:My new wack theory is midway/flow are scum together, midway came into the game agreeing with a very specific thought because it was on his mind because scum did in fact pick a number to sabotage a townie and look a little better/out of the spotlight.
In post 194, Mare wrote:Already explained.In post 185, Something_Smart wrote:Why notIn post 96, Mare wrote:I don’t... really think this a real passing thought you had.
In post 215, Mare wrote:I don’t have a reason to be skeptical yet and I’m not going to waste my energy on it until you do something worth skepticism. There are other people who are currently worth it and you’re not.In post 206, Faker wrote:Mare, I have spoken in several different games of my intentionality in interacting with you to either shut you out of the game or to stay out of your way. It should be obvious that I intend to do neither this game.
However, in previous iterations (ex. Slaughter Hour) your response has been to be (rightfully) extremely skeptical of my intentions and to steer clear as much as possible. Your only real post about me that game came to warn off someone townreading me for tilt, and you only quoted someone else rather than added any commentary of your own.
I don't see the same skepticism of my intent here. I am very happy voting you.
In post 218, Mare wrote:If you want me to do the little song and dance I do going oh, you’re so stupid, nice try reading me and failing again, I’m... really not interested in acting like that this game.
In post 243, Mare wrote:I mean, I wanted to push a point I felt was important at the time. It didn’t really matter the past treatment or the weird distance in games.In post 230, Faker wrote:Weird, considering I've exploited the assumption of good will before and you've correctly adapted to it before.In post 215, Mare wrote:I don’t have a reason to be skeptical yet and I’m not going to waste my energy on it until you do something worth skepticism. There are other people who are currently worth it and you’re not.
Responding to your latest post, I am critiquing yourleaning intothe dance rather than cautiously away.
I don't really want to match your tone here, and I don't think it's NAI, but I think going out of your way across multiple posts to suggest I am not worth effort is disappointing.
You’re not worth the effort of a scumread currently, which... don’t really think is worth disappointment. Of interacting/as a whole you are or else I wouldn’t attempt to interact with you. I thought that was clear but it probably wasn’t, apologies.
In post 599, Mare wrote:Hard disagree on Cakez. Felt pretty insubstantial so far.
In post 792, Mare wrote:That I think your way of thinking is different to mine, I find it strange, and that I’m going to read closer into you as the game goes but for right now it’s *enough*.In post 791, Datisi wrote:if i had thought the scumread is uncalled for, i'd have called her out and demanded explanation.In post 787, Mare wrote:Huh. To me, if someone comes out of the gate thinking I’m scum on entrance I think I’d personally want to know why like... immediately. And then discern from there.
what is this conversation telling you?
In post 946, Mare wrote:Don't care, was right last time and I feel the same about him so far, gonna stick with my vote.
In post 949, Mare wrote:Want to slapfight me so you can figure it out sooner rather than later that I'm not off?In post 947, skitter30 wrote:>.>In post 867, Mare wrote:Another observation is Andante immediately jumped on the numbers when used against her to swing at everyone else/deflect.
you're feeling a bit off tbh
In post 958, Mare wrote:Okay, my counterpoint:
I viscerally felt that SirCakez was scum from the moment he began posting in a previous game. I cop checked him N1 and he was elimmed the next day.
Why should I ignore it when I get the same exact feeling from his posts here? Should I not immediately press on something familiar when I am familiar with it as scum?
In post 960, Mare wrote:And, let me say, once more.
I really don't give a fuck if he's catching up. People do it. I dislike it. Whatever.
I dislike what he's saying.
In post 966, Mare wrote:Like you want to be ? but you're sitting here saying that he hasn't done anything AI which is patently false soooo.
In post 982, Mare wrote:Nope, not born out of nothing.
In post 984, Mare wrote:Still sticking by my read, don't care about the other posts in town games. Way he worded it was the same.
Distancing from his own ideas.
In post 992, Mare wrote:Because it's going to turn out again like the last game where my thoughts on things are weird, until there is basis in mechanical action, etc etc. It's frustrating and unfun when I try to play like this again and again and I am consistently felt out as weird despite trying to apply myself to the game in a different way.In post 985, catboi wrote:I think Mare is coming off worse here mostly because I don't get why she's this up in arms over disagreement on a read ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
So, fuck it, doubling down on the stuff that I think is right.
In post 1112, Mare wrote:In post 994, skitter30 wrote:ok i hope things get better soon <3
maybe let's try this again tomorrowIn post 1064, skitter30 wrote:Thoughts on mare?
--
Also i'm kinda meh on pooky but not sure its ai for himIn post 1100, skitter30 wrote:Lets wagon mare!
In post 1115, Mare wrote:Skitter's opportunistic scum. Second place in draft too.
Cakez is OMGUSing me for a bad push when he's reading Pooky the same way.
In post 1117, Mare wrote:This can be scum too for egregiously misrepresenting my posts in which I have repeatedly expressed that I dislike catch-ups on a personal level, but was voting Cakez for content.In post 1114, Andante wrote:I wanna vote Mare out solely for selfing, after going on about how we hate when people are catching up...like, pooky is scum, but idk what mare is doing?? saving pooky?
In post 1119, Mare wrote:Don't care. You went from "take this up tomorrow" to "okay wagon time" without blinking.In post 1116, skitter30 wrote:Ok i do kinda object to that characterization tho ...
In post 1121, Mare wrote:And it's with an upswing of more people saying they want to kill me, so just go ahead and vote me, and when I flip town my grave will be a fucking arrow pointed at you.
Go on.