Mini 1431: The Tenements (Game Over)
-
-
WT Snacks
-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
The Rufflig wrote:Re: Uberninja: Party Pooper (No link provided )
Re: CoolDog:
1) It isn't incomprehensible
2) Nor is it irrelevant. It was merely a tool to help get us past RVS.
Lol how does postingrandomshit help us get past therandomvote stage? This is bullshit scum filler posting. UNVOTE: VOTE: The Rufflig-
-
WT Snacks Goon
-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
In post 71, UberNinja wrote:
a) there are no pirates and lazers and gold in that story
b) it was a fucking useless story
c) of course he's "mostly useless", 3/4 of the game is "mostly useless" at this point
d) what kind of scum pings are you expecting on page 3 of a game with 0 activity?
e) there is no e, but I want a damn good response to the above 4 points.
a) k
b) k
c) no shit, sherlock
d) we'll take whatever we can get. you think we should all just go "oh lol it's early game, no scumhunting to be done here"?
e) huehuehuehue-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
In post 109, The Rufflig wrote:Yeah. You know what? I find that I'm really not that interested in defending my early posts against the charge of them being garbage or filler as there was nothing going on at the time. However, there are relevant topics available for WT to discuss and he's actively avoiding them in favor of posting garbage.
I'm not sure how us answering a question is "garbage" compared to your stupid spammy youtube links, but okay.-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
In post 117, UberNinja wrote:cooldog admitted to being scum
lynch the fuck out of him
that's all. thanks for listening
Can you explain why cooldog is scum? I want to sheep you but I don't see it.-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
Well, first of all, different heads.In post 141, UberNinja wrote:how does this reconcile itself in your mind?
Secondly, I made no pretense that I was posting youtube videos to push us out of RVS. Secondly, you asked a bunch of derpty questions and got some derpty answers. Trying to spin it as though I'm scum for answering the questions you asked is disingenuous at best.-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
You votedIn post 140, UberNinja wrote:he's scummy because he's trying to get town cred for something mundane
he's scummy because he's making all sorts of weird assertions which seem uncharacteristic of towniesbeforehe did his stupid fake day action.-
-
WT Snacks
-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
In post 185, MrObvious wrote:In post 184, ArcAngel9 wrote:While i see he getting paranoid at L-1 and how he called me scum the moment i asked for being paranoid.
Getting paranoid at L-1 isn't a scum tell. Lots of players, both scum and town, get frustrated being at L-1. The refusal to claim is the scum tell. The town has spoken by running CD up to L-1. Town expects a claim at that point, and his refusal to do so is nothing more than the giving of a middle finger to the town.
Disagree. There's no way in hell I'd claim on page 6.-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
In post 250, The Rufflig wrote:Thanks for checking in, JacobSavage. I find it difficult to believe that you forgot about this game when your posts keep showing up about 2 hours before you are due to be prodded. We'll see you again in about 46 hours then?
That's just how Jacob plays. I've been in two+ other games with him and he just lurk lurk lurks. It's very annoying but not indicative of alignment.-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
In post 254, The Rufflig wrote:Well, I happen to know Limo and JacobSavage are both in Mainstream Mafia (large theme). I know they are both active in that game. I also know that Mainstream Mafia went into night 2 yesterday evening. So the two of them should have enough bloody time currently to play this game or decide they can't handle this many games and replace out!
I reported this post as well; that's really not appropriate.-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
We've been pretty active. What do you think about us?In post 255, ArcAngel9 wrote:and the rest haven't been much active yet to tell anything about them...-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
In post 280, MrObvious wrote:If Uber is town and truly believes CD is scum, why would he care if there was a derp hammer?
If Uber is scum and knows CD is scum, he sure doesn't want a hammer, he wants to derail the CD lynch(which Uber has clearly tried to do).
Specious reasoning is specious.
What about the case where Uber is town and CD's reaction changes Uber's read?-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
In post 287, guille2015 wrote:@WT what are your current reads at the moment. (Is this redundant current - moment?)
I don't like to give lists of reads; it just helps scum know who to kill.
Leaning town on Slandaar and Mr Obvious tho.
I want ArcAngel to answer my question.-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
In post 297, The Rufflig wrote:Good luck getting anything out of him. I've been trying for a few days now.
