[4] q21: Nachomamma8, Kthxbye, Ztife, DeathRowKitty,
[3] Goodmorning: q21, Slandaar, Psyche,
[2] Ztife: Jennifer, Goodmorning,
Not Voting: Kwll,
With 10 alive it takes 6 to lynch
Deadline:
In post 807, Ztife wrote:In post 804, Kthxbye wrote:Eff it. I'll switch cuz Nacho makes sense (as usual). I've never played with GM before, but Nacho sounds sincere.
Am I sheeping? Hell yeah I am. Am I buddying nacho? Yup. Don't like it? Start a wagon.
VOTE: q21
For the record I'm willing to lynch this scum as well
In post 828, Ztife wrote:q21 today, psyche tomorrow.
In post 837, goodmorning wrote:Slandaar, that is probably the worst argument I've ever seen.
I don't really know how I feel about this q21 thing, he does give off a weird sort of feeling to me and he is in the small group of people I'm not calling Town, but I just don't know if he's the best lynch right this second. Gut's not that great to base a case on.
I am willing to deadline hammer him though, and intend to do so barring some claim of importance sometime Sunday morning EST.
Nacho wrote:no just fucking wall me
In post 865, Malakittens wrote:Nice, I hate my own slot's post 88. Complaining about pages to read overnight/during the day is really scummy to me. I have recently seen some scum players complain about it.
In post 865, Malakittens wrote:I already know my own alignment, but if I was a speculator looking in - I would have been convinced that this post is a telegraphed 'HEY SCUM BUDDY CALM THE HELL DOWN'.
In post 865, Malakittens wrote:I kinda like DRK's post 257. I don't get the reason why she would put the damn metaphor into it. It's basically adding nothing. Feels as if she's trying to give too much explanation for a vote that could be explained without going round-round.
In post 865, Malakittens wrote:I don't see how Z or Joel is town. I dislike your lack of explanations. Explain, please?
In post 865, Malakittens wrote:Also, why can't it be a bad vig? Why does it have to be a SK?
In post 867, Nachomamma8 wrote:In post 865, Malakittens wrote:Nice, I hate my own slot's post 88. Complaining about pages to read overnight/during the day is really scummy to me. I have recently seen some scum players complain about it.
why did you say this?
In post 865, Malakittens wrote:I already know my own alignment, but if I was a speculator looking in - I would have been convinced that this post is a telegraphed 'HEY SCUM BUDDY CALM THE HELL DOWN'.
or this?
In post 865, Malakittens wrote:I kinda like DRK's post 257. I don't get the reason why she would put the damn metaphor into it. It's basically adding nothing. Feels as if she's trying to give too much explanation for a vote that could be explained without going round-round.
that's DRK's posting style and it is what makes him enjoyable
don't attack playstyle
In post 865, Malakittens wrote:I don't see how Z or Joel is town. I dislike your lack of explanations. Explain, please?
joel/kwll is town mainly from kwll being completely fucking different from last time we played together and he was scum
in particular, the "short and sweet cases" exchange we had was REALLY FUCKING AWESOME and was kwll bleeding town
In post 865, Malakittens wrote:Also, why can't it be a bad vig? Why does it have to be a SK?
they suck too bad to be a vig
@ GM's last post. Feels like he's just trying to post something without really trying. It feels forced.
@GM:Nice. Let's sheep a really bad vote by Kwll that's strictly doing nothing to help us out. Also sheeping DKR who is being sketchy as hell.