Open 180 - 3 of 5 / Out in the Wilde (Game Over!)

dramonic · Post Post #7 (isolation #0) » Wed Oct 28, 2009 4:58 pm

Vote: Saber

I,m not accepting the loss I just undergone

dramonic · Post Post #8 (isolation #1) » Wed Oct 28, 2009 4:59 pm

err... underwent?

underthat....

dramonic · Post Post #11 (isolation #2) » Wed Oct 28, 2009 5:11 pm

saberwolf wrote: stumbling over words is a scumslip

Which still doesnt answer my question. WHat's the correct word?

dramonic · Post Post #14 (isolation #3) » Wed Oct 28, 2009 5:19 pm

MrSuave wrote:YOU AGAIN!!! DRAMONIC IS A SPY!!!

vote:dramonic

...

Do I know you? XP

dramonic · Post Post #17 (isolation #4) » Wed Oct 28, 2009 5:25 pm

I've played/am playing with everyone on the list except Deathsauce

dramonic · Post Post #23 (isolation #5) » Thu Oct 29, 2009 4:40 am

So I can't lynch you with extreme prejudice?

dramonic · Post Post #34 (isolation #6) » Fri Oct 30, 2009 11:49 am

Heh, I think claiming miller isn't that bad. Considering Saber took the risk (if he's scum) of getting counterclaimed the first day of the game it ain't so bad and town points from my perspective.

dramonic · Post Post #46 (isolation #7) » Sat Oct 31, 2009 5:18 am

This shows you haven't played with Hohum enough to analyze his playstyle, Suave ^^

Neither have I, but he's... special...

dramonic · Post Post #71 (isolation #8) » Sat Oct 31, 2009 6:19 pm

Well, this game sounds like an overeager jumping fest. =_=

Anyways, Saber, have we actually played mafia together or just a wide brochette of mishmash?

dramonic · Post Post #73 (isolation #9) » Sat Oct 31, 2009 7:28 pm

You and Suave jumping at each other's neck.

dramonic · Post Post #76 (isolation #10) » Sun Nov 01, 2009 3:55 am

hohum wrote:I kind of figured that's what you were reacting to, so I prepared some questions for you.

1) How would you suggest we go about scum hunting?

2) Do you support policy lynches? If so, in what circumstances are they appropriate.

1) Latch on to something that doesn't seem right. For example, the fact that MrSuave votes me first, while I'm the one most prone to be able to readhim as I played lotsa games with him, is strange.

2) I support only two types of policy lynches. Fakeclaims and things I'd modkill (like "go die in a fucking fire you fucktard")

Hey, fakeclaims aren't all bad! ~Nik

dramonic · Post Post #85 (isolation #11) » Sun Nov 01, 2009 6:30 pm

hohum wrote:
dramonic wrote:1) Latch on to something that doesn't seem right. For example, the fact that MrSuave votes me first, while I'm the one most prone to be able to readhim as I played lotsa games with him, is strange.
Do you not believe my vote on MrSuave is justified based on this notion? Does it seem right to you that MrSuave is pushing for my policy lynch, or am I over reacting?

I have no problem with your vote on Suave.

Hohum wrote:
DeathSauce wrote: Is this why your vote remains on saberwolf? Do you believe he is fakeclaiming?
This is an excellent point, especially since you yourself just pointed out a reason for you to vote MrSuave.

Because I believe the same thing could apply to Saberwolf. I might be mistaken and we only played Mishmash together, in which case my vote will move to Suave, but in the meantime under the same situation I believe Suave is more prone to these type of mistakes as town due to newbness.

I am not sure about the miller claim. Waiting for SW's confirmation to my earlier question bout our games together.

dramonic · Post Post #87 (isolation #12) » Sun Nov 01, 2009 7:37 pm

works for me.

