In post 1734, Bingle wrote:
Hey everyone. I’ve read nothing but this page and I have one very important question. How do we make ccs lose the game?
Greeting
In post 1745, Bingle wrote:
In post 1744, Eiralox wrote:
Haven't read all.
Day cop suggestions:
Not_Mafia:
On absolve, confirmed vannilla town and possible wise voter. On condemn, just funny.
Eira:
Absolve a vannilla town.
Itenerants:
I feel good about absolving or condemning here.
I'm operating on Not_Mafia trueclaim from the little I've read. Confirming either me or Not_Mafia means that killers have to kill a powerless role eventually instead of us confirming a strong role and damning them.
I'm also operating on the basis that pisskop has the check, that's obvious I guess.
Nothing else for now. Have fun... unless fun isn't your thing.
This logic is less valid in a bastard multiball game, for two reasons. Oops all inno doesn’t work in the presence of a cult, or any godfather like ability, which are both possible.
Multiple kills per night reduces the impact of innocents over all.
Cops should definitely be hunting for guilties.
Eiralox interaction. Mentions vannilla shouldn't be checked but give no input whether Itenerants is a good target.
In post 1776, Bingle wrote:
You vastly overestimate my "knowing who the fuck that is" stat. It was my dumpstat. I put everything into "Spite".
Dodges. Bingle continues this pattern of not having read or making it appear so. mistakes like not knowing about n_ms and veryhappys prior claims,oracting like it to achieve a predistened goalbasedupon eira'sinitial fos of itenerants.
In post 1781, Bingle wrote:
In post 1778, pisskop wrote:
enh. When I sober up Ill figure out why I thought flavor gave me an offering, and if Im mad at cook for no reason or not.
Don’t examine your anger. Succumb to it. Together we can rule the galaxy as dogbeast and snake.
Nothing to say here
In post 1789, Bingle wrote:
In post 1782, Cook wrote:
if this is another fucking amway recruitment message i'm going to shoot someone
Don't worry, if I'm going to recruit someone to amway I'll at least actually claim every part of my role when I do so.
I'm bored now.
VOTE: Cook for offering to shoot people for me. She's clearly buddying.
Nothing to say here. Cook is probably town here so if bingle mafia maybe they thought pisskop would vote cook idk.
In post 1798, Bingle wrote:
In post 1790, Enchant wrote:
Amway really suck i am surprised people ever accepted knowing they will lose all powers.
There were a lot of shitty roles and there were actually a few ways to make it breaking, but yeah… a lot of d1 was me winding aureal up about it to make noise.
Can someone clue me in on what the pisskop situation is? It kinda sounds to me like pisskop is talking out his ass and I’d like to clarify that a bit.
Nothing to say here. Maybe doesnt want pisskop to beconfirmed at this point.
In post 1800, Bingle wrote:
Pisskop accused cook of stealing a snackrifice and then was told that didn’t make any sense and the mod confirmed you’re a serial killer.
Nothing to say here.
In post 1810, Bingle wrote:
I replaced in overnight and am unrepentantly not putting effort into reading what’s already happened.
Which kinda makes eir wanting to sheep a page 70 rvs vote even more scummy.
VOTE: eiralox
Eira says doesn't want to vote cook with bingle because cook iso looks good. bingle decideds eira almost voting cook means something.instinct i had is itenerants needs to be protected and bingle is the expendable runner.
In post 1831, Bingle wrote:
I’m wagoning eiralox for the scummy ass posting on the last four pages. Why are you wagoning eiralox?
No true input.I have discussed many slots at this point, bingledoesnt want to approach that content at this time cos afraid he'll clear town by spew
In post 1838, Bingle wrote:
That doesn’t answer my question, it merely dodges it. You see, the correct thing to do here is to vote eiralox and then give a reason for doing so. I’ll let you try again.
Nothing post. beligerence as seen with recent pushes.
In post 1839, Bingle wrote:
In post 1813, MegAzumarill wrote:
Mech breakdown since people don't seem to want to read Day 1.
One shot Dayvig as a role doesn't exist according to 3p.
Pisskop is a day alignment cop we can sacrifice ourselves at night to give more checks to. Currently has 1 check.
Cook had the power to dayvig day 1, doing so when their wagon picked up momentum, otherwise unknown for role.
Pisskop is an ISK according to patchwork, and therefore is mech!town if we trust patchwork's flip.
Other deaths have been to a day 1 dayvig/selfkill courtesy of flavor leaf.
NM and Eira are VT claims.
Some people but not all have claimed between mod discretion and town.
I think that's about it?
The role One Shot Dayvig specifically, or any role that can dayvig exactly one time?
Can pisskop daycop multiple times per day?
Cook was wagoner d1 and saved by a dayvig, why? What about the dayvig made her town?
What the fuck is an ISK?
Mechanically, how were roles decided this game. I thought it was supposed to be a upick?
Nothing to say here.either unaware of the patchwork flip or acts that way.
In post 1863, Bingle wrote:
In post 1843, Eiralox wrote:
Bingle how can anyone take your push on me seriously at this point if you don't even know about the inner sanctum keepers. Or perhaps act that way. On one side though things like these make me wonder if I can still consider you as part of a pt, as I have suspected. Because if this ignorance is sincere then I have to re-examine that possibility. For now it's still in my table though.
