I think you misunderstood. I'm againstIn post 375, borkjerfkin wrote:
The case on T&P from BK sounds more like an objection against hydras in general. That is fallacious.
Basically the way T&P uses the hydra is scummy.
I think you misunderstood. I'm againstIn post 375, borkjerfkin wrote:
The case on T&P from BK sounds more like an objection against hydras in general. That is fallacious.
In post 404, BK201 wrote:It is when you can say half of you didn't (really) want to do it. If that was one player saying half of him didn't want to do it, he would be lynched on the spot.
In post 373, Terrance and Phillip wrote:Okay, there are three days left in deadline, and there's one wagon which looks like lynching.
If we wait till L-1 for Rach to claim, we may not have time to assemble a new wagon.
We truly hate to no-lynch day one, we assume we're all familiar with the maths behind this.
So, we don't feel we're out of line in asking Rach to claim.
In post 409, Chrimi wrote:Yes, I am seeing what you are seeing, if you have already said what you are seeing.
In post 365, Terrance and Phillip wrote:Would you rather have a bunch of wrong town reads, or few accurate town reads?
In post 412, Chrimi wrote:I am seeing what you are seeing, I never said I didn't see more.
In post 415, RachMarie wrote:Ok I am back from the doc in Oakdale, now will go through ISOs and get back with a vote and a case.
In post 362, Kassadin wrote:im following the wagon
In post 415, RachMarie wrote:@LS it is a bit hard to get much content when we have so little of it posted to actually analyze. How do you analyze a one word post like eh, for example? But I will do my best.
... uh, that's a little harsh, but maybe we use the term 'white knight' a little differently. Meh, we honestly don't see any reason not to argue town reads just as fiercly as scum reads, to not debate them cuts down on an avenue of discussion, and we honestly don't see any benefit to letting a townread we disagree with slide.In post 411, Lastsurvivor wrote:In post 365, Terrance and Phillip wrote:Would you rather have a bunch of wrong town reads, or few accurate town reads?
:/ I don't see why you don't get it. You're not a town white knight for destroying people's town reads. It doesn't work like that.
Dude, quit stalling the lynch. You're claiming to have information on us, and it makes people not want to lynch anyone else (Rach) yet. You're not revealing what that information is, which is putting people off lynching us.In post 412, Chrimi wrote:I am seeing what you are seeing, I never said I didn't see more.