Mwahahahaha.
@kondi: Are you going to be an awesome scumhunter again?
In post 15, Rhinox wrote:@Sir Bastion: It is public knowledge that in the game you reference I was lynched not long after replacing in on page 80. Can't say any more than that due to the game currently being ongoing.
@cobblerfone: you've now sucked up to both kondi and Bastion. I'm happy with where my vote is. It is a serious vote. Please explain your town read on Bastion. What has he done that makes you think he's distinctly town?
In post 21, iamausername wrote:Question for all; would you rather lynch a wolf or a mafia today?
Cobblerfone wrote:You're begining to make me think your doing this on purpose as scum.
What exactly do you mean by this? What is he 'doing on purpose'?
VOTE: TheOtherFiction
Why did you take so long to confirm?
In post 22, Rhinox wrote:I think there are some merits either way. I'll just say either is fine, a scum lynch is a scum lynch at this point.In post 21, iamausername wrote:Question for all; would you rather lynch a wolf or a mafia today?
How vague... Can you elaborate on that?In post 16, Cobblerfone wrote:It's his attitude.
In post 24, Rhinox wrote:So... you're saying only town would express eagerness in moving the thread along?
Also, you're giving him town points for his eagerness to move the thread along, in the same post where you basically say his questions are doing nothing to move the thread along?
iamausername wrote:Question for all; would you rather lynch a wolf or a mafia today?
Fiction wrote:Either way, we should investigate Cobbler,
In post 33, Rhinox wrote:In post 28, Cobblerfone wrote:In post 24, Rhinox wrote:
So... you're saying only town would express eagerness in moving the thread along?
Also, you're giving him town points for his eagerness to move the thread along, in the same post where you basically say his questions are doing nothing to move the thread along?
Eagerness =/= actually did.
That was my point. Do you think eagerness alone is enough for a town read?
You also didn't answer the first question.
In post 44, Rhinox wrote:In post 43, Sir Bastion wrote:If I wanted your answer to my questions I would have asked you and not cobbler.
I wasn't answering your question, I was making my observations and reads as the game currently stands.
Well I don't agree with your observations. cobbler didn't make a gut read, he made a read based on your attitude of wanting to progress the thread (his words). Then he said you might be scum for what was essentially the same reason he called you town
In post 58, Yosarian2 wrote:On an unrelated note, Primate's inital post sounded vaugly town-ish to me, so I'llUnvote:Primate
Vote:princesskdw, who hasn't posted yet. (/slightly better then random vote since I have a weak town read on a few people and obviously have no read on her.)
In post 60, Yosarian2 wrote:In post 59, Cobblerfone wrote:In post 58, Yosarian2 wrote:On an unrelated note, Primate's inital post sounded vaugly town-ish to me, so I'llUnvote:Primate
Vote:princesskdw, who hasn't posted yet. (/slightly better then random vote since I have a weak town read on a few people and obviously have no read on her.)
Why did you feel the need to type the parenthesized?
Do you think there's any harm to me explaining my vote here? It's cool to vote people without explaning to see how they react, but you only get a useful reaction if they are going to wonder if you have some kind of magic super-awesome scum read on them based on something; there's no point to doing that in a daystart game on day 1 while voting for someone who hasn't posted yet. Otherwise, I think it's usually useful to explain why you're doing what you're doing.
In post 62, Yosarian2 wrote:Again, I'm not sure I get the reasoning behind this like of questioning. Do you think there's something anti-town about me sharing my thought process behind my vote? I generally think that's a helpful thing to do most of the time, since it should make it easier for people to read me.
In post 87, Yosarian2 wrote:In post 85, Cobblerfone wrote:
Anyway, yeah, prod-dodge I guess. Nothing's really changed. I'm really just waiting for a response from Yos to Rhinox.
Response to what? This?
In post 76, Rhinox wrote:
Cobbler asked the wrong question. The right question was: what were you hoping to accomplish by voting an inactive?
First of all, she's actually more likely then not to be scum. If I have 2 town reads on people in this game, then I vote someone else, I've got a 2/3 chance of voting for scum (9 other people, 6 of them are scum). That's why if you're town, you really want to be voting *someone* at all times in a game like this. This is an ideal game to lynch lurkers in, because the lurkers will usually also be scum.
Also, I did want her to be under some pressure when she started posting, since she needs to catch up with the rest of us. Besides that, scum are probably going to be more passive then townies (that's probably why this game is moving so slowly, all the scum are probably sitting on their hands doing nothing, and that's half the people in this game). Voting for people who seem to not be doing much is key to this kind of game, we all need to be doing it, because "too many scum" games are much more likely to stall out then normal games.
