L-1 Jack Forman - 4 - Hiraki, theplague42, Does Bo Know, [Moonstruck]
brundibar - 1 - Shift
Hiraki - 1 - Jack Forman
Not Voting: martini, brundibar, Quilford
With 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch
Deadline: April 8.
V/LA: ...
The point wasn't that it was Vi, it was that Vi is a well-known player that is known to be good.theplague42 wrote:Never played with Vi, so I wouldn't know.
Also, anyone else notice that brundibar practically copied a cople of my summaries? He also left out me, which of course I did as well... Thoughts?
Moon wrote:It even says in the paragraph about Lurking in one of the rule posts that it's scummie to just have a few random posts that don't have much to do with anything.
Here people saying Fluff.shift wrote:Iso#2=Fluff
Iso#3=More fluff, RVS vote
This is what scum says when they realize they can't defend. I'm telling you guys. This is a really fucking juicy lynch.Jack Forman wrote:I don't want to give up on this fight but it does not matter what I say someone will twist it to look bad or you will say that you can't understand what I am trying to say. When I flip town you guys should take a good look at the people in this wagon cus one of the will turn up scum.
So your vote was for pressure. Hmmzorz.Jack Forman wrote:My vote on Hiraki was not OMGUSit was me wanting to know what he wanted me dead and the fact that I think he is scum now.
This is Jack calling me scum because I called him scum.Jack wrote:now you want me dead?? Sounds like scum, why don't you just jump out and push the wagon. scum
But wait, didn't you do the same thing, except present a case that's next to piss poor? Sheesh.Jack Forman wrote:That is funny, I could see someone that is scum saying that.Hiraki wrote:Ha. Jack is challenging me. I'll admit that I thought I made a post that isn't here, but now it's go-time. When I get back home, I'm going to show everyone the obv. Jackscum.
Of course you wouldn't, just the fact that you're mentioning it now means you know it's scummy and would be avoiding it.brundibar wrote:I'm not throwing out FoS's to see who will hop on my wagon. I'm just trying to make observations without automatically assuming that they makes them scum. I'm trying to put ideas out there for everyone to discuss, and either agree with or disagree with.If I was trying to get people to hop on wagons, I would be constantly vote changing.While I admit I did change votes a couple times early on when I was still trying to figure everything out, I haven't cast a vote since post 80.
Tossing out random logic that could possibly incriminate someone at anyone you can serves the same purpose.brundibar wrote:If I was trying to get people to hop on wagons, I would be constantly vote changing.
My argument is that newbie scum make more mistakes than newbie town. That coincides with the fact that experienced scum make more mistakes than experienced town. I'm not trying to compare newbie-town with experienced-scum. (BTW when I say just "newbie" I generally imply town; I'll try to be more specific from now on)Hiraki wrote:The point wasn't that it was Vi, it was that Vi is a well-known player that is known to be good.theplague42 wrote:Never played with Vi, so I wouldn't know.
Also, anyone else notice that brundibar practically copied a cople of my summaries? He also left out me, which of course I did as well... Thoughts?
So we shouldn't try and make arguments to influence others? Hiraki has been making good points all game, I was leaning towards voting Jack, and then he posted his final analysis and I found it convincing enough to hammer.Does Bo Know wrote:
Brundi hammered with the simple statement that Hiraki convinced him. Piggybacking. I don’t like that.At all.Bad for brundi. You have been fence-sitting (Shift coined the term and I’m just using it, if that’s alright), and this hammering vote shows further that you rely on other people to help you, and when you “try to help” others, it’s to make sure you’re not suspicious for something wrong. This has how you’ve played the whole game, and while I do feel bad for saying this due to your apology-post earlier in the game, you’re the scummiest I’ve got right now.
I really don't follow this at all. Can you clear up this statement?Does Bo Know wrote:
To add on to this, brundibar stated that his reason for Quilford's town read is that Quilford was an aggressive scumhunter, after saying that he now knows what to look for. Didn't Quilford point all of us toward Brundi's post that he's read games before? How could brundi "not know what to look for" if he's read games where people (hopefully) knew what to do? This pushes my suspicion for brundi even further. This enforced suspicion is, admittedly, driven by Quilford's play, but I'll place my vote on brundibar.