I mean… how can anyone not be voting you after you are this obvscum from only the last 6 pages? I don’t need to read the rest of the game to smell the shit you’re trying to pass off as potpourri.
still nothing. compares my input to excrement
asks infoalready provided excpept for one role: iamveryhappy'stown pick.means bingle probably suspects i might be an investigative with a possible guilty.
In post 1865, Bingle wrote:
In post 1842, MegAzumarill wrote:
Bingle, Itinerats and Psyche (by my count) need to confirm if they are in a pt or not.
I told you I wasn’t in a pt in our pt. Go check it once in a while.
No answer given, really. Maybe in the pt with enchant and itenerants.
In post 1905, Bingle wrote:
In post 1867, Eiralox wrote:
Does it matter? Overall I have little reason to interact with you beyond what I've already said. I haven't felt you approach my slot in good faith or with any depth, you've basically done nothing today, blah blah blah i'm sort of tired so if don't end it here i'll rant on and on. And N_M already shared all his picks.
Yeah, so… really easy to claim a role you don’t actually have, and no associated risk. Really hard to claim a role that is believably gamebreaking but not gamebreaking enough that you wouldn’t send it in the first place, especially when someone else might actually HAVE that role.
Still nothing of note said.
In post 1906, Bingle wrote:
In post 1880, DkKoba wrote:
"why are we wagoning eiralox"
im on that wagon
im supposedly suspicious
barely anything breated towards me
that is fear. that is someone who knows their push is wrong tbh.
lest we not forget the scummy way cook used their dayvig on d1, distinctly different from FL's hero shot in that FL was grilling that slot actively.
Counter point: likely multiball. Scum probably actually believe their arguments here.
This is what made me think koba is town and bingle needs them on his side. wangts me and cook to be superobv scum buddies in koba and others' minds.
In post 1907, Bingle wrote:
Dk, do you think any of eirs treatment of me is good faith? Because the discrediting of my reads based on my not reading prior to my replacement seems like pretty much the opposite of that, and I want whatever you’re smoking to reach that conclusion.
if someone with a limited graspor a seemingly limited graspof the game pushes me without explanation this is a probable response from me.
In post 1916, Bingle wrote:
In post 1912, DkKoba wrote:
In post 1907, Bingle wrote:
Dk, do you think any of eirs treatment of me is good faith? Because the discrediting of my reads based on my not reading prior to my replacement seems like pretty much the opposite of that, and I want whatever you’re smoking to reach that conclusion.
i think eira is approaching the game in good faith in their own POV overall yes.
:/
Did you roll scum? Sad days, dk, sad days.
I think i'll try not to see the world where koba and bingleare together.i mean i'm giving koba the benefit of the doubt today.
Again nothing much ofnote.at this point i was in the know that binglewas gonna try and gun for the one opening he had,that is, the one thing veryhappy didnt claim.
In post 1928, Bingle wrote:
I swear I meant to do things tonight, but a 10 hour shift turned into a 13 hour shift unexpectedly because no one told me we had contractors on site tonight.
Instead I’ll just ask dk why they’re unconcerned with eir explicitly hiding information that there is no town motivation to hide.
Again nohting much.Redux so far: 'Eira Bad'
In post 1929, Bingle wrote:
dk, why are you unconcerned with eir explicitly hiding information that there is no town motivation to hide?
Nothing much. nomassclaim yet so doesn't really really matter does it,unlessi made yall afraid i got that guilty
In post 1940, Bingle wrote:
In post 1930, DkKoba wrote:
In post 1929, Bingle wrote:
dk, why are you unconcerned with eir explicitly hiding information that there is no town motivation to hide?
what information + eira strikes me as the type to not share stuff willingly like that so its not really a good reason to scumread them over their dayplay
The actual submission that turned into a vt. It literally can’t hurt to share a submission that was vetoed, as explained earlier. It is also an easy lie to make. I don’t think eiralox has an answer to the question, which means…
Doesn't matter.
In post 1941, Bingle wrote:
In post 1936, Eiralox wrote:
Can't say your viewpoint encourages me. Bingle has no solid reasoning. Not_Mafia is Not_Mafia, radiant and pure. Itenerants has been on every wagon basically day one and simply doesn't act town from what I've felt.
The correct play is voting in Bingle, Enchant, Itenerants. My plan at least.
Makes me a bit sad that your take is 'maybe just go for cook or eira, there's people voting there.'
But I'm not pushing you today so you do you.
This is pretty much a perfect example of what eir is doing that’s sketch as fuck, in case anyone is genuinely confused.
This is ATE “it makes me sad that you’re willing to vote me” while simultaneously discrediting his wagon. they offer enchant up for an alternative despite having had even less evidence to share about enchant than I have about them. The pushes are shallow AF (Bingle isn’t reading!).
Everything about eirs play is “Please don’t lim me.”
And for the record, my initial reason for voting them was the attempt to target the day op rather poorly. Similarly to how I spent a lot of resources in veiled committee trying to target the various investigations.
Redux: *Eira scummy for FOSING itenerants and enchant
*Eira scummy for wanting to stay alive
*eiras scummy for disrecditing the wagin in them
In post 1942, Bingle wrote:
In post 1939, KatyKimFanClub wrote:
Hello, can someone explain uPick to me? I replaced in but in retrospect maybe I should have figured out the theme and stuff beforehand.
People picked roles. They got one of those roles, unless they sucked so hard at picking that TL said fuck off. Eiralox claims to have sucked at picking and also won’t share the role they didn’t get, presumably because they are ignoring all of my posts.
Again, an Eiralox based post