Open 871 - The Haunted Village | Postgame

[Saihara Shuichi]

Are you serious right now lmao

[furtiveglance]

Are you serious right now lmao

Just answer the question

[Saihara Shuichi]

20: you already know what I think of this. +scum.

38: a bit defensive, idk if that was warranted. I'm gonna give this a 0.25+scum.

42: this and the following are nulls. I don't know why exactly STD had to remark in #43 that #42 was stilted, I don't think it particularly was and I don't get the need to excuse oneself even if it was, but I don't want to read to much into it.

76: idk, I don't agree with this vote. While I don't agree with Kyoko's criticism of me either, that seemed to me an honest attempt to scumhunt. Scumreading them over "being too nitpicky" with that (cfr #91, #92) seems a little forced. +0.5scum

90: of this post I like how my TR is apparently, cfr 94, not set in stone. It was not actually challenged afterwards, hough one must assume that if #76 were genuine than the TR on me probably is too. The Kaito TR is also reasonable.

132--141, 179: I'm ignoring meta posts rn, at least possibly until I find the will to go read games.

144: eh, the question is legitimate. +town

157: eh, this one I like less, falls somewhere in the category of asking about own SRs. Though I'm giving STD some slack for it.

159, 165: gut readings are fine, especially this early. Fuyuhiko apparently doesn't like that, and that may be reasonable, I just don't agree that's particularly AI at this point.

180: I genuinely didn't understand this post. Does what? @STD, I'm not trying to be an ass or anything, I would just like a clarification. I'm guessing it is trivially linked to 183?
Btw, 183 seem like a genuine attempt to workshop, I'm giving it +0.25 town.

191: while I also find #38 distasteful, this response to Kokichi is credible. I guess it could be construed as attempting to negate all further attempts at using meta to read him, which idk if I like. +0.25scum.

total: 0.75+scum

Please point out a decisive read on StD here

[furtiveglance]

20: you already know what I think of this. +scum.

38: a bit defensive, idk if that was warranted. I'm gonna give this a 0.25+scum.

42: this and the following are nulls. I don't know why exactly STD had to remark in #43 that #42 was stilted, I don't think it particularly was and I don't get the need to excuse oneself even if it was, but I don't want to read to much into it.

76: idk, I don't agree with this vote. While I don't agree with Kyoko's criticism of me either, that seemed to me an honest attempt to scumhunt. Scumreading them over "being too nitpicky" with that (cfr #91, #92) seems a little forced. +0.5scum

90: of this post I like how my TR is apparently, cfr 94, not set in stone. It was not actually challenged afterwards, hough one must assume that if #76 were genuine than the TR on me probably is too. The Kaito TR is also reasonable.

132--141, 179: I'm ignoring meta posts rn, at least possibly until I find the will to go read games.

144: eh, the question is legitimate. +town

157: eh, this one I like less, falls somewhere in the category of asking about own SRs. Though I'm giving STD some slack for it.

159, 165: gut readings are fine, especially this early. Fuyuhiko apparently doesn't like that, and that may be reasonable, I just don't agree that's particularly AI at this point.

180: I genuinely didn't understand this post. Does what? @STD, I'm not trying to be an ass or anything, I would just like a clarification. I'm guessing it is trivially linked to 183?
Btw, 183 seem like a genuine attempt to workshop, I'm giving it +0.25 town.

191: while I also find #38 distasteful, this response to Kokichi is credible. I guess it could be construed as attempting to negate all further attempts at using meta to read him, which idk if I like. +0.25scum.

total: 0.75+scum

Please point out a decisive read on StD here

Look at the bottom

[Saihara Shuichi]

OK and do you think these quote attributions follow any semblance of order and are not just thrown together merely for effort sake

[Saihara Shuichi]

144: eh, the question is legitimate. +town

157: eh, this one I like less, falls somewhere in the category of asking about own SRs. Though I'm giving STD some slack for it.

159, 165: gut readings are fine, especially this early. Fuyuhiko apparently doesn't like that, and that may be reasonable, I just don't agree that's particularly AI at this point.

lol How do these 3 posts line up with another in terms of a decisive read lol

[furtiveglance]

OK and do you think these quote attributions follow any semblance of order and are not just thrown together merely for effort sake

The order appears to be chronological

I sometimes make walls in which there are some conflicting ideas

[Saihara Shuichi]

How can a read be decisive if the recollection of events do not match the conclusion

[Saihara Shuichi]

How in the fuck is an arbitrary number of 0.75+ scum conclusive? That's not even a full number

[furtiveglance]

How can a read be decisive if the recollection of events do not match the conclusion

They do though. It's clearly an aggregate read

[furtiveglance]

How in the fuck is an arbitrary number of 0.75+ scum conclusive? That's not even a full number

SOMETIMES THEY GIVE OUT 0.25

[Saihara Shuichi]

OK and what do those numbers mean

[Saihara Shuichi]

Why would a town assign arbitrary structure to their reads that does not follow the own posts they are commenting on

[furtiveglance]

Why would a town assign arbitrary structure to their reads that does not follow the own posts they are commenting on

I didn't agree that they don't follow.

[Saihara Shuichi]

So if they don't follow then how is it decisive

[furtiveglance]

So if they don't follow then how is it decisive

They do follow. Did you misread my last post?

[Saihara Shuichi]

It's clearly an aggregate read

What is an aggregate read

[furtiveglance]

It's clearly an aggregate read

What is an aggregate read

What bianco clearly does

Weighs up his responses to individual posts together

[Saihara Shuichi]

That doesn't even follow because some of his responses don't have assigned values to it lmfao

[furtiveglance]

That doesn't even follow because some of his responses don't have assigned values to it lmfao

But some do

[Saihara Shuichi]

So how can an arbitrary pattern that has no barring on the conclusion form an aggregate

[furtiveglance]

So how can an arbitrary pattern that has no barring on the conclusion form an aggregate

The individual responses to posts clearly do have a bearing on the conclusion and form an aggregate

I think I said this already

[Saihara Shuichi]

No they don't because the value assigned is not clarified in any significant way

Do you know what decisive means? When something is decisive, there is no room for hypothetical or random events. Yet we can see by his post alone that his thoughts are often littered with both.

[furtiveglance]

No they don't because the value assigned is not clarified in any significant way

Do you know what decisive means? When something is decisive, there is no room for hypothetical or random events. Yet we can see by his post alone that his thoughts are often littered with both.

You're conflating the idea of having reads with them being completely set in stone and devoid of nuance

[Saihara Shuichi]

132--141, 179: I'm ignoring meta posts rn, at least possibly until I find the will to go read games.

Says nothing about StD

157: eh, this one I like less, falls somewhere in the category of asking about own SRs. Though I'm giving STD some slack for it.

Says nothing about StD

38: a bit defensive, idk if that was warranted. I'm gonna give this a 0.25+scum.

Says he doesn't even know (idk) if it was warranted but assigns a value anyways

191: while I also find #38 distasteful, this response to Kokichi is credible. I guess it could be construed as attempting to negate all further attempts at using meta to read him, which idk if I like. +0.25scum.

Again says he doesn't even know (idk) and assigns another random value

Very decisive