No you haven't. I just skimmed through your iso and you haven't addressed anything to us personally. So if you have a direct question, ask it. Otherwise stop trying to mischaracterize what's happened this game.-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
In post 312, CooLDoG wrote:
wrong reason to vote for arcangle. If this is your real reason you would hop on jacob.
Your post makes zero sense.
1) You don't get to decide what our reasons for voting are.
2) I haven't asked jacob any questions that I want answered. I agree that Jacob's play has been even shittier than he usually is, but I'm focusing on other things right now. Meanwhile, Arc has been throwing OMGUS at anyone who votes her, so I want to see where this goes.-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
In post 337, ArcAngel9 wrote:you're sheeping my wagon with no reason. This is a scum vote.
Huehuehue, fucking called it.
The only people who you think are scummy are the ones who vote you? Nope. You're scum and my vote stays.-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
Oooooh, the Internet Tough Guy is threatening me. Go fuck yourself, Uber. You're consistently a prick in every game you play and it doesn't do you any favours. Last game we played together you tunnelled on us the whole game and at the end it was revealed we were town. Then you admitted you need to learn to read us better.In post 349, UberNinja wrote:give us some fucking reads or your head will be on a pike
Are you sure you're just not as good at mafia as you think you are?
This continual dick-waving you do to try to be the dominant player in the game won't work.-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
She's voting cooldog you retard.-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
In post 345, guille2015 wrote:Well, I blame myself for not being clear. When I said reads. I actually meant scum reads. That's what I am looking for. Like, who do you think is scummy and why?
Hey, since you're not a prick i'll actually answer.
- Arc Angel has done nothing but throw omgus and then argue about game theory instead of scum hunting.
- I'm also actually thinking Jacob might be scum. I played with him in a few other games and yeah, he lurks and is shitty, but I've seen his town game and this is a new level of shit, even for jacob.
- Null-scum on uber because despite the constant "hurr i'm the alpha male" routine, he's not actually doing much analysis, and his play is different from/more schizophrenic than in happy tree friends. Instead, he's just quoting posts and going "probtown," "probscum"... that's not worth anything at all, to anyone.
Everyone else is either null or town. I'm not going to get into who.
Anyways, the reason I don't like doing this:
In post 307, The Rufflig wrote:@WT Snacks: I would understand if you withheld some of your town reads. There can be good reasons for that. Robbing the scum of information on who to nk falls under that. I don't understand the rationale to withhold your scum reads. Why do this?
Is because listing your reads is basically the same thing. If everyone posted just their scum reads, then it would be a simple process of elimination to see who wasn't listed in very many scum lists. That person is likely to be seen as town by most.
It's really not a difficult concept and I don't see why it's so hard for you guys to grasp. If you want to know who someone finds scummy, look where their vote is.-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
I bet it won't. Your opinion only carries weight because the newbies in this game are letting you lead them around by the noses.In post 358, UberNinja wrote:But yes, it will work.-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
In post 362, The Rufflig wrote:In post 359, WT Snacks wrote:- I'm also actually thinking Jacob might be scum. I played with him in a few other games and yeah, he lurks and is shitty, but I've seen his town game and this is a new level of shit, even for jacob.
There. Now you see, you just told me something that I didn't know. Why hide a scum read like that behind something like this?
In post 262, WT Snacks wrote:That's just how Jacob plays. I've been in two+ other games with him and he just lurk lurk lurks. It's very annoying but not indicative of alignment.
That doesn't get scum lynched. That gives scum a pass for lurking.
Opinions. They change.-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
In post 375, Syryana wrote:It looks more like he's pointing out your argument sucks.
Grats on making your 4th post. Are you going to actually play the game, or what?-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
In post 381, Syryana wrote:Just because I don't slosh the forum with snarky posts like you and UN doesn't mean I'm not playing the game.
Says the lurker with 5 posts across 16 pages.-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
In post 381, Syryana wrote:she at least made a comparatively decent effort in #365, which was sneeringly ignored.
Difference of opinion?
Doing a PBPA where you just list the contents of each post is not, in my opinion, decent effort. Anyscum can do that.-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
In post 402, MrObvious wrote:
Not true at all, Syryana replaced in near the end of page 12.
Oh, my mistake. I was looking at the Activity Overview.-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
-
-
WT Snacks Goon
-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
Ugh, this game.