Unvote
Vote: Suave

dramonic · Post Post #107 (isolation #13) » Mon Nov 02, 2009 2:45 pm

I'm not sure how credible PR claims are in this setup...

dramonic · Post Post #114 (isolation #14) » Mon Nov 02, 2009 3:40 pm

It's irrevelant. We can't read Suave's mind.

dramonic · Post Post #122 (isolation #15) » Mon Nov 02, 2009 3:59 pm

my personal experience with Suave-town doesn't look like this.

dramonic · Post Post #124 (isolation #16) » Mon Nov 02, 2009 4:01 pm

He really wasn't half as sheepish last time he flipped town.

dramonic · Post Post #126 (isolation #17) » Mon Nov 02, 2009 4:09 pm

viewtopic.php?t=12130

dramonic · Post Post #135 (isolation #18) » Mon Nov 02, 2009 6:36 pm

read the game?

dramonic · Post Post #138 (isolation #19) » Mon Nov 02, 2009 6:41 pm

If you noticed, my reason for voting you is untouched by your tunneling on Hohum due to a meta analysis you haven't done <<

dramonic · Post Post #139 (isolation #20) » Mon Nov 02, 2009 6:42 pm

And you feel more like SuaveMonkey than SuavePokemon.

dramonic · Post Post #159 (isolation #21) » Wed Nov 04, 2009 5:43 am

Well that was some terrible play on Suave's part.

dramonic · Post Post #165 (isolation #22) » Wed Nov 04, 2009 9:32 am

DeathSauce wrote:Quick take is that scum did us a favor by taking out saberwolf. Eliminates the whole discussion about whether he was/was not the miller.

Also, now that we know there was a doc and a miller, I think that eliminates the possibility of there being a cop or a mafia roleblocker in this game, based on the rules in post 1.

Nikanor, can you clarify that ?

we can nhave one or the other. The third one is either rb, cop or another townie.

dramonic · Post Post #168 (isolation #23) » Wed Nov 04, 2009 10:39 am

Don't slap yourself. Only I have the right to make use of sadism on you.

Thank you? ~Nik

dramonic · Post Post #177 (isolation #24) » Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:14 pm

Suave's play was subpar at best. The better thing would have been to come out with it instead of saying "dont lynch me"

dramonic · Post Post #182 (isolation #25) » Wed Nov 04, 2009 6:08 pm

If scum were protown they'd be shooting themselves Xp

dramonic · Post Post #197 (isolation #26) » Sat Nov 07, 2009 9:00 am

you cant.

I find Aldu's play weird, but I cant exactly vote him

dramonic · Post Post #198 (isolation #27) » Sat Nov 07, 2009 9:00 am

well, could, but it'd be bad

dramonic · Post Post #202 (isolation #28) » Sat Nov 07, 2009 6:19 pm

Actually you know what, nevermind.

Vote: Alduskell

dramonic · Post Post #204 (isolation #29) » Sun Nov 08, 2009 4:00 am

You're accusing Hohum of doing what got Suave lynched and your defense is really erm... wait, where IS your defense?

dramonic · Post Post #206 (isolation #30) » Sun Nov 08, 2009 12:48 pm

You call that a defense? 0_o

Bandwagonning someone over a meta you do not possess is scummy. Not claiming at L-1 is scummy.

There, it's broken.

dramonic · Post Post #217 (isolation #31) » Sun Nov 08, 2009 5:36 pm

well, if someone want to hammer you yes, you ought to claim.

dramonic · Post Post #219 (isolation #32) » Sun Nov 08, 2009 6:08 pm

hmm?

Sure, if you have good reason now would be the time.

dramonic · Post Post #228 (isolation #33) » Mon Nov 09, 2009 3:10 am

Santos wrote:I'm holding off a vote for you at the moment because I would like to know what you were initially going to say in post 202 before placing Alduskkel at L-1.

I would have voted earlier, but thought "if he's not scum, we're in a fair amount of trouble."
Then I took note we weren't in LyLo yet and considering my belief that Aldu is scum I decided putting him at L-1 wasn't a too risky play, especially considering the fact the two people I believe most prone to hammer too quickly (aka you and Hohum) were already on the wagon.

dramonic · Post Post #247 (isolation #34) » Tue Nov 10, 2009 2:50 am

Well, it's not that there is much to talk about ^_^;

Aldu is defending Suave like crazy with crap arguements
ToD is over Hohum with a dubious case
Hohum is playing to his usual meta
Malp is posting basically nothing content-wise
DS feels town to me, even if his contribution is subpar
Santos I have very mixed feelings about.

