vezopiraka wrote:Now obligatory mod gaming from me. Lowell is scum. If anyone knows how I deduced this gets 6 vez points.
How could you deduce anything about Lowell. He's superlurk.
Unsight wrote:Then when Parama made his big post, I went and read nhammen's post and foilist13's posts that nhammen called rolefishing. The questions foilist13 was asking could really only satisfactorily be answered by telling more about vezo's role. It really seems like Parama was deliberately ignoring that. If Parama is ignoring some things to push his case then I figure he might be ignoring others as well.
SC mentioned something really smart about how nhamman was calling out the rolefishing but not saying the person was scum. That kind of thing bugs me but it bugs me on the same level as seeing Parama call out one of Chronopie's posts as a scumslip, vote him, and then go back to nhammen justifying it with "lol he's using meta." If I see a genuine scumslip, I'm really not inclined to move my vote away so easily so seeing Parama change back to nhammen for seemingly much flimsier reasoning is worrisome. Looks more like wagon testing than scum hunting to me. SC may be onto something, but Parama's activity just makes the nhammen wagon feel dirty to me.
Interesting case on Parama... I don't know though. Bad logic =/= scum.
Dry-fit wrote:Oh. Well, actually, the case on Robotnik really wan't anything. The first two players on the wagon didn't really make a case at all. And yet several players jumped on stating they thought the wagon was good. That's what was suspicious. The reason I thought Robotnik was scummy was because of his response. Not the (nonexistent) case.
Makes sense...
SGRaaize wrote:First of all, calm down, you hardly hold any authority over me here, there are many things I don't mind doing to prove my innocence, posting links for private forums on a forum as big as this just to show I like playing defensively is not in the list.
Well nuts. I tried... I still consider you to be slightly scummy...
Vi wrote:Bonus!
I will shamelessly jump onto the largest wagon formed on anyone (except maybe Unsight) on the Chronopie wagon (mostly because those are the people I don't trust individually, not so much because they're on the wagon).
Hey cool! So if I voted for Chrono, you'd shamelessly jump on me! You know threatening anybody on a specific wagon makes it look like you are protecting said player...
Leafsnail wrote:And... sometimes I prefer to gather my thoughts before posting. Specifically, when it's 1:30 in the morning.
In other news, you're on the same scumteam as chronopie. Either that or you've suffered a stroke within the last 24 hours. I guess you're hoping your ranknames will allow you to get away with this ridiculous behaviour.
Totally understand about 1:30 in the morning. That's when I finally decide to post after procrastinating all day (for example, right now). Agree on vi/chrono. BTW what are ranknames?
Midnight's Sorrow wrote:Here's a quick question for you guys.
Why is there an assumption that the major contributors are less scummy then those that don't? I'm curious to know what that has anything to do with being scummy besides just needing to post more?
It is hard to get a read on people that post less. So scum might try to hide by posting with little to no content.
foilist's defense of me and attack on Parama = <3
Better wording than any I used.
pman5595 wrote:HOLY CRAP PAGES! I'll try to catch up as soon as possible.
How's that coming? Did you see I had asked you a question? Well here is another:
@pman Give me a list of the 6 people you find scummiest.
Look at it this way, it will give you a goal during your reread.
Parama wrote:Wait, so foilist, you're saying nhammen's accusations against you are completely valid?
unvote, vote: foilist13
Straight from the horse's mouth, foilist admits to being scum.
Ummm...
My case was:
A) foilist was rolefishing
B) this rolefishing is scummy
A + B = foilist is scummy.
You said that my case A was invalid. foilist disagrees. He says my case B is invalid. He convinced me of this fact.
And Parama reaches for yet another case!! Go Parama![/sarcasm]
vezopiraka wrote:My explanation of why lowell is scum.
The mod didn't want to start the game early because lowell hasn't confirmed via PM. He then says that after lowell confirmed wants to give more time to the people with night talk abilities. He is not a mason or a monk therefore he must be scum.
Unvote nhammen
Vote Lowell
You are pulling out the last to confirm scumtell? Seriously?
Leafsnail wrote:Parama's case on foilist is solid. Foilist actualy says "I was blatant rolefishing" so... yeah. As far as I can tell, Foilist was trying so hard to paint parama scum that he actually began attacking himself. It's reaching to the point of hilarity. Also, he seems confused as to whether he's trying to call nhammen scum or town.
Parama has not had a solid case at all this game. I would be surprised if Parama would know what a solid case was if it was dropped into his lap.
@Parama How well did your tunneling strategy work in the last game you used it as Town?
Vi wrote:I've only lightly skimmed everything Parama has said since he started tunneling on SSBF.
I wish I had been doing this...
Parama wrote:You have until your next post to vote me or die a horrible death.
And you say you aren't a VI...