In post 455, Zang wrote:wind-up wrote:Doesn't it? If Katsuki is anti-town as both town and scum, how is acting anti-town not a null tell for him?
I never said it was. I'm saying that it's scummy to use meta to justify it.
Well... it's not. DX
In post 455, Zang wrote:wind-up wrote:Yes.
Then is there a reason why my read on katsuki is the only thing that you are responding to from the rest of the game? Do you have any reads?
Other than this discussion with me, it doesn't really seem like you are doing anything.
This discussion is taking up too much time. I was responding to your read on Katsuki because it was -- is -- poorly justified, and that seemed at odds with your manner, so I decided to press the issue and try and deduce whether your read arose from maliciousness or ignorance (for want of a better word). Whilst your obstinacy and lack of emotiveness make that hard to judge, I do think you're scummy for 'not accepting' laziness as an excuse for anti-town behaviour, and for saying 'defending yourself is not scumhunting'.
I do have other reads, I'll get to them soon.
In post 455, Zang wrote:Wind-up wrote:Why, exactly?
There is no pro-town motivation for being lazy and it is used too often as an excuse for anti-town behavior, especially by scum.
No pro-town motivation doesn't mean town don't do it. And the claim "laziness is used too often as an excuse for anti-town behaviour" needs to be addressed on a case-by-case basis, considering it's a playstyle issue and saying "especially by scum" doesn't cut it.
In post 455, Zang wrote:wind-up wrote:Ah, that clarifies things. How could Katsuki have defended against #134 in a pro-town way, then (as opposed to his defence in #136)? Can you give an example?
As I already stated, Katsuki could have explained how his previous posts were town motivated or instead, he could have asked for leafsnail to explain his case more so that he could address the specific issues that leafsnail had against him.
I think it's up to Leafsnail to explain how Katsuki's previous posts were scum motivated, but I concede that asking Leafsnail to elaborate would be a good idea.
In post 455, Zang wrote:wind-up wrote:Then I think it's unreasonable that you criticised Katsuki as you did in my second quote of #331.
I didn't quote you at all in that post but I don't find anything that I said in that post to be unreasonable.
Apologies. That post number should be #351.
Staying put means giving up.