In post 1216, Metal Overlord wrote:MS:
Would like to put some disclaimer before we launch into this big wall. IMO Bulb is trying to bite off more than he can chew; starting wallotext arguments with me, Kx, and now Antilles. Yeah I wasn't very nasty towards Bulb throughout our whole exchange, because I am familiar with such tactics which I conveniently employ myself. However Kx replied more aggressively and Antilles is now dominating via power talk. I'll say Bulb, if you keep this up you're going to get destroyed. I'm telling you. I was being nice.
Your concern is flattering and all, but I'm a big boy and can take care of myself. Antilles is not the first "big dog" I've taken on, and they won't be the last. Simply put, the bigger and cockier they are, the more rewarding it is when I finally logic them to death.
In post 1216, Metal Overlord wrote:
In post 1179, Antilles wrote:
A classic "wait, things are not going as I planned them. Shit... you guys, we gotta stop this" moment.
I relish these moments.
Bulbazak is finding a more difficult enemy that he has faced this game!
Yes, because spouting nonsense is cause to make me shake in my boots.
In post 1216, Metal Overlord wrote:
In post 1179, Antilles wrote:
It's funny: One could almost believe that you clicked the "quote" button on my post before even reading it in its entirety, with the express purpose of trying to dissuade people from lynching Ms Marangal.
And I'll tell you one thing right now. You're going to fail. She's going to be lynched, and she's going to flip scum, and there's not a damn thing you can do about it, friend. Soz in advance.
Strong opponent we have here
Loud does not necessarily equal strong.
Okay, I'm confused here. Are you on Antilles's side here, my side, or did you decide to bring our previous fight onto the dance floor and make this an uncomfortable threesome? I just want to know what sort of shoes I should wear.
In post 1217, Metal Overlord wrote:
In post 1192, Bulbazak wrote:
Going to begin with these:
In post 1179, Antilles wrote:
And I'll tell you one thing right now. You're going to fail. She's going to be lynched, and she's going to flip scum, and there's not a damn thing you can do about it, friend.
In post 1179, Antilles wrote:
but ignoring what's actually true. Such as, that I've just handed you your second scum player.
In post 1179, Antilles wrote:
Just follow my lead (like on kbw), and you'll get another red flip. On the other hand, you
could
fight me tooth and nail every step of the way and end up looking stupid
when
(yes) she is lynched, and (yes) there is a red flip. Again, it's your choice.
Just showing this trend. This is not certainty in reads. This is foreknowledge (notice the "when" instead "if"). Normally this degree of certainty is after an extended period of time, when the player has been pushing a specific slot, but there has been none of that from Antilles. Instead, he popped in, and claimed, with absolute certainty, that a player he hasn't interacted with AT ALL is scum, based on magical reasons that he's not going to share with anyone, because "if the blue fairy hasn't told them to you, then you must not be worthy".
Stop nitpicking please. You've also did that with the Kx reads with the ISO thing which honestly I did not understand at all. Lol
Not nitpicking. Showing a trend of scummy foreknowledge. Words mean something, MS, whether you want to acknowledge them or not.
In post 1217, Metal Overlord wrote:
Okay so, what now Bulbazak? Do you find Antilles scum? If he is scum, is it possible that I happen to be scum/will it change your read of me/ and vice versa?
I will admit, Antilles has actually set off my scumdar louder than your slot ever could. So yes, I do find him scum. I currently have 2 pools of suspects, one that's valid if Antilles is scum, and the other if you are scum. They hardly intersect. So if we lynch Antilles, and he flips scum, you're clear as far as I'm concerned. I'm going to be pursuing Antilles for the foreseeable future, though.
In post 1233, Antilles wrote:
Hey. You. I'm not a big bad wallmaster. I just enjoy dismantling a complete idiot's posts from time to time.
Apparently, dismantling a post equals using zero logic and a lot of hot air. No wonder I'm not getting anywhere...
In post 1233, Antilles wrote:
Bulbazak is currently on my /ignore list for... hmmm, it says here:
Gross Incompetence
*Looks back over short Mafia history. Remembers: Near flawless town win in Newbie 1305, breaking BBMolla in Newbie 1333, lauded scum play in same game (later brought up by Voidedmafia in True Love), took down [REDACTED] in [REDACTED]*
Nope. Try again.
Sorry. Idiots tend to trigger my snark button.
Which is high praise coming from someone whose posts are full of hot air.
In post 1314, Titan wrote:
No one actually fucking follows you when you don't want to take the time to explain your suspicion
And you basically just end up being hot air
The same, but @Antilles.
I'm going to wait until the next vote count to get a better feel of the situation before proceeding. There's a lot of nonsense going on at the moment, and all it's doing is spreading the votes around.