In post 5598, Datisi wrote::>
i hope you're feeling better by now, ari. and i hope we can and do win together.
I hope you are town as well too !
I don't think I care as much about winning anymore as I do about getting my read of you correct.
In post 5598, Datisi wrote::>
i hope you're feeling better by now, ari. and i hope we can and do win together.
Okay, what do you find awkward about my Andres interactions? Do you dislike some of my issues with his slot?In post 5586, Datisi wrote:my only opinion on your dayplay is that the suspicion/conversation with andres feels kinda awkward and makes me think you're distancing loleIn post 5585, innocentvillager wrote:I think you should have some opinion of my dayplay by now.
pedit: I talked about my Math read and yes I did abandon mech for him. I think he's town here by dayplay.
where did you talk about math again? i skimmed your iso, i don't see it, other than a generic "math twon by dlayplay"
Completely not game related, how was I dead wrong in this game my reads were fine lol. I never townread any of the scum and I only briefly pushed Facebones and Holden before realizing they were likely town. I had Pooky as most likely scum after Nor replaced in. Also, I don't usually push scumreads with conviction, that's super rare from me too.In post 5589, Aristeia wrote:Even on the last day when you are dead wrong
I'm fairly sure if I didn't freak out at Mathblade you would've actually sleepwalked into a win yesterday without even trying if Mathblade had kept his vote on me and then IV/Andres pile on too.In post 5604, innocentvillager wrote:You keep saying that I was gone D3 because I'm fake conftown and didn't want to rock the boat - If I was scum, being conftown by "False mech" isn't something I could've relied on in ELO given selection bias of still being alive and eventually my "coasting" would be called into serious question.
You do not have a single completed town game under this "new playstyle"In post 5604, innocentvillager wrote:All of your analysis there is ignoring the fact that I'm changing my playstyle, which I've mentioned many times, and deliberately been allocating a lot less to this game than normal.
My claim is fairly simple - you don't like to play scum - one way to read for your scum game is to simply see how much enthusiasm you have for solving the game - because you have stated yourself you just don't like to play scum.In post 5604, innocentvillager wrote:@Aristeia I'm surprised you went through all that and it's interesting to see your take on it (which I believe is genuine) but none of my polarization is a secret, everyone knows my old meta is to be polarized. My original accusation was your statement that I'm "obviously in his scum meta where he doesn't even play the game for multiple days or attempt to solve and the only thing that motivates him to make an effort is the fact that it's elo and he is a viable elim today" - this is the specific claim you made and that was the specific claim I wanted you to back up, which you couldn't do, you just went on a generic deep meta of me.
Perhaps you were not completely wrong but you kept your mind open and were solving on every day of that game despite the game being never in elo when you were alive.In post 5605, innocentvillager wrote:Completely not game related, how was I dead wrong in this game my reads were fine lol. I never townread any of the scum and I only briefly pushed Facebones and Holden before realizing they were likely town. I had Pooky as most likely scum after Nor replaced in. Also, I don't usually push scumreads with conviction, that's super rare from me too.In post 5589, Aristeia wrote:Even on the last day when you are dead wrong
VOTE: IVIn post 5602, Aristeia wrote:mm how about this one of a cat who discovers the miracle of tissue boxes?