In post 1966, DkKoba wrote:
You don't have to claim the pick that got VT'd I already see a scenario for you as town where you wouldn't.
Just claim the other 3
Fuck no. Literally useless to claim the other three. The only one that ACTUALLY MATTERS to claim is the one that got reverted to vanilla.
It takes like 20 seconds to find 3 roles that could have been submitted in GIM and overlap with another player isn't in the slightest incriminating. That's noise.
Actually figuring out a role that is both gamebreaking but not obviously gamebreaking and interesting enough that someone might have picked it takes significantly longer. I think it's pretty obvious that Eir fakeclaimed VT here and is jumping through hoops to avoid being caught in that, and DK trying to subvert the actual purpose of that line of questioning for something that actually is a gigantic waste of time is very :eyebrows:.
Yimmy felt sort of lost but benevolent, Gamma feels like they have town mentality by judging their actions.
Cook:
Feels town, benevolent intent. idk for me the snivy dayvig might be town indic as well, scum or third party might want to save that shot and not waste it early on a probable non-killing third party. hope u feel better.
DkKoba:
Investigative, driver, day one input paints as town as fuck imo. Missed koba's post last night but yeah I knew we've played together before and I just sense the depth and care I want to find in town here. also not proud of how i acted in that game to koba but this time it feels as if we're on the same side and working towards the same goal. koba's interactions with bingle and iterants really enforced this to me because it's been solid analysis and the sort of things town want to know. asking iten who's scum for instance, which itens never answered, itens' done no scum hunting today. hope ur healthy.
?:
Not_Mafia:
Mystery but I can ignore for now and place as vt
whemestar:
idk despite lack of input psyche finda felt town, not enough grasp to have on nono, so far a null I guess
KatyKimFanClub:
idk save the dragons gave me weird lurky vibes but also felt town a bit. Null I guess, same with wheme just havent done much so far. i can compromise on wheme and katykim but not ideal wagons for me per se
???:
Enchant:
Ok my feel day one was just popping in to be there.day two, has done nothing, struggle to see town here.
Bingle:
Almost every post and action focused on eira. doesnt seem interested in solving the game somuch as getting a spesific elim.don'tsee their actions and arguments coming from a town mentality at all but rather either as an informed driver for a minority faction or more edgewise in my mind a lone third party. probably in a pt for now due to how i've felt they react to my mentions of enchant and bingle. bluesnakelet just sscreams not town to me over all.
Itenerants:
I believe they're strong players so I'm a bit surprised by their game ngl. because scum really don't want to be obvious and to me they sort of are. popping in and now and again, day two done basically nothing, day one heavily incriminated by how and where they voted. my guess is they didn't expect to be caught maybe and know that starting to talk now might destroy any chance their team has left. idk thought maybe a zombie after all but with bingle stuff i'm pretty chill putting them as scum. maybe wouldn't have included zombie in claims if they got that idk.
Boop:
ZZZX:
forgot all about this slot so adding at end. felt town, probably place them above n_m , katykim and wheme in order, but can also see them as scum popping in now and again. town vibes so far but eh definitely not as strong a feel as on cook, gamma,koba
On absolve, confirmed vannilla town and possible wise voter. On condemn, just funny.
Eira:
Absolve a vannilla town.
Itenerants:
I feel good about absolving or condemning here.
I'm operating on Not_Mafia trueclaim from the little I've read. Confirming either me or Not_Mafia means that killers have to kill a powerless role eventually instead of us confirming a strong role and damning them.
I'm also operating on the basis that pisskop has the check, that's obvious I guess.
Nothing else for now. Have fun... unless fun isn't your thing.
This logic is less valid in a bastard multiball game, for two reasons. Oops all inno doesn’t work in the presence of a cult, or any godfather like ability, which are both possible.
Multiple kills per night reduces the impact of innocents over all.
Cops should definitely be hunting for guilties.
Eiralox interaction. Mentions vannilla shouldn't be checked but give no input whether Itenerants is a good target.
In post 1746, Eiralox wrote:
This doesn't say much. Yay or nay on Itinerants?