There is literally no way that our wagon is composed solely of townies. I'm looking at gorckat, possibly rufflig, and definitely Uber.
VOTE: UberNinja
He spent all game wagon-hopping. This is not scummy in and of itself, but because most of you sheep follow him around, it allows him to drag out the day and get us close to deadline, which makes it convenient and provides a nice cover for him to limp onto our wagon. He has no real reason, he just says it's for his peace of mind, and that it's because we're getting close to deadline. How convenient. If you try to call him on weak reasoning he'll say "lol I was hopping all day" and "it was close to deadline, stfu newbie" or something along those lines.
He'll also probably spout some WIFOM about how "I wouldn't do this as scum, it's in scum's best interest to end the day early" which will again be a convenient smoke screen. As if scum can't purposefully do something pro-town to gain towncreds
In post 450, UberNinja wrote:If there's only 3 days left to deadline, then we need to lynch SOMEBODY.
When we flip town he can lament that it was a "compromise lynch." Notice he set himself up for not having time to get a re-read in:
In post 459, UberNinja wrote:In post 452, MrObvious wrote:I'm doing a reread right now. I'm up to page 13 and my reads have changed substantially. I'll finish out my reread tomorrow evening and share my thought and new reads then. Jacob didn't move from the scum category, so my vote is fine there for the moment.
I'm going to do this exact thing.
In post 460, UberNinja wrote:Okay fine let's lynch WT. If I get a re-read in, great. Otherwise, WT should die before Day 3 anyway for my peace of mind
Vote: WT Snacks
Posts 459 and 460 came 1 minute apart, btw. So much for reading the thread, am I right? Nope, a convenient excuse to limp onto a wagon.
--
Even though we're only at L-2 (and we were before), since I can't trust any of you shitlords not to just fast-hammer instead of waiting for us to claim I will do it now. We are theLessor's Assistant.
At night we cansalvagemetal scraps (or unused items from other dead players) from the junk yard, we canmanufactureitems using the DIYconstruct, or we canuse itemsthat we've got. We also have a passiveday abilitythat I'm not going to claim, because fuck you.
--
Lynch us if you want, but you fuckers had better take a good hard look at the people on this wagon after we flip town. I want to reiterate the bit about Uber not being as good as he thinks he is, and having no idea whatsoever how to read us in Happy Tree Friends.-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
Other head also had a good point: Uber is buddying up to a lot of people, trying to make town friends.
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 6#p4791606
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 5#p4788955
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 8#p4786778-
-
WT Snacks
-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
This stuff right here?
In post 522, The Rufflig wrote:In post 476, MrObvious wrote:Rufflig, please tell us again why you faked a PR.
*sigh*
---
Welcome back to the music, friends. MrObvious has requested a blast from the past. Our next song was an international hit reaching number 4 on the Billboard chart on the week of Easter in 1974. The song itself was a successful blend of rock music and biblical verse paving the way for modern contemporary Christian rock music. The song was sung by Sister Janet Mead (well worth reading about on wikipedia) who donated her share of the royalties from the song to charity. Here she is: Sister Janet Mead and The Lord's Prayer.
---
No. Feel free to make your case on me, though. Meanwhile, I'll just wait to see what gorckat has to say before jumping into that particular topic.
In post 525, The Rufflig wrote:It's both (what a shock)
Here is a musical riddle for you:
What do you get when you cross Star Trek (the original series) with J.R.R. Tolkien's The Hobbit?
Spoiler:
In post 531, The Rufflig wrote:Do you honestly not see why CoolDog did not have a point?
CoolDog was trying to argue that I was scared of making an rvs vote and I was trying to avoid drawing attention to myself by faking a post restriction. Really? I'm scared of making a rvs vote so instead I guarantee that I'll bring the attention of every damn player in the game on me by pretending I have a post restricition. Yeah, ok. Go with the scared theory. I'd love to see you argue in favor of it.
In post 533, The Rufflig wrote:At any rate, let's talk about CoolDog's reason for voting me and the others, too.
His "I'm scared" theory is obviously a bunch of it. What I expected from a townie was questioning about the PR. As CoolDog stated fake PRs are very easy to see through. All CD had to do is establish what mine was and then watch for a slip, but he voted way before then. I would have accepted policy lynch as a valid reason for his vote or reaction testing or even that he thought my PR was obviously fake among other reasons. I got none of that from him or WT Snacks or SoraAdvent. I got terrible reasons from them for their votes that didn't hold any water. Why should I not have been suspicious of them? You guys can call it paranoid, if you want. I state that I had valid reasons for my suspicions.
