New York 152 Niiightless Game Over!

[mb53]

Mb53, What specifically was inte's slip (305)?

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 7#p4015927 is what I was referring to. It has since been showed I was wrong anyways.

I gotta re-read, I'll post my thoughts tomorrow most likely

[Psyche]

It's Nobody Special. He's really funny, and makes me laugh a lot.

2nded.

[Ythan]

I open up Ythan's Glorious Nightless Game

welp

[Psyche]

Now I am much more proud to be playing.

Okay, I'm bored the way things are now. Suppose I'll find someone else to harp about.

[Psyche]

Why is UN still voting for me? Is my explanation unbelievable? Or is me getting pissed scummy?

[Ythan]

Vote Count

3 redFF (Hiraki, Mogri, BBmolla) L-6
3 Mogri (Major Minor, mb53, crypto)
3 Nobody Special (noraaa, inte, UberNinja)
2 BBmolla (Psyche, BK201)
1 Psyche (Pine)
1 UberNinja (Nobody Special)
1 Blonde Doctor (Matias)
1 mb53 (redFF)
0 BK201
0 inte
0 Matias
0 crypto
0 Pine
0 noraaa
0 Major Minor
0 Hiraki

1 Not Voting (Blonde Doctor)

9 to lynch
Deadline May 10th

[Psyche]

Oh. Thanks, Ythan.

[UberNinja]

Why is UN still voting for me? Is my explanation unbelievable? Or is me getting pissed scummy?

Yep that's it. You getting pissed is scummy.

No, your explanation (once you had provided it, and it was a big deal when you hadn't) held water.

[Psyche]

Wow. It happened again. I suppose I never learn.

[UberNinja]

[Psyche]

I had this strategy of c/ping that was working pretty well, but the browser crashed on the wrong step. It seems that switching tabs a lot is what does it, for the browser's been working perfectly today.

I'll just take the more inconvenient notes app route. No biggie — I was getting more or less disillusioned with both the quality of reads in this thread, and with my own ability to develop them. I'll 'probably' try again tonight.

I'm still getting bogged with that basic question of mafia theory — "What makes scumplay distinct from townplay?" The answer seems depressingly absent from this thread. Of course, the distinction comes from the cognition that leads to the output post. But how does this distinction make the posts, themselves, distinct? I could've just as easily posted this as scum as I am as town. Or could I?

I'm going to try some soul searching for a bit. Bbl.

[UberNinja]

Does your ipad physically forbid you to use a real browser? like chrome?

[Matias]

This ipad bullshit is ridiculous. I've gained absolutely no information from this back and forth. I'm going to re-assess my reads. I'm behind on doing my catchup on BB.

[noraaa]

Psyche as town I don't think you'd need to ask us those sort of questions. If you have to decipher what sort of things might be perceived as scum then I feel you are scum being way too transparent. No townsperson should need to give more than a minor fuck about what anyone thinks of their posting, aside from how well they are getting their idea across. I'd vote for you if NS wasn't making me so damned itchy.

There's plenty of voting in this game but hardly any analytical dialogue going on. I feel like too many people are either scummy as fuck or not giving their all to this game. Starting my re-read now.

[noraaa]

note to self, start at page eleven.

So far, rereading has really helped me focus my reads. I think I'm pretty satisfied to keep my vote where it is. I'll read over the notes I took in the morning when I'm less tired, finish my read, and post a little bit of my thoughts on scumminess etc. of certain players.

[Psyche]

Psyche as town I don't think you'd need to ask us those sort of questions. If you have to decipher what sort of things might be perceived as scum then I feel you are scum being way too transparent. No townsperson should need to give more than a minor fuck about what anyone thinks of their posting, aside from how well they are getting their idea across. I'd vote for you if NS wasn't making me so damned itchy.

There's plenty of voting in this game but hardly any analytical dialogue going on. I feel like too many people are either scummy as fuck or not giving their all to this game. Starting my re-read now.

Uh...okay. I suppose not getting mislynched isn't really part of my Win Condition. Next time someone posts an attack on me, I'll just ignore it. I shouldn't care, right?

Your vote is is just as crappy as most of the others in this thread. Including the one that persuaded you to vote NS. But if you agreed with UN's psyche attack, I can't expect much.

[UberNinja]

Can I take it from your post that you disagree with any NS votes, Psyche?

[inte]

Can I take it from your post that you disagree with any NS votes, Psyche?

more importantly, why do you disagree with the NS votes?

[Blonde Doctor]

This ipad bullshit is ridiculous.

I really do not like agreeing with a scum read.

Where did BBmolla go? I am less and less motivated to do my reread now. This weekend was rather draining for me, but I am still keeping up with the thread and would like to know his thoughts on things and especially Psyche.

[BK201]

@ crypto noraa is pretty much null mang.

[BK201]

I'd rather lynch BB cus anyone who quits after having a wagon on them early is probably scum who feels they were cheated(like they got unlucky day 1 and didn't get a fair shot lol).

This is really, really bad. You see, mb53? THIS is opportunistic wagon hopping where timing is an actual argument.

Oh yup that's totally what I did.

This entire redFF wagon is scummy.

Really?

Really?

You think the

entire

redFF wagon is scummy?

When he flips scum, I'm parking my vote on you.

Anyways we need a lynch soon cus the deadline is in 3 days, so my 2nd pick would be Mogri because he is getting too defensive about the redwagon being called scummy(which he was on), or he is busing his buddy and knows the red is scum("when he flips scum, I'm parking my vote on you.") that would give him town cred and also get a free lynch when he referred back to his post the next day. So yeah 2nd pick Mogri.

[Psyche]

Can I take it from your post that you disagree with any NS votes, Psyche?

No, not really. NS isn't doing much. I disagree with any votes based on ill-thought premises.

[UberNinja]

Well, that was a convoluted answer. So, you agree with the NS votes?

[Psyche]

Well, that was a convoluted answer. So, you agree with the NS votes?

They could be on

someone better

BBM. Nothing about NS signifies anything worse than null.

Contrary to popular belief, "not doing much" is not, in itself, scummy.

[Psyche]

Ah. I suppose that's inconsistent. I'm basically saying that NS votes are understandable-and-I-would-vote-him-under-different-conditions, but not optimal.