In post 401, 10506670 wrote:
That's not to say I'm going to put my vote on any of them in an attempt to "pressure" them into posting more.
In post 402, theomoaner wrote:In post 401, 10506670 wrote:
That's not to say I'm going to put my vote on any of them in an attempt to "pressure" them into posting more.
Never works.
@MOD: Can we have prods on Maenara, Shinori, PMysterious and McStab please.
Sometimes works.
what part of sticking to the plan doesn't fit well with you?
In post 405, theomoaner wrote:I had Thurhame pegged as scum when he was in that slot, but he may have just been a bad player (or too busy like he said, stranger things have happened).
In post 407, dividizzle wrote:Looking at Thurhame's iso, he does focus pretty hard on two specific lynches without providing really any rationale. They both also happened to be fairly popular.
In post 409, Jun wrote:In post 405, theomoaner wrote:I had Thurhame pegged as scum when he was in that slot, but he may have just been a bad player (or too busy like he said, stranger things have happened).
In post 407, dividizzle wrote:Looking at Thurhame's iso, he does focus pretty hard on two specific lynches without providing really any rationale. They both also happened to be fairly popular.
Guys, Thurhame is town. Believe me. We have bigger fish to fry at the moment. Like mollie and PMysterious.
In post 409, Jun wrote:
Guys, Thurhame is town. Believe me. We have bigger fish to fry at the moment. Like mollie and PMysterious.
In post 413, theomoaner wrote:Why are we still on day 1? We have a confirmed liar in the town (Mollie was logged on earlier but declined to comment on my accusation of blatant lying) and we have not lynched. I know it's good and town-like to be cautious but you can take it too far.
In post 413, theomoaner wrote:@Maenara: We waited 2.5 days for those comments? Please do better.
Was that meant to be a reaction fishing post? or are you just trying to frame Salandaar when you flip scum?
In post 409, Jun wrote:
Guys, Thurhame is town. Believe me. We have bigger fish to fry at the moment. Like mollie and PMysterious.
Why are we to believe you? Also, it would be nice if you were to present some sort of case on these "bigger fish" that we need to "fry".
Why are we still on day 1? We have a confirmed liar in the town(Mollie was logged on earlier but declined to comment on my accusation of blatant lying)and we have not lynched. I know it's good and town-like to be cautious but you can take it too far.
P-edit: @Lottery-Number-Dude: I can live with that. I still think your slot is scummy though.
Mollie was logged on earlier but declined to comment on my accusation of blatant lying
or are you just trying to frame Salandaar when you flip scum?
In post 401, 10506670 wrote:I just read all 17 pages in about the course of a an hour or two, so don't expect me to have that much of a solid understanding of everything that happened.
In post 401, 10506670 wrote:
Just from what I saw, it looks like we have some minor to serious behavioral issues.
Mollie gives up with a defeatist attitude in Post 348. I mean, seriously? You have 4 votes on you (that's less than halfway to the lynch mark), and you already concede defeat? Correct me if I'm wrong (I've never played in a game as large as this one), but wagons have a tendency to change very quickly, especially when they're still somewhat small. If you're looking for a nicer way to put it, I suggest reading some Hiraki.
Hiraki. Makes me want to swallow staples.
I don't think I need to elaborate on Mr. Shinori either.
Now we do have a lot of more lurky people, and I hope not to fall into that state, but mostly you'll see me doing digest posts at around this time every 24 hours. Honestly, we seriously need some active participants to fill in the slots of these guys. Nobody except mcstab is targeting the lurkers - hell, all these guys could be scum.
That's not to say I'm going to put my vote on any of them in an attempt to "pressure" them into posting more.
In post 401, 10506670 wrote:
Mollie is definitely leaning scum at this point - either that or she's hopelessly trying to defend some stupid stuff that she said. I'm saying some, because I only picked up the "going after newbs bit as a scumtell bit". I'm assuming that there's more, as 6 people are voting molly (it was 7 before I took my vote off).
In post 401, 10506670 wrote:
Don't even try to meta me. I most likely have sanity issues as well, but they don't get into the way of my logic that much. They do get in the way of my playstyle.
In post 415, Hiraki wrote:Blah, Blah, Blah
In post 416, pirate mollie wrote:
wrt the bold: I answered you in post #393. who is blatantly lying now.
In post 393, pirate mollie wrote:Oh dear. Yes town can drop scumtells, how else could mislynches happen?but a scumtell is specifically something that scum are much more likely to do than town, not something that scum and town do in roughly equal measures. Otherwise what use is it for finding scum?
that is what I said.
you most certainly can cos town will drop a lot of objective scum tells too. I have met very few players who play a super clean game. scum will go after low hanging fruit but so will xenophobic town. the 2 are scummy but the motivations behind the 2 will be different.scum tend to do it more oftenthe reason they do it is consistent with their win condition (try to get town to lynch town) so that is why it is objectively scummy.
hth
In post 392, theomoaner wrote:
I explicitly said that I was scumhunting from who I thought was in my town pile out, telo and thurhame were on the periphereal. your weird fixation and persistent reframing of this looks scummy.
Wrong. I'm specificaly referring to your two posts #232 which is a direct answer to a question from Slandaar. No explicit "these are the scum who are in my town pool".
In post 392, theomoaner wrote:
And post 325, which also makes no such explicit claim, unless I missed it of course. You have now gone from contradiction to blatant lying.
In post 421, theomoaner wrote:In post 392, theomoaner wrote:
And post 325, which also makes no such explicit claim, unless I missed it of course. You have now gone from contradiction to blatant lying.
Doh!, This is where I accuse you of blantant lying which you delined to comment on Mollie.