In post 199, screamlampost wrote:Lets just show intent to hammer until we establish something please.
Vote against establishing something. (i'm not vetoing it but I am voting against it.)
In post 199, screamlampost wrote:Lets just show intent to hammer until we establish something please.
In post 199, screamlampost wrote:I think we should be discussing how the hell are we going to act tonight.
Zoidberg wrote:Mist, how come you aren't voting?
Mitillos wrote:@Mod: Can we get a VC?
@Mist: Your reads are generally quite pleasant. However, there's a few things I wanted to ask. 1) Where did Piggy hop on as soon as someone got a vote? She voted me in RVS and later voted Siv, several pages after he got a vote. And she had made several posts in between, so I'm not sure where you got that impression. Also, as Zoid said, why aren't you voting for anyone? You've made your reads, you have some people as scum, how can we believe that you are honest about your reads, if you don't vote accordingly? And if you think that I could be either "awesome town" or "great scum", shouldn't I be a null read? Saying that, could be taken as trying to set up for a possible future mislynch.
Because deadline is looming and I amIn post 209, ProHawk wrote:Zoid, why do you have the intent to hammer Piggy?
I don't understand the question.In post 210, qwints wrote:Zoid, why announce intent to hammer in this sort of game?
In post 212, Mist7676 wrote:Also, since I am against coordinating our night actions, and I have already seen a consensus in the voting,Vote: Piggy
Last note: Yes, I know I just contradicted myself in one post by voting Piggy, but the reason I didn't vote before, was because I didn't know if the town was ready to go into our night/day phase
In post 217, Zoidberg wrote:I don't understand the question.In post 210, qwints wrote:Zoid, why announce intent to hammer in this sort of game?
Oh, I see. Yes obviously I wasn't looking for a claim. I just wanted to make it known that I would hammer rather than no-lynch if deadline was about to hit.In post 219, Siveure DtTrikyp wrote:In post 217, Zoidberg wrote:I don't understand the question.In post 210, qwints wrote:Zoid, why announce intent to hammer in this sort of game?
I think it's basically saying that the only reason for intent to hammer is to get a claim from the about to be hammered person, not everyone else.
I don't think we should be vigging N1.Also, please, if anyone wants to vig mist for that, let's not make it two or three of us. Does anyone want to claim responsibility to do it?
In post 219, Siveure DtTrikyp wrote:In post 217, Zoidberg wrote:I don't understand the question.In post 210, qwints wrote:Zoid, why announce intent to hammer in this sort of game?
I think it's basically saying that the only reason for intent to hammer is to get a claim from the about to be hammered person, not everyone else.
Also, please, if anyone wants to vig mist for that, let's not make it two or three of us. Does anyone want to claim responsibility to do it?