Mini 1431: The Tenements (Game Over)

[The Rufflig]

@MrObvious: What is your case on Slandaar? I know you mentioned him as possible scum earlier, but I don't recall you ever saying why.

[Klick]

Also someone should totally give me a summary of this and tell me why I should vote who they suspect.

[4nxi3ty]

The Rufflig

(2)

- WT Snacks, MrObvious
MrObvious

(2)

- The Rufflig, Slandaar
WT Snacks (1) - JacobSavage
JacobSavage (1) - Syryana

Not voting (5) - guille2015, CooLDoG, korranth, ArcAngel9, Klick

With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch
Deadline: (expired on 2013-04-09 16:16:44)

[Slandaar]

Klick you mean you didn't join because of me?

Mr Obvious: I would also like to see your case on me.

[CooLDoG]

Un, you were a god and I'm sorry I didn't have faith in you.

Also, I'm for a snacks or ruffling lynch. Could go either way. I love how ruffling is already scared about a wagon on him...

vote: ruffling

Reasons have already been gone over multiple times. No need for it again.

[WT Snacks]

Read Rufflig's iso. He has done zero scumhunting.

His content consists of asking people what their scum reads are and trying to defend himself. He's more concerned about establishing himself as town then he is with finding scum.

[guille2015]

I'll go over Rufflings ISO at some point, but not soon. I am liking the arguments comming today.

My top suspect at this point is Jacob.

WT:

Given that you claimed yesterday, did you take action last night? It might give us an idea of what powers mafia has.

Last minute vote o Gorkat that didn't even count. And also, having had no contribution in day 1. Also what Syryana said.

Vote Jacob

[WT Snacks]

Given that you claimed yesterday, did you take action last night?

We salvaged and got a piece of scrap metal. So I assume that means we won't be able to make anything until N3, and won't be able to use anything we make until N4.

It might give us an idea of what powers mafia has.

I don't see how, given what we claimed, that it would give us any insight into scum's powers whatsoever. Trying to see if we got a sweet item that you should nightkill us over?

[guille2015]

I don't see how, given what we claimed, that it would give us any insight into scum's powers whatsoever. Trying to see if we got a sweet item that you should nightkill us over?

That means that a Hathor Drone can salvage metal scraps. Perhaps it's an equivalent power to the tenants.

[WT Snacks]

That means that a Hathor Drone can salvage metal scraps. Perhaps it's an equivalent power to the tenants.

wat

[CooLDoG]

Un, you were a god and I'm sorry I didn't have faith in you.

Also, I'm for a snacks or ruffling lynch. Could go either way. I love how ruffling is already scared about a wagon on him...

vote: ruffling

Reasons have already been gone over multiple times. No need for it again.

Ohh, I completely forgot about the claim.

Also, one thing to note is that scum have fake claims. Not saying I don't believe snacks, but the flip yesterday confirmed that the scum are given something to go off of.

Read Rufflig's iso. He has done zero scumhunting.

His content consists of asking people what their scum reads are and trying to defend himself. He's more concerned about establishing himself as town then he is with finding scum.

Also 100 and 10 % this. Anyone who does not vote the ruffling right now is suspect in my opinion.

[The Rufflig]

Read Rufflig's iso. He has done zero scumhunting.

Pshaw! Well, if you're going to lie, you might as well lie big. Btw, I notice that you are still ignoring the questions I put to you. Ignoring them doesn't make them go away. I keep having to ask who are your suspects because 1) You don't tell us and 2) you aren't doing any scum hunting, so we can't tell who you suspect.

I don't suppose you'd care to answer any of the questions about your suspects or your play late yesterday? Didn't think so. Ok, just keep burying your head in the sand and hoping for the best.

[CooLDoG]

mhhhmmm. I love how ruffling is trying to act town and say he was scum hunting. Ruflig is just reactionary scum. Not that hard to see.

[MrObvious]

Mr Obvious: I would also like to see your case on me.

Basically, my suspicion on you is based on my gut and your light tunneling of me yesterday which seems to have carried over until today.

