Open 871 - The Haunted Village | Postgame
-
-
Saihara Shuichi Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 79
- Joined: January 15, 2023
Are you serious right now lmao-
-
furtiveglance He/HimJack of All TradesHe/Him
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8683
- Joined: January 29, 2022
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Location: UK
Just answer the questionIn post 525, Saihara Shuichi wrote: Are you serious right now lmao-
-
Saihara Shuichi Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 79
- Joined: January 15, 2023
Please point out a decisive read on StD hereIn post 208, biancospino wrote:
20: you already know what I think of this. +scum.
38: a bit defensive, idk if that was warranted. I'm gonna give this a 0.25+scum.
42: this and the following are nulls. I don't know why exactly STD had to remark in #43 that #42 was stilted, I don't think it particularly was and I don't get the need to excuse oneself even if it was, but I don't want to read to much into it.
76: idk, I don't agree with this vote. While I don't agree with Kyoko's criticism of me either, that seemed to me an honest attempt to scumhunt. Scumreading them over "being too nitpicky" with that (cfr #91, #92) seems a little forced. +0.5scum
90: of this post I like how my TR is apparently, cfr 94, not set in stone. It was not actually challenged afterwards, hough one must assume that if #76 were genuine than the TR on me probably is too. The Kaito TR is also reasonable.
132--141, 179: I'm ignoring meta posts rn, at least possibly until I find the will to go read games.
144: eh, the question is legitimate. +town
157: eh, this one I like less, falls somewhere in the category of asking about own SRs. Though I'm giving STD some slack for it.
159, 165: gut readings are fine, especially this early. Fuyuhiko apparently doesn't like that, and that may be reasonable, I just don't agree that's particularly AI at this point.
180: I genuinely didn't understand this post. Does what? @STD, I'm not trying to be an ass or anything, I would just like a clarification. I'm guessing it is trivially linked to 183?
Btw, 183 seem like a genuine attempt to workshop, I'm giving it +0.25 town.
191: while I also find #38 distasteful, this response to Kokichi is credible. I guess it could be construed as attempting to negate all further attempts at using meta to read him, which idk if I like. +0.25scum.
total: 0.75+scum-
-
furtiveglance He/HimJack of All TradesHe/Him
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8683
- Joined: January 29, 2022
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Location: UK
Look at the bottomIn post 527, Saihara Shuichi wrote:
Please point out a decisive read on StD hereIn post 208, biancospino wrote:
20: you already know what I think of this. +scum.
38: a bit defensive, idk if that was warranted. I'm gonna give this a 0.25+scum.
42: this and the following are nulls. I don't know why exactly STD had to remark in #43 that #42 was stilted, I don't think it particularly was and I don't get the need to excuse oneself even if it was, but I don't want to read to much into it.
76: idk, I don't agree with this vote. While I don't agree with Kyoko's criticism of me either, that seemed to me an honest attempt to scumhunt. Scumreading them over "being too nitpicky" with that (cfr #91, #92) seems a little forced. +0.5scum
90: of this post I like how my TR is apparently, cfr 94, not set in stone. It was not actually challenged afterwards, hough one must assume that if #76 were genuine than the TR on me probably is too. The Kaito TR is also reasonable.
132--141, 179: I'm ignoring meta posts rn, at least possibly until I find the will to go read games.
144: eh, the question is legitimate. +town
157: eh, this one I like less, falls somewhere in the category of asking about own SRs. Though I'm giving STD some slack for it.
159, 165: gut readings are fine, especially this early. Fuyuhiko apparently doesn't like that, and that may be reasonable, I just don't agree that's particularly AI at this point.
180: I genuinely didn't understand this post. Does what? @STD, I'm not trying to be an ass or anything, I would just like a clarification. I'm guessing it is trivially linked to 183?
Btw, 183 seem like a genuine attempt to workshop, I'm giving it +0.25 town.
191: while I also find #38 distasteful, this response to Kokichi is credible. I guess it could be construed as attempting to negate all further attempts at using meta to read him, which idk if I like. +0.25scum.
total: 0.75+scum-
-
Saihara Shuichi Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 79
- Joined: January 15, 2023
OK and do you think these quote attributions follow any semblance of order and are not just thrown together merely for effort sake-
-
Saihara Shuichi Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 79
- Joined: January 15, 2023
lol How do these 3 posts line up with another in terms of a decisive read lol144: eh, the question is legitimate. +town
157: eh, this one I like less, falls somewhere in the category of asking about own SRs. Though I'm giving STD some slack for it.
