I have every reason to believe that the council has been town the entire game; you have been on the council the entire game.In post 4784, Firebringer wrote:even in a dats scum world. The only scummy thing ive found about mastina is she townreads me. That is just bizarre.
I know I still sort of scum read you and will probably revert to suspecting you in worlds where Datisi flips town (though furtive goes first I think, you really did sell me on furtive scum).In post 4846, fireisredsir wrote:i agree that datisi needs to die
im not even that confident that he's town. i thought he was more likely scum earlier and now my main reason for thinking that he's town is that idk how he wins as scum here and it feels like he would be doing something else to give him a better chance of winning (or if it's already unwinnable then maybe not trying so hard lol)
i just don't really feel like it needs to be today. i think we have a good chance at flipping a scum in the standard poe today and i would prefer to try to do that, and if we can't then we can go to datisi tomorrow
maybe that's not mechanically optimal, i think you're probably right, so i won't push for that i guess. my opposition to it might be on a more philosophical level
I'm very interested in the answer to this one, and how she will inevitably argue from the position it's bad and find an argument, as opposed to the other way around.In post 4851, fireisredsir wrote:mastina. if datisi flips town aren't we like still in a very good spot? i don't particularly like it but i don't think it's gamethrowing to confirm the checks and then people can actually focus on the correct (in that world) poe
Hey welcome to the team! It's called the killing Datisi today team.In post 4853, Roden wrote:My main problem with the scum kills is that we literally told scum we would vote out Datisi the Day before ELO. If we somehow don't hit scum for the next two Days, then Datisi has five green checks when we hit 9 players left. If Datisi is town when we elim him there then we have 5 conftown vs 3 scum...there's zero way to mis-elim anyone in that ELO.
They aren't killing conftowns, just Trackers who never got confirmed. They aren't stopping the Cop in any way, even though they were directly told that our conftowns will outnumber the scum team by the time we reach ELO.
Somebody make this make sense.
And wouldn't ya know it?In post 4796, Firebringer wrote:The whole council was saying dats wasn't going to be killed because the lot of you were pushing for a mislim on him and dats agreed with that. Theres no reason for scum to kill dats when u all do it for them, that is why we decided no protection for dats. If scum wanted to clear up paranoia on dats that was okay in our books
This is also bad logic.In post 4859, mastina wrote:And wouldn't ya know it?In post 4796, Firebringer wrote:The whole council was saying dats wasn't going to be killed because the lot of you were pushing for a mislim on him and dats agreed with that. Theres no reason for scum to kill dats when u all do it for them, that is why we decided no protection for dats. If scum wanted to clear up paranoia on dats that was okay in our books
Today every vote except for those on the furtiveglance wagon has been a vote on a council member!
I wonder why?
i mean i never accepted her terrible arguments.In post 4862, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:How many times will we allow Mastina to make these nothingburger insinuative points that hold nothing and say nothing and prove nothing before we stop fucking accepting them.
Mastina I’m going to make a deal with you.In post 4859, mastina wrote:And wouldn't ya know it?In post 4796, Firebringer wrote:The whole council was saying dats wasn't going to be killed because the lot of you were pushing for a mislim on him and dats agreed with that. Theres no reason for scum to kill dats when u all do it for them, that is why we decided no protection for dats. If scum wanted to clear up paranoia on dats that was okay in our books
Today every vote except for those on the furtiveglance wagon has been a vote on a council member!
I wonder why?
Oh you, you I'm not talking to because I don't want to get banned.In post 4797, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Hey, make that logic with me Mastina,
Didn’t you agree with the VP and GL wolf read they made just like I did?In post 4863, Firebringer wrote:i mean i never accepted her terrible arguments.In post 4862, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:How many times will we allow Mastina to make these nothingburger insinuative points that hold nothing and say nothing and prove nothing before we stop fucking accepting them.
It's guaranteed to be an elimination on town rather than on scum.In post 4799, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:What's the DOWNSIDE here?
God that's always fun to hear.In post 4865, mastina wrote:Oh you, you I'm not talking to because I don't want to get banned.In post 4797, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Hey, make that logic with me Mastina,
I have fucking WORDS I would like to say but I'm onverythin ice with the mafiascum mod teams (as-is I might still get banned anyway), so like. I can't say what I want to.
Did you include combat trialsIn post 4853, Roden wrote:My main problem with the scum kills is that we literally told scum we would vote out Datisi the Day before ELO. If we somehow don't hit scum for the next two Days, then Datisi has five green checks when we hit 9 players left. If Datisi is town when we elim him there then we have 5 conftown vs 3 scum...there's zero way to mis-elim anyone in that ELO.
They aren't killing conftowns, just Trackers who never got confirmed. They aren't stopping the Cop in any way, even though they were directly told that our conftowns will outnumber the scum team by the time we reach ELO.
Somebody make this make sense.
thanks buddy u 2In post 4866, GuiltyLion wrote:FB regardless of your alignment it's been fun playing with ya this game especially today you are making me laugh, thanks for being you buddy
I skim the walls. But dats made me do a deep dive on like day 2 on my read so i actually have read all of mastina posts.In post 4867, Roden wrote:Y'all are reading Mastina's posts??
if ive agreed with any read of mastina its by coincidence. every case she has made or argument ive literally argued against in this game because its been bad argumentation. Ive literally argued against some case she made like day 2 even tho i agreed with her conclusion on the read.In post 4868, ProfessorDrapion wrote:Didn’t you agree with the VP and GL wolf read they made just like I did?In post 4863, Firebringer wrote:i mean i never accepted her terrible arguments.In post 4862, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:How many times will we allow Mastina to make these nothingburger insinuative points that hold nothing and say nothing and prove nothing before we stop fucking accepting them.