It's from scum who's upset that he got caught for the wrong reasons.-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
In post 539, The Rufflig wrote:In post 537, WT Snacks wrote:It's from scum who's upset that he got caught for the wrong reasons.
Hey, welcome to the game, WT Snacks! Glad to have you with us. We're happy to have a fresh set of eyes look over the game and give us some new opinions and insights. Would you care to back your opinion with a vote?
Okay UNVOTE: VOTE: The Rufflig
I can't seem to get enough support for a UN lynch, but I'll settle for a Rufflig.-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
-
-
WT Snacks
-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
And you could have voted gorckat. Instead you conspicuously stayed off the wagon.In post 591, The Rufflig wrote:Well, you could have voted for him before he hit L-1. Ok, so maybe you weren't around at that time. You could have added your comments or arguments for why gorckat was scum. You could have threatened a hammer to force a claim out of gorckat instead of just pointing out that gorckat was at L-1. You could have pressed him on any part of his play with questions as you were in a position to hammer him.
Wasn't goaded. Came back at deadline to hammer because it was necessary. Weak scum read turned out to be a good read. Meanwhile where were you on the gorckat wagon? Oh right, parking your vote on an obvtownie.After the claim while we were in deadline crunch, you might have mentioned that you were willing to hammer or going to hammer after a specific length of time. You might have decided that you didn't like the argument against gorckat and stated that you would not hammer. You might have stated that you weren't going to hammer a claimed PR day 1. In fact, there were many things you could have done besides be non-committal during deadline crunch to let the town know whether you would or would not help to lynch gorckat. Instead, you sat on the fence apparently content to let a no lynch happen until you were goaded.
Nah, I've read some of your other games and you word your posts the same way. It's annoying either way.As far as the way I'm wording my posts being irritating, you are correct. I've been goading you on purpose. I started out being polite and then direct. Neither approach worked. You did respond to me intentionally getting under your skin, so I've been doing that whenever I really want a response from you.
Good, then shut up and get lynched, scum.I don't mind getting lynched, if the town will afterwards look at who was trying to revive my wagon while gorckat was getting lynched.-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
We salvaged and got a piece of scrap metal. So I assume that means we won't be able to make anything until N3, and won't be able to use anything we make until N4.In post 606, guille2015 wrote:Given that you claimed yesterday, did you take action last night?
I don't see how, given what we claimed, that it would give us any insight into scum's powers whatsoever. Trying to see if we got a sweet item that you should nightkill us over?It might give us an idea of what powers mafia has.-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
In post 608, guille2015 wrote:That means that a Hathor Drone can salvage metal scraps. Perhaps it's an equivalent power to the tenants.
wat-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
You're scum. We're not obligated to answer your questions.In post 611, The Rufflig wrote:Pshaw! Well, if you're going to lie, you might as well lie big. Btw, I notice that you are still ignoring the questions I put to you.
I keep having to ask who are your suspects because 1) You don't tell us and 2) you aren't doing any scum hunting, so we can't tell who you suspect.
1) Keep asking.
2) Demonstrably false.
I like how you answered your own question in the same post you asked it, as if that somehow makes your point stronger.I don't suppose you'd care to answer any of the questions about your suspects or your play late yesterday? Didn't think so. Ok, just keep burying your head in the sand and hoping for the best.
When you're done pretending to provide content and analysis I'll be over here, lynching you.-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
In post 624, Klick wrote:WT, I support Rufflig in you needing to answer his questions on the premise that you don't absolutely know if he's scum.
He doesn't actually ask many questions that have gone unanswered. Mostly it's just posturing and defending himself from 20 pages ago. He keeps harping on about "who do we find scummy" well, look where our fucking vote is. I wonder who we find scummy?-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
In post 654, The Rufflig wrote:In post 598, MrObvious wrote:In post 591, The Rufflig wrote:
Do you think the scum was inactive while gorckat was getting run up or would you suspect that the scum tried to ignite interest in another wagon (that would be mine) during this time frame?