159, 165: gut readings are fine, especially this early. Fuyuhiko apparently doesn't like that, and that may be reasonable, I just don't agree that's particularly AI at this point.-
-
furtiveglance He/HimJack of All TradesHe/Him
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8683
- Joined: January 29, 2022
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Location: UK
The order appears to be chronologicalIn post 529, Saihara Shuichi wrote: OK and do you think these quote attributions follow any semblance of order and are not just thrown together merely for effort sake
I sometimes make walls in which there are some conflicting ideas-
-
Saihara Shuichi Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 79
- Joined: January 15, 2023
How can a read be decisive if the recollection of events do not match the conclusion-
-
Saihara Shuichi Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 79
- Joined: January 15, 2023
How in the fuck is an arbitrary number of 0.75+ scum conclusive? That's not even a full number-
-
furtiveglance He/HimJack of All TradesHe/Him
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8683
- Joined: January 29, 2022
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Location: UK
They do though. It's clearly an aggregate readIn post 532, Saihara Shuichi wrote: How can a read be decisive if the recollection of events do not match the conclusion-
-
furtiveglance He/HimJack of All TradesHe/Him
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8683
- Joined: January 29, 2022
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Location: UK
In post 533, Saihara Shuichi wrote: How in the fuck is an arbitrary number of 0.75+ scum conclusive? That's not even a full number
SOMETIMES THEY GIVE OUT 0.25-
-
Saihara Shuichi Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 79
- Joined: January 15, 2023
OK and what do those numbers mean-
-
Saihara Shuichi Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 79
- Joined: January 15, 2023
Why would a town assign arbitrary structure to their reads that does not follow the own posts they are commenting on-
-
furtiveglance He/HimJack of All TradesHe/Him
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8683
- Joined: January 29, 2022
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Location: UK
I didn't agree that they don't follow.In post 537, Saihara Shuichi wrote: Why would a town assign arbitrary structure to their reads that does not follow the own posts they are commenting on-
-
Saihara Shuichi Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 79
- Joined: January 15, 2023
So if they don't follow then how is it decisive-
-
furtiveglance He/HimJack of All TradesHe/Him
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8683
- Joined: January 29, 2022
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Location: UK
They do follow. Did you misread my last post?In post 539, Saihara Shuichi wrote: So if they don't follow then how is it decisive-
-
Saihara Shuichi Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 79
- Joined: January 15, 2023
What is an aggregate readIn post 534, furtiveglance wrote: It's clearly an aggregate read-
-
furtiveglance He/HimJack of All TradesHe/Him
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8683
- Joined: January 29, 2022
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Location: UK
What bianco clearly doesIn post 541, Saihara Shuichi wrote:
What is an aggregate readIn post 534, furtiveglance wrote: It's clearly an aggregate read
Weighs up his responses to individual posts together-
-
Saihara Shuichi Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 79
- Joined: January 15, 2023
That doesn't even follow because some of his responses don't have assigned values to it lmfao-
-
furtiveglance He/HimJack of All TradesHe/Him
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8683
- Joined: January 29, 2022
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Location: UK
But some doIn post 543, Saihara Shuichi wrote: That doesn't even follow because some of his responses don't have assigned values to it lmfao-
-
Saihara Shuichi Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 79
- Joined: January 15, 2023
So how can an arbitrary pattern that has no barring on the conclusion form an aggregate-
-
furtiveglance He/HimJack of All TradesHe/Him
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8683
- Joined: January 29, 2022
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Location: UK
The individual responses to posts clearly do have a bearing on the conclusion and form an aggregateIn post 545, Saihara Shuichi wrote: So how can an arbitrary pattern that has no barring on the conclusion form an aggregate
I think I said this already-
-
Saihara Shuichi Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 79
- Joined: January 15, 2023
No they don't because the value assigned is not clarified in any significant way
Do you know what decisive means? When something is decisive, there is no room for hypothetical or random events. Yet we can see by his post alone that his thoughts are often littered with both.-
-
furtiveglance He/HimJack of All TradesHe/Him
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8683
- Joined: January 29, 2022
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Location: UK
You're conflating the idea of having reads with them being completely set in stone and devoid of nuanceIn post 547, Saihara Shuichi wrote: No they don't because the value assigned is not clarified in any significant way
Do you know what decisive means? When something is decisive, there is no room for hypothetical or random events. Yet we can see by his post alone that his thoughts are often littered with both.-
-
Saihara Shuichi Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 79
- Joined: January 15, 2023
Says nothing about StDIn post 528, furtiveglance wrote: 132--141, 179: I'm ignoring meta posts rn, at least possibly until I find the will to go read games.
Says nothing about StDIn post 528, furtiveglance wrote: 157: eh, this one I like less, falls somewhere in the category of asking about own SRs. Though I'm giving STD some slack for it.
Says he doesn't even know (idk) if it was warranted but assigns a value anywaysIn post 528, furtiveglance wrote: 38: a bit defensive, idk if that was warranted. I'm gonna give this a 0.25+scum.
Again says he doesn't even know (idk) and assigns another random valueIn post 528, furtiveglance wrote: 191: while I also find #38 distasteful, this response to Kokichi is credible. I guess it could be construed as attempting to negate all further attempts at using meta to read him, which idk if I like. +0.25scum.
Very decisive
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.