In post 724, Darthe wrote:I think Sixx is our better choice today but Bumi could well be scum. Some odd reactions.
All the more reason to simply PL him.In post 696, Jal wrote:I feel like nojoseph is just trolling. I can't interpret his earlier comment about black holes to be anything but trolling. I don't know where to go with him. Kinda wanna say town.
Or at least make it a spoiler...In post 721, Parama wrote:Daykill: Arc
Don't ever again quote a huge wall like that for a short response
That really pisses me off
You said the same exact thing less than 30 minutes ago (from the quoted post). 29 to be exact.njoseph wrote:I am indeed a black hole player,
Scared of being lynched maybe?njoseph wrote:If everybody voting me would vote Sixx, we would achieve our Day 1 goal :/. I AM NOT SCUM. I GUARANTEE IT. I GUARANTEE IT TWICE. I GUARANTEE IS THRICE.
What casing are you referring to, and chill out. There's not much to be said that I can contribute to, so I'm contributing where I can, like getting njoseph to share his reads and such. If you go back and read from before you replaced in, I am not scared of contributing, I have a decent amount of posts contributing.In post 729, Darthe wrote:thez shut up. That weak ass "casing" is a clear way to pretend that you're contributing.
I'm not sure your expectations of scum-nj are correct.In post 577, jeck wrote:njoseph said that my thought process made sense why would he do that if he's a scum? he would have wanted me to vote on thez and not on Sora/nacho if he was scum, thats why he doesnt look like scum, more like null-townish.
You could show these connections about a large number of players in this game. I don't see anything special about the BB and AA connection you posit. Also, AA's dayvig stuff looks more dumb than scum.In post 584, SlySly wrote:
I have noticed similar things. Still not enough for me to vote him, but its definitely getting there.In post 612, Ztife wrote:JacobSavage is actively lurking. From his numerous posts I see little scum hunting, and dubious wagoning.
280 putting thez at l-3 and changing later when a quick lynch is not evident. This vote is really fishy to me.
He also posts pretty actively in other games, but hardly contributes anything here. Only scrum reads he has on 329 but elaborates little.
I agree. I currently have a null read on Sixx. This type of analysis also seems to indicate that you are most likely town. Unless Sixx is scum.In post 616, SlySly wrote:- Extremely weak wagon. Only NM gives any valid reasoning and it is quite a stretch. Parama at least sheeped the best reasoning even though it was weak.Conclusion
This is the best active lurking i have seen in a while.In post 619, Parama wrote:In post 618, Baby Spice wrote:cum hunting
This is the best typo I've seen in a while
I had voted for thez, but I don't see my vote in this analysis. What gives?In post 625, SlySly wrote:- Fairly reasonable wagon. Though there are some very weak votes on this wagon, it appears there was much more thought put into the reasoning for the votes put on Thez by many players compared to the amount of thought put into the reasoning behind the current votes we're seeing on Sixx.Conclusion
No you really really don't. Your "logic" is more convoluted than a tangle of spaghetti. Luckily, I have seen enough to know that you appear to be town, so difficulty in reads is a non-issue.In post 627, jeck wrote:I make perfect sense. but elobrate why I don't make sense please.
The fact that you couldn't remember who he replaced, even though both potential slots were scummy, indicates to me that this reasoning is fake.In post 664, njoseph wrote:Bride of Sadistyx was someone whom I voted for and thought guttingly could actually be scum.
I tend to give weight to my first impression gut reads; I've been swayed when I had thought too much in the past about second-guessing. Anyway, replace KillerApple with Bride of Sadistyx for my reasoning, I knew it was a scummy slot.
I have similar rationale for SlySly and IdiotK's being more likely to be scum on top of their own lack of markedly town style:
SlySly replaced by scummy KA & IdiotK replaced by scummy Bride of Sadistyx.
I stand by my Sixx vote despite BB turning on me. Sixx doesn't feel right enough to let live.
Agree. I have a town read on SlySly, but if this game turns out to be multiball, that read flips to a scumread instantly.In post 696, Jal wrote:Slysly is scummy for considering multiball when nothing has hinted at that. Not town thinking. When I see two people being scummy and there's no way they can be together, I just assume if one flips scum in the future the other probably isn't.
Who are you?In post 732, PeregrineV wrote:Sorry, spent all weekend with my brother, so did no reading. Will catch up today & tomorrow.
In post 688, Edosurist wrote:I probably ranked it as a higher tell than it should be, but I still think it's there. Having a team puts you in the mentality of wanting to stay alive, thus looking scummy. If he was inquisitive to find information with his partner then, I don't see why he wouldn't now.
In post 689, Idiotking wrote:You are literally the most anti-town player I have ever seen. You refuse to independently scumhunt and are fully admitting that all you are doing is following along with what other people say. That's the complete opposite of what the town is meant to do.
In post 734, nhammen wrote:Who are you?In post 732, PeregrineV wrote:Sorry, spent all weekend with my brother, so did no reading. Will catch up today & tomorrow.
In post 733, nhammen wrote:
I had voted for thez, but I don't see my vote in this analysis. What gives?
In post 724, Darthe wrote:I think Sixx is our better choice today but Bumi could well be scum. Some odd reactions.
In post 708, SlySly wrote:1. See my last post. Scum make poor choices sometimes.
2. If you are mafia, I doubt seriously that the mod told you about another group of mafia. That makes it irrelevant.
In post 740, Jal wrote:
When you supposedly get onto a scum team of three people in a 25 man game, yeah, that would essentially be the mod telling you you're playing multiball.
In post 740, Jal wrote:
Your scum buddy scenario seems to be that all the scum decided to buddy each other and made poor choices regardless of experiences. Not buying it.
In post 729, Darthe wrote:thez shut up. That weak ass "casing" is a clear way to pretend that you're contributing.
In post 741, SlySly wrote:I never said my lists were comprehensive and that the team was made up of just 3. I just listed the ones I spotted defending each other strongly. Then I listed NJ separately because he didn't fit in the defender group.
In post 743, Jal wrote:
One can easily deduce whether there is another scum team or not if they get into a large game with few scum team members.
In post 742, Aj The Epic wrote:In post 729, Darthe wrote:thez shut up. That weak ass "casing" is a clear way to pretend that you're contributing.
I would like to say you've done little to help the town. Again, telling someone to shut up is counterproductive. Want to actually play the game or just continue telling people to be quiet? I'm fine with lynching you for discouragement or playing with very little helpful input.
In post 726, njoseph wrote:In post 724, Darthe wrote:I think Sixx is our better choice today but Bumi could well be scum. Some odd reactions.
Yes, listen to this dude.
In post 737, SlySly wrote:In post 733, nhammen wrote:
I had voted for thez, but I don't see my vote in this analysis. What gives?
I was using the last count. That's how I missed NJ originally. He was in the second to last count. You had jumped off that wagon long before the name lists I was using as reference.