Alright, this was made right after night 1 started, so bare with me.
Hiraki, I understand that you've seen more newbies than most likely any of us, and know behaviors. But don't assume anyone will follow your word without presenting any proof of brundibar's newbie town attitude.
Though...there is something that confuses me. You know how to play the game, Hiraki. The way you are asserting your point to everyone about brundi's playing style is too obvious and direct. Only an incredibly newbie player would do something like this. But, that's so obvious that you're scum, right?
...Wrong. I hate comparing people by skill, but you're an IC. You know not to make mistakes like that as Mafia. Therefore, I believe your reasoning for brundi and his alignment is a complete
null tell
.
Too much pride with the bolded words? Probably.
To the quick analysis:
I’ll be basing a lot of people’s analysis on Jack’s alignment, since I couldn’t finish this before the Day ended.
Plague, because of your post stating what we should do based on Jack's flip, we should believe that Hiraki is trying to prove innocence by backing Jack up while brundibar is town and Hiraki is trying to prove that. Hiraki was one of the first people to vote on the real Jack bandwagon. I don’t find that scummy, and in fact find that townie. You know, Plague, weren’t
you
the one that defended Jack because of your thoughts toward his “newbie attitude?” Though, I should take that back since he was a top suspect on your list, but that was after everybody else had grub against Jack.
On what I think overall, Plague, new arguments have rarely been presented. Improvements, yes. Creations, not really. Not really sure how I feel about this one. Neutral/leaning scum simply because no one else I have is scum except Brundi.
Also, Hiraki, your reasons for voting Jack are clearly expressed and clearly noted. Nothing wrong there, except I'm still confused as to why you've waited until
now
to display your full reasoning for Jack's vote. Otherwise, you’re neutral, but Jack’s vote places you a slight town read.
martini, while it is possible that you ran out of time to analyze everybody, just saying Jack is scummy in twilight when he’s about to be lynched is a soft input before the lynch is made, perhaps trying to hide that you’re not partners with him. Also, you’ve been too forgiving with everybody earlier, but you’ve fixed that just a tad. You’d be barely leaning scum to me, but considering Jack voted you for “lurking” earlier and no one else voted you, you’re neutral.
Brundi hammered with the simple statement that Hiraki convinced him. Piggybacking. I don’t like that.
At all.
Bad for brundi. You have been fence-sitting (Shift coined the term and I’m just using it, if that’s alright), and this hammering vote shows further that you rely on other people to help you, and when you “try to help” others, it’s to make sure you’re not suspicious for something wrong. This has how you’ve played the whole game, and while I do feel bad for saying this due to your apology-post earlier in the game, you’re the scummiest I’ve got right now.
Moonstruck, you’re townie to me. Slightly newbie, I might add, and your arguments toward people are small, but the quality in the small arguments is the quality I’d expect in small arguments. Probable town to me.
Shift, you are most town on my scale. You have presented an aggressive play style that is made to uncover the scumminess that is the Mafia. Though, the only difference between you and Quilford is, like a few others have stated, you haven’t presented as much new material as Quilford. The material you have produced, however, is being used correctly.
Scale from most scummy to townie:
brundibar
Plague
martini
Hiraki
Moonstruck
Shift
Also, we can now conclude that Mafia killed Quilford because they thought he was too townie to be convinced Mafia. I'll look over yesterday to see how attitudes toward Quilford have been.
Jack Forman - 4 - Hiraki, theplague42, Does Bo Know, [Moonstruck]
