maybe he's just burnt out but like...
He would have to be full force anti-spewing
He would have to be full force anti-spewing
Well I can at least say that I know this isn’t true lolIn post 475, Gypyx wrote: I'm really not buying NAS, like, this play seems kinda too audacious to pull off as scum
NAS literally just did this in the last game we played so...disagree.In post 475, Gypyx wrote: I'm really not buying NAS, like, this play seems kinda too audacious to pull off as scum
Kinda agree.In post 475, Gypyx wrote: I'm really not buying NAS, like, this play seems kinda too audacious to pull off as scum
maybe he's just burnt out but like...
He would have to be full force anti-spewing
Boo hooIn post 482, Thomith wrote: I'm not sure how much I like directing Vigs publicly
So trueIn post 482, Thomith wrote: I'm not sure how much I like directing Vigs publicly
Bad takeIn post 484, Gypyx wrote: i think i'd rather let us lim the uncontroversial slots and let the vig take risks?
Because I don't think this makes you scum?In post 486, Hu Tao wrote: If you don't like it then why don't you vote me? Seems like posturing.
Not even based on how the wagon grew?In post 489, Hu Tao wrote: NaS gives 0 info going into the night for night actions regardless of his alignment.
I like to use random buzz words to sound smartIn post 491, Thomith wrote:Because I don't think this makes you scum?In post 486, Hu Tao wrote: If you don't like it then why don't you vote me? Seems like posturing.
Also posturing how?
NopeIn post 492, Thomith wrote:Not even based on how the wagon grew?In post 489, Hu Tao wrote: NaS gives 0 info going into the night for night actions regardless of his alignment.
You're saying people should vote everyone they disagree with? Seems like posturingIn post 486, Hu Tao wrote: If you don't like it then why don't you vote me? Seems like posturing.
nooooooo, my precious associatives, aaaaaaaaah, i'm meltingIn post 489, Hu Tao wrote: NaS gives 0 info going into the night for night actions regardless of his alignment.
Then why not vote me then?In post 495, Gypyx wrote:You're saying people should vote everyone they disagree with? Seems like posturingIn post 486, Hu Tao wrote: If you don't like it then why don't you vote me? Seems like posturing.
I realise in hindsight on this site now, saying you don't like something usually means you scumread it.In post 493, Hu Tao wrote:I like to use random buzz words to sound smartIn post 491, Thomith wrote:Because I don't think this makes you scum?In post 486, Hu Tao wrote: If you don't like it then why don't you vote me? Seems like posturing.
Also posturing how?
Cause i'm posturingIn post 497, Hu Tao wrote:Then why not vote me then?In post 495, Gypyx wrote:You're saying people should vote everyone they disagree with? Seems like posturingIn post 486, Hu Tao wrote: If you don't like it then why don't you vote me? Seems like posturing.