Here is what I think of Eidolon's argument:
Once RC gets lynched and flips VT/Chosen townie, I will say "my gut told me he was town all along but McStab was so convincing, gah."
In post 283, Greywing wrote:What's funny is that I like both wagons right now. I'm getting strong Town reads on both McStab and Whiskers, and also newb-Town vibes from RGF. Rapid and Eid are my two biggest suspects.
McStab made a great case on Rapid which is completely logical to me. Rapid's response? "McStab's obvious scum!!!!" That sounds an awful lot like someone who is unable to refute the points against him, and is instead resorting to trying to discredit the person leading his lynch. That doesn't give me a whole lot of confidence in RapidTown. His arguments have been misreps of other players, and he's been flailing badly.
In post 283, Greywing wrote:
Eid is causing me concern because of his interaction with Rapid. He seemed to be subtly buddying Rapid at the beginning, and is now reading like bussing after the case from McStab. If Rapid flips scum, I want Eid lynched with fire. If Rapid flips Town, I need to rethink Eid's alignment.
Crypto could quite possibly be scum as well. Of course, he's a bit hard to read with his 0 posts >_>.
Anyways, Rapid needs to die.
VOTE: rapidcanyon
In post 286, rapidcanyon wrote:Grey, I find your argument difficult to understand? What if I flip VT or chosen townie? Will you go after Eidolon next? You say you will only go after her if I am scum but the fact is I am TOWN and I suspect her of being scum.
Please explain.
In post 289, rapidcanyon wrote:W/e, congrats Eidolon for completely breaking my spirit in this game. I guess if you can secure one more vote, you can hammer me for a mislynch.
In post 292, rapidcanyon wrote:This is what I don't understand. You'll "look" at her. So, she doesn't seem suspicious to you at all not even if I flip chosen? She constantly keeps saying that she gets a town read on me and yet wants me lynched. She won't even say that she has a "read me like a book scumtell on me" no matter how many times I ask. I find her far more suspicious than McStab at the moment.
And I find you more suspicious than McStab as well, Grey. If I flip chosen, I'd rather you and Eidolon be lynched than McStab.
What's AtE?
I am still hoping whiskers saves the day.
In post 283, Greywing wrote:What's funny is that I like both wagons right now. I'm getting strong Town reads on both McStab and Whiskers, and also newb-Town vibes from RGF.Rapid and Eid are my two biggest suspects.
In post 294, rapidcanyon wrote:Grey, I can't tell you anything if you just say "McStab's case" and vote for me. Put it down in writing why you want me lynched and I'll respond. I already refuted McStab's case and he just disappeared. So, there is nothing more of McStab's case at least until he logs back on. Are you just ignoring everything I typed in response as well my case for lynching Eidolon and my full page argument with her? If so, I ask that you don't because there is a lot that you can glean from that.
In post 294, rapidcanyon wrote:It is pretty annoying that McStab won't come back and unvote or explain further and a likely town vote is stuck on me. But Eidolon still needs another town vote before she can hammer me so I am still not giving up. My top suspects at this moment are Eidolon and Grey.Grey because no matter how much I insist that Eidolon be looked into when I flip town, he says he will only look into her if I am scum which I am not.
In post 294, rapidcanyon wrote:Also, somewhat annoyed that people voted for me and disappeared without giving any sort of substantial response. Grey has only considered my initial frustration with McStab and not my later detailed response. Why is this Grey?
In post 296, rapidcanyon wrote:I didn't misrep anything that McStab said. Care to articulate a single one?
In post 138, rapidcanyon wrote:
Argument 2, you say Pasch is misconstued as scum. So, are you telling me you voted on someone you felt was being misconstrued as scum?
In post 167, rapidcanyon wrote:McStab is obviously scum. He bandwagons and then accuses the person who made the case.
In post 174, rapidcanyon wrote:Your strategy of lynching a player, seeing their flip and then lynching the player that provided a case seems to me a setup for a double mislynch. Everyone who votes on a player's lynch is responsible for that lynch.You not giving reasons for your vote makes it more likely that you are the scum as opposed to less likely.
In post 197, rapidcanyon wrote:
The fact that you bandwagoned as scum on my case and are now voting for me based on a case you agreed with proves that you are scum.
In post 296, rapidcanyon wrote:You said you will go after Eidolon with fire if I flipped scum but not if I flipped town.
Greywing, you know FULL well that rapidcanyon does this as town.In post 291, Greywing wrote:In post 286, rapidcanyon wrote:Grey, I find your argument difficult to understand? What if I flip VT or chosen townie? Will you go after Eidolon next? You say you will only go after her if I am scum but the fact is I am TOWN and I suspect her of being scum.
Please explain.
If you end up flipping Chosen, then I'll look at Eid, and I'd probably need to look at McStab as well. As the leader of your wagon, he'd naturally fall under suspicion. I find it unlikely that I'll see anything other then a scum flip however.
In post 289, rapidcanyon wrote:W/e, congrats Eidolon for completely breaking my spirit in this game. I guess if you can secure one more vote, you can hammer me for a mislynch.
Continue with the AtE please. You're only making me feel more confident that I'm voting the right person.
In post 283, Greywing wrote:If Rapid flips scum, I want Eid lynched with fire. If Rapid flips Town, I need to rethink Eid's alignment.
In post 297, rapidcanyon wrote:...the only logical player (whiskers)...