[WT Snacks]

Pshaw! Well, if you're going to lie, you might as well lie big. Btw, I notice that you are still ignoring the questions I put to you.

You're scum. We're not obligated to answer your questions.

I keep having to ask who are your suspects because 1) You don't tell us and 2) you aren't doing any scum hunting, so we can't tell who you suspect.

1) Keep asking.
2) Demonstrably false.

I don't suppose you'd care to answer any of the questions about your suspects or your play late yesterday? Didn't think so. Ok, just keep burying your head in the sand and hoping for the best.

I like how you answered your own question in the same post you asked it, as if that somehow makes your point stronger.

When you're done pretending to provide content and analysis I'll be over here, lynching you.

[The Rufflig]

2) Demonstrably false.

Demonstrate it, liar.

@WT what are your current reads at the moment. (Is this redundant current - moment?)

WT, man, you gotta tells us your reads.

WT has a very low content to post ratio much like Jacob and UN and his rare content posts are vague as hell.

WT is prob scum, but who is your other head damn it. Also hiding reads never good.

BULLSHIT DETECTED

give us some fucking reads or your head will be on a pike

I have actually read through each post of her and has found nothing but a null.

That enough?

[Slandaar]

I am a chronic tunneler

I have learnt in the past the people who suspect obvtown on day 2 are normally town; does this mean Mr Obvious is town? Need to think about it; the case in my head was quite good.

Also; thanks for feeding my ego CD.

[CooLDoG]

Hay slandaar, you are such a boss. Mind voting for ruffling with me?[/shameless buddy]

[guille2015]

I did an ISO read on Ruffling and Gorkat. I don't think Ruffling is scum. A couple of things in his ISO kinda give me a small town read on him. Also, the accusations that he has not been scum hunting are exagerated. I see several examples of him going after people. Not superb scumhunting but it's there. The case on him not wanting to vote for gorkat is consistent with his views of thinking that gorkat was town. I have no idea how he thought gorkat was town, because I don't think Gorkat was playing with town intent day 1. The only uncomfortable post I see from Ruffling is the following one.

No. The only players I would be willing to sheep right now are Slandaar and gorckat. Those aren't strong town reads, but they appear to be the only other players in the game making any sort of effort.

Up to this point in the game, gorkat has done no good contribution to the game, so I don't understand what he is saying about making an effort. However, this is minor, and I've seen plenty of times where town defend scum for the wrong reasons.

On to something interesting I found about Gorkat.

I think CD's been unfairly jumped for poking Ruff.

WT's poking of Uber 'for breaking the chain' rings much more hollow than sniping a potential post restriciton.

This is not the only post like this but there are several posts where Gorkat is trying to shift the attention away from CoolDog. Although I admit that this doesn't mean that CD is scum. It's possible that Gorkat was whiteknighting Cooldog in an effort to look town when Cooldog flipped town. But the evidence is still not there. CoolDog needs more attention in this game, allthough I did like his play during the last half of Day 1. His vote on Gorkat seemed genuine. It seemed like he didn't think Gorkat would flip scum when he voted.

[CooLDoG]

guille, stop being wish-washy and take a stand on someone. Vote for ruffling.

[ArcAngel9]

CD, why are you pushing Ruffling wagon? How are you so sure he is scum, explain please.

[guille2015]

I am taking a stand on someone. i am voting for Jacob. and that's the person I want lynched.

Unless I see more concrete evidence on Ruffling, I don't intend on voting for him. I don't agree with the reasons that have been put forth.

[guille2015]

Mod: I will be in VLA for the next 4 days.

[The Rufflig]

We're not obligated to answer your questions.

Actually, let's try a different tack. Would someone please ask WT Snacks to answer my questions or re-ask the questions to him? Thanks.

Sooner or later you are going to have to answer the questions about your play, WT Snacks. This childish refusal only bought you a little time to come up with some answers.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: WT Snacks

[Klick]

WT, I support Rufflig in you needing to answer his questions on the premise that you don't absolutely know if he's scum.