I'm rereading still but could you tell me about where in this thread your read necessarily must have flipped?In post 649, Bingle wrote: Mayor guiltylion
@Datisi Enchant still scum to you, yes?
I'm rereading still but could you tell me about where in this thread your read necessarily must have flipped?In post 649, Bingle wrote: Mayor guiltylion
reads on meowth, Bloodb0t, SirCakezIn post 673, Datisi wrote: anyway, with the consensus seeming to be outing votes (and by consensus i mean bingle) i will be figuring out my votes tomorrow morning. i'm prob gonna be around for some 20 minutes or so so if anyone has anything real-time to ask me now's the time
What I was trying to get across were the parallels of a regular mafia game and this one despite the untypical nature of it. No, I didn't realize that you were fully anti-posting votes. That was not the implication that I gathered from your post. Now that you've explained it, fine. I'd rather not be summarily dismissed without explanation unless it's funny. Or strategic.In post 666, GuiltyLion wrote:I didn't understand why you told me that votes tell us information, especially in regular mafia set ups. I am aware of that - did you think I was not?In post 663, Herta wrote:I don't understand this attitude at all. What am I missing?
You said "we keep track of votes in a regular game for reasons, one of them is to see who votes for who" - doesn't that statement feel kinda obvious to you?
I'm also having a hard time empathizing with what the intention behind your post was, were you trying to change my mind about posting our ballots? It felt disconnected to me because I was more trying to understand what Pooky was afraid of if we kept ballots secret, I wasn't operating from a stance that there are no benefits to posting our votes. The conversation in my mind was more about evaluating the tradeoffs of consolidating votes or making our votes public, and you jumped in to state benefits of public votes that I wasn't disagreeing with or unaware of.
If you can't understand things I post you could alwaus ask me questions. Why haven't you yet? And why such a dichotomy, do you really believe you can't possibly understand my point of view on things?In post 674, BloodB0t wrote: Seems like GL is either someone who thinks about the game so differently from me that I can't possibly understand it or he's scum.
It didn't, I indirectly answered the why right before posting that ballot.In post 675, ActionDan wrote:I'm rereading still but could you tell me about where in this thread your read necessarily must have flipped?In post 649, Bingle wrote: Mayor guiltylion
@Datisi Enchant still scum to you, yes?
i saw he made some posts in the thread so maybe not. i'll look at him in a bit.In post 675, ActionDan wrote: @Datisi Enchant still scum to you, yes?
idk, town, town?In post 676, furtiveglance wrote: reads on meowth, Bloodb0t, SirCakez
i feel like i'm back in croatian literature class in high school where the teacher is asking us to divine meaning from a work where i see no deeper meaning at all.In post 677, GuiltyLion wrote: Datisi I'm fine with calling the read a reach but it's not convoluted at all, UNOwen pressed Bingle on a read I thought was particularly suspicious and to me that demonstrated townie intent. Why do you refer to that as "convoluted"?
weird assertion, I don’t see any risk to doing that regardless of my alignmentIn post 670, GuiltyLion wrote: SleepyKrew I'd be interested to hear if you have any thoughts about Pookys assertion that scum!you would not jump into a Mayor election against the two of us as townies.
i want to make it clear - "in a bit" means when the sun is out and i'm not on the verge of passing out. i.e. tomorrow.In post 684, Datisi wrote: i saw he made some posts in the thread so maybe not. i'll look at him in a bit.
In post 647, Bingle wrote: We should attempt to get PRs into the hands of town, yes. The takeaway from that is that you should pick people you think are town for the options. There are reasons to do otherwise (for example, voting enchant for cop because you don't think scum will want to shoot town enchant;voting GL for JOAT because you think forcing accountability for GL's night actions might help make a solid read there and you're not at all confident in your scumlean there), but overall we're better off if we manage 6 town PRs.
I don't see what Ausuka's done wrong and seeing a couple of players call her scum out of nowhere a few pages ago was weirdIn post 682, GuiltyLion wrote: Ausuka still public enemy #1
I really don't like that bloodb0t post I just replied to and don't remember anything else they've done so they're also a scumread
otherwise Datisi and Pooky have each given me some weird pings but they could both easily be town. I also didn't understand why LLD is at town!Pooky with such high confidence, that struck me as a lil pockety
You'll have to take my word for it that I did notice it but decided that it was entirely possible GuiltyLion could make that read as town.In post 684, Datisi wrote: and i think a townie on the receiving end of that read would notice that and react to it.
It's less about what shes done wrong, rather all I see from her is trying to pass vibe checks and little in the way of actual sorting or town mindset.In post 690, furtiveglance wrote:I don't see what Ausuka's done wrong and seeing a couple of players call her scum out of nowhere a few pages ago was weirdIn post 682, GuiltyLion wrote: Ausuka still public enemy #1
I really don't like that bloodb0t post I just replied to and don't remember anything else they've done so they're also a scumread
otherwise Datisi and Pooky have each given me some weird pings but they could both easily be town. I also didn't understand why LLD is at town!Pooky with such high confidence, that struck me as a lil pockety
This post is trying to sound chill and blase but the underlying reasoning is weaksauce - I highly doubt Ausuka genuinely thinks both of us are scum each maneuvering to discredit specifically her in particular. so either she's joking about reads to avoid actually giving a read on us, or she's not joking about the read and its an underwhelming take. Neither feels townie.In post 550, Ausuka wrote: Pooky and GL scumread me which is scummy so I am forced to vote for SleepyKrew for mayor
Where did this come from? I've literally been asking you questions right in this very dialogue?? Were there other posts you thought I should have asked you about that I didn't?In post 694, BloodB0t wrote: @gl I will answer any of your questions too, but atm I'm feeling like you haven't wanted to ask me questions this game because you don't think you'll be able to make people read me scum by doing that.