In post 349, saulres wrote:
@NS, no response to me calling our your claim based on you providing a definition of Rarefaction that doesn't jive with what we now know it to be?
I have no response. I know what my Role PM says (and what it
In post 349, saulres wrote:
@NS, no response to me calling our your claim based on you providing a definition of Rarefaction that doesn't jive with what we now know it to be?
In post 350, Nobody Special wrote:In post 349, saulres wrote:
@NS, no response to me calling our your claim based on you providing a definition of Rarefaction that doesn't jive with what we now know it to be?
I have no response. I know what my Role PM says (and what itdoesn'tsay) and I really can't offer anything else. It's weird, and I see the position you guys are taking with it, but what else can I do?
In post 351, Konowa wrote:saul, your setup speculation is broken.
Or do you disagree with my assessment that scum knowing would have too much mod interference?
He's not a VT, and his role name is perfectly fine with Vi-spec.In post 353, saulres wrote:Speaking of you being a VT with a role name...
@Everybody: Does anybody else claiming VT have a role name?
In post 284, Tierce wrote:I have to think what this means for NS's role. This changes a lot of stuff.
Because I have a bloody stupid power complex, that's why.In post 367, Shamrock wrote:Don't really see any reason to drag out the NS lynch