You vastly overestimate my "knowing who the fuck that is" stat. It was my dumpstat. I put everything into "Spite".
Dodges. Bingle continues this pattern of not having read or making it appear so. mistakes like not knowing about n_ms and veryhappys prior claims,oracting like it to achieve a predistened goalbasedupon eira'sinitial fos of itenerants.
In post 1790, Enchant wrote:
Amway really suck i am surprised people ever accepted knowing they will lose all powers.
There were a lot of shitty roles and there were actually a few ways to make it breaking, but yeah… a lot of d1 was me winding aureal up about it to make noise.
Can someone clue me in on what the pisskop situation is? It kinda sounds to me like pisskop is talking out his ass and I’d like to clarify that a bit.
Nothing to say here. Maybe doesnt want pisskop to beconfirmed at this point.
Pisskop accused cook of stealing a snackrifice and then was told that didn’t make any sense and the mod confirmed you’re a serial killer.
Nothing to say here.
In post 1810, Bingle wrote:
I replaced in overnight and am unrepentantly not putting effort into reading what’s already happened.
Which kinda makes eir wanting to sheep a page 70 rvs vote even more scummy.
VOTE: eiralox
Eira says doesn't want to vote cook with bingle because cook iso looks good. bingle decideds eira almost voting cook means something.instinct i had is itenerants needs to be protected and bingle is the expendable runner.
In post 1831, Bingle wrote:
I’m wagoning eiralox for the scummy ass posting on the last four pages. Why are you wagoning eiralox?
No true input.I have discussed many slots at this point, bingledoesnt want to approach that content at this time cos afraid he'll clear town by spew
That doesn’t answer my question, it merely dodges it. You see, the correct thing to do here is to vote eiralox and then give a reason for doing so. I’ll let you try again.
Nothing post. beligerence as seen with recent pushes.
One shot Dayvig as a role doesn't exist according to 3p.
Pisskop is a day alignment cop we can sacrifice ourselves at night to give more checks to. Currently has 1 check.
Cook had the power to dayvig day 1, doing so when their wagon picked up momentum, otherwise unknown for role.
Pisskop is an ISK according to patchwork, and therefore is mech!town if we trust patchwork's flip.
Other deaths have been to a day 1 dayvig/selfkill courtesy of flavor leaf.
NM and Eira are VT claims.
Some people but not all have claimed between mod discretion and town.
I think that's about it?
The role One Shot Dayvig specifically, or any role that can dayvig exactly one time?
Can pisskop daycop multiple times per day?
Cook was wagoner d1 and saved by a dayvig, why? What about the dayvig made her town?
What the fuck is an ISK?
Mechanically, how were roles decided this game. I thought it was supposed to be a upick?
Nothing to say here.either unaware of the patchwork flip or acts that way.
In post 1843, Eiralox wrote:
Bingle how can anyone take your push on me seriously at this point if you don't even know about the inner sanctum keepers. Or perhaps act that way. On one side though things like these make me wonder if I can still consider you as part of a pt, as I have suspected. Because if this ignorance is sincere then I have to re-examine that possibility. For now it's still in my table though.
I mean… how can anyone not be voting you after you are this obvscum from only the last 6 pages? I don’t need to read the rest of the game to smell the shit you’re trying to pass off as potpourri.
still nothing. compares my input to excrement
In post 1864, Bingle wrote:
NM, Eiralox: what roles did you submit that got vetoed?
asks infoalready provided excpept for one role: iamveryhappy'stown pick.means bingle probably suspects i might be an investigative with a possible guilty.
In post 1864, Bingle wrote:
NM, Eiralox: what roles did you submit that got vetoed?
Does it matter? Overall I have little reason to interact with you beyond what I've already said. I haven't felt you approach my slot in good faith or with any depth, you've basically done nothing today, blah blah blah i'm sort of tired so if don't end it here i'll rant on and on. And N_M already shared all his picks.
