In post 546, Rhaenyra wrote:And I am pretty sure I can negate any attempts you make to do so, by burying your posts with my own till no one pays attention to them. Don't try me. Leave your bias by the door, as it's not needed here.In post 538, Thestatusquo wrote:I am pretty sure I can make it so mastina does not get elected king in this game pretty easily.
I feel like this is all bait but egh whateverIn post 549, Rhaenyra wrote:*sighs sadly* Another bean of 'I will ignore you because you do not see things my way' variety...In post 545, Thestatusquo wrote:How is "I do not think this playstyle is good for a king" "personal reasons?"In post 540, Rhaenyra wrote:So it's for personal reasons? You would rather throw away a potential win because of personal reasons?In post 538, Thestatusquo wrote:I am pretty sure I can make it so mastina does not get elected king in this game pretty easily.
And I believe she does it as town. YOU were the one making the claim that it was town indicative of her. I was saying it was NAI and that I don't want a king who plays like that because its heinous.
*adds you to my do-not-support pile with Firebringer*
I think I shall not engage with you further because I think you have nothing reasonable to say. Good night.
You know, I'm not the most skilled player ever, nor I'm the greatest memer of all time, but you are not being any of those by any stretch of the imagination
so people can't be biased but YOU can?
people can't troll but YOU can?
you want your voice to be heard, yet the only thing you have done this game is talk about mastina a player who will probably be replaced?
like dude, we have 20+ pages of content drop your mastina rampage or I and probably others will be ignoring you for the rest of the game