Why didn't this happen?In post 1422, Enchant wrote:Yes.In post 1417, pisskop wrote:You mean enchant?In post 1414, MegAzumarill wrote: I mean we already have someone saccing to get a check for n2 so this isn't really relevant
Enchant, are you 100% going to nuke yourself for us?
Imagine believing me.In post 1730, Itinerants wrote:Why didn't this happen?In post 1422, Enchant wrote:Yes.In post 1417, pisskop wrote:You mean enchant?In post 1414, MegAzumarill wrote: I mean we already have someone saccing to get a check for n2 so this isn't really relevant
Enchant, are you 100% going to nuke yourself for us?
-Rat
That's a weird choice of words.In post 1735, Cook wrote: damn it i just lost the game
infohazard do not open if you do not know what i am talking aboutIn post 1736, Itinerants wrote:That's a weird choice of words.In post 1735, Cook wrote: damn it i just lost the game
I see.In post 1738, Cook wrote:infohazard do not open if you do not know what i am talking aboutIn post 1736, Itinerants wrote:That's a weird choice of words.In post 1735, Cook wrote: damn it i just lost the game
But what if I wanna be mysteriousIn post 1733, pisskop wrote: Anyone have a juicy guilty to out?
This logic is less valid in a bastard multiball game, for two reasons. Oops all inno doesn’t work in the presence of a cult, or any godfather like ability, which are both possible.In post 1744, Eiralox wrote: Haven't read all.
Day cop suggestions:
On absolve, confirmed vannilla town and possible wise voter. On condemn, just funny.
Not_Mafia:
Eira:Absolve a vannilla town.
Itenerants:I feel good about absolving or condemning here.
I'm operating on Not_Mafia trueclaim from the little I've read. Confirming either me or Not_Mafia means that killers have to kill a powerless role eventually instead of us confirming a strong role and damning them.
I'm also operating on the basis that pisskop has the check, that's obvious I guess.
Nothing else for now. Have fun... unless fun isn't your thing.
This doesn't say much. Yay or nay on Itinerants?In post 1745, Bingle wrote:This logic is less valid in a bastard multiball game, for two reasons. Oops all inno doesn’t work in the presence of a cult, or any godfather like ability, which are both possible.In post 1744, Eiralox wrote: Haven't read all.
Day cop suggestions:
On absolve, confirmed vannilla town and possible wise voter. On condemn, just funny.
Not_Mafia:
Eira:Absolve a vannilla town.
Itenerants:I feel good about absolving or condemning here.
I'm operating on Not_Mafia trueclaim from the little I've read. Confirming either me or Not_Mafia means that killers have to kill a powerless role eventually instead of us confirming a strong role and damning them.
I'm also operating on the basis that pisskop has the check, that's obvious I guess.
Nothing else for now. Have fun... unless fun isn't your thing.
Multiple kills per night reduces the impact of innocents over all.
Cops should definitely be hunting for guilties.
Strangely threateningIn post 1747, DkKoba wrote: I have visited someone. If anyone has a role that confirms who, now is your chance to prove it.
I thought 'needlessly provocative'In post 1748, MegAzumarill wrote:Strangely threateningIn post 1747, DkKoba wrote: I have visited someone. If anyone has a role that confirms who, now is your chance to prove it.