In post 119, Skygazer wrote: sideeyeing PP because it felt like they were just throwing easy shade at iavh but they havent voted there. PP, are you scumreading iavh or just trying to push them to be more productive?
![Image](https://media.giphy.com/media/3ohzdMDbNXvnWdeOZi/giphy.gif)
In post 119, Skygazer wrote: sideeyeing PP because it felt like they were just throwing easy shade at iavh but they havent voted there. PP, are you scumreading iavh or just trying to push them to be more productive?
I wish I had the self-control needed to hold onto info like that and use it to create a stronger read later on in the day, but alas, I do not.In post 122, KatyKimFanClub wrote: It's pretty accurate, but I don't think it means that much on Page 4. There are a couple of people in this game I've played with before as both scum and town, so I don't think it would be fair to assume I wouldn't change my meta to adjust for that. If I were you, I would have probably held onto that to try to get a better read later in the Day.
I have never seen your town meta, so I don't have the full info needed to properly judge this. I can see why you'd want to do this tho, having distinct metas can destroy your scum game so blending the two can be necessary, it's just not something that's gonna make you seem town to people who know your scum meta.In post 122, KatyKimFanClub wrote: Question for Daisy, would you believe me if I told you I'm trying to merge my honestly-quite-distinct-as-of-two-completed-games town and scum metas?
This is the sweet spot I try and live inIn post 118, Skygazer wrote: elements isnt doing a ton to make me not wanna vote them which ironically makes me not wanna vote them as much
Leaning scum, hence my vote there right now. I'm not gonna disregard my meta read just because the party has acknowledged it's a good read and has given a decent excuse as to why they're playing in their scum range. Ultimately they're still playing in their scum range.In post 128, Deltabreedy wrote: I get the sense we've had a lot of kind of waffly talk.
@Oopsiedaisie, which of the two do you think KKFC is right now?
Mostly so. Was also a bit of a reaction test, wanted to see if KKFC responded to the push in a way that felt +townie, but so far I'm not seeing anything that has convinced me I need to hop off the wagon.In post 130, Deltabreedy wrote: Is it purely a meta read?
In post 17, KatyKimFanClub wrote: Hey everyone, I'm new to forum mafia but I've played on epicmafia and in person before. I'm super excited to play with y'all!
VOTE: VOTE: Cook
Do you think that waffly talk is bad for the game?In post 128, Deltabreedy wrote: I get the sense we've had a lot of kind of waffly talk.
Of course a Page 4 meta read doesn't mean I've got a super confident read on you, it is Page 4, but pressuring slots with these kinda wagons is important to create discussions like these in the first place. Gives people something to make reads on and react to and that's 100% good for the game.In post 132, KatyKimFanClub wrote: I mean, you're trying to use a meta read on Page 4. I'm not really sure what you think the appropriate response or discussion would be. Here are all my posts by Page 4 from the game you've read.
In post 17, KatyKimFanClub wrote: Hey everyone, I'm new to forum mafia but I've played on epicmafia and in person before. I'm super excited to play with y'all!
VOTE: VOTE: Cook
I think so tbh - although whilst I'm on V/LA I've not had much time to really affect that which should be coming to an end tomorrow.In post 133, OopsieDaisy wrote:Do you think that waffly talk is bad for the game?In post 128, Deltabreedy wrote: I get the sense we've had a lot of kind of waffly talk.
It's harsh but in order to create pushes that move us out of RVS, the reasoning sorta has to be harsh unless someone does some crazy scummy stuff early on, which hasn't rly happened here. My meta read is weak but it's something that does point to a scum!kkfc world and I like the idea of letting this wagon sit for a bit and seeing how the game evolves around it.In post 135, KatyKimFanClub wrote: Sure, but saying I failed the reaction test when it was pretty obviously one seems a little harsh, right?
Ahh, I don't think you're gonna like my playstyle very much then lol. I'm quite the waffler.In post 136, Deltabreedy wrote:I think so tbh - although whilst I'm on V/LA I've not had much time to really affect that which should be coming to an end tomorrow.In post 133, OopsieDaisy wrote:Do you think that waffly talk is bad for the game?In post 128, Deltabreedy wrote: I get the sense we've had a lot of kind of waffly talk.
Do you think all waffeling is nai?In post 136, Deltabreedy wrote:I think so tbhIn post 133, OopsieDaisy wrote:Do you think that waffly talk is bad for the game?In post 128, Deltabreedy wrote: I get the sense we've had a lot of kind of waffly talk.
read my signatureIn post 118, Skygazer wrote: elements isnt doing a ton to make me not wanna vote them which ironically makes me not wanna vote them as much
might be shooting myself in the foot but iavh seems like one of those town players that just makes everyone want to vote them. i do wish they focused more on sorting players.
I really wanna pull the 'One Vote Away From Elimination' card kkIn post 120, Elements wrote:YesIn post 116, iamveryhappy wrote:wydm yesIn post 113, Elements wrote:YesIn post 112, iamveryhappy wrote: I'm the easiest push here, come on
I think context is key. If it's waffle designed to, for instance, elongate RVS or to occupy time in a game, or to stifle discussion then yeah it is. I don't see waffling in those contexts as a town-indicative action but I think that may be something for me to overcome as more of a playstyle clash than an AI action. If there is waffle in posts but the posts also have content then waffle awayIn post 139, Elements wrote:Do you think all waffeling is nai?In post 136, Deltabreedy wrote:I think so tbhIn post 133, OopsieDaisy wrote:Do you think that waffly talk is bad for the game?In post 128, Deltabreedy wrote: I get the sense we've had a lot of kind of waffly talk.
You're very defensive for being the first 'wagon' of the game. I wouldn't even say we're out of rvs yetIn post 142, iamveryhappy wrote:I really wanna pull the 'One Vote Away From Elimination' card kkIn post 120, Elements wrote:YesIn post 116, iamveryhappy wrote:wydm yesIn post 113, Elements wrote:YesIn post 112, iamveryhappy wrote: I'm the easiest push here, come on
In post 92, Random Nurse wrote: Elements is at 3 votes, RH?