In post 2920, DeasVail wrote:Benmage, how much were you trying to look town with your self-vote post?
>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<< this much.
How retarded of a question is this?
In post 2920, DeasVail wrote:Benmage, how much were you trying to look town with your self-vote post?
In post 2918, ChannelDelibird wrote:Cerulean - the main issue I'd like to take with your big post there is the same issue that I've been taking all game with people discussing my early-game Jason read. My scumread on him didnotsuddenly appear on Day 2 - it was already something that I was nursing...
In post 311, ChannelDelibird wrote:I'd be very strongly considering a vote on Jason but Sotty and Zach have never given me reason to doubt their reads on him.
But the fact that it was Day 1 and Sottyrulez had a declared townread made pursuing that particular ping of the scumdar at that time look like a less wise idea.
In post 2923, Shaft wrote:And you know what? I don't care for the theory that DV is a second traitor. I don't want that kind of dangerous thought process to keep possible po-po alive. Taking away daytalk is a heavy blow for scum, and like I said, it'd be weird to setup a game where scum can kill someone and PUNISH them for it. And you can't say we don't have enough time because we've looked at DV plenty.
DV and CDB's feelings for each other make them look like an easy pair so I will vote either with a preference to eliminate the encryptor first.
In post 2929, Cerulean wrote:But, shadoweh did die night one for some reason. It can't just be because of the absta thing because more than one person went after absta. She did attack ben? Don't know how much I think this is likely though.
In post 2929, Cerulean wrote:I mean I know there are the arguments that Faraday wouldn't use it or doesn't like it, but it still fits the flavor.
In post 2929, Cerulean wrote: Still think Jason's play is atrocious and am afraid we're letting scum go based on a theory about tgah which might not even turn out to be true.
In post 2932, Plessiezarus wrote:In post 2923, Shaft wrote:And you know what? I don't care for the theory that DV is a second traitor. I don't want that kind of dangerous thought process to keep possible po-po alive. Taking away daytalk is a heavy blow for scum, and like I said, it'd be weird to setup a game where scum can kill someone and PUNISH them for it. And you can't say we don't have enough time because we've looked at DV plenty.
DV and CDB's feelings for each other make them look like an easy pair so I will vote either with a preference to eliminate the encryptor first.
If your preference is to vote DV, why haven't you done so?
If you think DV is a Cop, why do you believe he's telling the truth about his claim? I mean, I agree that a town-aligned day-talk enabler is kind of swingy, but all the arguments against Faraday having used a "daytalk enabler" seem even stronger if DV is actually a Cop .
In post 2932, Plessiezarus wrote:In post 2929, Cerulean wrote:But, shadoweh did die night one for some reason. It can't just be because of the absta thing because more than one person went after absta. She did attack ben? Don't know how much I think this is likely though.
Meh. Itmighthave just been because of the absta thing? (I mean, shadoweh isn't the only person to have suspected absta, nor the most vocal, but scum can only kill people one at a time ...). Having a hard time seeing an obvious motive for either the shadoweh or sottyrulez NKs. A few ideas, but nothing concrete. Not sure it's worth speculating much until (unless?) we have another scum flip. (A lot of the 'obvious' people not dying early can probably just be explained by the threat of the Doctor?)
In post 2761, DeasVail wrote:And hey, I thought I'd just add 1-Shot Bodyguard as a test to see how ridiculous a claim I could make people believe?
In post 2761, DeasVail wrote:And hey, I thought I'd just add 1-Shot Bodyguard as a test to see how ridiculous a claim I could make people believe?