In post 107, Hiraki wrote:Scooby is a bt notorious in the Song Contests. I'm indifferent about him.
However, Scooby was spot on with my analysis of TOF.
Kudos.
PreEdit: scumflail.
This lynch. I feel it in mai bones.
Rush it loud and clear.
In post 114, Hiraki wrote:Being wishwashy is a big scumtell.In post 110, Cobblerfone wrote:In post 107, Hiraki wrote:Scooby is a bt notorious in the Song Contests. I'm indifferent about him.
However, Scooby was spot on with my analysis of TOF.
Kudos.
PreEdit: scumflail.
This lynch. I feel it in mai bones.
Rush it loud and clear.
While I'm seeing the scumflail, scooby's case was way weak. It wasn't even a case, just an English teacher's note not to be so wishy-washy in writing.
It's just allowing you to say "Hey, I don't have a real opinion. Let me wait to see which one is better."
nonono
TheOtherFiction wrote:Mafia members could hide among them while slowly controlling the vote.
In post 117, Yosarian2 wrote:Cobbler: So why don't you like my play here?
Yos2 wrote:First, he says "I could argue that voting just to vote is scummy", right after I explained why pro-town people should vote, especially in this game. Notice that he doesn't actually argue that it's scummy, he just vaguely claims that he could.
In post 145, funkybike1 wrote:For the first time ever, I think that Yos is actually making sense. Does that mean that he's town? No.
Yos2 wrote:So...you're accusing him of being my scumbuddy because he said I'm making sense? Also, you want to explain himself and why he said that, so you're...asking him if he's scum? Do you expect him to say yes?
TheOtherFiction wrote:Hypothetically, yos2 is town and cobbler is scum. Everyone lynches me (revealing town), and points out what Cobbler says. He get lynched, revealing scum. So, people might think that Yos2 is a scum buddy because of the interaction on day 1 leading to my lynch. Yos2 gets lynched and is either werewolf or townie. (I could not IMAGINE why werewolves, with a night kill/smaller group would think its a good idea to throw themselves out there, but even if things do not happen as outlined, mafia are more likely to buddy to make misslynches happen or even lynches of wolves to get rid of the competition.)
Yos2 wrote:If you actually wanted him to answer your question and explain why I'm making sense, then why didn't you ask him that in a less loaded way, so you might actually get a real answer from him?
Yos2 wrote:Your whole "You think Yos is making sense? ARE YOU HIS SCUMBUDDY" was just so totally out of left field, it feels more like a fake suspicion on your part then anything else.
Yos2 wrote:And if you do think i wasn't making sense in that post, you haven't at all explained how or why you think that, which is really odd on your part.
Fiction wrote:@cobbler, What? I thought yos2 would be likely to be a werewolf or townie because, as I said in my hypothetical, that mafia are more likely to do that than wolves cause of group size.
iam wrote:His vote on TOF seems to be completely at odds with... pretty much every other post he's made. Not only has he shown no indication that he finds TOF scummy, besides the vote, he actually seems to be exclusively attacking other people on the same wagon that he is on. Cognitive dissonance all up the friggin' walls here.
SB wrote:no she was at L-2 Crypto moved his vote before you posted. (#185)
In post 208, scooby wrote:Do you realize pressure it's a good thing for getting reads?
Do you really think someone can quickhammer in day 1?
In post 212, TheOtherFiction wrote:In post 209, Cobblerfone wrote:Fiction wrote:@cobbler, What? I thought yos2 would be likely to be a werewolf or townie because, as I said in my hypothetical, that mafia are more likely to do that than wolves cause of group size.
I still don't get what you mean. And what alignment am I supposed to be?
Any anti town position, but more likely a mafia because wolves wouldn't be as prone to the plan as mafia due to number of there group. It was an explanation for some reason that isn't worth looking up. I was disproving someone's claim, but I don't remember what it is.
Scooby, I haven't claimed yet cause I have decided not to claim yet.
In post 213, iamausername wrote:In post 209, Cobblerfone wrote:iam wrote:His vote on TOF seems to be completely at odds with... pretty much every other post he's made. Not only has he shown no indication that he finds TOF scummy, besides the vote, he actually seems to be exclusively attacking other people on the same wagon that he is on. Cognitive dissonance all up the friggin' walls here.
I'm sorry, were you unaware that there were two scum teams?
No.
Why are you voting TOF?
@Cobblerphone: Why did you originally vote ToF? I don't think you've said yet why you did that.