Yeah, so… really easy to claim a role you don’t actually have, and no associated risk. Really hard to claim a role that is believably gamebreaking but not gamebreaking enough that you wouldn’t send it in the first place, especially when someone else might actually HAVE that role.
This is what made me think koba is town and bingle needs them on his side. wangts me and cook to be superobv scum buddies in koba and others' minds.
In post 1907, Bingle wrote:
Dk, do you think any of eirs treatment of me is good faith? Because the discrediting of my reads based on my not reading prior to my replacement seems like pretty much the opposite of that, and I want whatever you’re smoking to reach that conclusion.
if someone with a limited graspor a seemingly limited graspof the game pushes me without explanation this is a probable response from me.
In post 1907, Bingle wrote:
Dk, do you think any of eirs treatment of me is good faith? Because the discrediting of my reads based on my not reading prior to my replacement seems like pretty much the opposite of that, and I want whatever you’re smoking to reach that conclusion.
i think eira is approaching the game in good faith in their own POV overall yes.
:/
Did you roll scum? Sad days, dk, sad days.
I think i'll try not to see the world where koba and bingleare together.i mean i'm giving koba the benefit of the doubt today.
In post 1918, Bingle wrote:
I disagree that there’s nuance. Performance, but not nuance.
Again nothing much ofnote.at this point i was in the know that binglewas gonna try and gun for the one opening he had,that is, the one thing veryhappy didnt claim.
In post 1928, Bingle wrote:
I swear I meant to do things tonight, but a 10 hour shift turned into a 13 hour shift unexpectedly because no one told me we had contractors on site tonight.
Instead I’ll just ask dk why they’re unconcerned with eir explicitly hiding information that there is no town motivation to hide.
Again nohting much.Redux so far: 'Eira Bad'
In post 1929, Bingle wrote:
dk, why are you unconcerned with eir explicitly hiding information that there is no town motivation to hide?
Nothing much. nomassclaim yet so doesn't really really matter does it,unlessi made yall afraid i got that guilty
In post 1929, Bingle wrote:
dk, why are you unconcerned with eir explicitly hiding information that there is no town motivation to hide?
what information + eira strikes me as the type to not share stuff willingly like that so its not really a good reason to scumread them over their dayplay
The actual submission that turned into a vt. It literally can’t hurt to share a submission that was vetoed, as explained earlier. It is also an easy lie to make. I don’t think eiralox has an answer to the question, which means…
In post 1936, Eiralox wrote:
Can't say your viewpoint encourages me. Bingle has no solid reasoning. Not_Mafia is Not_Mafia, radiant and pure. Itenerants has been on every wagon basically day one and simply doesn't act town from what I've felt.
The correct play is voting in Bingle, Enchant, Itenerants. My plan at least.
Makes me a bit sad that your take is 'maybe just go for cook or eira, there's people voting there.'
But I'm not pushing you today so you do you.
This is pretty much a perfect example of what eir is doing that’s sketch as fuck, in case anyone is genuinely confused.
This is ATE “it makes me sad that you’re willing to vote me” while simultaneously discrediting his wagon. they offer enchant up for an alternative despite having had even less evidence to share about enchant than I have about them. The pushes are shallow AF (Bingle isn’t reading!).
Everything about eirs play is “Please don’t lim me.”
And for the record, my initial reason for voting them was the attempt to target the day op rather poorly. Similarly to how I spent a lot of resources in veiled committee trying to target the various investigations.
Redux: *Eira scummy for FOSING itenerants and enchant
*Eira scummy for wanting to stay alive
*eiras scummy for disrecditing the wagin in them
In post 1939, KatyKimFanClub wrote:
Hello, can someone explain uPick to me? I replaced in but in retrospect maybe I should have figured out the theme and stuff beforehand.
People picked roles. They got one of those roles, unless they sucked so hard at picking that TL said fuck off. Eiralox claims to have sucked at picking and also won’t share the role they didn’t get, presumably because they are ignoring all of my posts.
waste of my time. should be clear to anyone this is scum or third party
tl;dr
Bingle is scummy because Bingle doesn't want to effort to read the first half of the game and is fixating on things that have happened since his replace in.