I'd rather lynch Aldu than ToD. ToD looks more misleaded than scummy.

dramonic · Post Post #251 (isolation #35) » Tue Nov 10, 2009 2:41 pm

I blew up your defense in something like 10 words.

dramonic · Post Post #254 (isolation #36) » Tue Nov 10, 2009 3:18 pm

Alduskkel wrote:
dramonic wrote:I blew up your defense in something like 10 words.

sorry, 17 words.

dramonic · Post Post #279 (isolation #37) » Fri Nov 13, 2009 1:53 am

@mod: Saberwolf didn't die night 2...

THAT IS A LIE!

...Fixed... ~Nik

dramonic · Post Post #306 (isolation #38) » Mon Nov 16, 2009 4:17 am

Yes, using Ad Hominem is sure to help you get your point accross.

dramonic · Post Post #309 (isolation #39) » Mon Nov 16, 2009 11:11 am

It'd be particularly fascinating.
Look, we're locked in a situation where basically everyone has done stupidly scummy stuff, once someone dies we can hope the game will regain some speed

dramonic · Post Post #316 (isolation #40) » Mon Nov 16, 2009 2:57 pm

Well, there was stuff to extract some info from in our game ToD, while this game has come to a standstill. I never said I wasn't as lynchable as the others (which is sad really), but Aldu distancing hard, Santos quickhammering and Malp lurking aint better.

dramonic · Post Post #334 (isolation #41) » Thu Nov 19, 2009 8:23 am

DTMaster wrote:I'll be the handy dandy replacement that will require 2 days before I can post something substantial.

dont worry, if you post something substancial you'll have been more useful than all of us ^_^;

dramonic · Post Post #342 (isolation #42) » Fri Nov 20, 2009 7:44 pm

dramonic · Post Post #365 (isolation #43) » Sun Nov 22, 2009 6:20 am

Back and... this is an open setup, using the pm ain't gonna work <_<

dramonic · Post Post #368 (isolation #44) » Sun Nov 22, 2009 6:20 pm

I'm not sure I understand how I'm tied to DTM and DS...

well, barring the d

dramonic · Post Post #370 (isolation #45) » Sun Nov 22, 2009 6:21 pm

And your reason for eliminating Santos and Aldu are... what exactly?

dramonic · Post Post #379 (isolation #46) » Mon Nov 23, 2009 4:14 pm

Unvote
Vote: DeathSauce

Fixed.

dramonic · Post Post #391 (isolation #47) » Thu Nov 26, 2009 10:04 am

Hmm...
Thoughts, Aldu?

dramonic · Post Post #392 (isolation #48) » Thu Nov 26, 2009 1:14 pm

My thoughts are that our two cops are the two scum. It's much too fitting for them to both have Aldu on their suspect list.

dramonic · Post Post #401 (isolation #49) » Tue Dec 01, 2009 2:15 am

... so what now?
should we just no lynch?

dramonic · Post Post #403 (isolation #50) » Tue Dec 01, 2009 5:17 am

Well, while I agree we have found our scum, I dont think its Aldu. Pretty sure its you trumpet.
Interesting how no NK happened, considering there is no reason to not kill when you have 2 confirmed townies (me and Santos)

Additionally its interesting how the one of you two that was offsite during the complete night phase is... oh look, its you trumpet.

dramonic · Post Post #407 (isolation #51) » Tue Dec 01, 2009 2:48 pm

Vote: ToD

Oh please.

dramonic · Post Post #410 (isolation #52) » Tue Dec 01, 2009 2:58 pm

Your interaction with the DTM yesterday reeks of scum gambit to me.

dramonic · Post Post #412 (isolation #53) » Tue Dec 01, 2009 3:28 pm

Mon Nov 30, 2009 8:40 am
Nov 27, 2009 10:23 pm

no post between those two points.

Aldu was active on forum during that time, so he's more liekly to have been able to submit a kill than you.

dramonic · Post Post #421 (isolation #54) » Wed Dec 02, 2009 9:56 am

oops? XP

dramonic · Post Post #427 (isolation #55) » Wed Dec 02, 2009 11:48 am

sorry trumpet?

dramonic · Post Post #440 (isolation #56) » Wed Dec 02, 2009 5:59 pm