Mini 69: Untitled Mafia (finis)

Fishbulb · Post Post #1 (isolation #0) » Mon Nov 03, 2003 3:14 am

Confirm, and... Hello, everyone!

Fishbulb · Post Post #5 (isolation #1) » Mon Nov 03, 2003 4:01 am

This will be a pretty rough start with no kills or other nightly happenings to examine.

From the opening post, it woulds seem we might have some unconventional mechanics regarding night, but I might just be reading into it too much.

Fishbulb · Post Post #8 (isolation #2) » Mon Nov 03, 2003 5:53 am

Fishbulb wrote:From the opening post, it would
s
seem...

"it would seem"

Curse you typo!!!

Fishbulb · Post Post #17 (isolation #3) » Tue Nov 04, 2003 3:36 am

Yeah yeah... Let the chaos begin.

Vote: Talitha

. She burned me in Simpsons.

Fishbulb · Post Post #40 (isolation #4) » Wed Nov 05, 2003 3:32 am

Sorry, Isaac. What were you people thinking?!?

Fishbulb · Post Post #57 (isolation #5) » Tue Nov 11, 2003 4:59 am

If we get a replacement, we should let them have a clean slate. Spqr, being new, probably didn't realize that it was bad play.

Fishbulb · Post Post #60 (isolation #6) » Tue Nov 11, 2003 1:39 pm

Look at what I said, please.

If

we get a replacement, we shouldn't hold it against them

(the replacement)

. If Spqr shows up, he would certainly need to explain what he did, no argument here.

Fishbulb · Post Post #62 (isolation #7) » Tue Nov 11, 2003 1:46 pm

Oops! I just realized I was guilty of not seeing what was said.

For some reason, on first reading I thought you said that

I

said I would give Spqr a clean slate. Not sure how I came up with that.

Oh well, I guess I got my stupid act out of the way early this game.

--

My point is, that we have a newbie jump the gun on the bandwagon. That is precisely why it is a good idea to leave a few spots on the bandwagon and not just one. I'd be willing to bet it was just a newbie mistake, but if you guys are going to hold it against any replacement (who can't justify actions they did not partake in), we'd might as well lynch them now. Who would

want

to take his place??

Fishbulb · Post Post #64 (isolation #8) » Tue Nov 11, 2003 2:00 pm

Double or nothing?

My proposal: either we give them a clean slate, or we lynch him now.

Replacement Vote: Clean Slate

Fishbulb · Post Post #71 (isolation #9) » Wed Nov 12, 2003 4:35 am

Carmine wrote:It's impossible not to bear it in mind, and that makes Zoneace's deal much harder. However, if we'd just lynched him, then nobody gets to have the difficult-replacement-deal...

Yeah, that was my point. But it's too late for that now. I'm just happy someone agreed to take that position

I'm willing to ignore the actions of his predecessor. Like I said previously, I think we should be looking at those who put it so close to the lynch to allow a newbie to do something like that. Those two votes that put him one away were unnecessary and just as heinous as what spqr did, in my opinion.

Fishbulb · Post Post #83 (isolation #10) » Thu Nov 13, 2003 1:51 am

ZONEACE, the site usually takes a lull during evening hours. It's not that unusual.

I'm starting to lean on the getting rid of our townie. I find it unlikely that he is

just

a townie, and if he is, we haven't lost much. Sorry, ZONEACE, but I think it's what is best for the town.

Fishbulb · Post Post #87 (isolation #11) » Thu Nov 13, 2003 7:37 am

That was mostly because I didn't think there were townies. That is obviously not the case so that would be a bad route. Besides, I didn't even vote for you, I was just posting my thoughts for the moment.

Fishbulb · Post Post #91 (isolation #12) » Thu Nov 13, 2003 3:06 pm

Yes, I'd certainly like to hear from Empathy. Not just because of the voting, either. Speak up before we go lurker hunting.

Fishbulb · Post Post #99 (isolation #13) » Fri Nov 14, 2003 6:19 am

Yeah, we don't need another incident like with Isaac. I think the mention, and possibly one vote, is all that is really needed at this point.

Vote: Demeech

I still think you went too far when you added the fifth vote. And you should've known better.

Fishbulb · Post Post #118 (isolation #14) » Mon Nov 17, 2003 3:23 am

I'm with Talitha. I just don't believe he is a roleblocker. Maybe we can get a confirmation from Empathy, though. Did you receive a message saying you were blocked?