Eiralox is scummy for excessive survivalism and discrediting the wagon against them in a bad faith manner.
wrt the first, effort is NAI for people who aren't trash tier players.
wrt the second: Yes, actually.
In post 2002, Eiralox wrote:
Bingle: Almost every post and action focused on eira. doesnt seem interested in solving the game somuch as getting a spesific elim.don'tsee their actions and arguments coming from a town mentality at all but rather either as an informed driver for a minority faction or more edgewise in my mind a lone third party. probably in a pt for now due to how i've felt they react to my mentions of enchant and bingle. bluesnakelet just sscreams not town to me over all.
Bingle is actively pushing a scum read and spending more time looking at someone who has been active for the portion of the game he's read! Oh noes!
As far as hyper fixating: I'm currently poking DK to try to find out if their eiralox read is a genuine one or just bullshit wk'ing (I'm leaning the latter) and I don't actually hate the itinerants push by DK. I've been trying to work with Meg to figure out the state of things, and I'm pretty solid on Meg town aorn. Gamma is also towny (the attempt to engage over multiball theory seems like a genuine attempt to figure me out), and no one else has given much impression of anything.
I don't feel much need to do more than I have been, and that's probably not going to change.
On absolve, confirmed vannilla town and possible wise voter. On condemn, just funny.
Eira:
Absolve a vannilla town.
Itenerants:
I feel good about absolving or condemning here.
I'm operating on Not_Mafia trueclaim from the little I've read. Confirming either me or Not_Mafia means that killers have to kill a powerless role eventually instead of us confirming a strong role and damning them.
I'm also operating on the basis that pisskop has the check, that's obvious I guess.
Nothing else for now. Have fun... unless fun isn't your thing.
This logic is less valid in a bastard multiball game, for two reasons. Oops all inno doesn’t work in the presence of a cult, or any godfather like ability, which are both possible.
Multiple kills per night reduces the impact of innocents over all.
Cops should definitely be hunting for guilties.
Eiralox interaction. Mentions vannilla shouldn't be checked but give no input whether Itenerants is a good target.
In post 1746, Eiralox wrote:
This doesn't say much. Yay or nay on Itinerants?
You vastly overestimate my "knowing who the fuck that is" stat. It was my dumpstat. I put everything into "Spite".
Dodges. Bingle continues this pattern of not having read or making it appear so. mistakes like not knowing about n_ms and veryhappys prior claims,oracting like it to achieve a predistened goalbasedupon eira'sinitial fos of itenerants.
In post 1790, Enchant wrote:
Amway really suck i am surprised people ever accepted knowing they will lose all powers.
There were a lot of shitty roles and there were actually a few ways to make it breaking, but yeah… a lot of d1 was me winding aureal up about it to make noise.
Can someone clue me in on what the pisskop situation is? It kinda sounds to me like pisskop is talking out his ass and I’d like to clarify that a bit.
Nothing to say here. Maybe doesnt want pisskop to beconfirmed at this point.
Pisskop accused cook of stealing a snackrifice and then was told that didn’t make any sense and the mod confirmed you’re a serial killer.
Nothing to say here.
In post 1810, Bingle wrote:
I replaced in overnight and am unrepentantly not putting effort into reading what’s already happened.
Which kinda makes eir wanting to sheep a page 70 rvs vote even more scummy.
VOTE: eiralox
Eira says doesn't want to vote cook with bingle because cook iso looks good. bingle decideds eira almost voting cook means something.instinct i had is itenerants needs to be protected and bingle is the expendable runner.
In post 1831, Bingle wrote:
I’m wagoning eiralox for the scummy ass posting on the last four pages. Why are you wagoning eiralox?
No true input.I have discussed many slots at this point, bingledoesnt want to approach that content at this time cos afraid he'll clear town by spew
That doesn’t answer my question, it merely dodges it. You see, the correct thing to do here is to vote eiralox and then give a reason for doing so. I’ll let you try again.
Nothing post. beligerence as seen with recent pushes.
One shot Dayvig as a role doesn't exist according to 3p.
