Micro 71: Lucid Dreamers - Night 4

[Zoidberg]

Well, this post:

I'm pretty sure you haven't stolen anyone's vote as there'd not be 7 votes out already, zoid.

Said to me that we weren't so concerned about that. Also a Mist vote should be just as much evidence as a whoever vote, shouldn't it? I would assume nobody made me a doublevoter, and since I know I didn't steal someone's vote my conscience is clear in this regard.

If you

really

want me to go back to Siv, then just say so.

[Mitillos]

@Zoidberg:
1)Very good point. Siv is absolutely right. Your vote is definitely a singleton and it also means no one stole your vote either. Unless, you stole someone's vote and someone stole yours, but I doubt that sort of thing very much.
2) If there still had been a question about votes, Mist would have been a horrible place to put your vote, since a) others are voting her already and b) someone moved away from her before you voted her but after the previous vote.
3) Your vote was on me before Mist, not Siv.

@Hawk and Siv: Your biggest scumread seems to be Emp. Who would his most likely partner be?

@Emp, scream and Zoidberg: Same question; who would her most likely partner be?

@Mist: You're voting qwints. Was his explanation for why he voted you inadequate? Is he still scummy? Is there someone scummier?

@qwints: You moved off Mist. Any reads since then?

[Zoidberg]

Your vote was on me before Mist, not Siv.

So it was. I just picked someone who was in no danger of being lynched at the time; shows you how much thought I put into it beyond that.

who would her most likely partner be?

Gut says it's Siv, but I'd prefer not to do a great deal of partner-speculation until we actually have a confirmed scum.

[Mitillos]

Good point, again.

[Mist7676]

Ok since this is such 'scummy reasoning' right here I guess I should do examples

[insert name] might be scum, but I don't think pressuring him would make him scream I admit I am scum.

If he were to say I admit I am scum, then would you vote him?

of course with your imagination you could think of more.

[Empking]

The target dies when they make their first post can get round BPness.

HFOS: Pro

So this is your explanation as to why you made yourself "untargetable"? Whats with the OMGUS? I am not being dishonest, I am posting my thoughts. For the record this is my first Lucid Dreamers game.

The "OMGUS" is for you suggesting I'd be better off making myself bulletproff when it isn't true.

Mit: Siv is the obvious one, and I'll go with that.

[Mitillos]

@Mist: I am not sure what post 354 is supposed to be telling me. Could you clarify?

[Empking]

@Mist: I am not sure what post 354 is supposed to be telling me. Could you clarify?

Ways somebody could say "I am scum" without claiming scum.

[Mitillos]

Oh. Alright.

[Zoidberg]

Not buying it.

[Siveure DtTrikyp]

@Hawk and Siv: Your biggest scumread seems to be Emp. Who would his most likely partner be?

Speaking for myself, I've hit the brick wall of no reads and no motivation. Um...

Also, I'd probably have just lurked megahard were I to I admit I am scum.

Emp, why am I the obvious scum? Based on night actions, unless I'm lying about siteflaking (which I'm not), I'm scum with mitillos if I'm scum, and mist did some weird stuff to me, or I'm scum with mist and lied about siteflaking

Also, why lie about a siteflake as scum?

(Massive WIFOM, but this WIFOM is a big and unnecessary risk for scum. Seriously).

Anyway. To get at least a little bit of a read.

VOTE: Zoidberg

[Empking]

Emp, why am I the obvious scum? Based on night actions, unless I'm lying about siteflaking (which I'm not), I'm scum with mitillos if I'm scum, and mist did some weird stuff to me, or I'm scum with mist and lied about siteflaking

Why does being scum with have to involve you lyinng about siteflaking?

Also, why lie about a siteflake as scum?

If you tried to kill me then you'd have issues.

[Zoidberg]

@Hawk and Siv: Your biggest scumread seems to be Emp. Who would his most likely partner be?

Speaking for myself, I've hit the brick wall of no reads and no motivation. Um...

Also, I'd probably have just lurked megahard were I to I admit I am scum.

Emp, why am I the obvious scum? Based on night actions, unless I'm lying about siteflaking (which I'm not), I'm scum with mitillos if I'm scum, and mist did some weird stuff to me, or I'm scum with mist and lied about siteflaking

Also, why lie about a siteflake as scum?

(Massive WIFOM, but this WIFOM is a big and unnecessary risk for scum. Seriously).

Anyway. To get at least a little bit of a read.

VOTE: Zoidberg

Maybe I just need my mid-day coffee but I've read this post three times and still really not sure what Siv is trying to say.

[Zoidberg]

Speaking for myself, I've hit the brick wall of no reads and no motivation. Um...

If you've hit this point you should ask the mod to replace you.

[Siveure DtTrikyp]

Emp, why am I the obvious scum? Based on night actions, unless I'm lying about siteflaking (which I'm not), I'm scum with mitillos if I'm scum, and mist did some weird stuff to me, or I'm scum with mist and lied about siteflaking

Why does being scum with have to involve you lyinng about siteflaking?

If I did no night action due to siteflake, why did mitsy come up with innocent on me unless somebody else disrupted it / he was scum. And if scum planned on both just self-godfathering. Well yeah, I was here at the start of the night for that to sortof work, but I didn't plan on the siteflake.

PEdit: I make all my reads up as I go along anyway. And they're never coherent. Yeah, I'm never a help to town unless it's a breakable setup.

[Zoidberg]

Yeah, I'm never a help to town unless it's a breakable setup.

That's three times now you've basically flat-out said you're dead weight. That is not town motivated.

[Empking]

If I did no night action due to siteflake, why did mitsy come up with innocent on me unless somebody else disrupted it / he was scum. And if scum planned on both just self-godfathering. Well yeah, I was here at the start of the night for that to sortof work, but I didn't plan on the siteflake.

Oh forgot about that.

[Siveure DtTrikyp]

Er, yeah zoid. Is it scum-motivated either? It happens as town who isn't really taking things very seriously.

Anyway, I'm sortof reading somewhat scummy on zoid.

[Zoidberg]

Er, yeah zoid. Is it scum-motivated either? It happens as town who isn't really taking things very seriously.

I'm sorry, are you trying to play your lack of participation as pro-town?

[Zoidberg]

Anyway, I'm sortof reading somewhat scummy on zoid.

Ah yes, that standard tactic.

[ProHawk]

Zoid is town.

[Mitillos]

@Pro: Go on.

[ProHawk]

Zoid and Scream cleared each other. The likelihood of them both being scum is low because that one string of actions connects both of them and they either have to be both scum or both town. Therefore I won't support a Zoid or Scream lynch today.

[Mitillos]

So you doubt that, for example, I didn't investigate Siv and instead godfathered scream, or something? Or turning it around, you could have done that, or even qwints or Emp.

[ProHawk]

Perhaps I shouldn't be looking into non-confirmable actions so closely... but I still feel like the likelihood being fairly low regarding those two.