i don't feel as confident in my read on klickIn post 547, Black wrote: Why are you voting Clap over Klick when it seems pretty obvious that there is a bigger appetite for a Klick wagon
sureIn post 550, Dannflor wrote: i think there are some people on this playerlist who might be likely to follow me onto the wagon of my choosing
i just want to quote this again to say i have a deep primal distaste for this postIn post 368, Claptastik wrote:Problem is that someone with that join date and post count could very well be town, and could very well have good reads. And they're difficult to lim. It's a type that's good for investigatives to check.In post 363, NekoLover wrote: yea tbh I don't like dann simply because he won't explain his train of thought
I'm town. You're projecting because it's something in your own scum bag of tricks. For example:In post 536, Dannflor wrote: i don't believe i said 185 specifically was scummy, but i do think you seemed overly anxious to have bulletproof and unique reasons to be scum reading black
like you said enough in 185, and then i find your followup in 243 to be more about the performance than anything else.
like i don't think you read all the posts you highlighted and have these thoughts. i think you wanted to scum read black and then reinforced that with 243 afterwards
that's something town sometimes too but it comes from scum an awful lot of the time that want to make their reads seem more real, and more importantly, bulletproof to argue against
Just from this game? I agree. But, I read your D1 play in some recent games and it has me leaning town on you.In post 538, Dannflor wrote: I also don't really think it makes sense for Claptastik to think I'm townier than fakegod or kawaii
Why did your opinion of me changeIn post 559, Claptastik wrote: Currently I have black, neko, de70, and you north of null
First, some players I town read said this isn't your scum game.In post 561, Black wrote:Why did your opinion of me changeIn post 559, Claptastik wrote: Currently I have black, neko, de70, and you north of null
North of null. I've given reasons.In post 562, Dannflor wrote: where do you have klick
is there a reason you linked a scum game of mine besides to show off that you’ve been metaing peopleIn post 559, Claptastik wrote:I'm town. You're projecting because it's something in your own scum bag of tricks. For example:In post 536, Dannflor wrote: i don't believe i said 185 specifically was scummy, but i do think you seemed overly anxious to have bulletproof and unique reasons to be scum reading black
like you said enough in 185, and then i find your followup in 243 to be more about the performance than anything else.
like i don't think you read all the posts you highlighted and have these thoughts. i think you wanted to scum read black and then reinforced that with 243 afterwards
that's something town sometimes too but it comes from scum an awful lot of the time that want to make their reads seem more real, and more importantly, bulletproof to argue against
viewtopic.php?p=13971095#p13971095
I'm town. You should look elsewhere.
Currently I have black, neko, de70, and you north of null
skygazer null
fakegod, kawaii - scum pool
I guess I doubt it's this easy, but it sure seems like it is.
LOL, yes, and I already gave the point. You were scum and early on gave a forced list case on someone. When I saw that the light bulb went on - he's scum reading me for a list case because he does it as scum.In post 565, Dannflor wrote:is there a reason you linked a scum game of mine besides to show off that you’ve been metaing peopleIn post 559, Claptastik wrote:I'm town. You're projecting because it's something in your own scum bag of tricks. For example:In post 536, Dannflor wrote: i don't believe i said 185 specifically was scummy, but i do think you seemed overly anxious to have bulletproof and unique reasons to be scum reading black
like you said enough in 185, and then i find your followup in 243 to be more about the performance than anything else.
like i don't think you read all the posts you highlighted and have these thoughts. i think you wanted to scum read black and then reinforced that with 243 afterwards
that's something town sometimes too but it comes from scum an awful lot of the time that want to make their reads seem more real, and more importantly, bulletproof to argue against
viewtopic.php?p=13971095#p13971095
I'm town. You should look elsewhere.
Currently I have black, neko, de70, and you north of null
skygazer null
fakegod, kawaii - scum pool
I guess I doubt it's this easy, but it sure seems like it is.
What's so off about his game?In post 553, Dannflor wrote: there's also an element of I think Klick is a great town player and he could be having an off game or i could be having an off game but if I give him time I'll be able to find him as town
Why? Is bussing not a thing on this site?In post 188, FakeGod wrote: Now, if an actual quickhammer had occurred and the flip was scum, I would give massive towncred to the hammerer,
You can taste it however you like, but it's accurate regardless.In post 558, Dannflor wrote:i just want to quote this again to say i have a deep primal distaste for this postIn post 368, Claptastik wrote:Problem is that someone with that join date and post count could very well be town, and could very well have good reads. And they're difficult to lim. It's a type that's good for investigatives to check.In post 363, NekoLover wrote: yea tbh I don't like dann simply because he won't explain his train of thought
I think its more so that why would someone buss their teammate day 1 page 2, especially if its not a guaranteed 100% town; even if it is scum, they don't know if a cop exists in this setupIn post 569, Claptastik wrote:Why? Is bussing not a thing on this site?In post 188, FakeGod wrote: Now, if an actual quickhammer had occurred and the flip was scum, I would give massive towncred to the hammerer,
I've come back from work and this post caught my eye. I am saddened.In post 490, Klick wrote:In very brief: I was vaguely aware that Black was at E-1. I didn't care that much about it. In the very early stages of the game I find that sort of stuff somewhat amusing. If people want to do crazy stuff early on, that's their prerogative. Ultimately there's stuff to read into that sort of play. The E-1 contributed to us progressing the thread in a healthy way.
tl;dr risk-averse play during RVS is for losers.