Pisskop is a day alignment cop we can sacrifice ourselves at night to give more checks to. Currently has 1 check.
Cook had the power to dayvig day 1, doing so when their wagon picked up momentum, otherwise unknown for role.
Pisskop is an ISK according to patchwork, and therefore is mech!town if we trust patchwork's flip.
Other deaths have been to a day 1 dayvig/selfkill courtesy of flavor leaf.
NM and Eira are VT claims.
Some people but not all have claimed between mod discretion and town.
I think that's about it?
The role One Shot Dayvig specifically, or any role that can dayvig exactly one time?
Can pisskop daycop multiple times per day?
Cook was wagoner d1 and saved by a dayvig, why? What about the dayvig made her town?
What the fuck is an ISK?
Mechanically, how were roles decided this game. I thought it was supposed to be a upick?
Nothing to say here.either unaware of the patchwork flip or acts that way.
In post 1843, Eiralox wrote:
Bingle how can anyone take your push on me seriously at this point if you don't even know about the inner sanctum keepers. Or perhaps act that way. On one side though things like these make me wonder if I can still consider you as part of a pt, as I have suspected. Because if this ignorance is sincere then I have to re-examine that possibility. For now it's still in my table though.
I mean… how can anyone not be voting you after you are this obvscum from only the last 6 pages? I don’t need to read the rest of the game to smell the shit you’re trying to pass off as potpourri.
still nothing. compares my input to excrement
In post 1864, Bingle wrote:
NM, Eiralox: what roles did you submit that got vetoed?
asks infoalready provided excpept for one role: iamveryhappy'stown pick.means bingle probably suspects i might be an investigative with a possible guilty.
In post 1864, Bingle wrote:
NM, Eiralox: what roles did you submit that got vetoed?
Does it matter? Overall I have little reason to interact with you beyond what I've already said. I haven't felt you approach my slot in good faith or with any depth, you've basically done nothing today, blah blah blah i'm sort of tired so if don't end it here i'll rant on and on. And N_M already shared all his picks.
Yeah, so… really easy to claim a role you don’t actually have, and no associated risk. Really hard to claim a role that is believably gamebreaking but not gamebreaking enough that you wouldn’t send it in the first place, especially when someone else might actually HAVE that role.
This is what made me think koba is town and bingle needs them on his side. wangts me and cook to be superobv scum buddies in koba and others' minds.
In post 1907, Bingle wrote:
Dk, do you think any of eirs treatment of me is good faith? Because the discrediting of my reads based on my not reading prior to my replacement seems like pretty much the opposite of that, and I want whatever you’re smoking to reach that conclusion.
if someone with a limited graspor a seemingly limited graspof the game pushes me without explanation this is a probable response from me.
In post 1907, Bingle wrote:
Dk, do you think any of eirs treatment of me is good faith? Because the discrediting of my reads based on my not reading prior to my replacement seems like pretty much the opposite of that, and I want whatever you’re smoking to reach that conclusion.
i think eira is approaching the game in good faith in their own POV overall yes.
:/
Did you roll scum? Sad days, dk, sad days.
I think i'll try not to see the world where koba and bingleare together.i mean i'm giving koba the benefit of the doubt today.
In post 1918, Bingle wrote:
I disagree that there’s nuance. Performance, but not nuance.
Again nothing much ofnote.at this point i was in the know that binglewas gonna try and gun for the one opening he had,that is, the one thing veryhappy didnt claim.
In post 1928, Bingle wrote:
I swear I meant to do things tonight, but a 10 hour shift turned into a 13 hour shift unexpectedly because no one told me we had contractors on site tonight.
Instead I’ll just ask dk why they’re unconcerned with eir explicitly hiding information that there is no town motivation to hide.
Again nohting much.Redux so far: 'Eira Bad'
In post 1929, Bingle wrote:
dk, why are you unconcerned with eir explicitly hiding information that there is no town motivation to hide?