Try again, scum. Gorkat had 2 votes when I voted you. That's hardly a wagon that needs to be distracted from. I'd gladly support a Slandaar lynch as well.
I'll admit that your vote (with no case) came while gorckat had only 2 votes. However, your case on me didn't come until after gorckat was at L-1, at which point you did start pushing for my lynch.
Let's go over your case, shall we?
In post 524, MrObvious wrote:Why did Rufflig fake a PR?
Reason 1 - get us out of the RVS
Reason 2 - gather reactions.
Scummily inconsistent!
My apologies for snipping the quoted parts out, but they weren't necessary. What gets the game out of rvs? Content. What is content at the beginning of a game? Reactions to posts or reactions to lack of posts mainly. Why is getting out of rvs scummily inconsistent with gathering reactions? This is the thrust of your initial argument, but it doesn't make any sense to me. Would you care to explain?
---
Your next argument involved my dismissal of CoolDog's "points". You dismissed my argument that CoolDog's "points" had no basis in favor of a lynch all liars approach.In post 535, MrObvious wrote:You are missing the point. I really don't care what Cooldog's argument was. Whether you like it or not, or agree with them or not, Cooldog had made several points when you said he had made none.
The trouble is that your first argument supported some of CoolDog's arguments and you obviously care about CoolDog's arguments from your next post.
In post 536, MrObvious wrote:Rufflig, Cooldog's spot on, could only be from a townie, post 69 kicked your ass so hard, you've been butthurt crying about it ever since.
---
You also try to link me with JacobSavage.In post 529, MrObvious wrote:It is clear to see here that Rufflig is coaching his scumbuddy JacobSavage.
You should know better than this. You can't make a link like this without knowing either player's alignment. You are concluding that I am scum based off JacobSavage's alignment. I think the tv legal phrase is "Objection! Assumes facts not in evidence".
Rufflig continues to defend himself thoroughly against the day 1 case against him. This reads to me like he's upset that he got caught on a weak case, he can't resist the urge to point out why the case if flawed. This is not helpful to town.
In post 654, The Rufflig wrote:
---
It is possible that the scum did not try to push a competing wagon. In which case, korranth and SoraAdvent come readily to mind. Neither of them appeared to be around while gorckat was at L-1. Unfortunately, neither of them is available for questioning -- we can only question their replacements.
---
I'm going to leave off JacobSavage for now for a couple of reasons. The most important being that I want to hear his answer to Syryana.
Here Rufflig provides his incredibly valuable and insightful scum hunting. He's not going to vote anyone and he's going to provide some obvious commentary on the game. He's just trying to appear involved in the game for townie points, but not actually doing anything.
Am I living in the twilight zone? How do people think this is town behaviour. It's very shallow gameplay devoid of critical thinking, analysis, pressure votes, anything that a real town would do when trying to find scum.
Our vote stands where it is.-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
In post 663, ArcAngel9 wrote:Did someone just poked me!!Huh!!
Am not sure about Ruflling, this is his usual town meta unless he is faking it now....
We're gonna need some more content from you than this.-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
You have zero reading comprehension.
The Rufflig wrote:@WT Snacks: Wow. Way to not read anything I wrote. I wasn't defending my actions. I was showing what crappy, misleading and contradictory arguments MrObvious was piling on me while gorckat was at L-1 as this was possible scum activity to save gorckat.
Pointing out what how bad a case is that someone made on you is called defending yourself.
The Rufflig wrote:
You said that this analysis on MrObvious isobviousand shallow
I said no such thing.
The Rufflig wrote:
As far as my not going to vote anyone -- now you'reobviouslyjust making things up now in order to try and push my lynch through.
Did I miss any votes besides your OMGUS on MrObvious and us?-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
In post 734, guille2015 wrote:I don't think the pressure will work on Klick.
VOTE: JacobSavage
Anyways, I agree with Fitz.
What a completely weak-ass way to jump ship when your scumbuddy gets to L-1.
Would happily lynch any of Klick, Rufflig, Jacob. Let's pick one and go for it.-
-
WT Snacks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: November 30, 2012
In post 750, The Rufflig wrote:^
Two of your suspects are viable wagons. What are you waiting for? Make a choice and vote. If you're really feeling daring, make a case as well.
---
Why kick Guille over voting for someone that you are willing to lynch?
Any time you want to contribute to the game is fine with me.
-
-
-
-