Nothing much. nomassclaim yet so doesn't really really matter does it,unlessi made yall afraid i got that guilty
In post 1929, Bingle wrote:
dk, why are you unconcerned with eir explicitly hiding information that there is no town motivation to hide?
what information + eira strikes me as the type to not share stuff willingly like that so its not really a good reason to scumread them over their dayplay
The actual submission that turned into a vt. It literally can’t hurt to share a submission that was vetoed, as explained earlier. It is also an easy lie to make. I don’t think eiralox has an answer to the question, which means…
In post 1936, Eiralox wrote:
Can't say your viewpoint encourages me. Bingle has no solid reasoning. Not_Mafia is Not_Mafia, radiant and pure. Itenerants has been on every wagon basically day one and simply doesn't act town from what I've felt.
The correct play is voting in Bingle, Enchant, Itenerants. My plan at least.
Makes me a bit sad that your take is 'maybe just go for cook or eira, there's people voting there.'
But I'm not pushing you today so you do you.
This is pretty much a perfect example of what eir is doing that’s sketch as fuck, in case anyone is genuinely confused.
This is ATE “it makes me sad that you’re willing to vote me” while simultaneously discrediting his wagon. they offer enchant up for an alternative despite having had even less evidence to share about enchant than I have about them. The pushes are shallow AF (Bingle isn’t reading!).
Everything about eirs play is “Please don’t lim me.”
And for the record, my initial reason for voting them was the attempt to target the day op rather poorly. Similarly to how I spent a lot of resources in veiled committee trying to target the various investigations.
Redux: *Eira scummy for FOSING itenerants and enchant
*Eira scummy for wanting to stay alive
*eiras scummy for disrecditing the wagin in them
In post 1939, KatyKimFanClub wrote:
Hello, can someone explain uPick to me? I replaced in but in retrospect maybe I should have figured out the theme and stuff beforehand.
People picked roles. They got one of those roles, unless they sucked so hard at picking that TL said fuck off. Eiralox claims to have sucked at picking and also won’t share the role they didn’t get, presumably because they are ignoring all of my posts.
waste of my time. should be clear to anyone this is scum or third party
tl;dr
Bingle is scummy because Bingle doesn't want to effort to read the first half of the game and is fixating on things that have happened since his replace in.
Bingle is scummy for not approaching the game in depth in any real capacity until post #2005, they now realize they need allies. Tries to get Meg, who they say seem townie but is de facto cleared already. Tries to get gamma, who's bound to become a strong voice and a wagon setter along with DkKoba, by using a very basic and lazy read.
Bingle is scummy for the way they've been dancing around Itenerants and Enchant.
Bingle is scummy because Bluesnakelet is scummy.
Bingle is scummy because how they've basically been informed that Eira isn't on their team by how they've approached Eira, never sensed any doubt in them.
Bingle is scummy because they're very likely in a pt with Itenerants and don't have much maneuvering space in this day.
Bingle is scummy because in tone that's just how they feel. In intent. By actions.
Bingles is scummy because, again, before #2005 they didn't really care to 'sort' other slots or show themselves concerned with the state of the game or town's chances in it.
Bingle is scummy because.
Bingle is scummy because can anyone tell me who they suspect other than me?
Bingle bingle bingle.
Afterthought, Bingle scummy for knowing Eira town, suspecting Eira isn't VT because Eira is targeting Itenerants, Pushing Eira on: 'what's happy's townpick', 'bad faith' and 'fake' and 'Everything Eira has said is excrement.' Town are looking to discover threats and eliminate them. Town is uncertain. Town tries at least, most of the time, to discover who's town,who they can trust at least a bit. Scum however only need to kill, in this setup perhaps also discover threats, but overall are looking to secure their position. I have no desire to defend myself against Bingle because there's little to defend against. If, say, Koba was to think I'm scum I'd be efforting and struggling far harder because probably the push would make sense. Here it doesn't, by intent it is predatory and not town motivated, and so on. I'm typing all of it anyway and explaining why because we're needing an elim and Katykim and wheme already sorta silent, pisskop watching from the sidelines, zzzx idek. so someone has to type a lot of words and try to make some sense to get somewhere i guess.
In post 2003, Bingle wrote:
Eiralox is scummy for excessive survivalism and discrediting the wagon against them in a bad faith manner.
Eira does indeed want to survive very much. Eira has indeed discredited Bingle's vote on them, and while not in bad faith Eira is sufficiently irritated by Bingle to no have any decently minded or friendly approach towards pushes by the slot. Call it disgruntled faith, frustrated faith, amused faith. but i'm not hating on anyone over a text game.
The Koba vote Eira wanted to understand, and does. No discrediting, no bad faith. Eira did say at the start that they're not impressed by Kkoba but after reading Day one and gauging intent this has utterly changed.
The Not_Mafia vote Eira took in good humor, yes did humorously discredit it a bit, never understood it, on the whole no bad faith because Eira loves Not_Mafia.
The Itenerants vote Eira never bothered to discredit in any faith because it was expected, it's ineffectual and overall a bit boring.
The second koba vote and gamma vote eira was completely fine with because koba was set as town and gamma sort of felt like it. the unvote very much raised gamma's town chances to highly probable.
In post 2003, Bingle wrote:
wrt the first, effort is NAI for people who aren't trash tier players.
wrt the second: Yes, actually.
flavor leaf killed guillotina d1 by voluntarily quitting the game
there's a guardian deity of cops (pisskop) who you can sacrifice yourself to so they can have daycop powers
i dayvigged camelcasedsnivy and he didn't die, he then sacrificed himself the next night
we eliminated a martyr so that the mafia couldn't kill, and now we're on day 2
eiralox is a wagon that exists, but because bingle is on it, it's more like a wagon that has not_mafia and itinerants just happenstance voting it. eiralox i think is being voted due to coasty content on the slot or something? but it's a bingle push. also they were being really cagey about claiming discards, and koba was going on that
the consolidation target will be enchant given nothing else
Your friendly neighborhood chef and baker. LONG LIVE THE CHEFHAT REBELLION!
retired
"1 thing I will give you Dk, I think you are very good at manipulating. I don't mean that in a bad way, I just think you [have] this way with yourself. You know what to say and when to say [it]." ~VFP
"Koba doesn't really have a scumrange/townrange, Koba will kill your pet cat to win a game" ~Pooky
retired
"1 thing I will give you Dk, I think you are very good at manipulating. I don't mean that in a bad way, I just think you [have] this way with yourself. You know what to say and when to say [it]." ~VFP
"Koba doesn't really have a scumrange/townrange, Koba will kill your pet cat to win a game" ~Pooky
for slots that are contentious I am strongly against are enchant, meg, and eira
retired
"1 thing I will give you Dk, I think you are very good at manipulating. I don't mean that in a bad way, I just think you [have] this way with yourself. You know what to say and when to say [it]." ~VFP
"Koba doesn't really have a scumrange/townrange, Koba will kill your pet cat to win a game" ~Pooky
NM flaking is kinda scummy for him regrettably tho but i'd be willing to wait for replacement for him because he showed some good stuff at points
retired
"1 thing I will give you Dk, I think you are very good at manipulating. I don't mean that in a bad way, I just think you [have] this way with yourself. You know what to say and when to say [it]." ~VFP
"Koba doesn't really have a scumrange/townrange, Koba will kill your pet cat to win a game" ~Pooky
In post 2019, WhemeStar wrote:
So flavor killed himself so a random person got a day cop shot?
lol please can we kill this slot
retired
"1 thing I will give you Dk, I think you are very good at manipulating. I don't mean that in a bad way, I just think you [have] this way with yourself. You know what to say and when to say [it]." ~VFP
"Koba doesn't really have a scumrange/townrange, Koba will kill your pet cat to win a game" ~Pooky
retired
"1 thing I will give you Dk, I think you are very good at manipulating. I don't mean that in a bad way, I just think you [have] this way with yourself. You know what to say and when to say [it]." ~VFP
"Koba doesn't really have a scumrange/townrange, Koba will kill your pet cat to win a game" ~Pooky
